Software make a system, not harware

  • 67 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for LazySloth718
LazySloth718

2345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 LazySloth718
Member since 2011 • 2345 Posts

I agree

Apple doesn't sell because of hardware.

It sells because of superior OS and iTunes.

Hardware doesn't matter.

Look at PC

Best hardware, nobody cares because it don't have blockbusters.

Look at Wii

Weakest system, outsold everything because of Mario.

Software matters

Hardware not so much

Avatar image for p4s2p0
p4s2p0

4167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 p4s2p0
Member since 2010 • 4167 Posts
Hardware is a factor by how much varies like portables didn't intrest me at all tell psp came along.
Avatar image for Overlord93
Overlord93

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Overlord93
Member since 2007 • 12602 Posts
True, but hardware is important to allow greater improvement in software. So whilst small hardware differences aren't as influential as small software differences. Large leaps in hardware are still very important.
Avatar image for deactivated-61cc564148ef4
deactivated-61cc564148ef4

10909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 deactivated-61cc564148ef4
Member since 2007 • 10909 Posts

[QUOTE="OB-47"]

[QUOTE="eboyishere"]

Is it?

killa4lyfe

We'll soon find out. Or not. The PS3's architecture is very odd, but then again the PS2 wasn't exactly conventional either. I hope the Cell isn't just a short term solution as that will mean Sony has a winner on their hands.

It would only make sense. They recently bought that factory that makes the Cell Processors, and although Sony has had their pitfalls, I doubt they would do that unless they knew the cell was going to be worth it. Hopefully this means full backwards comparability too :) (and a cheaper buy-in price at launch....yeah maybe I am asking too much of sony. :P )

That would indicate yes that Cell still has staying power. And now that most Sony devs are accustomed to it's hardware, it'll mean better games faster.

Avatar image for VanDammFan
VanDammFan

4783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#55 VanDammFan
Member since 2009 • 4783 Posts

Times have changed since the "software,hardware" debate. Nowdays its just a big mixed bag of crap that wins.

Avatar image for Another48hours
Another48hours

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 Another48hours
Member since 2012 • 1970 Posts

[QUOTE="simomate"]

[QUOTE="Kaszilla"]

Say what you want but the SNES,PS1,PS2,and DS all won because of their superior software, notice how all but the snes were the weakest of their Gen. Don't expect the Software>Hardware to change anytime soon, I don't see why Sony cares about power now all of a sudden.

Kaszilla

You are thinking of NES.

"all BUT the snes were the weakest of their Gen."

Wait the PS1 was weaker then the Saturn and the Jaguar?
Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

[QUOTE="Kaszilla"]

[QUOTE="simomate"] You are thinking of NES.

Another48hours

"all BUT the snes were the weakest of their Gen."

Wait the PS1 was weaker then the Saturn and the Jaguar?

It had a weaker CPU than Saturn and weaker GPU than Jaguar.

Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

But good hardware attracts the hardcore.

Avatar image for turtlethetaffer
turtlethetaffer

18973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 0

#60 turtlethetaffer
Member since 2009 • 18973 Posts

Good hardware helps, but, at the end of the day, it all comes down to how enjoyable the games are.

Avatar image for tjricardo089
tjricardo089

7429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 tjricardo089
Member since 2010 • 7429 Posts

Yes, indeed. I don't care about components, I care about games.

Avatar image for WithoutGraceXII
WithoutGraceXII

1797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 WithoutGraceXII
Member since 2007 • 1797 Posts
For the most part I agree, though solid hardware is important.
Avatar image for Merex760
Merex760

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 Merex760
Member since 2008 • 4381 Posts
I prefer to have the best of both, which is why I mainly game on my PC.
Avatar image for deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
deactivated-5ac102a4472fe

7431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 deactivated-5ac102a4472fe
Member since 2007 • 7431 Posts

I prefer to look at it like this:

Hardware = the potential for good games, but can not in any way define a system, nor make it popular.

Software = The actual system maker.

There is no garantee that Better Hardware yields better games, it opens the potential for better games, but it is always a wildcard.

Avatar image for ddlcpc
ddlcpc

887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 ddlcpc
Member since 2007 • 887 Posts

50 = 50..... sure softwer increase the sell but a software can only go so far without the hardware capabilities...

Avatar image for BenGenio
BenGenio

566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

#67 BenGenio
Member since 2005 • 566 Posts

The hardware is necessary but not sufficient. The software on the other hand is necessary AND should be sufficient.