So the impressive PS3 graphics never came

  • 84 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kage_53
kage_53

12671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#51 kage_53
Member since 2006 • 12671 Posts
[QUOTE="OrlandoEngelaar"][QUOTE="Toriko42"][QUOTE="HoldThePhone"]

Well, I think it looks good anyways.

SpruceCaboose

And it is multiplat now...

Yeah it will be dumbed down.

Why, was it being developed for PC originally?

...................All games are created on the PC.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
[QUOTE="LOXO7"][QUOTE="FamiBox"]

Sony lies... as usual.

Did the PS2 "Toy Story" graphics ever come? Nope.

karasill

lol That was xbox. Because it came out after and people were hyping it up more, just like Ps3 is now to the 350. Uhh but Ms beaten sony out the door first and it may have made some already accustom with the graphics. ..*

No. I actually still have the magazine somewhere about this topic and it was Sony that said the PS2 could produce Toy Story like graphics. They obviously lied because the PS3 can't even do that.

Rumors, what can you do? oh yeah, call them names. Walmart said i had to buy a whole bunch of bateries and a generator and water and just supplies in general because the computers were not going to compute 1999 to 2000. Boy i feel silly.

Avatar image for karasill
karasill

3155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 karasill
Member since 2007 • 3155 Posts
[QUOTE="karasill"][QUOTE="LOXO7"][QUOTE="FamiBox"]

Sony lies... as usual.

Did the PS2 "Toy Story" graphics ever come? Nope.

LOXO7

lol That was xbox. Because it came out after and people were hyping it up more, just like Ps3 is now to the 350. Uhh but Ms beaten sony out the door first and it may have made some already accustom with the graphics. ..*

No. I actually still have the magazine somewhere about this topic and it was Sony that said the PS2 could produce Toy Story like graphics. They obviously lied because the PS3 can't even do that.

Rumors, what can you do? oh yeah, call them names. Walmart said i had to buy a whole bunch of bateries and a generator and water and just supplies in general because the computers were not going to compute 1999 to 2000. Boy i feel silly.

Way to spin it :lol: Doesn't change the fact that Sony overhyped the machine and lied to people about it's processing power. I remember watchin an interview about the devs for Twisted Metal Black saying the power of the PS2 was infinite. :lol: It was all hype. And you should feel silly.
Avatar image for insomnia37
insomnia37

1442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#54 insomnia37
Member since 2004 • 1442 Posts
Uncharted and MGS4?? I believe those games are out already!
Avatar image for queenster08
queenster08

859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 queenster08
Member since 2005 • 859 Posts
[QUOTE="OrlandoEngelaar"][QUOTE="Toriko42"][QUOTE="HoldThePhone"]

Well, I think it looks good anyways.

SpruceCaboose

And it is multiplat now...

Yeah it will be dumbed down.

Why, was it being developed for PC originally?

LOL

Avatar image for mhsdrake
mhsdrake

3091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 mhsdrake
Member since 2007 • 3091 Posts
IMO ps3 graphics are slightly better and processing power slightly better. Also the ps3 has more room for improvement in the coming years. I havnt seen a game on the x360 which is as viusally impressive as uncharted, or heavenly sword.
Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#57 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

Uncharted, Rachet & Clank, and Little Big Planet already proved that. When Killzone 2 comes out next year, forget it, X-box 360 wouldn't even catch up. The X-Box 360 has probably reached it limit with Gears of War 2 as it looks like a slight improvement from GeOW 1.MaximumD

I don't see either system improving vastly over what's already out. Maybe 25% better looking at the most. Uncharted, Ratchet and Clank, etc.. could all be done on the XBox 360 and look exactly the same. So your point is pretty mute. The XBox 360 GPU is slightly better then the PS3. This has been confirmed by developers all over the world. That explains why some of the 2rd party multiplat titles look a bit better on the XBox 360. By 2011 it won't matter much as both Nintendo and Microsoft will be launching news systems that year.

Avatar image for woobabooba
woobabooba

1251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 woobabooba
Member since 2008 • 1251 Posts

They should release the ageia physX unreal tournament 3 maps for ps3.....ageia used to say cell was good for its physics back in the day.

even though ut3 only 30 fps on ps3 should stay pretty stable .

Avatar image for woobabooba
woobabooba

1251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 woobabooba
Member since 2008 • 1251 Posts
[QUOTE="karasill"][QUOTE="blazed0000"]

Killzone 2 is more advanced graphically then anything on the 360. Movie quality motion blur, real time reloading, and character models that make gears 2 look like last gen.

blazed0000

That is by far one of the funniest things I've read today. So KillZone 2 will make Gears 2 look like a PS2 game? That's what you're basically saying. I could turn this on you and say Gears 2 will make Killzone 2 look last gen because it has way better textures, more enemies on screen, better physics, etc... See what I did there? Grow up and stop being a fanboy.

Those horrible textures look barely better then xbox 1's tbh.

every game has bad textures......including crysis.

ive seen worse looking textures in crysis and killzone2.

Avatar image for Timstuff
Timstuff

26840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#60 Timstuff
Member since 2002 • 26840 Posts

[QUOTE="munu9"]I think many would agree LBP is more visually impressive than any 360 game. MGS4 isn't bad either. BioShockOwnz

LBP could easily be done on 360, visually. Actually, Banjo has some of the same stuff going on...

Image 81

Are you kidding? Banjo's Nuts looks like a joke compared to Little Big Planet. If you want to make a compelling argument, try comparing Gears 2 with MGS4-- however, Killzone 2's visuals so far look quite a bit grander than Gears 2 due to it's epic scale.

Avatar image for MojondeVACA
MojondeVACA

3916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 MojondeVACA
Member since 2008 • 3916 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="munu9"]I think many would agree LBP is more visually impressive than any 360 game. MGS4 isn't bad either. Timstuff

LBP could easily be done on 360, visually. Actually, Banjo has some of the same stuff going on...


Are you kidding? Banjo's Nuts looks like a joke compared to Little Big Planet. If you want to make a compelling argument, try comparing Gears 2 with MGS4-- however, Killzone 2's visuals so far look quite a bit grander than Gears 2 due to it's epic scale.



Linear shooters don't have epic ''scale'' the only games with epic scale are Crysis,FarCry2 and Stalker.
Avatar image for supras989
supras989

1558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#62 supras989
Member since 2006 • 1558 Posts
[QUOTE="Timstuff"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="munu9"]I think many would agree LBP is more visually impressive than any 360 game. MGS4 isn't bad either. MojondeVACA

LBP could easily be done on 360, visually. Actually, Banjo has some of the same stuff going on...


Are you kidding? Banjo's Nuts looks like a joke compared to Little Big Planet. If you want to make a compelling argument, try comparing Gears 2 with MGS4-- however, Killzone 2's visuals so far look quite a bit grander than Gears 2 due to it's epic scale.



Linear shooters don't have epic ''scale'' the only games with epic scale are Crysis,FarCry2 and Stalker.

i second that
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts

hype, since the PS3 wasn't out and sony needed something to distract people who wanted to jump IN with the 360. Sony did it with the dreamcast and it worked, the lies worked and people were just easy to get to back then and since Sega was a finacial mess, they died.

different this time. and people are just much wiser...

Avatar image for gamewhat
gamewhat

926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 gamewhat
Member since 2007 • 926 Posts

Don't know why 360 fans are up in arms with sony saying their console is the most powerful. Remember Microsoft said the same thing about their console being vastly superior. Just check out some of the ps3 vs 360 articles from 2006. Anyone remember the ps3's 250 million triangles per second vs 360's 500 million triangles per second; and the list goes on and on with the 360 stomping the crap out of the ps3 in every catagory.

Where is the 360's power at? certainly doesn't show in games. The T.C is right. Personally i don't care which system is better. I have both and I can tell you that I love my 360 as much as my ps3. They are both equal in gameplay and graphics. It's when you have to pay to play online is when the difference shows. It sucks but hey I still love my 360. Use the 360 for single player games like deadspace and ps3 for multiplayer games like farcry if you can and the world is a much better place.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
they are both equal, and both consoles offer some fantastic games with beautiful graphics, you can't decide which has the better graphics based on exclusives cos for all you know geow2 could look just as good on the ps3 and killzone 2 could look just as good on the 360, i go by multiplats and as far as i can see all multiplats are identical on both systems, i wish people would stop using arguments (like exclusives) that can never be proved.
Avatar image for ukillwegrill
ukillwegrill

3528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#66 ukillwegrill
Member since 2007 • 3528 Posts

Don't know why 360 fans are up in arms with sony saying their console is the most powerful. Remember Microsoft said the same thing about their console being vastly superior. Just check out some of the ps3 vs 360 articles from 2006. Anyone remember the ps3's 250 million triangles per second vs 360's 500 million triangles per second; and the list goes on and on with the 360 stomping the crap out of the ps3 in every catagory.

Where is the 360's power at? certainly doesn't show in games. The T.C is right. Personally i don't care which system is better. I have both and I can tell you that I love my 360 as much as my ps3. They are both equal in gameplay and graphics. It's when you have to pay to play online is when the difference shows. It sucks but hey I still love my 360. Use the 360 for single player games like deadspace and ps3 for multiplayer games like farcry if you can and the world is a much better place.

gamewhat

But that's true ... You jsut though it would have a huge impact.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
i guess i'm from that camp that neither console has released anything that i thought was definitively better than the other.
Avatar image for Snugenz
Snugenz

13388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Snugenz
Member since 2006 • 13388 Posts

The PS3 has games with very impressive graphics. Just like the 360.SpruceCaboose

QFT.

Sony hyped the PS3 to be more than what it is, but its in no way a slouch when it comes to graphics.

Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts

Remember just 2-3 years ago how everyone were like the PS3 will be much better than the XBOX360 on the graphics side, cpu etc...

Years later, the graphics are absolutly the same, and so is the cpu power. I did well to buy a XBOX360 as soon it came out.

AC2010

that is because they make the games for each system equal, it saves them money then building it from scratch for each system. yes, the ps3 can have better graphics than the 360, its just a matter if and company is willing to spend the extra money to make the game that way.

Avatar image for infamous_27
infamous_27

857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 infamous_27
Member since 2008 • 857 Posts
why do ps3 fans care so much about graphics now? last gen microsoft had much better graphics and you know how that turned out..
Avatar image for leadernator
leadernator

9064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 leadernator
Member since 2003 • 9064 Posts
Well the best looking PS3 games look better than the best looking 360 games... PS3 being one year behind, i'd say it's pretty impressive.
Avatar image for leadernator
leadernator

9064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 leadernator
Member since 2003 • 9064 Posts

why do ps3 fans care so much about graphics now? last gen microsoft had much better graphics and you know how that turned out..infamous_27

Why do 360 fans care about JRPGS now?

Same $*it.

Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#73 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts

[QUOTE="infamous_27"]why do ps3 fans care so much about graphics now? last gen microsoft had much better graphics and you know how that turned out..leadernator

Why do 360 fans care about JRPGS now?

Same $*it.

/agree

Avatar image for AtrumRegina
AtrumRegina

1584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 AtrumRegina
Member since 2008 • 1584 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="munu9"]I think many would agree LBP is more visually impressive than any 360 game. MGS4 isn't bad either. munu9

LBP could easily be done on 360, visually. Actually, Banjo has some of the same stuff going on...

I still think LBP, with it's actually giant levels (full 3 story high buildings, like 150 times taller than sack boy) and the game's phsysics, and art **** and fire effects and such (albeit similar to banjo) combine to make an overall graphically superior game than anything the 360 has.

Your not normal

A 2d platformer ...wow EVEN THE WII COULD DO THAT . LBP looks ugly and it's unimpressive graphically ...SOny promised 4d and delivered only 2 lol.

Avatar image for shoeman12
shoeman12

8744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#75 shoeman12
Member since 2005 • 8744 Posts
they're equal to the 360's at this point and will stay that way.
Avatar image for naruto7777
naruto7777

8059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 naruto7777
Member since 2007 • 8059 Posts
yes its about gameplay these days
Avatar image for munu9
munu9

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#77 munu9
Member since 2004 • 11109 Posts

As a crazed LBP fanboy, I completely disagree.

BioShockOwnz

Just because your a crazed LBP fanboy, doesn't mean your opinion should be more credible than mine. Explain your position

Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts
Yet RE5 looks better than killzone and gears2 hmmmm :roll:
Avatar image for gamefan274
gamefan274

1863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#79 gamefan274
Member since 2007 • 1863 Posts

Don't know why 360 fans are up in arms with sony saying their console is the most powerful. Remember Microsoft said the same thing about their console being vastly superior. Just check out some of the ps3 vs 360 articles from 2006. Anyone remember the ps3's 250 million triangles per second vs 360's 500 million triangles per second; and the list goes on and on with the 360 stomping the crap out of the ps3 in every catagory.

Where is the 360's power at? certainly doesn't show in games. The T.C is right. Personally i don't care which system is better. I have both and I can tell you that I love my 360 as much as my ps3. They are both equal in gameplay and graphics. It's when you have to pay to play online is when the difference shows. It sucks but hey I still love my 360. Use the 360 for single player games like deadspace and ps3 for multiplayer games like farcry if you can and the world is a much better place.

gamewhat

Sir, that is the first time I have ever heard that online was better on the PS3. I think I'll cry...

On topic, I own all 3. Haven't been too impressed with tha 360. Looks ok but really Gears has been the only game to really show off what the system can do. Look at PS2 games. In the beginning, they were awful but games of more recent release look pretty good in terms of quality. It seems, with the 360 being much easier to use, has already peaked while the PS3 has many years for someone to make a game (like gears) to show off the true potential of the console.

Avatar image for gdp72
gdp72

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 gdp72
Member since 2007 • 1270 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

[QUOTE="munu9"]I think many would agree LBP is more visually impressive than any 360 game. MGS4 isn't bad either. MaximumD

LBP is really stunning, but its not that much better than things on 360, such as Viva Pinata, Kameo, etc.

In fact, I have yet to play a game on PS3 or 360 that I thought could not be done on the other system.

I have Kameo on 360 and it doesn't even look as good as Rachet & Clank.

Being an owner of both games, I would have to disagree.

Avatar image for caseypayne69
caseypayne69

5396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#81 caseypayne69
Member since 2002 • 5396 Posts
[QUOTE="HoldThePhone"]

adsdasasdsadfWell, I think it looks good anyways.

Toriko42

And it is multiplat now...

yOUR LOOKING AT A PS3 screen. 360 hasn't even entered into production.

Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts

Remember just 2-3 years ago how everyone were like the PS3 will be much better than the XBOX360 on the graphics side, cpu etc...

Years later, the graphics are absolutly the same, and so is the cpu power. I did well to buy a XBOX360 as soon it came out.

AC2010

Yes, at a cheaper price point also. Which is still true today, if both consoels were equal then PS3 owners paid extra cash jsut for the BR player and a $2 integrated WIFI adapter....

Avatar image for mikhail_tisoy
mikhail_tisoy

216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#83 mikhail_tisoy
Member since 2007 • 216 Posts
Wait until 2011, then GT should be out and if the enviornments are vastly improved (to match the cars) then they can talk.Nintendo_Man
Avatar image for xion1234
xion1234

235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 xion1234
Member since 2007 • 235 Posts
[QUOTE="HoldThePhone"]

adsdasasdsadfWell, I think it looks good anyways.

Toriko42
And it is multiplat now...

thats the ps3 one the 360 is not even being done untill the ps3