Not to mention 153 multiplats as found by digital foundry.True. So not only does the 360 have far more quality games but the games they do share are most times better on the 360.[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]Funny how cows try to act like the PS3 has so many games when the 360 has 74 more retail games that are either AAA,AA, or A and 75 more games that are AAA,AA or A on XBL then on PSN. That means the 360 has 149 more quality games then the PS3.groverslanding
So we can count on a PS4?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Not to mention 153 multiplats as found by digital foundry.[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]Funny how cows try to act like the PS3 has so many games when the 360 has 74 more retail games that are either AAA,AA, or A and 75 more games that are AAA,AA or A on XBL then on PSN. That means the 360 has 149 more quality games then the PS3.groverslanding
Since you and the other remaining idiot lemmings bound to your face are bragging about them, have you played all 153 of them? :lol:
[QUOTE="arkephonic"]
[QUOTE="dante1st"]I'm sure there'll be a PS4, and I'm sure it'll once again be a second rate system.groverslanding
Lol, second rate system. Give me a break, where do these people come from.
Technically it's true. 360 is way ahead in overall library and third party support so PS3 is indeed second rate. Naw, the 360 is only ahead when lems like yourself start setting their own stupid little criteria like "AA and AAA games according only to gamespot" ect. Heres the down and dirty facts, Half the games in the 360's library, are kinect games that you wouldn't even care about, and you work for M$! Also, not to mention that the well over 75% of the 360's library IS ALSO AVAILABLE on the PS3. So not only does the PS3 GET every single multi plat that the 360 does, but the PS3 also gets the more and better exclusives too- on top of all that! True gamers in the real world know that the PS3 has been crushing the 360 in exclusives..in quality and in quantity ..for the past couple of years. And if not for the more then 1 year head start for M$, then the PS3 would have a much bigger lead on paper But paper doesn't decide everything. Common sense alone can tell you what system has the games and the exclusives games. But then again, lems like yourself, won't ever let logic or facts get in the way of your agenda and or trolling. So carry on with your crazy self PhonesmugWow that link of Sony being down to a mere 18 billion from 100 billion net worth has the Cows fuming :lol:[QUOTE="KingsofQueens"]
Phonemaggot and Groversanidiot = the laughing stocks on Lemming LaLa Land :lol:
Whatever makes you turds sleep at night.
Most Lemmings have already refuse to be associated with you dumbasses.
groverslanding
And Sony's existence has you crying rambling crying rambling crying rambling for almost 2 solid months.....creating threads after threads after threads, new accounts after new accounts after new accounts..........and still counting :lol:
The PS3 commands just as strong as third party support as the 360 does. And in fact, one of the best FPS in Battlefield 3 was superior in every way on the PS3. But unlike the 360, the PS3 has amazing first party support to its fullest. For you to say that Sony lost the hardcore, when the PS3 is the chosen console of the core gamer, And when it(the PS3) is the console that is most for -and supports- the core gamer currently ... Well you have clearly lost what little marbles you had left in your head then.. If we are just making up ridiculous sh* t at this point, Then I might as well go ahead, and say that: I'm the richest man in the universe, I date Audrina Lima, I can bench press 900 pounds, I have a 15 inch **** And I can beat up Shogun Rua, Anderson Silva, and Jon Jones all combined in less then 10 seconds. Horray me!I stopped reading right there.[QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"][QUOTE="groverslanding"]They already command the core market with superior 3rd party support so they can afford to focus on Kinect.
Sony lost the hardcore market and failed to gain any traction in the casual space with Move so they are desperately trying to survive in the core market and will probably try to take a casual approach next gen if they can release a console.
groverslanding
3rd parties have clearly made the 360 first priority with 153 superior multiplats because software sales on the 360 are the highest.
Again, here you lems go with your crazy , distorted, and misconstrued useses of irrelevant stats. You really are trying to impersonate the sleazy politicians at M$ as best you can, uh! Well you have succedded in doing so Phonesmug! Oh and you should re-check the numbers because you are wrong as always! The fact of the matter is that the PS3 gets every single milti plat that the 360 does + all those awesome exclusives that the 360 doesn't get! And the differences are so insignificant between the 360 and PS3 versions of multi plats, that you'd be hard pressed to even tell the versions apart if no one told you which version was which. And if you truly cared about NOTICEABLY better lookimg multi plats , then you'd get the damn PC version![QUOTE="groverslanding"]Technically it's true. 360 is way ahead in overall library and third party support so PS3 is indeed second rate. Naw, the 360 is only ahead when lems like yourself start including their own stupid little criteria like "AA, and AAE games according only to gamespot" And half the games in the 360's library, are kinect games that you wouldn't even care about, and you work for M$! Also, not to mention that the well over 75% of the 360's library IS ALSO AVAILABLE on the PS3. So not only does the PS3 GET every single multi plat that the 360 does, but the PS3 also gets the more and better exclusives too..on top of all that! Gamers in the real world know that the PS3 has been crushing the 360 in exclusives..in quality and in quantity ..for the past couple of years. And if not for the more then 1 year head start for M$, then the PS3 would have a much bigger lead on paper. Even though common sense alone can tell you what system has the games and the exclusives games. But then again, lems like you, won't ever let logic or facts get in the way of your agendas or trolling. So.carry on with your crazy self PhonesmugI did not read your insane ramblings but just wanted you to know[QUOTE="arkephonic"]
Lol, second rate system. Give me a break, where do these people come from.
DrakesHaloGears
Between retail and XBL games the 360 has 149 more AAA,AA,A games
https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AriQpIFbPoEacGM1b0xxcGVucFQ3OFc4N3BNZmd2QkE&gid=1
The games that the 360 and PS3 do share of the ones tested the 360 has 153 better multiplat games and the PS3 only has 38
http://misterslimm.wordpress.com/360-vs-ps3/xbox-360-vs-ps3-head-to-head-face-off-results/
The 360 has far more games and the ones they do share are normally better on the 360.
Wow that link of Sony being down to a mere 18 billion from 100 billion net worth has the Cows fuming :lol:[QUOTE="groverslanding"]
[QUOTE="KingsofQueens"]
Phonemaggot and Groversanidiot = the laughing stocks on Lemming LaLa Land :lol:
Whatever makes you turds sleep at night.
Most Lemmings have already refuse to be associated with you dumbasses.
KingsofQueens
And Sony's existence has you crying rambling crying rambling crying rambling for almost 2 solid months.....creating threads after threads after threads, new accounts after new accounts after new accounts..........and still counting :lol:
I talk about gaming. You talk about me.Goes to show who has no argument :lol:
Naw, the 360 is only ahead when lems like yourself start including their own stupid little criteria like "AA, and AAE games according only to gamespot" And half the games in the 360's library, are kinect games that you wouldn't even care about, and you work for M$! Also, not to mention that the well over 75% of the 360's library IS ALSO AVAILABLE on the PS3. So not only does the PS3 GET every single multi plat that the 360 does, but the PS3 also gets the more and better exclusives too..on top of all that! Gamers in the real world know that the PS3 has been crushing the 360 in exclusives..in quality and in quantity ..for the past couple of years. And if not for the more then 1 year head start for M$, then the PS3 would have a much bigger lead on paper. Even though common sense alone can tell you what system has the games and the exclusives games. But then again, lems like you, won't ever let logic or facts get in the way of your agendas or trolling. So.carry on with your crazy self PhonesmugI did not read your insane ramblings but just wanted you to know[QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"][QUOTE="groverslanding"]Technically it's true. 360 is way ahead in overall library and third party support so PS3 is indeed second rate.
CanYouDiglt
Between retail and XBL games the 360 has 149 more AAA,AA,A games
https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AriQpIFbPoEacGM1b0xxcGVucFQ3OFc4N3BNZmd2QkE&gid=1
The games that the 360 and PS3 do share of the ones tested the 360 has 153 better multiplat games and the PS3 only has 38
http://misterslimm.wordpress.com/360-vs-ps3/xbox-360-vs-ps3-head-to-head-face-off-results/
The 360 has far more games and the ones they do share are normally better on the 360.
Owneddddd!Naw, the 360 is only ahead when lems like yourself start including their own stupid little criteria like "AA, and AAE games according only to gamespot" And half the games in the 360's library, are kinect games that you wouldn't even care about, and you work for M$! Also, not to mention that the well over 75% of the 360's library IS ALSO AVAILABLE on the PS3. So not only does the PS3 GET every single multi plat that the 360 does, but the PS3 also gets the more and better exclusives too..on top of all that! Gamers in the real world know that the PS3 has been crushing the 360 in exclusives..in quality and in quantity ..for the past couple of years. And if not for the more then 1 year head start for M$, then the PS3 would have a much bigger lead on paper. Even though common sense alone can tell you what system has the games and the exclusives games. But then again, lems like you, won't ever let logic or facts get in the way of your agendas or trolling. So.carry on with your crazy self PhonesmugI did not read your insane ramblings but just wanted you to know[QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"][QUOTE="groverslanding"]Technically it's true. 360 is way ahead in overall library and third party support so PS3 is indeed second rate.
CanYouDiglt
Between retail and XBL games the 360 has 149 more AAA,AA,A games
https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AriQpIFbPoEacGM1b0xxcGVucFQ3OFc4N3BNZmd2QkE&gid=1
The games that the 360 and PS3 do share of the ones tested the 360 has 153 better multiplat games and the PS3 only has 38
http://misterslimm.wordpress.com/360-vs-ps3/xbox-360-vs-ps3-head-to-head-face-off-results/
The 360 has far more games and the ones they do share are normally better on the 360.
My god, do you ever get tired of being so wrong? And how many people have to continue calling you out for your delusional posting , and crazy posting habbits, until you finally realise how bad you are? You are one of this sites worst lemmings, and considering how bad Phonesmug/Groverslanding are, that says it all about you. Like I said; "The 360 is only ahead when lems like yourself start setting their own stupid little criteria like "AA and AAE games according only to gamespot" And you proved my point almost perfectly by posting what you did, so thanks for owning yourself you mentally unfit lem troll! The bottom line is, Half the games in the 360's library, are kinect games that you wouldn't even care about, and you work for M$! Also, not to mention that the well over 75% of the 360's library IS ALSO AVAILABLE on the PS3. So not only does the PS3 get every single multi plat that the 360 does, but the PS3 also gets the more and better exclusives too- on top of all that! True gamers in the real world know that the PS3 has been crushing the 360 in exclusives..in quality and in quantity ..for the past couple of years. And if not for the more then 1 year head start for M$, then the PS3 would have a much bigger lead on paper But paper doesn't decide everything. Common sense alone can tell you what system has the games and the exclusives games. But then again, lems like yourself, would not ever let logic or facts get in the way of your agenda and or trolling. So carry on with your crazy selfes, youcandigit and Phonesmug/groverslandingI did not read your insane ramblings but just wanted you to know[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]
[QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"] Naw, the 360 is only ahead when lems like yourself start including their own stupid little criteria like "AA, and AAE games according only to gamespot" And half the games in the 360's library, are kinect games that you wouldn't even care about, and you work for M$! Also, not to mention that the well over 75% of the 360's library IS ALSO AVAILABLE on the PS3. So not only does the PS3 GET every single multi plat that the 360 does, but the PS3 also gets the more and better exclusives too..on top of all that! Gamers in the real world know that the PS3 has been crushing the 360 in exclusives..in quality and in quantity ..for the past couple of years. And if not for the more then 1 year head start for M$, then the PS3 would have a much bigger lead on paper. Even though common sense alone can tell you what system has the games and the exclusives games. But then again, lems like you, won't ever let logic or facts get in the way of your agendas or trolling. So.carry on with your crazy self Phonesmuggroverslanding
Between retail and XBL games the 360 has 149 more AAA,AA,A games
https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AriQpIFbPoEacGM1b0xxcGVucFQ3OFc4N3BNZmd2QkE&gid=1
The games that the 360 and PS3 do share of the ones tested the 360 has 153 better multiplat games and the PS3 only has 38
http://misterslimm.wordpress.com/360-vs-ps3/xbox-360-vs-ps3-head-to-head-face-off-results/
The 360 has far more games and the ones they do share are normally better on the 360.
Owneddddd! It makes sense that you two imbalanced lem trolls would agree with each other. What else is new!
[QUOTE="groverslanding"]Owneddddd! It makes sense that you two mentally imbalanced and chemically deprived lem trolls would agree with each other. What else is new!Well, you did say that half of 360 games are Kinect games, and then said that 75% of 360 games are on the PS3. I didn't realize that the PS3 had Kinect games =P Seriously though, the 360 has about twice as many games...[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]I did not read your insane ramblings but just wanted you to know
Between retail and XBL games the 360 has 149 more AAA,AA,A games
https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AriQpIFbPoEacGM1b0xxcGVucFQ3OFc4N3BNZmd2QkE&gid=1
The games that the 360 and PS3 do share of the ones tested the 360 has 153 better multiplat games and the PS3 only has 38
http://misterslimm.wordpress.com/360-vs-ps3/xbox-360-vs-ps3-head-to-head-face-off-results/
The 360 has far more games and the ones they do share are normally better on the 360.
DrakesHaloGears
Naw, the 360 is only ahead when lems like yourself start including their own stupid little criteria like "AA, and AAE games according only to gamespot" And half the games in the 360's library, are kinect games that you wouldn't even care about, and you work for M$! Also, not to mention that the well over 75% of the 360's library IS ALSO AVAILABLE on the PS3. So not only does the PS3 GET every single multi plat that the 360 does, but the PS3 also gets the more and better exclusives too..on top of all that! Gamers in the real world know that the PS3 has been crushing the 360 in exclusives..in quality and in quantity ..for the past couple of years. And if not for the more then 1 year head start for M$, then the PS3 would have a much bigger lead on paper. Even though common sense alone can tell you what system has the games and the exclusives games. But then again, lems like you, won't ever let logic or facts get in the way of your agendas or trolling. So.carry on with your crazy self PhonesmugI did not read your insane ramblings but just wanted you to know[QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"][QUOTE="groverslanding"]Technically it's true. 360 is way ahead in overall library and third party support so PS3 is indeed second rate.
CanYouDiglt
Between retail and XBL games the 360 has 149 more AAA,AA,A games
https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AriQpIFbPoEacGM1b0xxcGVucFQ3OFc4N3BNZmd2QkE&gid=1
The games that the 360 and PS3 do share of the ones tested the 360 has 153 better multiplat games and the PS3 only has 38
http://misterslimm.wordpress.com/360-vs-ps3/xbox-360-vs-ps3-head-to-head-face-off-results/
The 360 has far more games and the ones they do share are normally better on the 360.
The problem is that don't mean !]*ck. 99% of the games are perfectly playable on ps3. This is like arguing during the Genesis/snes gen. A lot of the games looked better on the snes, but they played just fine on the Genesis.
[QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"][QUOTE="groverslanding"]wneddddd!superclockedIt makes sense that you two mentally imbalanced and chemically deprived lem trolls would agree with each other. What else is new!Well, you did say that half of 360 games are Kinect games, and then said that 75% of 360 games are on the PS3. I didn't realize that the PS3 had Kinect games =P Seriously though, the 360 has about twice as many games... Except that what I said there would still be much closer to the actual truth then what your fellow delusional lems have said lol. But I meant to type that Kinect and XBLA games make up half of the 360's library. It also wasn't meant to be taken literal, but more or so, it was to illustrate the point that even a M$ paid shill poster like himself, wouldn't care about half the 360's bloated and inflated line up. The Ps3 has more games that matter, and that matter to core gamers! And let's not also forget that the 360 had more then a year long yead start, so that is the only reason, why the PS3 doesn't have a bigger lead then it should have on paper. But that's only on paper. Common sense can you tell that the PS3 has been crushing the 360 in games and in exclusive games since late 2007 till now. For you to say what you did - with your last statement, well that was just as much a troll statement as your fellow lems have made. So c'mon now! And you also have an AV of Halo! But I'm sure you aren't biased or anything
I did not read your insane ramblings but just wanted you to know[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]
[QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"] Naw, the 360 is only ahead when lems like yourself start including their own stupid little criteria like "AA, and AAE games according only to gamespot" And half the games in the 360's library, are kinect games that you wouldn't even care about, and you work for M$! Also, not to mention that the well over 75% of the 360's library IS ALSO AVAILABLE on the PS3. So not only does the PS3 GET every single multi plat that the 360 does, but the PS3 also gets the more and better exclusives too..on top of all that! Gamers in the real world know that the PS3 has been crushing the 360 in exclusives..in quality and in quantity ..for the past couple of years. And if not for the more then 1 year head start for M$, then the PS3 would have a much bigger lead on paper. Even though common sense alone can tell you what system has the games and the exclusives games. But then again, lems like you, won't ever let logic or facts get in the way of your agendas or trolling. So.carry on with your crazy self PhonesmugHeirren
Between retail and XBL games the 360 has 149 more AAA,AA,A games
https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AriQpIFbPoEacGM1b0xxcGVucFQ3OFc4N3BNZmd2QkE&gid=1
The games that the 360 and PS3 do share of the ones tested the 360 has 153 better multiplat games and the PS3 only has 38
http://misterslimm.wordpress.com/360-vs-ps3/xbox-360-vs-ps3-head-to-head-face-off-results/
The 360 has far more games and the ones they do share are normally better on the 360.
The problem is that don't mean !]*ck. 99% of the games are perfectly playable on ps3. This is like arguing during the Genesis/snes gen. A lot of the games looked better on the snes, but they played just fine on the Genesis.
Some differences are great and some are small but the fact is there are differences. If a person has a choice they will always pick the better version no matter if great or small. The 360 version of The Witcher 2 looks great but it looks even better on PC on ultra settings. People will enjoy each version but anyone that has the ability to play the game on ultra settings on PC would always choose that version. Like I said anyone that can choose will choose the 360 of multiplats because there is no reason to play the lesser version of games.[QUOTE="Heirren"]
[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]I did not read your insane ramblings but just wanted you to know
Between retail and XBL games the 360 has 149 more AAA,AA,A games
https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AriQpIFbPoEacGM1b0xxcGVucFQ3OFc4N3BNZmd2QkE&gid=1
The games that the 360 and PS3 do share of the ones tested the 360 has 153 better multiplat games and the PS3 only has 38
http://misterslimm.wordpress.com/360-vs-ps3/xbox-360-vs-ps3-head-to-head-face-off-results/
The 360 has far more games and the ones they do share are normally better on the 360.
CanYouDiglt
The problem is that don't mean !]*ck. 99% of the games are perfectly playable on ps3. This is like arguing during the Genesis/snes gen. A lot of the games looked better on the snes, but they played just fine on the Genesis.
Some differences are great and some are small but the fact is there are differences. If a person has a choice they will always pick the better version no matter if great or small. The 360 version of The Witcher 2 looks great but it looks even better on PC on ultra settings. People will enjoy each version but anyone that has the ability to play the game on ultra settings on PC would always choose that version. Like I said anyone that can choose will choose the 360 of multiplats because there is no reason to play the lesser version of games.I stand by what I said and am now starting to think you are dillusional. MOST people don't care about the tiny differences. They really don't. Wanna play NFS: Hot Pursuit? IT IS AVAILABLE ON BOTH CONSOLES. Wanna play FIfa? Hmmm....THE *UCKING GAME IS AVAILABLE ON BOTH CONSOLES. The games that really make a consumer decide are the ones that aren't available on each respected console. At this point in time, sony is playing the smarter game--gearing up for next gen by sticking to releasing core games.
[QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"][QUOTE="superclocked"]Well, you did say that half of 360 games are Kinect games, and then said that 75% of 360 games are on the PS3. I didn't realize that the PS3 had Kinect games =P Seriously though, the 360 has about twice as many games...superclockedblah, blah, blah, fellow delusional lems.. blah, blah blah, fellow lems... blah, blah, blahlol, fellow lems.. I'm a PC gamer =P Then why are we arguing! I like the PC too! And IMO, the best and most logical combination that a core gamer can get is the PS3/PC combo. The PC for all the truly superior multi plats, and the PS3 for all the stupidly amazing diverse amount of console exclusives!(Hell Uncharted alone is enough said!) The PC has its own share of great exclusives too. PC+PS3=WINNING
Well I guess this will be a good time to announce that Sony will probably be last to announce a new console next gen but that's not because of financial troubles! It's because the PS3 is doing great and will be at the forefront of our focus for a long, long time!
Here is the interview!
Playstation: "We will Probably be Last to Announce Something"
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lepoint.fr%2Fjeux-video%2Fplaystation-nous-serons-probablement-les-derniers-a-annoncer-quelque-chose-29-01-2012-1424903_485.php
[QUOTE="superclocked"][QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"]blah, blah, blah, fellow delusional lems.. blah, blah blah, fellow lems... blah, blah, blahDrakesHaloGearslol, fellow lems.. I'm a PC gamer =P Then why are we arguing! I like the PC too! And IMO, the best and most logical combination that a core gamer can get is the PS3/PC combo. The PC for all the truly superior multi plats, and the PS3 for all the stupidly amazing diverse amount of exclusives!(Hell Uncharted alone is enough said!)I wasn't trying to argue with you. I just thought it was funny that your post suggested that the PS3 had Kinect games ;)
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]I did not read your insane ramblings but just wanted you to know
Between retail and XBL games the 360 has 149 more AAA,AA,A games
https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AriQpIFbPoEacGM1b0xxcGVucFQ3OFc4N3BNZmd2QkE&gid=1
The games that the 360 and PS3 do share of the ones tested the 360 has 153 better multiplat games and the PS3 only has 38
http://misterslimm.wordpress.com/360-vs-ps3/xbox-360-vs-ps3-head-to-head-face-off-results/
The 360 has far more games and the ones they do share are normally better on the 360.
CanYouDiglt
The problem is that don't mean !]*ck. 99% of the games are perfectly playable on ps3. This is like arguing during the Genesis/snes gen. A lot of the games looked better on the snes, but they played just fine on the Genesis.
Some differences are great and some are small but the fact is there are differences. If a person has a choice they will always pick the better version no matter if great or small. The 360 version of The Witcher 2 looks great but it looks even better on PC on ultra settings. People will enjoy each version but anyone that has the ability to play the game on ultra settings on PC would always choose that version. Like I said anyone that can choose will choose the 360 of multiplats because there is no reason to play the lesser version of games. You are delusional, aren't you? You need help. Defending the 360 with all your life, like if it were your wife, IS THE LAST thing you should be worrying about right now. The differences are so insignificant between the 360 and PS3 versions of multi plats, that you'd be hard pressed to even tell the versions apart if no one told you which version was which. IF you truly cared about NOTICEABLY better looking multi plats , then you'd get the PC versionHoly smokes no PS4 on the horizon confirmed TCHBO! :lol:Well I guess this will be a good time to announce that Sony will probably be last to announce a new console next gen but that's not because of financial troubles! It's because the PS3 is doing great and will be at the forefront of our focus for a long, long time!
Here is the interview!
Playstation: "We will Probably be Last to Announce Something"
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lepoint.fr%2Fjeux-video%2Fplaystation-nous-serons-probablement-les-derniers-a-annoncer-quelque-chose-29-01-2012-1424903_485.php
kylemoffattscea
Holy smokes no PS4 on the horizon confirmed TCHBO! :lol:Who wants to start the thread?[QUOTE="kylemoffattscea"]
Well I guess this will be a good time to announce that Sony will probably be last to announce a new console next gen but that's not because of financial troubles! It's because the PS3 is doing great and will be at the forefront of our focus for a long, long time!
Here is the interview!
Playstation: "We will Probably be Last to Announce Something"
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lepoint.fr%2Fjeux-video%2Fplaystation-nous-serons-probablement-les-derniers-a-annoncer-quelque-chose-29-01-2012-1424903_485.php
groverslanding
This is huge news. Sony is done.
[QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"][QUOTE="superclocked"]lol, fellow lems.. I'm a PC gamer =PsuperclockedThen why are we arguing! I like the PC too! And IMO, the best and most logical combination that a core gamer can get is the PS3/PC combo. The PC for all the truly superior multi plats, and the PS3 for all the stupidly amazing diverse amount of exclusives!(Hell Uncharted alone is enough said!)I wasn't trying to argue with you. I just thought it was funny that your post suggested that the PS3 had Kinect games ;) Umm, I wasn't trying to suggest so, so that was poor wording on my part(in that instance) let me just say my bad my broski, and lets start new! I use to be a huge fan of counter strike(PC) when i was a kid. It was incredible! Its probably still my favorite competitive FPS to date. What PC games, and even PS3 games do you like? :)
Holy smokes no PS4 on the horizon confirmed TCHBO! :lol: The way you interpreted his post,and that info, along with your obsessive posting nature, leads me to believe you are delusional. Like, I'm totally serious, I think you may have some serious issues, and you should get help. (I'll even pay for you to go see a psychiatrist!) Anywayz, The PS3 is one of the greatest consoles of all time IMO, and it stil has more red hot exclusives that are set to release for it. So its awesome to hear that Sony is going to let the PS3 get its shine on for longer! It will create more profits, and in the meantime, Sony can work on the PS4, for as long as it takes, to ensure as best as a launch as they can for the PS4. It will give Sony the time to do things the right way, and make things right, as best as they can, and it would allow them to bring a true next generationally leap with the PS4 to boot. I'm super pumped up for this news! As the PS3 still has more to give![QUOTE="kylemoffattscea"]
Well I guess this will be a good time to announce that Sony will probably be last to announce a new console next gen but that's not because of financial troubles! It's because the PS3 is doing great and will be at the forefront of our focus for a long, long time!
Here is the interview!
Playstation: "We will Probably be Last to Announce Something"
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lepoint.fr%2Fjeux-video%2Fplaystation-nous-serons-probablement-les-derniers-a-annoncer-quelque-chose-29-01-2012-1424903_485.php
groverslanding
[QUOTE="groverslanding"]Holy smokes no PS4 on the horizon confirmed TCHBO! :lol: The way you interpreted his post,and that info, leads me to believe you are delusional. Like I'm serious, I think you may have some issues, and you need help. Anywayz, The PS3 is one of tge greatest consoles of all time IMO, and it stil has more red hot exclusives releasing for it. So its awesome to hear that Sony is going to let the PS3 get its shine on for longer! It will creater more profita for them, and in the meantime, Sony can work on the PS4, for as long as it takes, to ensure as best as a launch as they can for the PS4. It will give Sony the time to do things the right way, and make things right, as best as they can, and it would allow them to bring a true next generationally leap with tge PS4. I'm super pumped up for this news! As the PS3 still has more to give!lmao your damage control is priceless[QUOTE="kylemoffattscea"]
Well I guess this will be a good time to announce that Sony will probably be last to announce a new console next gen but that's not because of financial troubles! It's because the PS3 is doing great and will be at the forefront of our focus for a long, long time!
Here is the interview!
Playstation: "We will Probably be Last to Announce Something"
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lepoint.fr%2Fjeux-video%2Fplaystation-nous-serons-probablement-les-derniers-a-annoncer-quelque-chose-29-01-2012-1424903_485.php
DrakesHaloGears
The way you interpreted his post,and that info, leads me to believe you are delusional. Like I'm serious, I think you may have some issues, and you need help. Anywayz, The PS3 is one of tge greatest consoles of all time IMO, and it stil has more red hot exclusives releasing for it. So its awesome to hear that Sony is going to let the PS3 get its shine on for longer! It will creater more profita for them, and in the meantime, Sony can work on the PS4, for as long as it takes, to ensure as best as a launch as they can for the PS4. It will give Sony the time to do things the right way, and make things right, as best as they can, and it would allow them to bring a true next generationally leap with tge PS4. I'm super pumped up for this news! As the PS3 still has more to give!lmao your damage control is priceless To any sane normal human being who can interpret information correctly, and see things for what they are, its reality and the cold hard truth! But unfortunately you don't fall into that catagory of sane or rational human being! So obviously you have trouble seeing what others are seeing with this F'n AWESOME news! I'm a good dude though! Ill pay for you to go see a psychiatrist! You NEED it badly![QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"][QUOTE="groverslanding"]Holy smokes no PS4 on the horizon confirmed TCHBO! :lol:
groverslanding
[QUOTE="groverslanding"]lmao your damage control is priceless To any sane normal human being who can interpret information correctly, and see things for what they are, its the cold hard truth! But unfortunately you don't fall into that catagory of sane or rational human being! So obviously you have trouble seeing what others are seeing with that awesome news! I'm a good dude though! Ill pay for you to go see a psychiatris! You NEED it badly!psychiatris?... I don't even...[QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"] The way you interpreted his post,and that info, leads me to believe you are delusional. Like I'm serious, I think you may have some issues, and you need help. Anywayz, The PS3 is one of tge greatest consoles of all time IMO, and it stil has more red hot exclusives releasing for it. So its awesome to hear that Sony is going to let the PS3 get its shine on for longer! It will creater more profita for them, and in the meantime, Sony can work on the PS4, for as long as it takes, to ensure as best as a launch as they can for the PS4. It will give Sony the time to do things the right way, and make things right, as best as they can, and it would allow them to bring a true next generationally leap with tge PS4. I'm super pumped up for this news! As the PS3 still has more to give!DrakesHaloGears
Some differences are great and some are small but the fact is there are differences. If a person has a choice they will always pick the better version no matter if great or small. The 360 version of The Witcher 2 looks great but it looks even better on PC on ultra settings. People will enjoy each version but anyone that has the ability to play the game on ultra settings on PC would always choose that version. Like I said anyone that can choose will choose the 360 of multiplats because there is no reason to play the lesser version of games.CanYouDiglt
I have a 360 and a PS3, and I always get my multi-platform games on PS3. I don't subscribe to Xbox Live because I think it is a scam, so by getting all my games on PS3, I can play them online. Plus, I like having all my games on 1 disc instead of multiple discs. Add in the fact that blu ray discs are scratch resistant and much, much more durable than DVD, another big reason why I get games on PS3 when I have the choice. Most of my friends play on PSN, not on Xbox Live, that is another contributing factor to my preference. I also prefer the Dual Shock 3 controller to the 360 game pad. All of these things are infinitely more important to me than a sharper rock texture here and there. Not to mention, a good deal of my multi-platform games are actually significantly superior on PS3 compared to their 360 counter part, as in added content and game features are included that are completely absent on the 360 versions. Take for example Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion, Bioshock, Eternal Sonata, Final Fantasy XIII, Portal 2, Ultimate Marvel v Capcom 3, Super Street Fighter 4 Arcade Edition. Those are just the games that I personally own that are significantly better on the PS3 than the 360, by way of better control inputs like a usable D-pad for fighting games, added content and performance in games like Eternal Sonata, Bioshock and Oblivion, better graphics and performance in games like Final Fantasy XIII, Steam integration in games like Portal 2, those kind of changes are significant. The only advantage I've ever seen the 360 have on a PS3 multi-plat game are as insignificant as a rock texture. Literally every other multi-platform game you could name have such insignificant changes that you need to go on Digital Foundry and look under a microscope just to find the most negligible changes in the history of gaming when comparing different console versions.
Although I will say that Skyrim is better on the 360 than the PS3. I did in fact get the 360 version of Skyrim because that is a multi-platform game that really was better on the 360 and it was actually noticable.
[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]Some differences are great and some are small but the fact is there are differences. If a person has a choice they will always pick the better version no matter if great or small. The 360 version of The Witcher 2 looks great but it looks even better on PC on ultra settings. People will enjoy each version but anyone that has the ability to play the game on ultra settings on PC would always choose that version. Like I said anyone that can choose will choose the 360 of multiplats because there is no reason to play the lesser version of games.arkephonic
I have a 360 and a PS3, and I always get my multi-platform games on PS3. I don't subscribe to Xbox Live because I think it is a scam, so by getting all my games on PS3, I can play them online. Plus, I like having all my games on 1 disc instead of multiple discs. Add in the fact that blu ray discs are scratch resistant and much, much more durable than DVD, another big reason why I get games on PS3 when I have the choice. Most of my friends play on PSN, not on Xbox Live, that is another contributing factor to my preference. I also prefer the Dual Shock 3 controller to the 360 game pad. All of these things are infinitely more important to me than a sharper rock texture here and there. Not to mention, a good deal of my multi-platform games are actually significantly superior on PS3 compared to their 360 counter part, as in added content and game features are included that are completely absent on the 360 versions. Take for example Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion, Bioshock, Eternal Sonata, Final Fantasy XIII, Portal 2, Ultimate Marvel v Capcom 3, Super Street Fighter 4 Arcade Edition. Those are just the games that I personally own that are significantly better on the PS3 than the 360, by way of better control inputs like a usable D-pad for fighting games, added content and performance in games like Eternal Sonata, Bioshock and Oblivion, better graphics and performance in games like Final Fantasy XIII, Steam integration in games like Portal 2, those kind of changes are significant. The only advantage I've ever seen the 360 have on a PS3 multi-plat game are as insignificant as a rock texture. Literally every other multi-platform game you could name have such insignificant changes that you need to go on Digital Foundry and look under a microscope just to find the most negligible changes in the history of gaming when comparing different console versions.
Great post arkephoic. And even when I've quoted you to slightly disagreed with something you said, you've still always have made a lot of sense. You are the rare good poster on this site, and its a shame that there aren't more good posters like you.[QUOTE="Cheese-Muffins"]
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
Wii hit an untapped market. PS2 was a worthy upgrade from the PSX.
Heirren
And that's a market Sony wants to get on as well (hence Move). PS2 was a worthy upgrade, but the Gamecube was more powrful than the PS2. If, by your logic, console buyers want to get the best of the best, why did Gamecube fail? It's not about graphics.
Sony is not going to risk another colossal, expensive failure when they're already bleeding money. Why would any company push out an incredibly powerful system, sell it at a loss to be price competitive, and try to compete when the developers and the rest of the competition are doing perfectly fine with less-powerful hardware.
The wii market is a big risk, as it is unsure whether or not it is a sustainable market. There's no proof or evidence to show that everybody, and every bar, that went out and bought a wii for wii bowling are going to invest again. The wiis success was a one off thing, I think. It is very silly for MS to seek this market. It paid off a little this gen I suppose, but just like Nintendos move with the wii, it is walking a fine line with the loyal fanbase.
Sony knows this, which is why Move was marketed more as a "in addition to" as opposed to where the brand is going. Sony played it safe with the move. The returning game market still prefer core games, as they are the people loyal to the games industry.
And to the other thing you said: bringing up the gamecube makes no sense. All three of those consoles were a worthy step up from the prior generation.
I brought up the Gamecube because I was trying to show that more powerful doesn't always equal sales. Yes, they were a step up from previous gen, but so is the Wii U and the rumored NextBox. I think you're underestimating them. Wii to Wii U is going to be more than a full generational leap, and while NextBox won't be quite as significant, it will still be a sizable jump. The market will have fairly powerful consoles. If Sony goes more powerful, it doesn't mean many consumers are going to jump on it for the graphics. If anything, the PS4 could be 2x/3x more powerful than Nextbox/Wii U. People are not necessarily going to flock to that, just as hardly anyone flocked to the Gamecube, despite it being far more powerful than the PS2. Power hardly matters. It's a risky venture for Sony.
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
[QUOTE="Cheese-Muffins"]
And that's a market Sony wants to get on as well (hence Move). PS2 was a worthy upgrade, but the Gamecube was more powrful than the PS2. If, by your logic, console buyers want to get the best of the best, why did Gamecube fail? It's not about graphics.
Sony is not going to risk another colossal, expensive failure when they're already bleeding money. Why would any company push out an incredibly powerful system, sell it at a loss to be price competitive, and try to compete when the developers and the rest of the competition are doing perfectly fine with less-powerful hardware.
Cheese-Muffins
The wii market is a big risk, as it is unsure whether or not it is a sustainable market. There's no proof or evidence to show that everybody, and every bar, that went out and bought a wii for wii bowling are going to invest again. The wiis success was a one off thing, I think. It is very silly for MS to seek this market. It paid off a little this gen I suppose, but just like Nintendos move with the wii, it is walking a fine line with the loyal fanbase.
Sony knows this, which is why Move was marketed more as a "in addition to" as opposed to where the brand is going. Sony played it safe with the move. The returning game market still prefer core games, as they are the people loyal to the games industry.
And to the other thing you said: bringing up the gamecube makes no sense. All three of those consoles were a worthy step up from the prior generation.
I brought up the Gamecube because I was trying to show that more powerful doesn't always equal sales. Yes, they were a step up from previous gen, but so is the Wii U and the rumored NextBox. I think you're underestimating them. Wii to Wii U is going to be more than a full generational leap, and while NextBox won't be quite as significant, it will still be a sizable jump. The market will have fairly powerful consoles. If Sony goes more powerful, it doesn't mean many consumers are going to jump on it for the graphics. If anything, the PS4 could be 2x/3x more powerful than Nextbox/Wii U. People are not necessarily going to flock to that, just as hardly anyone flocked to the Gamecube, despite it being far more powerful than the PS2. Power hardly matters. It's a risky venture for Sony.
Most importantly 3rd parties will make WiiU and 720 the standard because they will miss out on the bulk of the market otherwise. PS4's power would be completely negated.[QUOTE="Cheese-Muffins"]
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
The wii market is a big risk, as it is unsure whether or not it is a sustainable market. There's no proof or evidence to show that everybody, and every bar, that went out and bought a wii for wii bowling are going to invest again. The wiis success was a one off thing, I think. It is very silly for MS to seek this market. It paid off a little this gen I suppose, but just like Nintendos move with the wii, it is walking a fine line with the loyal fanbase.
Sony knows this, which is why Move was marketed more as a "in addition to" as opposed to where the brand is going. Sony played it safe with the move. The returning game market still prefer core games, as they are the people loyal to the games industry.
And to the other thing you said: bringing up the gamecube makes no sense. All three of those consoles were a worthy step up from the prior generation.
groverslanding
I brought up the Gamecube because I was trying to show that more powerful doesn't always equal sales. Yes, they were a step up from previous gen, but so is the Wii U and the rumored NextBox. I think you're underestimating them. Wii to Wii U is going to be more than a full generational leap, and while NextBox won't be quite as significant, it will still be a sizable jump. The market will have fairly powerful consoles. If Sony goes more powerful, it doesn't mean many consumers are going to jump on it for the graphics. If anything, the PS4 could be 2x/3x more powerful than Nextbox/Wii U. People are not necessarily going to flock to that, just as hardly anyone flocked to the Gamecube, despite it being far more powerful than the PS2. Power hardly matters. It's a risky venture for Sony.
Most importantly 3rd parties will make WiiU and 720 the standard because they will miss out on the bulk of the market otherwise. PS4's power would be completely negated. No those next gen muti plats will just end up being ported to the PS3. And the BIG FACT that you, or even muffin man- or what ever his name is, fail to realise - is that the Wii-U has a unique tablet controller. So developers would be in the same situation with the Wii-u, that they would be in with the PS4's power, in deciding whether to utilize that console's strength or not. Multi-platform development isn't going to be as easy as some suggest, And the Wii-U will be such a radically different console, with such different ideas then the casual based kinectBOX, that the fact that some desperate lems can even suggest that those two consoles will be so similar, and will have all their multi plats shared versus the playstation is laughable. If anything Sony and Nintendo look to be the only consoles that will be for the core gamer[QUOTE="groverslanding"]lmao your damage control is priceless To any sane normal human being who can interpret information correctly, and see things for what they are, its reality and the cold hard truth! But unfortunately you don't fall into that catagory of sane or rational human being! So obviously you have trouble seeing what others are seeing with this F'n AWESOME news! I'm a good dude though! Ill pay for you to go see a psychiatrist! You NEED it badly!So you're saying it's awesome news that PS4 is not coming out any time soon if ever? :lol: I think most Cows would disagree[QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"] The way you interpreted his post,and that info, leads me to believe you are delusional. Like I'm serious, I think you may have some issues, and you need help. Anywayz, The PS3 is one of tge greatest consoles of all time IMO, and it stil has more red hot exclusives releasing for it. So its awesome to hear that Sony is going to let the PS3 get its shine on for longer! It will creater more profita for them, and in the meantime, Sony can work on the PS4, for as long as it takes, to ensure as best as a launch as they can for the PS4. It will give Sony the time to do things the right way, and make things right, as best as they can, and it would allow them to bring a true next generationally leap with tge PS4. I'm super pumped up for this news! As the PS3 still has more to give!DrakesHaloGears
[QUOTE="groverslanding"]Most importantly 3rd parties will make WiiU and 720 the standard because they will miss out on the bulk of the market otherwise. PS4's power would be completely negated. No those muti plats will just end up being ported to the PS3. And the BIG FACT that you, or even muffin man, fail to realise - is that the Wii-U has a unique tablet controller. So developers would be in the same situation with the Wii-u, that they would be in with the PS4, in deciding whether to utilize that console's strength or not. Multi platform development isn't going to be as easy as some suggest, And the Wii-U will be such a radically different console with such different ideas then the casual based kinectBOX, that the fact that some desperate lems can even suggest that those two consoles will be so similar and will have all their multi plats shared versus the playstation is laughable. If anything Sony and Nintendo look to be the only consoles that will be for the core gamerPS3? Third Parties don't even care about PS3 this gen and they're going to base next gen around it :lol:[QUOTE="Cheese-Muffins"]
I brought up the Gamecube because I was trying to show that more powerful doesn't always equal sales. Yes, they were a step up from previous gen, but so is the Wii U and the rumored NextBox. I think you're underestimating them. Wii to Wii U is going to be more than a full generational leap, and while NextBox won't be quite as significant, it will still be a sizable jump. The market will have fairly powerful consoles. If Sony goes more powerful, it doesn't mean many consumers are going to jump on it for the graphics. If anything, the PS4 could be 2x/3x more powerful than Nextbox/Wii U. People are not necessarily going to flock to that, just as hardly anyone flocked to the Gamecube, despite it being far more powerful than the PS2. Power hardly matters. It's a risky venture for Sony.
DrakesHaloGears
The tablet could include new features or be as little as a map screen. You're kidding yourself.
To any sane normal human being who can interpret information correctly, and see things for what they are, its reality and the cold hard truth! But unfortunately you don't fall into that catagory of sane or rational human being! So obviously you have trouble seeing what others are seeing with this F'n AWESOME news! I'm a good dude though! Ill pay for you to go see a psychiatrist! You NEED it badly!So you're saying it's awesome news that PS4 is not coming out any time soon if ever? :lol: I think most Cows would disagree Many and many people are still enjoying their PS3s! But they've been too busy actually playing it, then to come on internet forums, like disgruntled lems - who have no excluisve games to play. The PS3 still has lots more to give! Sony would be doing the right thing by letting the PS3 get its shine on for longer. And as we talked about earlier, the PS3 still has plenty of red hot exclusives releasing this year, and in the future So by letting the PS3 get its shine on, and thus building lots more profits. Sony can take the time that they need to make the PS4 right, and take the time they need to ensure a great launch for the PS4. And thus they can also make sure that the PS4 is a true next generationally leap[QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"][QUOTE="groverslanding"]lmao your damage control is priceless
groverslanding
[QUOTE="groverslanding"]Most importantly 3rd parties will make WiiU and 720 the standard because they will miss out on the bulk of the market otherwise. PS4's power would be completely negated. No those next gen muti plats will just end up being ported to the PS3. And the BIG FACT that you, or even muffin man- or what ever his name is, fail to realise - is that the Wii-U has a unique tablet controller. So developers would be in the same situation with the Wii-u, that they would be in with the PS4's power, in deciding whether to utilize that console's strength or not. Multi-platform development isn't going to be as easy as some suggest, And the Wii-U will be such a radically different console, with such different ideas then the casual based kinectBOX, that the fact that some desperate lems can even suggest that those two consoles will be so similar, and will have all their multi plats shared versus the playstation is laughable. If anything Sony and Nintendo look to be the only consoles that will be for the core gamer[QUOTE="Cheese-Muffins"]
I brought up the Gamecube because I was trying to show that more powerful doesn't always equal sales. Yes, they were a step up from previous gen, but so is the Wii U and the rumored NextBox. I think you're underestimating them. Wii to Wii U is going to be more than a full generational leap, and while NextBox won't be quite as significant, it will still be a sizable jump. The market will have fairly powerful consoles. If Sony goes more powerful, it doesn't mean many consumers are going to jump on it for the graphics. If anything, the PS4 could be 2x/3x more powerful than Nextbox/Wii U. People are not necessarily going to flock to that, just as hardly anyone flocked to the Gamecube, despite it being far more powerful than the PS2. Power hardly matters. It's a risky venture for Sony.
DrakesHaloGears
If you don't know my name, look at the quotes on your post... :/
Developing for a tablet controller does not pose the same challenges at all. It's not like you have to completely redesign a game along the touch screen, as opposed to if you're developing with different power levels and hardware capabilities in mind.
[QUOTE="groverslanding"]So you're saying it's awesome news that PS4 is not coming out any time soon if ever? :lol: I think most Cows would disagree Many and many people are still enjoying their PS3s! But they've been too busy actually playing it, then to come on internet forums, like disgruntled lems - who have no excluisve games to play, do, The PS3 still has lots more to give! Sony would be dping the right thing by letting the PS3 get its shine on for longer. And as we talked about earlier, the PS3 still has plenty of red hot exclusives releasing this year, and in the future So by letting the PS3 get its shine on, and thus builder lots more profits. Sony can take the time that they need to make the PS4 right, and take thw time they need to ensire a great launch for the PS4. And thus they can also make sure that the PS4 is a true next generationally leapThat's a nice excuse but the truth is Sony doesn't have the money to release a next gen console. They would never willingly be last out of the gate against MS and Nintendo after what happened this gen. That's a terrible strategy. PS4 is screwed either way.[QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"] To any sane normal human being who can interpret information correctly, and see things for what they are, its reality and the cold hard truth! But unfortunately you don't fall into that catagory of sane or rational human being! So obviously you have trouble seeing what others are seeing with this F'n AWESOME news! I'm a good dude though! Ill pay for you to go see a psychiatrist! You NEED it badly!DrakesHaloGears
[QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"][QUOTE="superclocked"]I wasn't trying to argue with you. I just thought it was funny that your post suggested that the PS3 had Kinect games ;)superclockedUmm, I wasn't trying to suggest so, so maybe that was poor wording on my part(in that instance) let me just say my bad my broski, and lets start new! I use to be a huge fan of counter strike(PC) when i was a kid. It was incredible! Its probably still my favorite competitive FPS to date. What PC games, and even PS3 games do you like? :)lol, yeah, I know man.. I was just being sarcastic... But I like all types of games really, though I don't have a PS3. I got a 360 at launch, but it got stolen a couple of years later, and I just built a new gaming PC instead of getting another 360. But my son wanted another 360 instead of a PS3, so we ended up with a 360 and Wii instead of all 3 consoles, like I originally planned. I could've gotten a PS3 instead of a 560 Ti a year ago, but I'm glad that I didn't now, since I'm mainly playing Skyrim and Starcraft 2 at the moment. I'm still going to get a PS3 to use as a Blu-ray player eventually though. I'll probably get the Resistance and Killzone series first... That's cool. As long as you are happy with your decision,then that's what matters! I've heard that starcraft was super addicting too! LOL how do you like it so far? Yeah,i bought a 360 at launch too. I later received a PS3 as a Christmass present , and I never looked back lol. Let's just say that the 360 has spent a majority of time in my closet. I kid you not, I have every PS3 exclusive, even Liar, and I've beaten them all. If you do get a PS3, then I'd highly recommend the Uncharted series. Uncharted 2 and Uncharted 3 are just brilliant IMO. I'd also recommend the Infamous series. Both were great games. And for the kids, you couldn't go wrong with LittleBig Planet( both were great) and or Ratchet and Clank! I like Tools of destruction and a crack in time! *edit* Oh damm, I almost forgot about Heavy Rain and God of War 3! The PS3 has too mamy great exclusives for me to remember lol. You should definitely check those games out too, if you do get a PS3. I hope you are happy with what ever decision you make. The PS3 is an awesome console, and I'm sure you'll have some good times on it, like many have! *edit #2 haha* And not to mention, that in this year alone, Twisted Metall, Sly Cooper, and StarHawk, which looks absolutely F'N SICK, are all coming out. So you will definitely still be getting great games with the PS3 for the future + along with all the other great exclusives that you can buy! Where as Microsoft has pretty much killed all its support for the 360, and is gearing up for the 720 now. Hey, and there's some new PC exclusives on the way too, from what ive heard, So over all, its a great time to be a core gamer. Happy gaming bro! I hope you enjoy your PS3 :)
Don't expect a PS4 announcement this year at E3. Sony is pushing hard to make 3D gaming/blu-ray mainstream. Sony is focused on moving PS3 3D Display Bundles.
Of course, there's always next year.
If I were Sony, I wouldn't even release a PS4. I bet you they could compete with the next gen of consoles if they had PS3 Slims going for $100 bucks and all the PS3 games were $10 or $20 bucks tops. If the hardware and software were that cheap, it would probably still sell well. I would forgo the 8th generation, milk the PS3 dry, and come out strong in the 9th generation and release their console first, with proper research and development behind it. I can see the PS3 selling really well for a while and since it is now profitable for them and they're not selling it at a loss, they might as well milk it for every penny they can. Honestly, I am anticipating an HD Mario and Zelda game way more than anything else, I could deal with the absence of a PS4.
Many and many people are still enjoying their PS3s! But they've been too busy actually playing it, then to come on internet forums, like disgruntled lems - who have no excluisve games to play, do, The PS3 still has lots more to give! Sony would be dping the right thing by letting the PS3 get its shine on for longer. And as we talked about earlier, the PS3 still has plenty of red hot exclusives releasing this year, and in the future So by letting the PS3 get its shine on, and thus builder lots more profits. Sony can take the time that they need to make the PS4 right, and take thw time they need to ensire a great launch for the PS4. And thus they can also make sure that the PS4 is a true next generationally leapThat's a nice excuse but the truth is Sony doesn't have the money to release a next gen console. They would never willingly be last out of the gate against MS and Nintendo after what happened this gen. That's a terrible strategy. PS4 is screwed either way. To a delusional person like yourself who has a distorted thought process, then yeah, its your "excuse" But to every one else its simply the reality. And by letting the PS3 continue to sell and build revenue , remember that the PS3 is making a massive profit on each console sold, so that can only be a great thing. And it would provide Sony with more finances to make an even better PS4! Also, And I know this will put you into a fit of blind nerd rage, But the reality that you refuse to accept is that, M$ games division is an a tremendous amount of debt. So going by your "logic" or more appropriately lack there of, M$ doesn't have enough for a new console, and that's why its much weaker then expected, and is rumored to be a causal kinectBOX! LMAO am I doing it right?[QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"][QUOTE="groverslanding"]So you're saying it's awesome news that PS4 is not coming out any time soon if ever? :lol: I think most Cows would disagree
groverslanding
Well I guess this will be a good time to announce that Sony will probably be last to announce a new console next gen but that's not because of financial troubles! It's because the PS3 is doing great and will be at the forefront of our focus for a long, long time!
Here is the interview!
Playstation: "We will Probably be Last to Announce Something"
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lepoint.fr%2Fjeux-video%2Fplaystation-nous-serons-probablement-les-derniers-a-annoncer-quelque-chose-29-01-2012-1424903_485.php
kylemoffattscea
:lol:
Exactly. The PS3 still has much more to give, and many people are still happy with their PS3s, and do want more! So why shouldn't Sony continue to support the PS3 , instead of just blindly rushing into a next gen like M$ seems to be doing. Remember what happened the last time they rushed to release a console? PROD happened- the single greatest electronic failure in the history of man kind! Anyway, The Wii-U and the PS3 will be more then enough to hold me off, until a PS4. And the 720 won't be so powerful enough, that multi plats from it, cant also be ported down to the PS3 neither.If I were Sony, I wouldn't even release a PS4. I bet you they could compete with the next gen of consoles if they had PS3 Slims going for $100 bucks and all the PS3 games were $10 or $20 bucks tops. If the hardware and software were that cheap, it would probably still sell well. I would forgo the 8th generation, milk the PS3 dry, and come out strong in the 9th generation and release their console first, with proper research and development behind it. I can see the PS3 selling really well for a while and since it is now profitable for them and they're not selling it at a loss, they might as well milk it for every penny they can. Honestly, I am anticipating an HD Mario and Zelda game way more than anything else, I could deal with the absence of a PS4.
arkephonic
Blue Ray is pretty much at or around main stream level. Now, ive never tried 3D gaming , but I've been wanting to so badly! It should be interesting to see what happens with 3D gamimg, but im glad that Sony is not forcing that technology down our throats like M$ is doing with the KinectDon't expect a PS4 announcement this year at E3. Sony is pushing hard to make 3D gaming/blu-ray mainstream. Sony is focused on moving PS3 3D Display Bundles.
Of course, there's always next year.
FashionFreak
[QUOTE="FashionFreak"]Blue Ray is pretty much at or around main stream level. Now, ive never tried 3D gaming , but I've been wanting to so badly! It should be interesting to see what happens with 3D gamimg, but im glad that Sony is not forcing that technology down our throats like M$ is doing with the KinectDon't expect a PS4 announcement this year at E3. Sony is pushing hard to make 3D gaming/blu-ray mainstream. Sony is focused on moving PS3 3D Display Bundles.
Of course, there's always next year.
DrakesHaloGears
The thing that I like about Sony's strategy is that everything is always optional. I was reading a Game Informer article, and they were talking about how the majority of Kinect compatible games required Kinect, whereas the majority of Move compatible games just offered Move as an option, not a requirement. The same goes for 3D, it's just optional, not required. They're not forcing anything down anyone's throat, they're simply offering more ways to experience games for people that are interested in doing so.
My main gripe with Kinect is how they limited the possibilities and potential by advertising it as, "You are the controller". That simple phrase literally killed off a ton of potential. If you could just use something as simple as a joystick or a navigation controller, something similar to a Wii Nunchuck, the possibilities would be endless for that device. But as it stands, it is just an on-rail only device with extremely limited options.
Blue Ray is pretty much at or around main stream level. Now, ive never tried 3D gaming , but I've been wanting to so badly! It should be interesting to see what happens with 3D gamimg, but im glad that Sony is not forcing that technology down our throats like M$ is doing with the Kinect[QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"][QUOTE="FashionFreak"]
Don't expect a PS4 announcement this year at E3. Sony is pushing hard to make 3D gaming/blu-ray mainstream. Sony is focused on moving PS3 3D Display Bundles.
Of course, there's always next year.
arkephonic
The thing that I like about Sony's strategy is that everything is always optional. I was reading a Game Informer article, and they were talking about how the majority of Kinect compatible games required Kinect, whereas the majority of Move compatible games just offered Move as an option, not a requirement. The same goes for 3D, it's just optional, not required. They're not forcing anything down anyone's throat, they're simply offering more ways to experience games for people that are interested in doing so.
I couldn't have said it better myself. Beautifully put my bro.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment