Skyward Sword: No Voice Acting

Why the **** do Nintendo fanboys support this? They're perfectly capable of adding voice acting to the series, but they don't. The only reason why is because they're lazy, just like with everything else they make. Why do Nintendo fanboys let Nintendo be so complacent? It's because of them that this series, along with all of their other ones, never evolve.

Why is it because they're lazy? They've largely reworked the Zelda formula, and are releasing a high-budget game. What's lazy about that?

I'm not a Nintendo fanboy, and I find that the lack of voice-acting adds to the charm.

It´s a design choice and it doesn´t really need it,besides,last time Zelda had VA it wasn´t very good lol.

It's Zelda, it's stuck in the 90s. Even Resident Evil 1 had voice acting.

Nice opinion you got there, but I come from the school where VA is just a special effect, nothing more, nothing less. If the emotion is being conveyed, that's all that matters. In Zelda they accomplish that via the text speed, the facial expressions, and the hylian phrases uttered. I don't see how them taliking is "evolution" in any sense. Nintendo tried it in Mario and Metroid previously, and it didn't make the games any better.

The game would just be bad with voice acting.

You're a bit late to the party TC. This topic has been debated and discussed from every possible angle, there isn't anything else to be said about it. meetroid8

It's Zelda, it's stuck in the 90s. Even Resident Evil 1 had voice acting.

Peredith