So Why is the 360, a better console?

  • 133 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="Espada12"]

Are you serious? Live isn't like an optional accessory.. live is the only way to play the other 1/2 of the game I paid for. How in any shape or form does that sound optional?

Because tons and tons of people don't play online? I haven't played online in months, as you can see from out of date gamer card. I'm playing Tropico 3, Mass Effect 2, Assassin's Creed 2 and looking at Bioshock 2, Darksiders, Dante's Inferno and Bayonnetta, all great single player games that have nothing to do with online.

Ok? What does that have to do with anything? And why haven't you answered my earlier question of if you ever used live?

It's obvious what it has to do with the issue, you can't say online is mandatory when there are dozens if not hundreds of good single player games! As for Live, yes I have used it, what's your point?
Avatar image for MFDOOM1983
MFDOOM1983

8465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 MFDOOM1983
Member since 2010 • 8465 Posts

i'm six months in to owning a ps3, and have had a 360 since Oblivion came out. While the ps3 is clearly the better built machine, and probably has a much longer life span to look forward to both in terms of hardware life and technological ceiling, the library is a JOKE. i already have almost everything worth owning for the system at 8 games. 8 games. compared to maybe 80 games on the 360, most of which are stellar titles. now, i love Blu ray and there's no getting past the fact that i use my ps3 more for movies and netflix than for gaming. but multiplatform titles are still better in almost every instance on teh 360 due to the easy development, and the exclusives there have been every bit as strong as the ps3's. and yes, the hidden fees for premium online services on the ps3 pretty much negate any argument that psn is "free".

AND ONE THING THE 360 KILLS THE PS3 ON: CUSTOM SOUNDTRACKS. on anything. the first time i tried to play music in the bg of Infamous and the ps3 told me i couldn't, i wanted to cry. when i play games on the 360, i constantly stream music and the 360 mixes the stereo into the 5.1 surround ambience perfectly. PS3 FAIL. most games license the worst mainstream music or have useless pretentious western bg music. the west never learned to make interesting video game music.

each controller has it's ups and downs; somewhere in between teh ps3 and 360 controllers is the perfect controller. take the dpad and analog face buttons of the ps3, and use the ergonomics, sticks and triggers of the 360. that would be so perfect.

i'm too in love with gaming to choose either side a winner, and you can too!

HEY, BUT AT LEAST FF13 IS A COMPLETE JOKE ON THE 360!!!

zeigzero
I'm the same way. I bought and played the 6-9 games that were on my to play list and now it waits for the next exclusive worth playing. I play single player multi plats on pc and multi player multi plats on 360.
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#53 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="locopatho"]

But I could easily say 20 GB PS3's would all be filled within 2 or 3 game installs, thus forcing an upgrade to a bigger HDD. LOL PS3 GOT DEARER! Or I could argue all Sixaxis owners had to buy DS3s when they came out. LOL MILKAGE! It's pointless, you can't include optional extras in a consoles cost. Silverbond

Are you serious? Live isn't like an optional accessory.. live is the only way to play the other 1/2 of the game I paid for. How in any shape or form does that sound optional?

Live is optional. You choose to play the other 1/2 half of the game.

Not to sure what to say here but I'll just a drop a link.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantics

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#54 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

Out of 800 games you take out 3 and get nothing??? Sorry, i cant understand your math, TC...

Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts
[QUOTE="Solid_Tango"]

You take away gears 2, halo 3-Reach, and Alan wake and you practically have nothing worth mentioning.

ME2,gears of war 1, splinter cell conviction are all on pc.

You pay for online while the others have it for free ( even handles ) :|

I really do want to understand this .

Explain

LOL, you take away GOW3, MGS4, Uncharted 2, and Killzone 2, and you have practically nothing left on the PS3 that isn't done "better" on the 360. Yup, see what happened there?
Avatar image for Ugalde-
Ugalde-

3732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Ugalde-
Member since 2009 • 3732 Posts
Why are you excluding games in the 360 line up? Just because ME2 and SP:C can be played on PC doesn't mean I cant play them on my 360. I like the online on 360 better and the games nuff said.
Avatar image for -Snooze-
-Snooze-

7304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 -Snooze-
Member since 2009 • 7304 Posts

Pointless thread is pointless.

It's better for me 'cause it has games i can enjoy with my friends. An excellent live based interface and active community.

Avatar image for Assassin_87
Assassin_87

2349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#58 Assassin_87
Member since 2004 • 2349 Posts

Why is the PS3 a better console?
You take away Uncharted, MGS4, God of War, Valkyria Chronicles, Warhawk, Heavy Rain, Ratchet and Clank, Killzone, and Resistance and you're left with LBP and Demon's Souls. :|

You look at the fact that they will charge for premium features for the PSN even though they've touted that it was free since forever and you begin to wonder, what else will they change completely contradictory to what they've been saying? Of course I can still play games for free online if I want to, but whatever. STILL SUCKS GUYS!

The PS3 has less quality games than the 360 in my opinion, just so you guys know.

Silverbond

Adjusted for accuracy. :|

Now, before you go on your little follow up rant about me being a fanboy because of this response let me clear this up. I'm just trying to show that your post was a gross exaggeration of the state of the PS3 as far as games go. It's pretty much not behind at all anymore where great games are concerned, in case you were wondering.

Then again if you were just trying to post hyperbolic BS on purpose to expose the fact that the OP is terrible, then that's fine. :)

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#59 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="locopatho"] Because tons and tons of people don't play online? I haven't played online in months, as you can see from out of date gamer card. I'm playing Tropico 3, Mass Effect 2, Assassin's Creed 2 and looking at Bioshock 2, Darksiders, Dante's Inferno and Bayonnetta, all great single player games that have nothing to do with online.locopatho

Ok? What does that have to do with anything? And why haven't you answered my earlier question of if you ever used live?

It's obvious what it has to do with the issue, you can't say online is mandatory when there are dozens if not hundreds of good single player games! As for Live, yes I have used it, what's your point?

My point is your 360 has cost you more than a PS3. I'm going to assume you have an elite or pro, single player games are obviously not the problem,the problem is the best 360 games all have MP, save mass effect 1+2. I had gears, halo 3, ODST, gears 2, R6 vegas, GRAW 2 and PDZ and I couldn't play any of them on live simply because I refused to pay that stupid fee. How is limiting me to 1/2 my game and having me to pay a fee to use it in any shape or form sounding optional? It's one of the reasons my 360 is currently used as a footrest under my desk (that and rrod)

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

its all personal preference. some might prefer the 360 for its selection, while others like the PS3 offerings.

i think a lot of it is just the ebb and flow of the industry. lately, the PS3 has been seeing quite a bit of killer apps. there will most likely be a time when the 360 is getting a bunch of titles that the PS3 isn't.

Avatar image for DEATH775
DEATH775

4216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#61 DEATH775
Member since 2005 • 4216 Posts
I really don't know why, but I decide to get both console. So problem solved
Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

Then again if you were just trying to post hyperbolic BS on purpose to expose the fact that the OP is terrible, then that's fine. :)

Assassin_87

Yes, I thought that was pretty obvious. :|

Avatar image for CZVA
CZVA

1166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 CZVA
Member since 2009 • 1166 Posts

Its not. From a neutral point of view, the PS3 has better exclusives. And multiplats arent even worth comparing anymore.

All of these top PS3 exclusive games are REAL exclusive material. All of these top 360 exclusives like Halo, Gears and even ME2, have multiplat quality and could have been multiplat games if MS didnt pay for exclusivity.

And of course, when it comes down to hardware and reliability, its obvious who wins. From a neutral POV, the only thing keeping the 360 alive is XBL and fanboys. There arent any other reasons for a new gamer to choose a 360 over a PS3 with what they both have to offer now.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

You take away gears 2, halo 3-Reach, and Alan wake and you practically have nothing worth mentioning.

ME2,gears of war 1, splinter cell conviction are all on pc.

You pay for online while the others have it for free ( even handles ) :|

I really do want to understand this .

Explain

Solid_Tango
niether console is 'better' than the other, games like splinter cell and ME2 may be on the PC but some of us cannot afford to buy gaming rigs and the 360 is a good cheaper alternative for those that want to play those games but cannot afford too, i bought my 360 BECAUSE of PC/360 multiplats as i cannot afford a gaming rig, i 'prefer' the xbox 360, but i don't think it is better than the ps3, they are both about equal in power and games, i just prefer the games that are on the 360, i can't imagine my life without left4dead,mass effect, halo, fable and splinter cell, also games like RISEN, which i am having a blast with, for me it more a case of what's NOT on the PS3 that's on the 360
Avatar image for Ryan_Som
Ryan_Som

2474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 Ryan_Som
Member since 2009 • 2474 Posts

[QUOTE="Ryan_Som"]

Better games? Preference.
Cheaper? Not anymore, Slick. ;)

Silverbond

1. Games aren't subjective. The 360 outperforms the PS3 as far as that is concerned.
2. The 360 is cheaper. $199< $299 EVERY SINGLE TIME.

1. Games are ALWAYS subjective. What do you think a review is? Fact? Those are just glorified opinions, too!

2. When you look at it like the typical consumer, yes. The fact of the matter is you don't get get everything out of the box to get the most out of the experience. A new PS3 owner can go home and find out they can play online with people. Not the case with the 360. You'll also need a HDD to get the most out of the system. Optional? Technically. But only insofar as Microsoft likes to pretend they're optional.

Car companies do this all the time. They show the top options package in a commercial and then say, "Prices starting at X" when the reality is you need to pay more to get what they're showing you in the commercial because it's not the base model.

Avatar image for Assassin_87
Assassin_87

2349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#66 Assassin_87
Member since 2004 • 2349 Posts

[QUOTE="Assassin_87"]

Then again if you were just trying to post hyperbolic BS on purpose to expose the fact that the OP is terrible, then that's fine. :)

Silverbond

Yes, I thought that was pretty obvious. :|

You thought wrong. :|

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#67 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts

Nice for him, but I didn't buy any of those silly accesories. So my 360 was indeed cheaper than a PS3.

locopatho

"Silly accessories"? XBL Gold and wifi adapters are not silly accessories. Neither is a play and charge kit. Those were absolutely necessary to me when I bought my 360.

It's funny how lems here always claim they didn't buy a single accessory for XBox yet they all have Live, many of them have a wifi adapter, charge kit, etc. Pretending they all spent the absolute bare minimum and that satisfied them. :lol: How anyone can pay for AA batteries in this day and age is beyond me. I bought the wireless batt pack and charge kit immediately for both controllers.Another amazing coincidence is how many of them already happened to have rechargable batteries that are separate from the cost of their XBox +.

The fact is that the PS3 is cheaper than the 360 if you want the exact same feature set (minus Bluray), this is true on paper and true in my personal experience. I don't regret paying for the 360 and accessories one bit, neither did I regret paying for the PS3 at launch. I knew what I was getting into. I am of the opinion that this "I didn't spend any money on accessories" is a form of DC. Suddenly nobody plays online. :roll:

Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
Why do you bring up games that are available on pc when the title specially says console? Apparently you need 2 gaming system to compete with what the 360 offers. :wonder:MFDOOM1983
You're also using games on two systems (PC / 360) against the PS3. It goes both ways.
Avatar image for kittyloaf69
kittyloaf69

1023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 kittyloaf69
Member since 2009 • 1023 Posts
[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"][QUOTE="dog_dirt"]

i don't get why ME, L4D, GeOW1 being on the PC means they don't count. contrary to what believed in SW not every one has a gaming PC.

MFDOOM1983
Those games, L4D especially don't need a 1337 machine to run them. Most people could run them with a simple graphics card upgrade, single core processors are fine.

All 3 of those games would look and run terrible on said system.

Haha, no they definitely wouldn't. My friend has a single core cpu, an HD4850, and 3 gigs of RAM and ME and L4D run perfectly fine on high settings. I can't speak for Gears because I've never seen it on his system. You don't know what you're talking about.
Avatar image for kittyloaf69
kittyloaf69

1023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 kittyloaf69
Member since 2009 • 1023 Posts
[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"][QUOTE="dog_dirt"]

i don't get why ME, L4D, GeOW1 being on the PC means they don't count. contrary to what believed in SW not every one has a gaming PC.

dog_dirt
Those games, L4D especially don't need a 1337 machine to run them. Most people could run them with a simple graphics card upgrade, single core processors are fine.

its SW myth that "most people" own PC that will play games. i worked in a large PC retail outlet in the UK for many years and sold 1000's of PC and only a small percentage of those had anything other that an on board graphics chipset.

So? You can get a capable 4800 series card for $150.
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#71 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

[QUOTE="locopatho"] Nice for him, but I didn't buy any of those silly accesories. So my 360 was indeed cheaper than a PS3.

Hahadouken

"Silly accessories"? XBL Gold and wifi adapters are not silly accessories. Neither is a play and charge kit. Those were absolutely necessary to me when I bought my 360.

It's funny how lems here always claim they didn't buy a single accessory for XBox yet they all have Live, many of them have a wifi adapter, charge kit, etc. Pretending they all spent the absolute bare minimum and that satisfied them. :lol: How anyone can pay for AA batteries in this day and age is beyond me. I bought the wireless batt pack and charge kit immediately for both controllers.Another amazing coincidence is how many of them already happened to have rechargable batteries that are separate from the cost of their XBox +.

The fact is that the PS3 is cheaper than the 360 if you want the exact same feature set (minus Bluray), this is true on paper and true in my personal experience. I don't regret paying for the 360 and accessories one bit, neither did I regret paying for the PS3 at launch. I knew what I was getting into. I am of the opinion that this "I didn't spend any money on accessories" is a form of DC. Suddenly nobody plays online. :roll:

i don't have any OPTIONAL extra's for my 360, i don't play online and if i did i would use a hardline not wi-fi, don't have a plug and charge kit, i can get 12 AA batteries for less than a quid, what may be necessary for you isn't necessary for someone else, at it's base cost out of the box the 360 is cheaper, especially over here in the UK whare you can pick up a 360 elite 70 pounds cheaper than the cheapest Ps3 SKU, there are plenty of stirling single player games out there, online is an OPTION not essential.
Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#72 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]

[QUOTE="locopatho"] Nice for him, but I didn't buy any of those silly accesories. So my 360 was indeed cheaper than a PS3.

delta3074

"Silly accessories"? XBL Gold and wifi adapters are not silly accessories. Neither is a play and charge kit. Those were absolutely necessary to me when I bought my 360.

It's funny how lems here always claim they didn't buy a single accessory for XBox yet they all have Live, many of them have a wifi adapter, charge kit, etc. Pretending they all spent the absolute bare minimum and that satisfied them. :lol: How anyone can pay for AA batteries in this day and age is beyond me. I bought the wireless batt pack and charge kit immediately for both controllers.Another amazing coincidence is how many of them already happened to have rechargable batteries that are separate from the cost of their XBox +.

The fact is that the PS3 is cheaper than the 360 if you want the exact same feature set (minus Bluray), this is true on paper and true in my personal experience. I don't regret paying for the 360 and accessories one bit, neither did I regret paying for the PS3 at launch. I knew what I was getting into. I am of the opinion that this "I didn't spend any money on accessories" is a form of DC. Suddenly nobody plays online. :roll:

i don't have any OPTIONAL extra's for my 360, i don't play online and if i did i would use a hardline not wi-fi, don't have a plug and charge kit, i can get 12 AA batteries for less than a quid, what may be necessary for you isn't necessary for someone else, at it's base cost out of the box the 360 is cheaper, especially over here in the UK whare you can pick up a 360 elite 70 pounds cheaper than the cheapest Ps3 SKU, there are plenty of stirling single player games out there, online is an OPTION not essential.

Yeah and I think "the base cost" is a lie. I don't see how you got your money out of MW2 without XBox Live.
Avatar image for SpideR_CentS
SpideR_CentS

4766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#73 SpideR_CentS
Member since 2006 • 4766 Posts

TC you didn't mention Fable, Forza, Crackdown, PGR, DoA, etc. Anyways I like PS3 and 360 close to the same. The only reason I like 360 a little better is XBL.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"] Yeah and I think "the base cost" is a lie. I don't see how you got your money out of MW2 without XBox Live.

trust me, i don't play online,check my xbox account, it's silver, and i got my moneys worth from playing the single player game to death, then i exchanged it using gamesations 10 day exchange pilicy, so i got my 40 quid back, so i got more than my moneys worth cos i paid nothing for the experience,lol
Avatar image for darthkirmy
darthkirmy

174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 darthkirmy
Member since 2009 • 174 Posts
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]So Why is the PS3, a better console? (seewhutidunthar) Different strokes for different folks. I happen to like them both, they can happily coexist on your shelf without getting into fistfights. I finished GoW3 this weekend AND pumped a bunch of hours into BFBC2 on 360, and I wasn't struck by lightning. Try it out. ;)

LOL i did the same exact thing..... Though i do like my 360 more than my ps3.
Avatar image for MFDOOM1983
MFDOOM1983

8465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 MFDOOM1983
Member since 2010 • 8465 Posts
[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"][QUOTE="dog_dirt"][QUOTE="kittyloaf69"] Those games, L4D especially don't need a 1337 machine to run them. Most people could run them with a simple graphics card upgrade, single core processors are fine.

its SW myth that "most people" own PC that will play games. i worked in a large PC retail outlet in the UK for many years and sold 1000's of PC and only a small percentage of those had anything other that an on board graphics chipset.

So? You can get a capable 4800 series card for $150.

Most of those dell/hp/gateway pc's use 350w psu's and prevent you from switching them out.. If you're lucky add another $75-$100 for a decent one.
Avatar image for chaplainDMK
chaplainDMK

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 chaplainDMK
Member since 2008 • 7004 Posts

You take away gears 2, halo 3-Reach, and Alan wake and you practically have nothing worth mentioning.

ME2,gears of war 1, splinter cell conviction are all on pc.

You pay for online while the others have it for free ( even handles ) :|

I really do want to understand this .

Explain

Solid_Tango

Oh system wars logic, where are you!?

So by that:
Without Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, Heavy Rain and God of War 3 PS3 has basicaly nothing worth mentioning.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#78 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

[QUOTE="Solid_Tango"]

You take away gears 2, halo 3-Reach, and Alan wake and you practically have nothing worth mentioning.

ME2,gears of war 1, splinter cell conviction are all on pc.

You pay for online while the others have it for free ( even handles ) :|

I really do want to understand this .

Explain

chaplainDMK

Oh system wars logic, where are you!?

So by that:
Without Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, Heavy Rain and God of War 3 PS3 has basicaly nothing worth mentioning.

it makes me laugh when people overlook the many brilliant multiplats that are available on both consoles, both consoles have a library that's worth playing, as far as exclusives are concerned that's down to purely personal preference, but the way people carry on around here you would think that exclusives are the only games that you can play on consoles, console gaming would be pretty dull if that was the case,lol
Avatar image for Ryan_Som
Ryan_Som

2474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#79 Ryan_Som
Member since 2009 • 2474 Posts

[QUOTE="Solid_Tango"]

You take away gears 2, halo 3-Reach, and Alan wake and you practically have nothing worth mentioning.

ME2,gears of war 1, splinter cell conviction are all on pc.

You pay for online while the others have it for free ( even handles ) :|

I really do want to understand this .

Explain

chaplainDMK

Oh system wars logic, where are you!?

So by that:
Without Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, Heavy Rain and God of War 3 PS3 has basicaly nothing worth mentioning.

That'd be completely true if Metal Gear Solid 4, inFamous, Valkyria Chronicles, ModNation Racers, LittleBigPlanet, and Demon's Souls didn't exist. :D

Avatar image for calvinsora
calvinsora

7076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#80 calvinsora
Member since 2009 • 7076 Posts

Well, none of the consoles are "better", it just goes by personal opinion. For example, I find the PS3 more appealing in both hardware (Bluray, free online) and library, while others might feel the complete opposite. Anyone would be wrong in saying one is better than the other :? The 360 isn't the better console, but neither is the PS3.

Avatar image for Ryan_Som
Ryan_Som

2474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#81 Ryan_Som
Member since 2009 • 2474 Posts

[QUOTE="chaplainDMK"]

[QUOTE="Solid_Tango"]

You take away gears 2, halo 3-Reach, and Alan wake and you practically have nothing worth mentioning.

ME2,gears of war 1, splinter cell conviction are all on pc.

You pay for online while the others have it for free ( even handles ) :|

I really do want to understand this .

Explain

delta3074

Oh system wars logic, where are you!?

So by that:
Without Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, Heavy Rain and God of War 3 PS3 has basicaly nothing worth mentioning.

it makes me laugh when people overlook the many brilliant multiplats that are available on both consoles, both consoles have a library that's worth playing, as far as exclusives are concerned that's down to purely personal preference, but the way people carry on around here you would think that exclusives are the only games that you can play on consoles, console gaming would be pretty dull if that was the case,lol

Truthness.

Avatar image for chaplainDMK
chaplainDMK

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 chaplainDMK
Member since 2008 • 7004 Posts

[QUOTE="chaplainDMK"]

[QUOTE="Solid_Tango"]

You take away gears 2, halo 3-Reach, and Alan wake and you practically have nothing worth mentioning.

ME2,gears of war 1, splinter cell conviction are all on pc.

You pay for online while the others have it for free ( even handles ) :|

I really do want to understand this .

Explain

Ryan_Som

Oh system wars logic, where are you!?

So by that:
Without Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, Heavy Rain and God of War 3 PS3 has basicaly nothing worth mentioning.

That'd be completely true if Metal Gear Solid 4, inFamous, Valkyria Chronicles, ModNation Racers, LittleBigPlanet, and Demon's Souls didn't exist. :D

I just dumped that because he left out Fable 2, Forza 2 & 3, Gears of War 1, Banjo & Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts, Project Gotham Racing 4 etc.

Fighting fanboy logic with fanboy logic: Fight fire with fire...

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#83 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

You take away gears 2, halo 3-Reach, and Alan wake and you practically have nothing worth mentioning.

ME2,gears of war 1, splinter cell conviction are all on pc.

You pay for online while the others have it for free ( even handles ) :|

I really do want to understand this .

Explain

Solid_Tango
same reason the cows went nuts over the Ps3 slim when it was first rumored, and if you can't afford a gamin rig, the 360 is the must have console if you want to play mass effect 2,left 4dead 2,splinter cell,metro 2033 and Risen, also you forgot perfect dark zero,kameo,fable 2,PGR 4,forza 3 and many other games that are only available on 360 (about 190 titles including arcade games) before you carry on, i should mention that the 360 actually has more exclusive titles than the Ps3, both console have a stirling library, either choice is agood one, lets not forget the brillaiant multiplats available for both
Avatar image for Quaker-w00ts
Quaker-w00ts

1646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 Quaker-w00ts
Member since 2009 • 1646 Posts

its preference....

i like them equally. friends have 360, so i can chat with them when im on etc.

Ps3 has phenomenal single player games.

Avatar image for Ryan_Som
Ryan_Som

2474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#85 Ryan_Som
Member since 2009 • 2474 Posts

[QUOTE="Ryan_Som"]

[QUOTE="chaplainDMK"]

Oh system wars logic, where are you!?

So by that:
Without Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, Heavy Rain and God of War 3 PS3 has basicaly nothing worth mentioning.

chaplainDMK

That'd be completely true if Metal Gear Solid 4, inFamous, Valkyria Chronicles, ModNation Racers, LittleBigPlanet, and Demon's Souls didn't exist. :D

I just dumped that because he left out Fable 2, Forza 2 & 3, Gears of War 1, Banjo & Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts, Project Gotham Racing 4 etc.

Fighting fanboy logic with fanboy logic: Fight fire with fire...

Ahh. I was only "poking the bear" so to speak. I'm all about fighting fanboy logic though. Fight the power! :P

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#86 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50077 Posts

[QUOTE="gregbmil"]

How will you save your games? It's just a DVD player without

Silverbond

It has 256MB worth of space. I'll figure something out.

And pretty soon you'll be able to use USB drives to hold space as well.
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts

[QUOTE="locopatho"] Nice for him, but I didn't buy any of those silly accesories. So my 360 was indeed cheaper than a PS3.

Hahadouken

"Silly accessories"? XBL Gold and wifi adapters are not silly accessories. Neither is a play and charge kit. Those were absolutely necessary to me when I bought my 360.

It's funny how lems here always claim they didn't buy a single accessory for XBox yet they all have Live, many of them have a wifi adapter, charge kit, etc. Pretending they all spent the absolute bare minimum and that satisfied them. :lol: How anyone can pay for AA batteries in this day and age is beyond me. I bought the wireless batt pack and charge kit immediately for both controllers.Another amazing coincidence is how many of them already happened to have rechargable batteries that are separate from the cost of their XBox +.

The fact is that the PS3 is cheaper than the 360 if you want the exact same feature set (minus Bluray), this is true on paper and true in my personal experience. I don't regret paying for the 360 and accessories one bit, neither did I regret paying for the PS3 at launch. I knew what I was getting into. I am of the opinion that this "I didn't spend any money on accessories" is a form of DC. Suddenly nobody plays online. :roll:

I use the ethernet cable that came free with my 360, and I have had rechargable AA batteries for PS2 and Wii aready, in any case it's under a tenner for 4 if I had to buy them. Live is the only substantial complaint that I agree with, but again it's optional. Plus I got a year free with console. So it's not a big deal to me. I've still spent less on console and accessories than a PS3 would cost me. I have a friend who got a launch one for nearly 700 euros, it broke and cost him 160 euros to get repaired, he bought a dualshock 3 to replace his Sixaxis for another 50 euro, and bought a bigger harddrive too. Huge PS fanboy tho so he doesn't mind :P It's easy to use all the optional/random stuff for "ownage", but simple fact is for console and games 360 is cheaper. Add in all the extra features and options that people may or may not need and PS3 is better value. But it's still dearer.
Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

[QUOTE="chaplainDMK"]

[QUOTE="Solid_Tango"]

You take away gears 2, halo 3-Reach, and Alan wake and you practically have nothing worth mentioning.

ME2,gears of war 1, splinter cell conviction are all on pc.

You pay for online while the others have it for free ( even handles ) :|

I really do want to understand this .

Explain

Ryan_Som

Oh system wars logic, where are you!?

So by that:
Without Uncharted 2, Killzone 2, Heavy Rain and God of War 3 PS3 has basicaly nothing worth mentioning.

That'd be completely true if Metal Gear Solid 4, inFamous, Valkyria Chronicles, ModNation Racers, LittleBigPlanet, and Demon's Souls didn't exist. :D

Why haven't you told the TC the exact same thing? :|

Avatar image for RavenLoud
RavenLoud

2874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 RavenLoud
Member since 2009 • 2874 Posts

Why is the PS3 a better console?
You take away Uncharted, MGS4, Killzone, and Resistance and you're left with LBP and Demon's Souls. :|

You look at the fact that they will charge for premium features for the PSN even though they've touted that it was free since forever and you begin to wonder, what else will they change completely contradictory to what they've been saying?

The PS3 has less quality games than the 360.

Silverbond

I can't tell if you are being serious. :?

Fad posts are FTL :P

Avatar image for Cow_tipping
Cow_tipping

602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Cow_tipping
Member since 2009 • 602 Posts

The only way you could say the xbox360 is a better console is in sales but as far as games go both systems have great games and it comes down to your preference or what your friends play

1 year head start helps the xbox360 but it does lack exclusive first party games and those are the games that do a better job getting the most out of the system

ps3 has tons of exclusive games and most multiplats have minor difference only 2 games i can think of had big diff between systems fallout 3 and bayonetta

i have both xbox360 and ps3 but stop playing the 360 after i got rid of xbox live

which system you buy should come down to which exclusives you like better because both systems have great exclusives because multiplat games little difference between systems so you could easily get multiplats for what ever system you decide on

Avatar image for Wings_008
Wings_008

3813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 173

User Lists: 0

#91 Wings_008
Member since 2008 • 3813 Posts
because it's a video game console from the ground up, not a flawed hastily made console, besides it's exclusives suit my taste more
Avatar image for TheDogout
TheDogout

807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 TheDogout
Member since 2010 • 807 Posts
[QUOTE="dog_dirt"]

i don't get why ME, L4D, GeOW1 being on the PC means they don't count. contrary to what believed in SW not every one has a gaming PC.

kittyloaf69
Those games, L4D especially don't need a 1337 machine to run them. Most people could run them with a simple graphics card upgrade, single core processors are fine.

Some people only have a laptop
Avatar image for TheDogout
TheDogout

807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 TheDogout
Member since 2010 • 807 Posts
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]

[QUOTE="locopatho"] Nice for him, but I didn't buy any of those silly accesories. So my 360 was indeed cheaper than a PS3.

locopatho

"Silly accessories"? XBL Gold and wifi adapters are not silly accessories. Neither is a play and charge kit. Those were absolutely necessary to me when I bought my 360.

It's funny how lems here always claim they didn't buy a single accessory for XBox yet they all have Live, many of them have a wifi adapter, charge kit, etc. Pretending they all spent the absolute bare minimum and that satisfied them. :lol: How anyone can pay for AA batteries in this day and age is beyond me. I bought the wireless batt pack and charge kit immediately for both controllers.Another amazing coincidence is how many of them already happened to have rechargable batteries that are separate from the cost of their XBox +.

The fact is that the PS3 is cheaper than the 360 if you want the exact same feature set (minus Bluray), this is true on paper and true in my personal experience. I don't regret paying for the 360 and accessories one bit, neither did I regret paying for the PS3 at launch. I knew what I was getting into. I am of the opinion that this "I didn't spend any money on accessories" is a form of DC. Suddenly nobody plays online. :roll:

I use the ethernet cable that came free with my 360, and I have had rechargable AA batteries for PS2 and Wii aready, in any case it's under a tenner for 4 if I had to buy them. Live is the only substantial complaint that I agree with, but again it's optional. Plus I got a year free with console. So it's not a big deal to me. I've still spent less on console and accessories than a PS3 would cost me. I have a friend who got a launch one for nearly 700 euros, it broke and cost him 160 euros to get repaired, he bought a dualshock 3 to replace his Sixaxis for another 50 euro, and bought a bigger harddrive too. Huge PS fanboy tho so he doesn't mind :P It's easy to use all the optional/random stuff for "ownage", but simple fact is for console and games 360 is cheaper. Add in all the extra features and options that people may or may not need and PS3 is better value. But it's still dearer.

I didnt need a play and plug kity cause i had a rechargable battery pack that works for more than the xbox controller I dont need wifi cause i use ethernet (which is more reliable) I didnt buy a year of live until later. Just used the 1 monthers. Your topic failed.
Avatar image for SpinoRaptor24
SpinoRaptor24

10316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 143

User Lists: 0

#94 SpinoRaptor24
Member since 2008 • 10316 Posts

Wrong. There are plenty of other games on the 360 worth mentioning. You're just not looking hard enough.

And I don't understand why PS3 fanboys here are so quick to dismiss Halo and Gears. They're great games, why ignore them?

Avatar image for BURSTIIIFIRE
BURSTIIIFIRE

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 BURSTIIIFIRE
Member since 2007 • 2025 Posts

[QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]Why do you bring up games that are available on pc when the title specially says console? Apparently you need 2 gaming system to compete with what the 360 offers. :wonder:kittyloaf69
He's using those games as a point to say that you don't need a 360 to play those games. Most people have a PC anyway, you don't need amazing specs to run those games.

If most ppl have a pc that can run these games than why do they bother buying them on the 360 at all? ME2 sold way more on the 360...Just like Splintercell will.

Avatar image for rp108
rp108

1743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#96 rp108
Member since 2008 • 1743 Posts

i don't get why ME, L4D, GeOW1 being on the PC means they don't count. contrary to what believed in SW not every one has a gaming PC.

dog_dirt

Nor do people want to play on PC, hence owning a console. On topic, 360 is better for the most obvious reasons that have been stated multiple times on these forums.

1. Bigger game library.

2. Better exclusives.

3. Better online service.

4. Better multiplatform games.

5. Better controller.

6. Larger online communities.

7. Better integration of social applications.

8. Better arcade games.

9. First to get download content and demos.

10. Runs out of box with any Windows PC with minimal configuration.

Actually owning a Xbox 360 and PS3 unlike most people on these forums I can say for certain that the PS3 is the weakest console on the market. I used to think it was an excellent Blu-ray player but after upgrading my receiver and realizing that the hardware cannot transfer HD audio codecs through bitstream and LFE is something that the PS3 cannot perform very well has changed my opinion on that.

And Sony has also made the value of any older PS3s practically worthless since they have dropped their prices so frequently (to keep up with Xbox 360) that I feel like I am trying to get rid of a Dreamcast or Gamecube. So go ahead and keep telling yourself "teh graphics, cellz, and exclusives" to make you feel better about owning the least popular console that is a considered a joke amongst the majority of gamers.

Avatar image for racing1750
racing1750

14567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#97 racing1750
Member since 2010 • 14567 Posts
Teh games :)
Avatar image for TheDogout
TheDogout

807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 TheDogout
Member since 2010 • 807 Posts

[QUOTE="dog_dirt"]

i don't get why ME, L4D, GeOW1 being on the PC means they don't count. contrary to what believed in SW not every one has a gaming PC.

rp108

Nor do people want to play on PC, hence owning a console. On topic, 360 is better for the most obvious reasons that have been stated multiple times on these forums.

1. Bigger game library.

2. Better exclusives.

3. Better online service.

4. Better multiplatform games.

5. Better controller.

6. Larger online communities.

7. Better integration of social applications.

8. Better arcade games.

9. First to get download content and demos.

10. Runs out of box with any Windows PC with minimal configuration.

Actually owning a Xbox 360 and PS3 unlike most people on these forums I can say for certain that the PS3 is the weakest console on the market. I used to think it was an excellent Blu-ray player but after upgrading my receiver and realizing that the hardware cannot transfer HD audio codecs through bitstream and LFE is something that the PS3 cannot perform very well has changed my opinion on that.

And Sony has also made the value of any older PS3s practically worthless since they have dropped their prices so frequently (to keep up with Xbox 360) that I feel like I am trying to get rid of a Dreamcast or Gamecube. So go ahead and keep telling yourself "teh graphics, cellz, and exclusives" to make you feel better about owning the least popular console that is a considered a joke amongst the majority of gamers.

The ps3 is a joke among the community?? Ps3 got 7 AAAE'S The xbox is only getting more gears and more halo and it RROD'S 50% of the time Whos the joke console?
Avatar image for TheDogout
TheDogout

807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 TheDogout
Member since 2010 • 807 Posts
Teh games :)racing1750
yep I got a 360 for Killzone 2 Uncharted 2 Little big planet Heavy rain God of war 3 Demons souls Infamous :D
Avatar image for Midnightshade29
Midnightshade29

6003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 301

User Lists: 0

#100 Midnightshade29
Member since 2008 • 6003 Posts
[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"][QUOTE="dog_dirt"]

i don't get why ME, L4D, GeOW1 being on the PC means they don't count. contrary to what believed in SW not every one has a gaming PC.

dog_dirt
Those games, L4D especially don't need a 1337 machine to run them. Most people could run them with a simple graphics card upgrade, single core processors are fine.

its SW myth that "most people" own PC that will play games. i worked in a large PC retail outlet in the UK for many years and sold 1000's of PC and only a small percentage of those had anything other that an on board graphics chipset.

uh dude its called buying a graphics card... You buy it you open the case you snap it in and plug in the montior cord. Done, Now go download the drivers off the net you are set. Not a big deal. And a lot of people play games on pc. You can upgrade. I have been doing it for years. PC gaming has had high spec requirments for years. All games can play direct x9 and that has been out since 2003. A 8800gt can max most games even play crisis at high settings, (just not with AA on) . M