So after 2 1/2 years

There are 57 different definitions of terrorism within the United Nations. FAILURE.usmcjdk6

And yet none of that changes the fact that only 3227 deaths have occured from terrorism in the USA. :|

NationMaster statistics know full well the varying definitions of terrorism and they've classified them accordingly.

And yet again you've failed to prove that more than 3227 deaths have occurred from terrorism in the US. You've got no statistics, no sources just your ass and a computer you happen to be typing on.

On top of that. What in the sweet God is the difference between slaughtering someone because you are racist against said persons race, vs. slaughtering them because you are prejudiced of their race? Can you even tell me if there a difference? IS THERE EVEN A DIFFERENCE?usmcjdk6

Killing with an actual political purpose rather than out of sheer hatred is the defining difference between a race crime and that of terrorism. The vast majority of race crimes in the US are not carried with any real political intent or intend to bring about political change through them.

3231 http://www.themilitant.com/2001/6528/652857.html

3231 http://www.themilitant.com/2001/6528/652857.html

usmcjdk6

Four more deaths than what I have said. :| 3227 + 4 = Your number. :| All that whining over such a small almost negligible differnence.

Why didn't you just come out and say hey I think this number is more accurate, instead of insulting and using patronising language? :|

Wow you really are a jarhead, well that's the US army for you nowdays.Hoobinator

[QUOTE="usmcjdk6"]

3231 http://www.themilitant.com/2001/6528/652857.html

Hoobinator

Four more deaths than what I have said. :| 3227 + 4 = Your number. :| All that whining over such a small almost negligible differnence.

Why didn't you just come out and say hey I think this number is more accurate, instead of insulting and using patronising language? :|

[QUOTE="the1stfandb"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="Andrew_Xavier"]I don't for a second believe that your xbox survived a tour of duty, nevermind a freakin IED explosion.Andrew_Xavier

I think this whole post is one big massive flamebait. And I think he used the whole "soldier" story to try to buy himself some credibility so people won't bash him.

Why keep your PS3 if you dislike it so much? Why not just buy a 360? Why not get some HD cables and watch Blu-Ray movies? Why post lies on a message board? Why? Why? Why?

did u bother to read the thread?

I'm not sure, ask "u" if he read the thread, he is always a bit flanky, always partying with T and all. As per me, why yes, I read it, claimed his xbox survived an IED blast and every ps3 game he played sucked, despite not giving any real details about them, then claimed the ps3 is only useful for playing ps2 games.

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="usmcjdk6"]On top of that. What in the sweet God is the difference between slaughtering someone because you are racist against said persons race, vs. slaughtering them because you are prejudiced of their race? Can you even tell me if there a difference? IS THERE EVEN A DIFFERENCE?usmcjdk6

Killing with an actual political purpose rather than out of sheer hatred is the defining difference between a race crime and that of terrorism. The vast majority of race crimes in the US are not carried with any real political intent or intend to bring about political change through them.

And no race is not purely political, it has for thousands of years been seen as a demarcation between different groups of people, their lineage and history. People have always seen themselves as essentially being separate and distinct. It can be seen as a study of people and history, distinct from the politics.

But to kill a person without political intent is not ******* terrorism. Why can't you get that through your jarhead? :| Has the sound of IED's exploding made you delusional?

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"]Wow you really are a jarhead, well that's the US army for you nowdays.dooly420

You know what's great about being 1L? Knowing that no matter what this hippy decides to discuss, I will make him look retarded.usmcjdk6

You're being humiliated in this thread like the US is on the war on terror. :lol:

[QUOTE="usmcjdk6"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="usmcjdk6"]On top of that. What in the sweet God is the difference between slaughtering someone because you are racist against said persons race, vs. slaughtering them because you are prejudiced of their race? Can you even tell me if there a difference? IS THERE EVEN A DIFFERENCE?Hoobinator

Killing with an actual political purpose rather than out of sheer hatred is the defining difference between a race crime and that of terrorism. The vast majority of race crimes in the US are not carried with any real political intent or intend to bring about political change through them.

And no race is not purely political, it has for thousands of years been seen as a demarcation between different groups of people, their lineage and history. People have always seen themselves as essentially being separate and distinct. It can be seen as a study of people and history, distinct from the politics.

But to kill a person without political intent is not ******* terrorism. Why can't you get that through your jarhead? :| Has the sound of IED's exploding made you delusional?

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="usmcjdk6"]

3231 http://www.themilitant.com/2001/6528/652857.html

usmcjdk6

Four more deaths than what I have said. :| 3227 + 4 = Your number. :| All that whining over such a small almost negligible differnence.

Why didn't you just come out and say hey I think this number is more accurate, instead of insulting and using patronising language? :|

Yeah sounds like something your awesome president would say, what with it not actually being a word and making no sense. Your awesome education showing through yet again. :lol:

[QUOTE="usmcjdk6"]You know what's great about being 1L? Knowing that no matter what this hippy decides to discuss, I will make him look retarded.Hoobinator

You're being humiliated in this thread like the US is on the war on terror. :lol:

[QUOTE="usmcjdk6"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="usmcjdk6"]

3231 http://www.themilitant.com/2001/6528/652857.html

Hoobinator

Four more deaths than what I have said. :| 3227 + 4 = Your number. :| All that whining over such a small almost negligible differnence.

Why didn't you just come out and say hey I think this number is more accurate, instead of insulting and using patronising language? :|

Yeah sounds like something your awesome president would say, what with it not actually being a word and making no sense. Your awesome education showing through yet again. :lol:

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="usmcjdk6"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="usmcjdk6"]On top of that. What in the sweet God is the difference between slaughtering someone because you are racist against said persons race, vs. slaughtering them because you are prejudiced of their race? Can you even tell me if there a difference? IS THERE EVEN A DIFFERENCE?usmcjdk6

Killing with an actual political purpose rather than out of sheer hatred is the defining difference between a race crime and that of terrorism. The vast majority of race crimes in the US are not carried with any real political intent or intend to bring about political change through them.

And no race is not purely political, it has for thousands of years been seen as a demarcation between different groups of people, their lineage and history. People have always seen themselves as essentially being separate and distinct. It can be seen as a study of people and history, distinct from the politics.

But to kill a person without political intent is not ******* terrorism. Why can't you get that through your jarhead? :| Has the sound of IED's exploding made you delusional?

:lol: The Tribe of Israel were seen as a race of people by the Ancient Egyptians, thousands of years ago. And yes this is documented history divorced from the religious aspect. The Sumerians were seen as a race of people, some of the oldest recorded civilisations in history.

Seriously leave the marines and go back to school. :lol:

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="usmcjdk6"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="usmcjdk6"]

3231 http://www.themilitant.com/2001/6528/652857.html

usmcjdk6

Four more deaths than what I have said. :| 3227 + 4 = Your number. :| All that whining over such a small almost negligible differnence.

Why didn't you just come out and say hey I think this number is more accurate, instead of insulting and using patronising language? :|

Yeah sounds like something your awesome president would say, what with it not actually being a word and making no sense. Your awesome education showing through yet again. :lol:

I see you're now using words you have no idea of what they actually mean. :lol: Wrong context bud.

Euphemism:

1.the substitution of a mild, indirect, or vague expression for one thought to be offensive, harsh, or blunt.

[QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]Wow you really are a jarhead, well that's the US army for you nowdays.usmcjdk6

[QUOTE="usmcjdk6"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="usmcjdk6"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="usmcjdk6"]On top of that. What in the sweet God is the difference between slaughtering someone because you are racist against said persons race, vs. slaughtering them because you are prejudiced of their race? Can you even tell me if there a difference? IS THERE EVEN A DIFFERENCE?Hoobinator

Killing with an actual political purpose rather than out of sheer hatred is the defining difference between a race crime and that of terrorism. The vast majority of race crimes in the US are not carried with any real political intent or intend to bring about political change through them.

And no race is not purely political, it has for thousands of years been seen as a demarcation between different groups of people, their lineage and history. People have always seen themselves as essentially being separate and distinct. It can be seen as a study of people and history, distinct from the politics.

But to kill a person without political intent is not ******* terrorism. Why can't you get that through your jarhead? :| Has the sound of IED's exploding made you delusional?

:lol: The Tribe of Israel were seen as a race of people by the Ancient Egyptians, thousands of years ago. And yes this is documented history divorced from the religious aspect. The Sumerians were seen as a race of people, some of the oldest recorded civilisations in history.

Seriously leave the marines and go back to school. :lol:

[QUOTE="usmcjdk6"][QUOTE="dooly420"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]Wow you really are a jarhead, well that's the US army for you nowdays.dooly420

[QUOTE="usmcjdk6"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="usmcjdk6"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="usmcjdk6"]

3231 http://www.themilitant.com/2001/6528/652857.html

Hoobinator

Four more deaths than what I have said. :| 3227 + 4 = Your number. :| All that whining over such a small almost negligible differnence.

Why didn't you just come out and say hey I think this number is more accurate, instead of insulting and using patronising language? :|

Yeah sounds like something your awesome president would say, what with it not actually being a word and making no sense. Your awesome education showing through yet again. :lol:

I see you're now using words you have no idea of what they actually mean. :lol: Wrong context bud.

Euphemism:

1.the substitution of a mild, indirect, or vague expression for one thought to be offensive, harsh, or blunt.

[QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="usmcjdk6"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"][QUOTE="usmcjdk6"][QUOTE="Hoobinator"]

[QUOTE="usmcjdk6"]On top of that. What in the sweet God is the difference between slaughtering someone because you are racist against said persons race, vs. slaughtering them because you are prejudiced of their race? Can you even tell me if there a difference? IS THERE EVEN A DIFFERENCE?usmcjdk6

Killing with an actual political purpose rather than out of sheer hatred is the defining difference between a race crime and that of terrorism. The vast majority of race crimes in the US are not carried with any real political intent or intend to bring about political change through them.

And no race is not purely political, it has for thousands of years been seen as a demarcation between different groups of people, their lineage and history. People have always seen themselves as essentially being separate and distinct. It can be seen as a study of people and history, distinct from the politics.

But to kill a person without political intent is not ******* terrorism. Why can't you get that through your jarhead? :| Has the sound of IED's exploding made you delusional?

:lol: The Tribe of Israel were seen as a race of people by the Ancient Egyptians, thousands of years ago. And yes this is documented history divorced from the religious aspect. The Sumerians were seen as a race of people, some of the oldest recorded civilisations in history.

Seriously leave the marines and go back to school. :lol:

My, my, my you've utterly lost it now. :lol: A race is not solely classified by skin colours. Arabs are classified as a race but have skin colour ranging from white to dark brown. Skin colour actually means very little when classifying a people as a race.

And WTF does The Tribes of Israel not being brown have to do with them not being a race. :lol: That's the most retarded crap I've read in a while. Yet again I'm having to pull the dictionary out to educate you:

Race:

1.a group of persons related by common descent or heredity.

That's right race is no more than common lineage, not skin colour which is no more than a defining characteristic which a racial group may share. :lol: