Should Sony take the Sega route next generation?

[QUOTE="KevinPlanet"]

[QUOTE="bbkkristian"]No, competition is good for the industry.bbkkristian

You forgot to add *sarcasm*

Without the 360, the PS3 would still be $599.99

Oh, much better

Why would they do that?

That would be nice, then the Xbox would have something better other than Halo to play:P

Eh? Sony's games typically are not that good, so I don't get the dreaming. Devil-Itachi

Yeah, I mean nothing on the PS3 can top the originality and greatness of Call of Duty:roll:

[QUOTE="Devil-Itachi"]Eh? Sony's games typically are not that good, so I don't get the dreaming. Adamantium4k2

Yeah, I mean nothing on the PS3 can top the originality and greatness of Call of Duty:roll:

I hope both Nintendo and Sony continue in the hardware market. With that said I certiantly wouldn't mind if Valve struck a deal with Nintendo and we got some of Nintendo's great franchises on PC.

Ignore hardware and just make games for the next generation Microsoft and Nintendo consoles much as Sega did after the Dreamcast?

juliankennedy23

Isnt this what people were saying about NINTENDO after the N64 and with the GC? Yes it was...NOW look at NIN..Sony was a HUGE business with the PS1 and PS2..and the PS3 is doing just fine. Its the rabid fanboys here that make it out like its failing..

No, the more competition the better.

[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]Sony shouldn't and neither should Nintendo.parkurtommo

Whatever games seen on other systems (CDi, PC, Atari 2600, ColecoVision) were developed and published by other companies, the only reason Nintendo ever gets credited for those games is because... well, they OWN THE IP's and they made the original games (like how Infinity Ward still got credited for the Wii version of CoD4 when Treyarch made that port).

: (

No, they shouldn't. The big 3 should stay the big 3.