So far Halo 3 is still my favorite FPS ths gen, and its all possible simply....

  • 121 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Emaldon117
Emaldon117

277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Emaldon117
Member since 2009 • 277 Posts

because the aiming controls are actually fast.

I played the FPS's for PS3 including the new one, but the aiming was just so slow, even on maximum seinsitivity.

Discuss:

Avatar image for Mr_Apple_Soup
Mr_Apple_Soup

3580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 Mr_Apple_Soup
Member since 2006 • 3580 Posts

guns are heavy, most people can't just whip them around

then again...halo isn't exactly realistic

Avatar image for Emaldon117
Emaldon117

277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Emaldon117
Member since 2009 • 277 Posts
Who wants to play a realistic shooter anyway?
Avatar image for Mr_Apple_Soup
Mr_Apple_Soup

3580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 Mr_Apple_Soup
Member since 2006 • 3580 Posts

Who wants to play a realistic shooter anyway?Emaldon117

apparently the millions of people who bought COD4...i'm not saying i prefer realistic shooters, i'll take R2 and Halo 3 over CoD games anyday, but most developers are aiming to stay in the realm of realism nowadays

Avatar image for jethrovegas
jethrovegas

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 jethrovegas
Member since 2007 • 5103 Posts

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]Who wants to play a realistic shooter anyway?Mr_Apple_Soup

apparently the millions of people who bought COD4...i'm not saying i prefer realistic shooters, i'll take R2 and Halo 3 over CoD games anyday, but most developers are aiming to stay in the realm of realism nowadays

The **** is this?

Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts
If you put FPS and Best in the same sentence without KZ2 automatic Fail.
Avatar image for atarigrad
atarigrad

2559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 atarigrad
Member since 2006 • 2559 Posts

I like GEOW2 better than Halo but thats not an FPS

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#9 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50109 Posts

guns are heavy, most people can't just whip them around

then again...halo isn't exactly realistic

Mr_Apple_Soup
Are you underestimating a Spartan's strength?
Avatar image for Emaldon117
Emaldon117

277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Emaldon117
Member since 2009 • 277 Posts

If you put FPS and Best in the same sentence without KZ2 automatic Fail.djsifer01

I hope best in this context does not include controls. I'd rather play KZ2 with an N64 controller if it were possible, it would make more playable.

Avatar image for Sully28
Sully28

5097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Sully28
Member since 2003 • 5097 Posts
[QUOTE="Mr_Apple_Soup"]

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]Who wants to play a realistic shooter anyway?jethrovegas

apparently the millions of people who bought COD4...i'm not saying i prefer realistic shooters, i'll take R2 and Halo 3 over CoD games anyday, but most developers are aiming to stay in the realm of realism nowadays

The **** is this?

hahaha thank you! i was just bout to say, COD 4 is not realistic by any means.

Avatar image for bladeeagle
bladeeagle

1863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 bladeeagle
Member since 2006 • 1863 Posts
[QUOTE="Mr_Apple_Soup"]

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]Who wants to play a realistic shooter anyway?jethrovegas

apparently the millions of people who bought COD4...i'm not saying i prefer realistic shooters, i'll take R2 and Halo 3 over CoD games anyday, but most developers are aiming to stay in the realm of realism nowadays

The **** is this?

lulz

COD4 is far from realistic

Avatar image for Great_Ragnarok
Great_Ragnarok

3069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 Great_Ragnarok
Member since 2007 • 3069 Posts

guns are heavy, most people can't just whip them around

then again...halo isn't exactly realistic

Mr_Apple_Soup
thats because chief is in a super suit that gives him insane strength!lol. so it makes sense how weapons are almost weightless to him. and the puny momentum poses no problems for his super hydraulics... on the other hand COD4 needs momentum fast. you can almost do a 360 in mid air with a shotgun!!!
Avatar image for Gamersince81
Gamersince81

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Gamersince81
Member since 2007 • 1787 Posts
Killzone 2 is the only realistic shooter.. everything else the guns feel like they weigh less than a molecule lmao!!!
Avatar image for The_Sand_Man
The_Sand_Man

6788

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 The_Sand_Man
Member since 2008 • 6788 Posts
Erm, I don't judge a FPS game on how "fast" the controls are. :?
Avatar image for Mr_Apple_Soup
Mr_Apple_Soup

3580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 Mr_Apple_Soup
Member since 2006 • 3580 Posts

[QUOTE="jethrovegas"][QUOTE="Mr_Apple_Soup"]

apparently the millions of people who bought COD4...i'm not saying i prefer realistic shooters, i'll take R2 and Halo 3 over CoD games anyday, but most developers are aiming to stay in the realm of realism nowadays

Sully28

The **** is this?

hahaha thank you! i was just bout to say, COD 4 is not realistic by any means.


:|

you didn't find the single player a tad more believable then most of the other shooters out there?

Avatar image for Emaldon117
Emaldon117

277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Emaldon117
Member since 2009 • 277 Posts

Erm, I don't judge a FPS game on how "fast" the controls are. :?The_Sand_Man

Whats the most important aspect of any game? "Being able to @!$%ing play it" - AVGN

Avatar image for jethrovegas
jethrovegas

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 jethrovegas
Member since 2007 • 5103 Posts
:|

you didn't find the single player a tad more believable then most of the other shooters out there?

Mr_Apple_Soup

No. Hell no.

The fact that it takes place in a "real world" setting doesn't make it any more realistic than Halo.

At least Halo has a reasonable excuse for Master Chief being able to soak up an ass load of bullets, with all the energy shields and the rest of the sci-fi bull ****.

In CoD 4 you just have magick powahz, end of story.

Avatar image for Mr_Apple_Soup
Mr_Apple_Soup

3580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 Mr_Apple_Soup
Member since 2006 • 3580 Posts
[QUOTE="Mr_Apple_Soup"]:|

you didn't find the single player a tad more believable then most of the other shooters out there?

jethrovegas

No. Hell no.

The fact that it takes place in a "real world" setting doesn't make it any more realistic than Halo.

At least Halo has a reasonable excuse for Master Chief being able to soak up an ass load of bullets, with all the energy shields and the rest of the sci-fi bull ****.

In CoD 4 you just have magick powahz, end of story.

fine, i guess you're right than...when it comes to FPS's, my perspective is very...casual

so much for my nifty example

Avatar image for Gamersince81
Gamersince81

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Gamersince81
Member since 2007 • 1787 Posts

Weapons are heavy?

That was the retard statement of the day. If 7lbs is heavy to you....that's about how much an M16 weighs. 7lbs. And M4....lol. Unless you are carrying a huge LMG around with you, then no, you are not going to struggle "whipping" that thing around.

usmcjdk6

Says the guy with 10 inch arms lmao!!! Hold 7 lbs out in front of you for 12 hours straight and see how light it is.. lmao

Avatar image for Canvas_Of_Flesh
Canvas_Of_Flesh

4052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Canvas_Of_Flesh
Member since 2007 • 4052 Posts
I am able to acclimate fairly well to most any control scheme. So, I never really find the need to whine about controls...unless it's an RTS on console.
Avatar image for jethrovegas
jethrovegas

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 jethrovegas
Member since 2007 • 5103 Posts
[QUOTE="usmcjdk6"]

Weapons are heavy?

That was the retard statement of the day. If 7lbs is heavy to you....that's about how much an M16 weighs. 7lbs. And M4....lol. Unless you are carrying a huge LMG around with you, then no, you are not going to struggle "whipping" that thing around.

Gamersince81

Says the guy with 10 inch arms lmao!!! Hold 7 lbs out in front of you for 12 hours straight and see how light it is.. lmao

I hold seven pounds in front of me every time I urinate.

It ain't a big deal.

Avatar image for whatisazerg
whatisazerg

2371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 whatisazerg
Member since 2009 • 2371 Posts
[QUOTE="Mr_Apple_Soup"]:|

you didn't find the single player a tad more believable then most of the other shooters out there?

jethrovegas

No. Hell no.

The fact that it takes place in a "real world" setting doesn't make it any more realistic than Halo.

At least Halo has a reasonable excuse for Master Chief being able to soak up an ass load of bullets, with all the energy shields and the rest of the sci-fi bull ****.

In CoD 4 you just have magick powahz, end of story.

LOL at "In CoD 4 you just have magick powahz" ah man that was great.

But yeah, Halo is just are realistic as Killzone as far as I can tell, in terms of gameplay.

In terms of story, well maybe not so much, but thats the fun of it. It's plausible, but not reality.

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts
[QUOTE="Gamersince81"][QUOTE="usmcjdk6"]

Weapons are heavy?

That was the retard statement of the day. If 7lbs is heavy to you....that's about how much an M16 weighs. 7lbs. And M4....lol. Unless you are carrying a huge LMG around with you, then no, you are not going to struggle "whipping" that thing around.

jethrovegas

Says the guy with 10 inch arms lmao!!! Hold 7 lbs out in front of you for 12 hours straight and see how light it is.. lmao

I hold seven pounds in front of me every time I urinate.

It ain't a big deal.

:o

You should do some exercise, if your belly blocks the way and you have to lift it to urinate, isn't a good sign.:P

On topic: Its true for a trained soldier that weight is nothing.

Avatar image for Canvas_Of_Flesh
Canvas_Of_Flesh

4052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Canvas_Of_Flesh
Member since 2007 • 4052 Posts

Weapons are heavy?

That was the retard statement of the day. If 7lbs is heavy to you....that's about how much an M16 weighs. 7lbs. And M4....lol. Unless you are carrying a huge LMG around with you, then no, you are not going to struggle "whipping" that thing around.

usmcjdk6
It's actually closer to 8.5 lbs unloaded. Almost 9 lbs when loaded. Now, assuming like most games, you add an M203, you just upped the weight another 3 lbs unloaded. That's not including the addition of a scope which vary in weight by model. So try lugging a 12 lb weapon around all day with 50 lbs of gear and see how quickly you can swing it around.
Avatar image for Mr_Apple_Soup
Mr_Apple_Soup

3580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 Mr_Apple_Soup
Member since 2006 • 3580 Posts
[QUOTE="usmcjdk6"]

Weapons are heavy?

That was the retard statement of the day. If 7lbs is heavy to you....that's about how much an M16 weighs. 7lbs. And M4....lol. Unless you are carrying a huge LMG around with you, then no, you are not going to struggle "whipping" that thing around.

Canvas_Of_Flesh

It's actually closer to 8.5 lbs unloaded. Almost 9 lbs when loaded. Now, assuming like most games, you add an M203, you just upped the weight another 3 lbs unloaded. That's not including the addition of a scope which vary in weight by model. So try lugging a 12 lb weapon around all day with 50 lbs of gear and see how quickly you can swing it around.

and add the fact that it really isn't pleasent on the arms if you've been firing that gun quite a bit

Avatar image for Virus214
Virus214

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Virus214
Member since 2007 • 2052 Posts

guns are heavy, most people can't just whip them around

then again...halo isn't exactly realistic

Mr_Apple_Soup
Actually. It is. It's based in the future, and everything is made out of a different material, not like steel. So it is more lightweight, hence the jumpin distance in the warthog.. which would be too heavy in RL today....
Avatar image for swazidoughman
swazidoughman

3520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 91

User Lists: 0

#30 swazidoughman
Member since 2008 • 3520 Posts

guns are heavy, most people can't just whip them around

then again...halo isn't exactly realistic

Mr_Apple_Soup

True, but it makes the game feel like crap.

and fun should always go before realism.

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

[QUOTE="Sully28"][QUOTE="jethrovegas"]

The **** is this?

Mr_Apple_Soup

hahaha thank you! i was just bout to say, COD 4 is not realistic by any means.


:|

you didn't find the single player a tad more believable then most of the other shooters out there?

No. The health regen system is not realistic and their is no logical explanation behind it for the game. At least in games like Halo and Crysis their is some realistic background to it.
Avatar image for Prydes
Prydes

559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 Prydes
Member since 2008 • 559 Posts
Killzone 2 the greatest game of all time is better than Halo 3.
Avatar image for LEGEND_C4A
LEGEND_C4A

3186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 LEGEND_C4A
Member since 2003 • 3186 Posts

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]Who wants to play a realistic shooter anyway?Mr_Apple_Soup

apparently the millions of people who bought COD4...i'm not saying i prefer realistic shooters, i'll take R2 and Halo 3 over CoD games anyday, but most developers are aiming to stay in the realm of realism nowadays

nothing about COD is realistic:P

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#37 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Timesplitters is faster... and you can turn off autoaim.
Avatar image for t3hTwinky
t3hTwinky

3701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#38 t3hTwinky
Member since 2005 • 3701 Posts

I hold seven pounds in front of me every time I urinate.

It ain't a big deal.

jethrovegas

Peeing on midgets is not cool.

Some of them are decent people.

Avatar image for TenP
TenP

3338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#39 TenP
Member since 2006 • 3338 Posts

So you like fast aiming and you choose halo 3 instead of one of the 9 billion PC shooters released this gen?

Huh.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#40 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
If you put FPS and Best in the same sentence without KZ2 automatic Fail.djsifer01
Its called an opinion Saying Killzone 2 is the best isn't a fact, its an opinion.....and forget being the best shooter ever, i would argue it still isn't the best shooter this gen.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#41 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
anyway my top shooter for single player Probably Crysis or STALKER Shadow of Chernboyl For Multiplayer so far its Halo 3 and Team Fortress 2, but I think Killzone 2 has a good shot of joining them...we will see.
Avatar image for strudel420
strudel420

3687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 strudel420
Member since 2006 • 3687 Posts

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]Who wants to play a realistic shooter anyway?Mr_Apple_Soup

apparently the millions of people who bought COD4...i'm not saying i prefer realistic shooters, i'll take R2 and Halo 3 over CoD games anyday, but most developers are aiming to stay in the realm of realism nowadays

Oh man... you are joking I hope.

Avatar image for -Jiggles-
-Jiggles-

4356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 -Jiggles-
Member since 2008 • 4356 Posts

Things that should be addressed in this thread:

1 - Standard assault rifles aren't heavy, unless your arms are parallel in diameter with a garden hose.

2 - Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare is anti-realistic. The only FPS games I've played that I would consider realistic are S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl, Operation Flashpoint and Red Orchestra; Call of Duty 4 isn't even a fraction of realism in comparison.

3 - Killzone to being "the best FPS this gen" is opinion, not fact. If you were to ask me what I felt the best FPS this generation was so far, it would either be Team Fortress 2 or Left 4 Dead. Nevertheless, Halo 3 is an excellent shooter.

Avatar image for Toriko42
Toriko42

27562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 45

User Lists: 0

#44 Toriko42
Member since 2006 • 27562 Posts
Halo 3 is the best console FPS this gen in terms of reviews, bar none. It's also the best.
Avatar image for TenP
TenP

3338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#45 TenP
Member since 2006 • 3338 Posts

Oh man... you are joking I hope.

strudel420

People usually think Real-guns = Real-istic

Avatar image for treedoor
treedoor

7648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 treedoor
Member since 2004 • 7648 Posts

The reason Halo 3 is my favorite FPS this gen?

The weapons and vehicles are balanced. A skilled player always wins. There's no god mode anything. It makes online awesome.

Not to mention the community is huge, and come time for Halo ODST that number will get bigger.

Avatar image for PSdual_wielder
PSdual_wielder

10646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 PSdual_wielder
Member since 2003 • 10646 Posts
[QUOTE="Mr_Apple_Soup"]

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]Who wants to play a realistic shooter anyway?strudel420

apparently the millions of people who bought COD4...i'm not saying i prefer realistic shooters, i'll take R2 and Halo 3 over CoD games anyday, but most developers are aiming to stay in the realm of realism nowadays

Oh man... you are joking I hope.

I think I know what he's talking about. Not neccessarily "realistic" gun mechanics, but a lot of people play CoD4 expecting it to be the most realistic military-themed shooter. What the game goes for is being American military and all that crap. The theme of the game kind of realistic, people may expect that out of the game, but obviously when they play it the guns are nowhere close to their real life counterparts.

Avatar image for porky_ownsu
porky_ownsu

1287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 porky_ownsu
Member since 2008 • 1287 Posts
[QUOTE="Mr_Apple_Soup"]

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]Who wants to play a realistic shooter anyway?jethrovegas

apparently the millions of people who bought COD4...i'm not saying i prefer realistic shooters, i'll take R2 and Halo 3 over CoD games anyday, but most developers are aiming to stay in the realm of realism nowadays

The **** is this?

call of duty 4 is not realistic, by any stretch of the imagination.
Avatar image for walter429
walter429

392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 walter429
Member since 2007 • 392 Posts
Dunno about all this "realism" talk, but KZ 2's controls are anything but slow at max sensitivy. They're pretty sensitive one you're at +2.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
*looks at mouse* Yeah ah, fast aiming.