So if BF3 is not going to be the graphics king then why...

Nvidia/AMD want games to be unoptimized to sell more graphics cards

so no dobut BF3 will be poorly optimized, when in truth a 9800x could max it out, but Nvidia/AMD want you to upgrade

HaloinventedFPS

are the reqs so high? I mean it makes no sense to me if they say it wont look better than crysis 1 then whats the point in saying you would need a monster pc to max it?

and im really a noob at judging graphics, nor have I seen any full hd pics/videos of BF3 in action so I really cant say if it looks better than crysis or not

lightleggy

because the physics engine will probably be a lot more pc consuming, is not only about shiny graphics but particles and stuff

Nvidia/AMD want games to be unoptimized to sell more graphics cards

so no dobut BF3 will be poorly optimized, when in truth a 9800x could max it out, but Nvidia/AMD want you to upgrade

HaloinventedFPS