I constantly see lemmings thrashing PSN and clamoring on how XBL is so much of a better experience, how it's one of the best aspects of the system.
And yet when a X360-PS3 price comparison pops up and someone points out that the service costs $50 a year, many lemmings immediately backpeddle and say that you only need silver, which is free.
I see almost all of you with gamertags in your sig and you're trying to defend that it's an option? true, but it's an option that the majority (and you) are just so willingly paying for:|
Reality Check - Silver dosent even let you play games online (okay, maybe once in a blue moon on a free weekend:|), which is the biggest and best part of XBL; agreed, lemmings?
So what will it be: Suck it up and accept that youre getting hit with $50 annually- or leave Silver as the norm, and admit that PSN is as good as XBL in general?
And another thing, the Wifi argument, stop trying to justify using ethernet cables to steer off tacking on another $100 to the 360's price.
1 - Wifi is the future.
2 - A good group of gamers already own a Wireless Router for their PC and want to put it to work (with their consoles)
3 - The average console owner does not have a Broadband Equipped PC with Modem in the same room as their gaming setup. A good deal of us live in 2 stories. You want to justify running ethernet cables 80+ feet throughout our house or drilling holes through the ceiling?:| Much more logical to use a wireless setup, accept it.
Then again, if the 360 came with those things standard you wouldnt be fighting yourselves out of a corner each time this argument comes up.
360 Core & Premium: No rechargeable batteries included, no Wifi Standard, no wireless controllers standard, pay-to-play online; "Next-Gen comes optional"
Log in to comment