Should Google get into the console game?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for clubsammich91
clubsammich91

2229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 clubsammich91
Member since 2009 • 2229 Posts

With the Google phone and the new Google Chrome OS coming out it seems they are becoming much more than just a search engine these days. What about a Google console? I would probably buy one if the price is right.

Avatar image for OreoMilkshake
OreoMilkshake

12833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#2 OreoMilkshake
Member since 2009 • 12833 Posts
No.
Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#3 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
No one should get into the console game. All these companies would be smarter to get OUT of the console game and get into a game that makes some damn sense.
Avatar image for Yandere
Yandere

9878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Yandere
Member since 2009 • 9878 Posts

No, but it would make things more entertaining.

Avatar image for appletsauce
appletsauce

1035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 appletsauce
Member since 2006 • 1035 Posts

Maybe if they created a handheld of similar expense as the DS Lite and launched with about 50 games.

Avatar image for psn8214
psn8214

14930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 psn8214
Member since 2009 • 14930 Posts

No... they have no experience whatsoever in the field. I mean, at least Apple tried and failed.

Avatar image for PublicNuisance
PublicNuisance

4582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#7 PublicNuisance
Member since 2009 • 4582 Posts

I say yes they should. I wouldn't buy their hardware but it would add more competition to the field.

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#8 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts

I say yes they should. I wouldn't buy their hardware but it would add more competition to the field.

PublicNuisance
Until they inevitably failed.
Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
They have essentially no experience designing hardware or games. If they bought out SEGA or Namco-Bandai first then I could see it, but they don't even have any studios of their own. At least when Sony entered the business they had experience via the MSX and their short partnership with Nintendo. And Microsoft had their game studios long before the Xbox.
Avatar image for clubsammich91
clubsammich91

2229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 clubsammich91
Member since 2009 • 2229 Posts

No... they have no experience whatsoever in the field. I mean, at least Apple tried and failed.

psn8214
True, but niether did Sony, or MS when they first introduced their home consoles.
Avatar image for PublicNuisance
PublicNuisance

4582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#11 PublicNuisance
Member since 2009 • 4582 Posts

[QUOTE="PublicNuisance"]

I say yes they should. I wouldn't buy their hardware but it would add more competition to the field.

Cherokee_Jack

Until they inevitably failed.

How does their failing directly hurt us ? Technically your saying that the companies in the video game field so far should all quit because they could fail.

Avatar image for kweeni
kweeni

11413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#12 kweeni
Member since 2007 • 11413 Posts
yea just so they could get pwned then GTFO and not come back seriously though i don't think any company should make a new console. 3 company's are enough imo
Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#13 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
[QUOTE="psn8214"]

No... they have no experience whatsoever in the field. I mean, at least Apple tried and failed.

clubsammich91
True, but niether did Sony, or MS when they first introduced their home consoles.

Not quite.
At least when Sony entered the business they had experience via the MSX and their short partnership with Nintendo. And Microsoft had their game studios long before the Xbox.savebattery
Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#14 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="PublicNuisance"]

I say yes they should. I wouldn't buy their hardware but it would add more competition to the field.

PublicNuisance

Until they inevitably failed.

How does their failing directly hurt us ? Technically your saying that the companies in the video game field so far should all quit because they could fail.

None of the big 3 are as likely to fail as Google would be.
Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
[QUOTE="psn8214"]

No... they have no experience whatsoever in the field. I mean, at least Apple tried and failed.

clubsammich91
True, but niether did Sony, or MS when they first introduced their home consoles.

Sony had worked on the MSX and with Nintendo on the SNES CD add-on before splintering off and making the Playstation. Sony Computer Entertainment was founded in 1987, long before the release of the Playstation. And Microsoft Games Studios predates the Xbox by years.
Avatar image for luisen123
luisen123

6537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 luisen123
Member since 2006 • 6537 Posts
They are trying to conquer the world, but I doubt they'll want to enter the console race.
Avatar image for DumbDubya
DumbDubya

668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 DumbDubya
Member since 2009 • 668 Posts

The whole no experience argument is nonsense.

Microsoft and Sony had no experience making consoles. Nintendo had no experience before NES.

Stop with the whole no experience garbage.

Avatar image for Deadly_Fatalis
Deadly_Fatalis

1756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#18 Deadly_Fatalis
Member since 2006 • 1756 Posts
No, I don't think Google would make a good console.
Avatar image for Doolz2024
Doolz2024

9623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#19 Doolz2024
Member since 2007 • 9623 Posts
No
Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#20 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts

Nintendo had no experience before NES.DumbDubya

Really?

Avatar image for Mogotoo
Mogotoo

1826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 Mogotoo
Member since 2009 • 1826 Posts

When I first glanced at the title, the idea seemed absolutely rediculous to me. Then, the next split second, I thought of how interesting it would be to see a brand new member of this war. Sure, the have no experience, but they would most likely have the resources to at least try.

One split second after that, some of my old skepticism returned. Many would probably be more amused to see Google's attempts than to actually use their products. It would most likely end badly.

Avatar image for Burning-Sludge
Burning-Sludge

4068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Burning-Sludge
Member since 2008 • 4068 Posts

Thanks but no thanks. I don't want the google privacy eater. Besides I think Barack is going to make google a puppet and he would dump the console because he doesn't like people who play video games and prefers people outside because they would be easier to organize.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#23 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
I get the feeling they'd fail horribly.
Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

Google doesnt have anything yet. Lets let them fail at the OS market 1st, and then talk about failing at consoles too. One step at a time people.

Avatar image for bronxxbombers
bronxxbombers

2840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 bronxxbombers
Member since 2009 • 2840 Posts
yes. Google makes cool stuff.
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

No.
Google made a good search engine *which has currently been surpassed by the others* other then that every software it releases pretty much sucks compared to whats available.

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#27 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
*which has currently been surpassed by the others* WilliamRLBaker
What others?
Avatar image for rogerjak
rogerjak

14950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 rogerjak
Member since 2004 • 14950 Posts

Why not? Everybody jump the gaming Bandwagoon!! Apple, Samsung, LG, IBM, Intel, heck why not Logitech? Or Gamespot? Man maybe a Walmart console would be awesome!

/sarcasm

I think 3 companies are more than enough. More than 3 companies would be to much for the consumer.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts
[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]*which has currently been surpassed by the others* Cherokee_Jack
What others?

bing works just as well, and even offers more information at times, yahoo still works just as well.
Avatar image for Burning-Sludge
Burning-Sludge

4068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Burning-Sludge
Member since 2008 • 4068 Posts

Why not? Everybody jump the gaming Bandwagoon!! Apple, Samsung, LG, IBM, Intel, heck why not Logitech? Or Gamespot? Man maybe a Walmart console would be awesome!

/sarcasm

I think 3 companies are more than enough. More than 3 companies would be to much for the consumer.

rogerjak

Why stop there? News Corp, GE, GM, Target, InBev, and even the federal government can jump on the bandwagon. Just imagine if the FEDs got in the industry, two arcade machenes in the middle of town with a month long waiting list to play it and we pay for it if we use it or not. /sarcasm

Avatar image for deactivated-57af49c27f4e8
deactivated-57af49c27f4e8

14149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#31 deactivated-57af49c27f4e8
Member since 2005 • 14149 Posts
google isn't exactly the kind of company you'll see putting out consoles.
Avatar image for DoomZaW
DoomZaW

6475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#32 DoomZaW
Member since 2007 • 6475 Posts

Maybe if they created a handheld of similar expense as the DS Lite and launched with about 50 games.

appletsauce

^ this, launch a true next gen handheld, and they can get a good grip on the consumers. Getting into the console wars so far in would be pointless.

Avatar image for gamer620
gamer620

3367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 gamer620
Member since 2004 • 3367 Posts
I have actually spent some playing around with the android technology, and it is actually up there with what Apple does for the Iphone. The technology is pretty good, and it has a fantastic community behind it.
Avatar image for Gamerz1569
Gamerz1569

2087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Gamerz1569
Member since 2008 • 2087 Posts

No I don't want a generation with LOTS of consoles (looks at previous gens) 3 competing consoles is already enough besides if google was smart then they would stay out of console gaming, its expensive and risky.

Avatar image for -Pred-Alien-
-Pred-Alien-

1733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 -Pred-Alien-
Member since 2009 • 1733 Posts
No Coca-Cola should:P
Avatar image for darth-pyschosis
darth-pyschosis

9322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 darth-pyschosis
Member since 2006 • 9322 Posts

while i think Google may do good stuff with online gaming i say no

Google should make a game using Google Earth, where you use real people as soldiers in an RTS and they have no control over their bodies and you start international wars with them

it will be called Google RTS: Now You know why we have Google Earth muahahahahha!

Avatar image for UnamedThing
UnamedThing

1761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 UnamedThing
Member since 2008 • 1761 Posts
I could see them getting into it. They have deep enough pockets at least. I usually only have one console a gen though, so I wouldn't buy it anytime soon.
Avatar image for PublicNuisance
PublicNuisance

4582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#38 PublicNuisance
Member since 2009 • 4582 Posts

None of the big 3 are as likely to fail as Google would be.Cherokee_Jack

Why is that ? Google has a profitable business as it is so they could weather a financial storm if need be. They have an OS coming out at some point so they could use their own software on their console. They could easily drum up developer support with the right business model. Do you think some devs that are tired of Microsoft's and Sony's arrogance wouldn't like a possible change ? The way I see it Sony is already posting losses (first time in 50 years but a loss is a loss) so it isn't like everything is a rose garden for Sony and Microsoft. Google would take a hit at the start but once they got some customers on board it could be the start of soemthing. Like I said, I wouldn't buy it, I don't buy consoles any more, but I do welcome someone onto the playing field to shake things up.

Avatar image for kingjazziephiz
kingjazziephiz

2650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 kingjazziephiz
Member since 2006 • 2650 Posts
[QUOTE="psn8214"]

No... they have no experience whatsoever in the field. I mean, at least Apple tried and failed.

clubsammich91
True, but niether did Sony, or MS when they first introduced their home consoles.

i thought sony made some games on the snes...
Avatar image for MetroidPrimePwn
MetroidPrimePwn

12399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#40 MetroidPrimePwn
Member since 2007 • 12399 Posts

They would need to get into videogame game first.

Avatar image for Dahaka-UK
Dahaka-UK

6915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Dahaka-UK
Member since 2005 • 6915 Posts

Another console wouldn't help in any way, shape or form.

Avatar image for MclovinKilledU
MclovinKilledU

345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 MclovinKilledU
Member since 2009 • 345 Posts

i think nokia should get into gaming

Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts

I don't understand why so many people see Google as a cool, peaceful company full of innovation while criticising Microsoft as an evil empire. As Google enters more and more markets, they will become more like Microsoft was. No thanks, I don't want Google in the console race. They have no idea or experience on how the console industry works, they have no relationship with third parties and no relationships with hardware manufacturers. A 3-way console race is already tight enough as it is, especially in these tough economic times.

Avatar image for Darth_DuMas
Darth_DuMas

2687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 Darth_DuMas
Member since 2006 • 2687 Posts

Getting into gaming is a massive leap from having a phone and an entry level os.

Plus it takes quite a financial clout, it could ruin them, if they invest billions and it doesn't work out.

Remember MS literally had to force their why in using just about everything they knew and everything at their disposal and its only just started to work out for them half way through their second gen. MS had experience in PC gaming for a long time and still have lots of issues. MS are still struggling with Japan.

Its not a good idea.

It also takes a lot to get the consumer on side, most wrote off MS before they started, it will be the same with google. So they would start from scratch.

Avatar image for DoomZaW
DoomZaW

6475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#45 DoomZaW
Member since 2007 • 6475 Posts

i think nokia should get into gaming

MclovinKilledU

They tried once, and they failed so badly with it that it earned 7.th worst console of all time on GT

Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts
Yes! I welcome any kind of clean fair competition in the gaming world.
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#47 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts
I'd rather have Apple make a console than Google to be honest. Realistically though, three console makers are enough.. I don't need a fourth - I don't have THAT much money to support everything, its hard enough not owning one of the three consoles.