@nintendoboy16 said:
@tocool340: "It's annoying how far out of reach Switch is power-wise compared to the other systems."
"They don't need to compete, just be within the same stratosphere..."
So... they do then? Pick ONE!
@eoten said:
@tocool340 said:
They can keep the hybrid console as long as they improve on its hardware for once. It's annoying how far out of reach Switch is power-wise compared to the other systems. They don't need to compete, just be within the same stratosphere...
And yet, they still so many of those "inferior" pieces of hardware. Like I've said, many times, on many threads, most gamers don't give a shit about graphics, they just want games that are fun and Nintendo tends to provide fun, even with "inferior" hardware.
....I'm confused. I'm failing to see how both statements are...exclusive or don't relate to each other? Me saying I want a Nintendo system to be within the same neighborhood of other systems in terms of power =/= wanting a system competing to be the powerhouse of it's generation (what Sony and Microsoft have been doing for years)...
Graphics isn't the only thing that benefits from better hardware (although I wouldn't complain about having a pretty game), it's optimization/performance. You might not care, but I do support third-party companies that bring games to Nintendo systems. Well, at least I did until Wii happened, where multiplat games needed to be drastically downgraded in order to function on a Nintendo system (a trend that's still apparently going on now). Hell, even Nintendo games could benefit from the extra power so that their potential is fully realized.
Breath of the Wild is a perfect example of a game that leaves me wishing that the system its on had more power. Don't get me wrong, I had the pleasure of actually playing it since I finally decided to invest in a Switch recently and the game is brilliant! However, there's bouts of performance problems that pop up (some literal) more often than I'd like which sort of breaks immersion....
Log in to comment