So 360 owners (A Dark Souls query)

  • 135 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts

Enjoyment=/entertainmentSquirrelTamer

That's wrong.

Avatar image for ianuilliam
ianuilliam

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 ianuilliam
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts

[QUOTE="Some-Mist"][QUOTE="clone01"] So because From Software feels like I shouldn't talk to my friends while I play, It gives them a right to disable something that I paid money for?clone01
yes. They're the developer. Noones forcing you to buy it.

And the developer has to adhere to specifications from the console manufacturer. It is not their right, and frankly I think its presumptious of them to think so.

They requested the option to disable it from MS, and MS said sure. So the console manufacturer obviously disagrees with you that a developer has to adhere to the standards with no exception, and it IS their right to disable that feature.

Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#103 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts

lol :P .. the developer of this franchise is so uptight that if you stuck a lump of coal up their a$$es, in two weeks you'd have diamonds.

Avatar image for Badosh
Badosh

12774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#104 Badosh
Member since 2011 • 12774 Posts
I really could care less, I barely use party chat, just private chat, so meh whatever. Besides, not like I can't call/text half the people on my friend's list to ask them for help and or go to the dashboard and pop into party chat and talk about it, then go back to play. I don't see a problem with it.
Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#105 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
The game was designed to no allow voice chat, so good. It's doing something different. It's a shame we wont be able to talk to friends while playing but players would just take advantage of party chat and talk to each other making the game experience much different from what the developer intended.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
[QUOTE="Some-Mist"]but that's how it works. As the developer, it is their right to include and disable anything they want. once again, you're not forced to buy the game....the game doesn't permanently disable party chat...so you can still use what you paid for in other games.. if you feel you were wronged, try and sue... complaining on gamespot system wars isn't going to change anything.

Isn't that the point of an internet forum? To discuss things?
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

cmon man, uve been here for awhile. I'm sure you were even here when demons souls was about to come out.. are you telling me you never knew DS didn't have any chat? Its not like this is new infoultraking
We're not talking about voice chat. We're discussing the disabling of party chat...something that, as far as I know, only one other game in the 360's library has done.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
[QUOTE="SquirrelTamer"] Game=/=entertainment. Enjoyment=/entertainment

taken from dictionary.com: 1. an amusement or pastime: children's games. 2. the material or equipment used in playing certain games: a store selling toys and games. 3. a competitive activity involving skill, chance, or endurance on the part of two or more persons who play according to a set of rules, usually for their own amusement or for that of spectators. specifically 1 and 3 say "amusement." Would that not be a synonym for entertainment? Honestly, some of you get so uptight about these titles. It is a game. Nothing more.
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#109 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
Awesome move on their part. I'm already enjoying the side-effects of the decision.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

They requested the option to disable it from MS, and MS said sure. So the console manufacturer obviously disagrees with you that a developer has to adhere to the standards with no exception, and it IS their right to disable that feature.

ianuilliam

I suppose in that sense. And that's certainly a big shame on MS.

Avatar image for Some-Mist
Some-Mist

5631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#111 Some-Mist
Member since 2009 • 5631 Posts
[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="Some-Mist"]but that's how it works. As the developer, it is their right to include and disable anything they want. once again, you're not forced to buy the game....the game doesn't permanently disable party chat...so you can still use what you paid for in other games.. if you feel you were wronged, try and sue... complaining on gamespot system wars isn't going to change anything.

Isn't that the point of an internet forum? To discuss things?

A game that you don't have to buy, disables a feature that they don't want you to use - with microsofts approval - and you don't think they should have.. okay. either people are going to agree with your or disagree with you..but there's not much to discuss - you just keep saying the same thing over and over again. I can do the same: don't buy it no one is forcing you to buy it it's their choice what to include/disable don't buy it problem solved.
Avatar image for BlbecekBobecek
BlbecekBobecek

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#112 BlbecekBobecek
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

Its now been more or less confirmed that Dark Souls will disable party chat. What are your thoughts?

My two cents. Not a big fan. This is a feature that I pay for with XBL gold. I don't think it should be the developers call to remove this. I know this will bring a flurry of posters crying about how the game is "meant" to be played. Sorry, but they're called games for a reason. They are entertainment, and players should get to decide how to approach the way they enjoy a game. I'm curious to know how SW feels about it.

clone01

Maybe Dark Souls developers decided, that part of the entertainment that Dark Souls offers is the feeling of solitude and the "anonymous ghosts of other players" approach to multiplayer and party-chat would ruin the experience this game can offer.

I like the guts of FROM Software - "You will be alone in this and the only way of interaction between players will be based on messages, bloodstains and phantoms. Take it or leave it."

Avatar image for BlbecekBobecek
BlbecekBobecek

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#113 BlbecekBobecek
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="Some-Mist"]but that's how it works. As the developer, it is their right to include and disable anything they want. once again, you're not forced to buy the game....the game doesn't permanently disable party chat...so you can still use what you paid for in other games.. if you feel you were wronged, try and sue... complaining on gamespot system wars isn't going to change anything.Some-Mist
Isn't that the point of an internet forum? To discuss things?

A game that you don't have to buy, disables a feature that they don't want you to use - with microsofts approval - and you don't think they should have.. okay. either people are going to agree with your or disagree with you..but there's not much to discuss - you just keep saying the same thing over and over again. I can do the same: don't buy it no one is forcing you to buy it it's their choice what to include/disable don't buy it problem solved.

If you dont want to discuss it, then just dont. But let us who enjoy discussing such a topic do so. Thanks.

Avatar image for Some-Mist
Some-Mist

5631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#114 Some-Mist
Member since 2009 • 5631 Posts

[QUOTE="Some-Mist"][QUOTE="clone01"] Isn't that the point of an internet forum? To discuss things?BlbecekBobecek

A game that you don't have to buy, disables a feature that they don't want you to use - with microsofts approval - and you don't think they should have.. okay. either people are going to agree with your or disagree with you..but there's not much to discuss - you just keep saying the same thing over and over again. I can do the same: don't buy it no one is forcing you to buy it it's their choice what to include/disable don't buy it problem solved.

If you dont want to discuss it, then just dont. But let us who enjoy discussing such a topic do so. Thanks.

I don't mind discussing it, but what's there to discuss? as it has been stated MANY times, (and I'll restate it so you don't have to reread the entire thread) no ones forcing him to buy it...he doesn't need to play dark souls. If he wants to play dark souls and he wants to go against what the developer wants, then he should do the same thing he did with demon's souls and buy it on ps3 and party chat on 360. but from software said it themselves that they choose not to include it for multiple reasons, the main reason being to create that feeling of solitude even with you are partied up with someone.. they can include or disable whatever they choose...they're the developer and they're going to develop the game how they want it. even when players constantly complained about no pause button in demon's souls, did they add one in dark souls? if Microsoft had a problem with it, they wouldn't have approved from software's change/decision. Some gamers are going to agree and complain as well, ps3 fanboys are going to laugh and say that's what you get for saying dark souls will be superior on 360 for party chat, some will say that's how the game is meant to be played. regardless, all he has to say is that he doesn't like from software's choice of disabling party chat...seems like a blog-worthy post to me. with all of that being said multiple times, he's still going on and complaining about it. write a blog post about it.
Avatar image for SquirrelTamer
SquirrelTamer

1185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 SquirrelTamer
Member since 2011 • 1185 Posts

[QUOTE="SquirrelTamer"]Enjoyment=/entertainmentIronBass

That's wrong.

I didn't mean entertainment isn't enjoyable but enjoyment isn't always entertaining.
Avatar image for SquirrelTamer
SquirrelTamer

1185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 SquirrelTamer
Member since 2011 • 1185 Posts
[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="SquirrelTamer"] Game=/=entertainment. Enjoyment=/entertainment

taken from dictionary.com: 1. an amusement or pastime: children's games. 2. the material or equipment used in playing certain games: a store selling toys and games. 3. a competitive activity involving skill, chance, or endurance on the part of two or more persons who play according to a set of rules, usually for their own amusement or for that of spectators. specifically 1 and 3 say "amusement." Would that not be a synonym for entertainment? Honestly, some of you get so uptight about these titles. It is a game. Nothing more.

What? nothing of those is a definition of video game to me.
Avatar image for HaloinventedFPS
HaloinventedFPS

4738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 HaloinventedFPS
Member since 2010 • 4738 Posts

Dark souls is better on 360 anyway

PS3 version has an even worse framerate, 360 version chugs in a couple of places, but overall beats the PS3 version

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts

I didn't mean entertainment isn't enjoyable but enjoyment isn't always entertaining. SquirrelTamer

I've never heard of somebody getting bored from doing something that's enjoyable for him/her in that particular time, so I'm going toassume that's wrong.

Avatar image for Some-Mist
Some-Mist

5631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#119 Some-Mist
Member since 2009 • 5631 Posts

Dark souls is better on 360 anyway

PS3 version has an even worse framerate, 360 version chugs in a couple of places, but overall beats the PS3 version

HaloinventedFPS
source? I actually find that pretty surprising seeing as the ps3 was the lead platform, and it was ported to the 360 by namco bandai. I'd hope there isn't too big of a difference, tho I would have guessed that it would perform slightly better on ps3.
Avatar image for ultraking
ultraking

6904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 ultraking
Member since 2004 • 6904 Posts

Dark souls is better on 360 anyway

PS3 version has an even worse framerate, 360 version chugs in a couple of places, but overall beats the PS3 version

HaloinventedFPS
got a source?
Avatar image for HaloinventedFPS
HaloinventedFPS

4738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 HaloinventedFPS
Member since 2010 • 4738 Posts

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

Dark souls is better on 360 anyway

PS3 version has an even worse framerate, 360 version chugs in a couple of places, but overall beats the PS3 version

ultraking

got a source?

no, but word of mouth and reviewers are saying PS3 version has a bad framerate nearly at all times

ive been talking to people online who are playing it on 360 and not noticing bad framerates except for a few areas

we will see in a few days with lensoftruth

Avatar image for SquirrelTamer
SquirrelTamer

1185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 SquirrelTamer
Member since 2011 • 1185 Posts

[QUOTE="SquirrelTamer"]I didn't mean entertainment isn't enjoyable but enjoyment isn't always entertaining. IronBass

I've never heard of somebody getting bored from doing something that's enjoyable for him/her in that particular time, so I'm going toassume that's wrong.

I don't know I enjoy eating good food yet I'm not entertained while eating it.
Avatar image for ultraking
ultraking

6904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 ultraking
Member since 2004 • 6904 Posts
Well, I watched giant bombs quick look (which isn't really quick) , and I didn't notice any dips. I'm gonna assume its best on ps3, since its lead platform
Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#124 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15874 Posts

I don't use party chat and personally never liked it. For a game like Dark Souls that is incredibly focused in it's design philosophy, I think this is a plus.

Avatar image for ianuilliam
ianuilliam

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 ianuilliam
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

Dark souls is better on 360 anyway

PS3 version has an even worse framerate, 360 version chugs in a couple of places, but overall beats the PS3 version

ultraking

got a source?

I'd assume the same source people use when they talk about 99% of multiplats being better on 360. In other words, nope.

Avatar image for Cloud567kar
Cloud567kar

2656

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 Cloud567kar
Member since 2007 • 2656 Posts

Ohh they dont get to use party chat? bu bu butttt what happened to the $60 a year? all wasted

finalstar2007

Stop being such a troll, your honestly one of the biggest thats not banned. How is not having party chat for one gmae all wasted? Is that person going to just play that game all year no.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#127 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

Ohh they dont get to use party chat? bu bu butttt what happened to the $60 a year? all wasted

themyth01
Nicely done, but you don't actually believe it's just for party chat...

For party chat and advertisements. There, you win. :P
Avatar image for Some-Mist
Some-Mist

5631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#128 Some-Mist
Member since 2009 • 5631 Posts

[QUOTE="ultraking"]]got a source? ianuilliam

I'd assume the same source people use when they talk about 99% of multiplats being better on 360. In other words, nope.

99% of multiplats actually used to perform better on the 360, that is until the last couple of years when developers became more familiar with the PS3 architecture and used it as a lead platform, examples being vanquish, castlevania: lords of shadow, el shaddai: ascension of the metatron...and so fourth I would bet that they'll be nearly identical or the ps3 version will be slightly better seeing as it's the lead platform... and not a port job done by the publisher.

no, but word of mouth and reviewers are saying PS3 version has a bad framerate nearly at all times

ive been talking to people online who are playing it on 360 and not noticing bad framerates except for a few areas

we will see in a few days with lensoftruth

HaloinventedFPS
which reviewer?
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
I don't mind discussing it, but what's there to discuss? as it has been stated MANY times, (and I'll restate it so you don't have to reread the entire thread) no ones forcing him to buy it...he doesn't need to play dark souls. If he wants to play dark souls and he wants to go against what the developer wants, then he should do the same thing he did with demon's souls and buy it on ps3 and party chat on 360. but from software said it themselves that they choose not to include it for multiple reasons, the main reason being to create that feeling of solitude even with you are partied up with someone.. they can include or disable whatever they choose...they're the developer and they're going to develop the game how they want it. even when players constantly complained about no pause button in demon's souls, did they add one in dark souls? if Microsoft had a problem with it, they wouldn't have approved from software's change/decision. Some gamers are going to agree and complain as well, ps3 fanboys are going to laugh and say that's what you get for saying dark souls will be superior on 360 for party chat, some will say that's how the game is meant to be played. regardless, all he has to say is that he doesn't like from software's choice of disabling party chat...seems like a blog-worthy post to me. with all of that being said multiple times, he's still going on and complaining about it. write a blog post about it.Some-Mist
I know that no one is forcing me to buy the game. I'm curious about people's thoughts on it. I still believe its a relevant thread, and I disagree with the principle of the matter.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
What? nothing of those is a definition of video game to me.SquirrelTamer
So dictionary.com is incorrect and Oxford are incorrect?
Avatar image for Shatter_Effect
Shatter_Effect

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 Shatter_Effect
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
Seriously though, that's stupid, customers are always right. ALWAYS. and it makes no difference if the chat is enabled because if you dont wanna be in a chat, then don't. But if you choose to be in a chat, you should be able to be in one. Period. There is no good reason to take away a service that XbL customers are paying for.
Avatar image for Shatter_Effect
Shatter_Effect

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 Shatter_Effect
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
In what way is it a plus? If YOU don't use party chat, then don't, but other people do, and they pay to use it so taking it away is **** up and serves no purpose. The game wants this hardcore ambiance, but seriously if someone wants that ambiance they can leave the chat. Forcing no chat down our throats is just a dick hole move that will lose them A LOT of customers.
Avatar image for Shatter_Effect
Shatter_Effect

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 Shatter_Effect
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
Don't see a problem with having a service you pay for taken away? Don't see a problem that the game developers clearly don't actually think? Don't see a problem in that, if they enabled chat, it would not negatively affect the ambiance at all yet they decided to disable it just to be dickholes to the people who do care? Bro you need to see a problem. "Justice will only be achieved when those who are not affected by injustice feel as indignant as those who are."
Avatar image for Rockman999
Rockman999

7507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 Rockman999
Member since 2005 • 7507 Posts

It doesn't bother me since I would prefer to play the game alone and I would get it for the PS3 anyways.

Avatar image for tccavey2
tccavey2

1559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 tccavey2
Member since 2007 • 1559 Posts

Why would anyone party chat during Dark Souls?