This topic is locked from further discussion.
 This proves that a console launching first usually wins. Except for the Wii, which won because of it's different way of gameplay. Though it's awesome that Sony has sold as much as they have being in third place. But it will be different next gen, even if the WiiU released first, it will struggle.Â
Yeah because lems are substantiating all the garbage they spew lol. It's a fact Uncharted 2 won the most graphics awards this gen more than any other game. PS3 games also won in general the most graphic awards.[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="StormyJoe"]
Really? What a bunch of unsubstantiated garbage.
Do moos sneak out when you talk?
StormyJoe
Killzone 3 better looking that Crysis 2/3? Whatever, dude.
Proof otherwise? At least KZ2/3 have more graphics awards which amount to more proof than lems subjective claims.[QUOTE="StormyJoe"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Yeah because lems are substantiating all the garbage they spew lol. It's a fact Uncharted 2 won the most graphics awards this gen more than any other game. PS3 games also won in general the most graphic awards.kuraimen
Killzone 3 better looking that Crysis 2/3? Whatever, dude.
Proof otherwise? At least KZ2/3 have more graphics awards which amount to more proof than lems subjective claims.HA HA HA!!!
You make an unsubstantiated claim, I call you on it, you tell me "prove that I am wrong." What-the-f-ever.
IGN (Crysis 2 review): " This is the best-looking console game to date." Took me about 5 seconds to find that. http://www.ign.com/articles/2011/03/22/crysis-2-review-2?page=2
This proves that a console launching first usually wins. Except for the Wii, which won because of it's different way of gameplay. Though it's awesome that Sony has sold as much as they have being in third place. But it will be different next gen, even if the WiiU released first, it will struggle.
Martin_G_N
Dreamcast launched before the PS2...
Specs are getting less and less meaningful over time. I find it funny how everyone is assuming that the failure of the wiiu is somehow a triumph for high specs. The new ms and sony consoles could sell just as bad. If they are expensive then I expect them to sell even lessGunSmith1_basicHow expencive do you expect these consoles to be? People pay more for they're phones these days.
[QUOTE="Martin_G_N"]
This proves that a console launching first usually wins. Except for the Wii, which won because of it's different way of gameplay. Though it's awesome that Sony has sold as much as they have being in third place. But it will be different next gen, even if the WiiU released first, it will struggle.
StormyJoe
Dreamcast launched before the PS2...
That's true, I forgot about that. I remember I didn't know about the Dreamcast until after I bought the PS2. I guess the PS1's success and Sony's great marketing was a big reason for that.Proof otherwise? At least KZ2/3 have more graphics awards which amount to more proof than lems subjective claims.[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="StormyJoe"]
Killzone 3 better looking that Crysis 2/3? Whatever, dude.
StormyJoe
HA HA HA!!!
You make an unsubstantiated claim, I call you on it, you tell me "prove that I am wrong." What-the-f-ever.
IGN (Crysis 2 review): " This is the best-looking console game to date." Took me about 5 seconds to find that. http://www.ign.com/articles/2011/03/22/crysis-2-review-2?page=2
Â
Â
3 seconds
http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-killzone-3-vs-crysis-2-analysis/2/
Conclusion:Although Crysis 2 looks fantastic on both the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, the graphics crown still belongs to Guerrillas Killzone 3. Not only does Killzone 3 look graphically better, the performance its more stable throughout.
[QUOTE="StormyJoe"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Yeah because lems are substantiating all the garbage they spew lol. It's a fact Uncharted 2 won the most graphics awards this gen more than any other game. PS3 games also won in general the most graphic awards.kuraimen
Killzone 3 better looking that Crysis 2/3? Whatever, dude.
Proof otherwise? At least KZ2/3 have more graphics awards which amount to more proof than lems subjective claims.you are the one who made the original Claim, the onus is on you to prove him wrong, i will give you crysis 2, Killzone 3 does look on Par but performs better on consoles, Crysis 3 though? no chance, on a technical level crysis 3 on consoles is better than Killzone 3 and it'a better game to boot.[QUOTE="robotapple"]
snes beats neo geo, neo geo has better specs -Â Mega Drive
ps1 beats n64, n64 has better specs -Â Saturn
ps2 beats gc and xbox, they both have better specs -Â DreamcastMrYaotubo
Â
Let´s not forget the ones that completely dispell your point,shall we? But nice try.
His point is that the most powerul system didn't sell the most.[QUOTE="StormyJoe"]
[QUOTE="kuraimen"] Proof otherwise? At least KZ2/3 have more graphics awards which amount to more proof than lems subjective claims.kuraimen
HA HA HA!!!
You make an unsubstantiated claim, I call you on it, you tell me "prove that I am wrong." What-the-f-ever.
IGN (Crysis 2 review): " This is the best-looking console game to date." Took me about 5 seconds to find that. http://www.ign.com/articles/2011/03/22/crysis-2-review-2?page=2
Â
Â
3 seconds
http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-killzone-3-vs-crysis-2-analysis/2/
Conclusion:Although Crysis 2 looks fantastic on both the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, the graphics crown still belongs to Guerrillas Killzone 3. Not only does Killzone 3 look graphically better, the performance its more stable throughout.
so no poof it looks better than crysis 3 then.[QUOTE="omarissac"]
[QUOTE="delta3074"]Not true, there are quite a few games that where Not ports and a few games where the Ps3 was the lead platform that performed worse on the Ps3, the PORT excuse doessn't work for a lot fo the games,Even crysis 3 performs at a lower resolution on the Ps3 and we know that was optimised for the Ps3 using Cryengine 3, RDR was not a PORT, it's Sub-HD, Ghostbusters was significantly better on the 360 but the Ps3 was actually the lead platform. Although i agree with you that in a lot of cases it was bad porting but in quite a few it was the Ps3's lack of useable RAM that let it down, as was the case with Skyrim and other games like RAGE and Red faction Guerilla. Also, it had nothing to do with 'Lazy' developers it was more of a financial descision, why spend Extra time and money and man hours optimising a game when you can get it 90% to the 360 version without Ps3 gamers having to wait an extra 6 months for it to release on there console, everyone blames Lazy devs but Gives SONY a free pass even though they admitted they made the Ps3 hard to code for.Vatusus
Â
you can add DMC 4, MGS rising, mirrors edge, dead space and burnout pardise, all those games lead on ps3 but came out looking even or better looking on 360.
What a load of BS
DMC4 and Burnout Paradise both are better on PS3, even if slightly
http://www.videogamer.com/ps3/burnout_5/features/article/burnout_paradise_xbox_360_vs_playstation_3.html
 taken from IGN DMC4 Head2HeadÂThe PS3 game wins, but it's by the smallest margin.
Features
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/xbox-360-vs-ps3-face-off-round-16-article?page=2
Â
 In terms of real-life impact, the tearing is a minor annoyance on the PS3 Dead Space, taken by IGN insideDICE has done a magnificent job on both versions, regardless of the platform it may have led on, and Unreal Engine 3 has been proven as a cross-platform middleware capable - with minor compromises - in producing like-for-like multiformat games.
Graphics
If there's one category that should matter most for a game like Dead Space it's the graphics. So which version is better? EA Redwood Shores has done an outstanding job of making sure the game looks and runs identically on both consoles. Dead Space is brought to life with an impressive lighting model, high-resolution textures, and a remarkably detailed character model for Isaac. The color palate is comparatively limited to the industrial grays and blacks of a futuristic space station, but the significant amount of environmental detail is always impressive.
The 360 and PS3 versions of the game are all but indistinguishable. There is a small difference in the ways each render color, but with Dead Space's flexible brightness customization, you should be able to get an equally impressive image with both versions. Dead Space doesn't always have the smoothest framerate. You'll notices some hitches if you make wide camera swings in new areas. There's also a bit of slowdown in some rooms with a lot of enemies. This happened in equal measure on both the 360 and PS3. Videophiles might have some issues with the slowdown, but I actually found it enhanced the play experience, exacerbating the sense of fear and helplessness. Finally, you'll get a terrifically detailed and atmospheric game on both consoles, neither is inherently better than the other.
Overall
1. Xbox 360 & PS3
Overall
EA Redwood Shores has done one of the best jobs I've seen of making sure their game runs equally well on the 360 and PS3. The game looks great, sounds great, and plays great on both platforms. Neither version is missing a crucial feature, and EA has outdone most other major third party publishers by including Trophy support in the PS3 version. The game runs identically on both platforms, and controls equally as well on either controller. You'll be able to save yourself a few seconds when loading a saved game on the PS3 version, but this isn't something you'd notice unless you were actively timing it. Ultimately, the PS3 and 360 version of the game will deliver an identically entertaining and atmospheric experience.END
so please, dont lie to suit your fanboyish needs
Â
Â
why the f88k would you use ign, when we have Digitail foundry they think the 360 version looks better of DMC4 and they say burn out is even, so please the last thing i'am is a fanboy, like you. if we go by ign then cryisis 2 on 360 would be the best lookinjg console game ever. calling me a fanboy for saying the truth makes you look stupid.
[QUOTE="StormyJoe"]
HA HA HA!!!
You make an unsubstantiated claim, I call you on it, you tell me "prove that I am wrong." What-the-f-ever.
IGN (Crysis 2 review): " This is the best-looking console game to date." Took me about 5 seconds to find that. http://www.ign.com/articles/2011/03/22/crysis-2-review-2?page=2
Â
Â
3 seconds
http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-killzone-3-vs-crysis-2-analysis/2/
Conclusion:Although Crysis 2 looks fantastic on both the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, the graphics crown still belongs to Guerrillas Killzone 3. Not only does Killzone 3 look graphically better, the performance its more stable throughout.
so no poof it looks better than crysis 3 then. Ah classic Delta trolling. Tell me, doesnt 360 have anything you can defend anymore or you trying to make hermits look bad like you did with lemmings?Â
3 seconds
http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-killzone-3-vs-crysis-2-analysis/2/
Conclusion:Although Crysis 2 looks fantastic on both the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, the graphics crown still belongs to Guerrillas Killzone 3. Not only does Killzone 3 look graphically better, the performance its more stable throughout.
so no poof it looks better than crysis 3 then. Ah classic Delta trolling. Tell me, doesnt 360 have anything you can defend anymore or you trying to make hermits look bad like you did with lemmings?Reading comprehension, i was talking about the 360 version of crysis 3, it's got more going on under the hoodd than killzone 3 and is a better game to boot and i don't troll sunshine, i leave that to people like you.[QUOTE="MstaPrimeMnista"][QUOTE="delta3074"]so no poof it looks better than crysis 3 then.delta3074Ah classic Delta trolling. Tell me, doesnt 360 have anything you can defend anymore or you trying to make hermits look bad like you did with lemmings?Reading comprehension, i was talking about the 360 version of crysis 3, it's got more going on under the hoodd than killzone 3 and is a better game to boot and i don't troll sunshine, i leave that to people like you. And this somehow deletes all your recent posts? As for what your talking about, like I said, classic trolling by you.
[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="MstaPrimeMnista"] Ah classic Delta trolling. Tell me, doesnt 360 have anything you can defend anymore or you trying to make hermits look bad like you did with lemmings?MstaPrimeMnistaReading comprehension, i was talking about the 360 version of crysis 3, it's got more going on under the hoodd than killzone 3 and is a better game to boot and i don't troll sunshine, i leave that to people like you. And this somehow deletes all your recent posts? As for what your talking about, like I said, classic trolling by you.so why would you imply that i was trying to make hermits look bad like i 'DID' (Past tense) with lemmings, i was juts pointing out that i clearly was not. And i reall y don't care what you think, in my opinion Crysis 3 looks Better than Killzoone 3 and it's a better game to boot because it isn't a corridor shooter, unlike killzone 3 you can be completely flexible about how you engage the enemy and the methods you use in Crysis 3, it basically offers you Far more gameplay freedom than Killzone 3.
[QUOTE="MstaPrimeMnista"][QUOTE="delta3074"]Reading comprehension, i was talking about the 360 version of crysis 3, it's got more going on under the hoodd than killzone 3 and is a better game to boot and i don't troll sunshine, i leave that to people like you.delta3074And this somehow deletes all your recent posts? As for what your talking about, like I said, classic trolling by you.so why would you imply that i was trying to make hermits look bad like i 'DID' (Past tense) with lemmings, i was juts pointing out that i clearly was not. And i reall y don't care what you think, in my opinion Crysis 3 looks Better than Killzoone 3 and it's a better game to boot because it isn't a corridor shooter, unlike killzone 3 you can be completely flexible about how you engage the enemy and the methods you use in Crysis 3, it basically offers you Far more gameplay freedom than Killzone 3.
i think halo 4 looks better then kill zone 3 and crysis 2-3, if your only talking about consoles., crysis1-3 on consoles is sub hd and has horrible frame rate.
I don't care who "wins" a stupid war. I care about who is going to give me the best gaming experience, and at this time it looks like it's going to be the PS4.
Agreed, so Far the Ps4 looks to be the one that will deliver the goods for gamers, lloks like SONy are going all out to win back there fanbase.I don't care who "wins" a stupid war. I care about who is going to give me the best gaming experience, and at this time it looks like it's going to be the PS4.
ShadowMoses900
I don't care who "wins" a stupid war. I care about who is going to give me the best gaming experience, and at this time it looks like it's going to be the PS4.
ShadowMoses900
Â
I agree with this, anyway every single playstaion console has sold great, even ps3 will end up doing 90 million when it's all said and done amd will end up the second best console selling console this gen.
[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]Agreed, so Far the Ps4 looks to be the one that will deliver the goods for gamers, lloks like SONy are going all out to win back there fanbase.I don't care who "wins" a stupid war. I care about who is going to give me the best gaming experience, and at this time it looks like it's going to be the PS4.
delta3074
They never lost their fanbase.
Agreed, so Far the Ps4 looks to be the one that will deliver the goods for gamers, lloks like SONy are going all out to win back there fanbase.[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]
I don't care who "wins" a stupid war. I care about who is going to give me the best gaming experience, and at this time it looks like it's going to be the PS4.
ShadowMoses900
They never lost their fanbase.
*caugh* Move *caugh*Agreed, so Far the Ps4 looks to be the one that will deliver the goods for gamers, lloks like SONy are going all out to win back there fanbase.[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]
I don't care who "wins" a stupid war. I care about who is going to give me the best gaming experience, and at this time it looks like it's going to be the PS4.
ShadowMoses900
They never lost their fanbase.
Â
In the US, xbox really did take some of there fans away, a good amount.
True, specs don't determine who wins a generation. Lots of factors go in to who wins, such as developer support, ease of working with the platform, exclusives, advertising, etc.
Agreed, so Far the Ps4 looks to be the one that will deliver the goods for gamers, lloks like SONy are going all out to win back there fanbase.[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]
I don't care who "wins" a stupid war. I care about who is going to give me the best gaming experience, and at this time it looks like it's going to be the PS4.
ShadowMoses900
They never lost their fanbase.
yeah they did, some of them anyway, especially over here, Ps1 was the best console ever made, The Ps2 did not have a lot of titles i wanted so i went with the Cube, best exclusives last gen, IMO but the 3rd pary support was lacklustre so i switched to the Xbox, the Xbox gave me a few multiplats i wanted that you couldn't Get on other consoles like Pariah, Doom 3, Half life 2, Chronicles of Riddick and more importantly Morrowind and i loved Fable, with the xbox i caught the WRPG Bug and the 360 is the same, i could get Multiplats i want that not on other consoles and it has, more importantly i get WRPG's i want that i cannot get on other consoles like Gothic 4,risen, Ego draconis ,witcher, Torchlight and Fable. I have never gone with a particular Company, i go where the games i want are which is why i am not an early adopter but i am inclined to Believe that MS will attempt to Block used games and i loathe the idea of an 'always on Camera' and 'always online' approach to DRM, Besides, the Ps4 will get the better version of the next installments of Fallout and Elder scrolls, my two favorite series if the rumours are true.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment