So far Halo 3 is still my favorite FPS ths gen, and its all possible simply....

[QUOTE="swamplord666"]

personally i find halo 3 very overrated. I just do not find it that fun. I only play when i'm with my friends. I just don't like how "floaty" everything feels. guns fell like nerf guns because of the impact, do not like the floaty jumping, nor the fact that it takes a full clip to take anyone down (or a half clip and a melee). I do agree that weapons are balanced and skilled players are commendable. Basically the Halo style doesn't suit me.

My favorite FPS (multiplayerwise) this gen would have to be either TF2 or KZ2.

RobNBankz

It does not take a full clip to take someone down. Grab a BR, four shots to the head. You're a nub who uses the AR? It only takes about half a clip to the head. Then again, people don't have aim so I won't blame you for thinking it takes a full clip to kill someone.

Learn how to play a game instead of bashing it because you suck. I hate when people do that. The game isn't bad, you are.

Great on you if you love Halo and are good at it. Don't call me a hater because I suck at it. I have a valid reason to not like it as much as other FPS's but for some "odd" reason you seem to have completely ignoredmy reason that i disliked it.

[QUOTE="Mr_Apple_Soup"]

guns are heavy, most people can't just whip them around

then again...halo isn't exactly realistic

Stevo_the_gamer

Killzone 2 was going for a more gritty, down to earth feel. The guns are heeeeavy, as well as all the gear they carry. I love the physics in Killzone 2, slow spinning and all.

[QUOTE="RobNBankz"][QUOTE="swamplord666"]

personally i find halo 3 very overrated. I just do not find it that fun. I only play when i'm with my friends. I just don't like how "floaty" everything feels. guns fell like nerf guns because of the impact, do not like the floaty jumping, nor the fact that it takes a full clip to take anyone down (or a half clip and a melee). I do agree that weapons are balanced and skilled players are commendable. Basically the Halo style doesn't suit me.

My favorite FPS (multiplayerwise) this gen would have to be either TF2 or KZ2.

swamplord666

It does not take a full clip to take someone down. Grab a BR, four shots to the head. You're a nub who uses the AR? It only takes about half a clip to the head. Then again, people don't have aim so I won't blame you for thinking it takes a full clip to kill someone.

Learn how to play a game instead of bashing it because you suck. I hate when people do that. The game isn't bad, you are.

Great on you if you love Halo and are good at it. Don't call me a hater because I suck at it. I have a valid reason to not like it as much as other FPS's but for some "odd" reason you seem to have completely ignoredmy reason that i disliked it.

[QUOTE="swamplord666"][QUOTE="RobNBankz"]Ah yes, the typical Halo hater who doesn't know how to play it, so they think it's overrated. Don't you guys hate when games are no different than the next? There is not another shooter that plays like Halo, unless you dumb things down and say "it has guns, so does this game"

It does not take a full clip to take someone down. Grab a BR, four shots to the head. You're a nub who uses the AR? It only takes about half a clip to the head. Then again, people don't have aim so I won't blame you for thinking it takes a full clip to kill someone.

Learn how to play a game instead of bashing it because you suck. I hate when people do that. The game isn't bad, you are.

pi3m4ster

Great on you if you love Halo and are good at it. Don't call me a hater because I suck at it. I have a valid reason to not like it as much as other FPS's but for some "odd" reason you seem to have completely ignoredmy reason that i disliked it.

to the head it should. Seriously some people here have selective reading skills... is that all you gathered from what i just wrote??

[QUOTE="Sully28"][QUOTE="jethrovegas"]

The **** is this?

Mr_Apple_Soup

hahaha thank you! i was just bout to say, COD 4 is not realistic by any means.

:|

you didn't find the single player a tad more believable then most of the other shooters out there?

[QUOTE="pi3m4ster"][QUOTE="swamplord666"] Yeah, I'll admit i'm bad at halo 3. But i don't hate it because i suck at it. In most online FPS's I suck compared to most people like TF2. But i enjoy TF2 even tho i suck at it. All i said was I don't like the Halo style of FPS. And i'm sorry but you're not convincing me by saying that "it only takes half a clip to the head". IMO it should take a fraction of a clip to head to take a guy out.

Great on you if you love Halo and are good at it. Don't call me a hater because I suck at it. I have a valid reason to not like it as much as other FPS's but for some "odd" reason you seem to have completely ignoredmy reason that i disliked it.

swamplord666

to the head it should. Seriously some people here have selective reading skills... is that all you gathered from what i just wrote??

If you put FPS and Best in the same sentence without KZ2 automatic Fail.djsifer01

Well, for consoles goldeneye, perfect dark, orange box, riddick and the halo series are still the highest rated FPS's so it's no automatic fail!

More damage control. Seriously why can't a good shooter be on the PS3 with out all this nonsense? TheOrigin

damage control? I think some people are just reacting to cows saying killzone II is the best FPS on consoles! And critically it's not! The best graphics on consoles? Yes, but not the best FPS

[QUOTE="swamplord666"][QUOTE="pi3m4ster"] No it should not take a afraction of a clip. pi3m4ster

to the head it should. Seriously some people here have selective reading skills... is that all you gathered from what i just wrote??

that has nothing to do with what i just said... what do you mean by individual strategy? what does firing wildly have to do with headshots? on the contrary headshots are supposed to be a question of skill because it takes precise aiming on a moving target. Care to explain what you meant in your post and the relevance to what i said?

More damage control. Seriously why can't a good shooter be on the PS3 with out all this nonsense? TheOrigin

more like, why can't cows admit halo 3 is a good game, quality wise?

[QUOTE="swamplord666"][QUOTE="pi3m4ster"] No it should not take a afraction of a clip. pi3m4ster

I just wish they put more emphasis on the campaign. The first Halo had a really great campaign that I played through dozens of times with friends. But none of the levels in the new campaign really stood out to me.darkmoney52

As a big Halo fan i had that feeling when i played Halo2. On the other hand Halo3 campaign is awesome. Easily on pair with Halo1 one imo

[QUOTE="swamplord666"]

personally i find halo 3 very overrated. I just do not find it that fun. I only play when i'm with my friends. I just don't like how "floaty" everything feels. guns fell like nerf guns because of the impact, do not like the floaty jumping, nor the fact that it takes a full clip to take anyone down (or a half clip and a melee). I do agree that weapons are balanced and skilled players are commendable. Basically the Halo style doesn't suit me.

My favorite FPS (multiplayerwise) this gen would have to be either TF2 or KZ2.

RobNBankz

It does not take a full clip to take someone down. Grab a BR, four shots to the head. You're a nub who uses the AR? It only takes about half a clip to the head. Then again, people don't have aim so I won't blame you for thinking it takes a full clip to kill someone.

Learn how to play a game instead of bashing it because you suck. I hate when people do that. The game isn't bad, you are.