[QUOTE="PAL360"]
[QUOTE="Sushiglutton"]UC3 is a lot more challenging than the Witcher 2 graphically. Sure the areas in TW2 are larger, but I would hardly call it open world. The dungeons are super linear and really dull in their design (like the crypt, the ghost house etc). And the forest outside Flotsam is constucted of two roundabouts (and no you are not allowed to enter the center of them). Uncharted the possibilities to interact with the enviroment are far greater. You can climb and take cover etc .Also Drake reacts to door openings, walls, corners etc in a natural way. Not so in TW2. The levels in Uncharted are a lot more dynamic. They move and burn explode etc. Very little special effects like that in TW2 and not nearly as well made. The Kraken's tentacles is basically the highlight :lol:! Combine this with a stronger art direction and more detailed enviroments and it's clear the current graphics king is Naughty Dog's Uncharted 3 :D!charlesdarwin55
Its far from clear. Uncharted 3 looks amazing indeed, so do Gears3, RDR, KZ3, GoW3, Forza4, Crysis2, Rage and a few other console games (i have yet to play The Witcher 2 on 360).
Im impressed on how some of you guys, have the ability to look at 10 completly different yet impressive looking games, and claim one os miles better than the rest :o
Let's take one example. Crysis 2; Sub-hd. Unstable framerate. Screen tear (on the 360). Atrocious AA. Blurry as hell. Pop-in. Bad animation. So yes there are console games not only lightyears but many megaparcels ahead of Crysis 2. Crysis 2 hardly beats Haze. So there goes your argument.
Theres more about graphics than res and framerate. Otherwise, im sure you would agree than Perfect Dark on Xbla is the current 'console graphics king'. It runs at 1080p and 60fps afterall.
Log in to comment