@ DerekLoffin No. You are just making the typical Internet reaction about it "its bad news because its ticking off existing owners and its ticking off devs". If there is truth to this then it isn't ticking off as many owners as you assume. It would if it was just an all new model but (once again pretending this is true) there is an add on for existing 3DS owners. That is not making current 3DS systems obsolete is it?
Its no worse than going and buying four seperate Move devices. If you have to play a multiplayer game with Move (some of which Move is a standard) then you have to buy at least a second controller. That is ticking off customers who bought move in the first place. See I can do that too.
icegamerice
Yeah, and how much support is move getting again? Hardly any other than some poor tacked on optional controls. Plus that is a home console, you don't get away with this kind of stuff on portable system which are supposed to be a single unit. It WILL tick off current owners (sure not all, but a good chunk of them), and dev's won't be ticked, they just won't use it, or at best it will be optional like move, making it rather pointless as an upgrade. This is all around a stupid premiss anyway. Nintendo would have to be SERIOUSLY desperate to change the controls on the device this quickly, and there is really no reason they should be that desperate. I haven't heard wide screams for a second analog out of developers, and sales haven't even been properly analyzed yet from the price drop, let alone getting the good games out to conclude the public is seriously desiring such a change either. The only way this is true is there is some major behind closed doors hard talking coming from the dev community threatening to drop out, and I just don't see it, and splitting your salesbase is the last way you want to appease developers.
Log in to comment