Some new Gears 3 footages OMG @ graphics!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts
[QUOTE="killzowned24"]that running animation looks sooo bad.ocstew
I suppose your cowish pride prevents you from commenting on the graphics?

looks like gears 2 . certainly no graphics king.
Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#152 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
[QUOTE="ocstew"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]that running animation looks sooo bad.killzowned24
I suppose your cowish pride prevents you from commenting on the graphics?

looks like gears 2 . certainly no graphics king.

looks nothing like gears 2..
Avatar image for tempest91
tempest91

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#153 tempest91
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts

[QUOTE="1kryptic"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]that running animation looks sooo bad.killzowned24

None of that stopped you from giving MAG a 9.

MAG is a unique console game supporting 256 players.

No excuse for bad animations.

Avatar image for monkeysmoke
monkeysmoke

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 monkeysmoke
Member since 2010 • 457 Posts
Omfg!!! This looks awsome & it just the beast mode not campaigne. Gears of war 2 campaign looked a lot better than the hord mode. No gears of war game has ever come out 2nd to any game in term of graphics & gears of war 3 won't either.
Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts

[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="1kryptic"]

None of that stopped you from giving MAG a 9.

tempest91

MAG is a unique console game supporting 256 players.

No excuse for bad animations.

as i said 256 players to handle vs what 10 in gears?
Avatar image for zero_snake99
zero_snake99

3478

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#156 zero_snake99
Member since 2004 • 3478 Posts

[QUOTE="zero_snake99"]

It looks good, but I don't think its anywhere near some of the best out today. Yeah, the skybox is great, but whats even better is the total lack of skybox of Just Cause 2. Considering it renders all of it's clouds and the sky is completely dynamic. Besides, it's not hard making a skybox... all you have to do is make a large enough texture to map to the skydome/box

Snugenz

How come i never see you criticize and downplay PS3 exclusives ?.

If you're not interested in the 360 or its games, how bout you just ignore them and save your one sided negativity ?. I know its System Wars and all, but i'm sure you've heard that go old saying "if you've nothing good to say, say nothing".

Anyway, Halo Reach looks awesome for the amount on content its gonna come with, its what more devs should do, more content less graphics whore pandering.

/rant

Gears 3 looks pretty damn good alright, never picked up Gears 2 as the MP didnt really interest me but Beast mode looks like a lot of fun, might give it a go.

I think you missed the part where I said Halo was never about graphics. Halo is a great franchise, and anyone that doesn't know that Halo never really looked good has their had in their butt. Frankly, I have something negative to say about every game. For the first 2 years of the PS3 life cycle most if not all of the exclusives were garbage. My favorite game this gen? MGS4, broken by installs. Resistance 1? Broken by loading times. Resistance 2? Horrid graphics. Uncharted 2? MP is fun, but not that good after an hour, it gets boring. Want to know my opinion on Gears? I hate the series. I think it's trash. The online sucks, and the campaign is even worse. Halo? 1 and 3 I like a lot. The Campaign for 2 and 3 were bad though. Crackdown is fun. Crackdown 2, is Crackdown 1. Fable? Fable hasn't been good since the first one. Number 2 was trash because Molynuex broke it. I like Forza, it's fun, and I spend a lot of time with it, do I think it's fantastic simulator? No, do I still enjoy it? Yes. Now that I've "criticized" the only games I have something legitimate to say, am I a fanboy? No, BUT I will say, I dislike Microsoft with a passion. I believe their business practices are bad for consumers, and I think that their policies are worse. Oh, and IF you want to imply that I am a fanboy, it's because of my PC roots, not my ownership of a PS3.
Avatar image for tempest91
tempest91

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#157 tempest91
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts

[QUOTE="tempest91"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"] MAG is a unique console game supporting 256 players. killzowned24

No excuse for bad animations.

as i said 256 players to handle vs what 10 in gears?

So, if I don't want to make a game look good, I can just add more players and call it unique?

Avatar image for zero_snake99
zero_snake99

3478

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#158 zero_snake99
Member since 2004 • 3478 Posts

[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="1kryptic"] MAG is a unique console game supporting 256 players. tempest91

No excuse for bad animations.

Yes... it is an excuse, because its hardware demanding to animate 256 players with hundreds of animations, BUT is it an excuse for shallow mechanics? No. While admittingly fun, it is, as most people call it, bland.

True, but still, if epic skyboxes are not hard, then Why don't other devs do them?

siddhu33

It's not that it's hard, it's just there are other things they can focus on. Making a big high rest skybox/dome requires a lot of memory. Not to mention, most of those resolutions are limited by the engine. For example, I believe Source and EU3 engine are both limited to 1024x1024 for each side of the box.

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#159 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
[QUOTE="tempest91"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"] MAG is a unique console game supporting 256 players. killzowned24

No excuse for bad animations.

as i said 256 players to handle vs what 10 in gears?

why are you trying to change the point you first made? 256 players is no excuse for poor animations :|
Avatar image for tempest91
tempest91

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#160 tempest91
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts

[QUOTE="tempest91"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"] MAG is a unique console game supporting 256 players. zero_snake99

No excuse for bad animations.

Yes... it is an excuse, because its hardware demanding to animate 256 players with hundreds of animations, BUT is it an excuse for shallow mechanics? No. While admittingly fun, it is, as most people call it, bland.

I'm not demanding hundreds of animations, I would just like a few good ones.

Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#161 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts

[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="tempest91"]

No excuse for bad animations.

tempest91

as i said 256 players to handle vs what 10 in gears?

So, if I don't want to make a game look good, I can just add more players and call it unique?

lol, whatever. If you think that animation was awesome good for you. I didnt bring up MAG you did.
Avatar image for tempest91
tempest91

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#162 tempest91
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts

[QUOTE="tempest91"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"] as i said 256 players to handle vs what 10 in gears?killzowned24

So, if I don't want to make a game look good, I can just add more players and call it unique?

lol, whatever. If you think that animation was awesome good for you. I didnt bring up MAG you did.

No I didn't.

Avatar image for zero_snake99
zero_snake99

3478

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#163 zero_snake99
Member since 2004 • 3478 Posts

why are you trying to change the point you first made? 256 players is no excuse for poor animations :|lawlessx
You obviously have no clue how animations work do you? It IS possible, BUT only on better hardware. It requires too much processing and memory. Same reason why the graphics aren't that good in that game in the first place.

I'm not demanding hundreds of animations, I would just like a few good ones.tempest91

It still requires a lot of processing.

Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts

[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="tempest91"]

So, if I don't want to make a game look good, I can just add more players and call it unique?

tempest91

lol, whatever. If you think that animation was awesome good for you. I didnt bring up MAG you did.

No I didn't.

oh, sorry. but you react to it the most lol.
Avatar image for CwlHeddwyn
CwlHeddwyn

5314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 CwlHeddwyn
Member since 2005 • 5314 Posts

and they said the X360 was maxed-out lol

the graphics are getting better all the time.

Gears 3 looks to be up there with the best.

Avatar image for theonlyway316
theonlyway316

541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 theonlyway316
Member since 2010 • 541 Posts

wow nice cant wait for this game

Avatar image for Snugenz
Snugenz

13388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 Snugenz
Member since 2006 • 13388 Posts

[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

[QUOTE="zero_snake99"]

It looks good, but I don't think its anywhere near some of the best out today. Yeah, the skybox is great, but whats even better is the total lack of skybox of Just Cause 2. Considering it renders all of it's clouds and the sky is completely dynamic. Besides, it's not hard making a skybox... all you have to do is make a large enough texture to map to the skydome/box

zero_snake99

How come i never see you criticize and downplay PS3 exclusives ?.

If you're not interested in the 360 or its games, how bout you just ignore them and save your one sided negativity ?. I know its System Wars and all, but i'm sure you've heard that go old saying "if you've nothing good to say, say nothing".

Anyway, Halo Reach looks awesome for the amount on content its gonna come with, its what more devs should do, more content less graphics whore pandering.

/rant

Gears 3 looks pretty damn good alright, never picked up Gears 2 as the MP didnt really interest me but Beast mode looks like a lot of fun, might give it a go.

I think you missed the part where I said Halo was never about graphics. Halo is a great franchise, and anyone that doesn't know that Halo never really looked good has their had in their butt. Frankly, I have something negative to say about every game. For the first 2 years of the PS3 life cycle most if not all of the exclusives were garbage. My favorite game this gen? MGS4, broken by installs. Resistance 1? Broken by loading times. Resistance 2? Horrid graphics. Uncharted 2? MP is fun, but not that good after an hour, it gets boring. Want to know my opinion on Gears? I hate the series. I think it's trash. The online sucks, and the campaign is even worse. Halo? 1 and 3 I like a lot. The Campaign for 2 and 3 were bad though. Crackdown is fun. Crackdown 2, is Crackdown 1. Fable? Fable hasn't been good since the first one. Number 2 was trash because Molynuex broke it. I like Forza, it's fun, and I spend a lot of time with it, do I think it's fantastic simulator? No, do I still enjoy it? Yes. Now that I've "criticized" the only games I have something legitimate to say, am I a fanboy? No, BUT I will say, I dislike Microsoft with a passion. I believe their business practices are bad for consumers, and I think that their policies are worse. Oh, and IF you want to imply that I am a fanboy, it's because of my PC roots, not my ownership of a PS3.

1. Halo always looked good, not always the best but it always looked good when compared to other current games.

2. I never said you were a fanboy, just questioned why you even bother to post if you have nothing but negative things to say about the particular subject. The fact that i'm asking you instead of just ignoring your posts like the dozens of fanboys on the site is specifically because i dont think your a fanboy and that the behavior in question is baffling to me.

3. Disliking a company is no excuse to lay into developers hard work purely because that game is on said company's machine (not saying thats what your doing).

Anyway, in order to justify this post, back on topic ... yeah Gears 3 still looks good.

Avatar image for zero_snake99
zero_snake99

3478

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#169 zero_snake99
Member since 2004 • 3478 Posts

1. Halo always looked good, not always the best but it always looked good when compared to other current games.

2. I never said you were a fanboy, just questioned why you even bother to post if you have nothing but negative things to say about the particular subject. The fact that i'm asking you instead of just ignoring your posts like the dozens of fanboys on the site is specifically because i dont think your a fanboy and that the behavior in question is baffling to me.

3. Disliking a company is no excuse to lay into developers hard work purely because that game is on said company's machine (not saying thats what your doing).

Anyway, in order to justify this post, back on topic ... yeah Gears 3 still looks good.

Snugenz

1) Halo 1 looked good. Halo 2 looked slightly above average for its time, but Halo 3 and ODST looked just bad. It doesn't look good at all, and that's solely because of Bungie's choice in using the Halo 2 engine to do those other 2 games.

2) I'm glad you don't find me a fanboy, I did have something good to say about GeoW 3 though. While I didn't say it was "graphics king" (which in it's current stage, isn't) it doesn't look bad and it doesn't concern me how the game looks at this stage in the game. I did also say that the 3 types of "characters" in this game resembles Halo... in which, it does. I gave my reasons why I think so. Hopefully I'm just wrong in my assumption based on the last 2 games that the campaign is some half assed through together, and that's what got me flak.

3) I don't dislike the developers. Bungie is a great group of guys with lots of talent. Epic, I have started to dislike them more as they completely stopped making PC games, in which I own several of.

And yes. Gears 3 does look good.

Avatar image for Oonga
Oonga

633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 Oonga
Member since 2010 • 633 Posts

I cant believe how much the graphics/animations have jumped up. I was expecting something like gears 1 to 2, i didnt think it be this good.

Avatar image for JetB1ackNewYear
JetB1ackNewYear

2931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#171 JetB1ackNewYear
Member since 2007 • 2931 Posts
im sorry but ya i didnt expect it to look that good, gears 3 is looking amazing just wow
Avatar image for RobBourne
RobBourne

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#172 RobBourne
Member since 2010 • 161 Posts
Gears of War was great. The dark, gritty environment fit the game. You kind of felt like "damn, **** is serious" but in Gears of War 2 it was thrown out the window, and now Gears of War 3 seems to be set in tropical environment. The graphics look great, but I just can't help but think it feels completely out of place. "Oh noes! We're on the brink of extinction!!..oh look a beach!"
Avatar image for Foliage-King
Foliage-King

720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 Foliage-King
Member since 2010 • 720 Posts

But does it have da foliage

I mean yeah the worlds messed up but without any vegetation the world would be dead.

Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#174 FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts

1) Halo 1 looked good. Halo 2 looked slightly above average for its time, but Halo 3 and ODST looked just bad. It doesn't look good at all, and that's solely because of Bungie's choice in using the Halo 2 engine to do those other 2 games.

zero_snake99

Halo 1 looked good to the point of envy for PC gamers in 2001. Halo 2 looked "slightly above average" compared to Doom 3 and Half-Life 2. On the console front it was a contender alongside Ninja Gaiden and Chronicles of Riddick.

Halo 3 looks far from bad, and in fact its awesome lighting was only recently bested by Alan Wake. Both games incidentally have large scale levels.

Just for your info, Halo: Reach also uses the Halo 2 engine. I think they just reuse the framework for all their Halo games. Will probably change following their new action title.

Avatar image for CaptainHarley
CaptainHarley

2703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#175 CaptainHarley
Member since 2004 • 2703 Posts

[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="1kryptic"]

None of that stopped you from giving MAG a 9.

tempest91

MAG is a unique console game supporting 256 players.

No excuse for bad animations.

or really awful boring gameplay

Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts

[QUOTE="zero_snake99"]1) Halo 1 looked good. Halo 2 looked slightly above average for its time, but Halo 3 and ODST looked just bad. It doesn't look good at all, and that's solely because of Bungie's choice in using the Halo 2 engine to do those other 2 games.

FrozenLiquid

Halo 1 looked good to the point of envy for PC gamers in 2001. Halo 2 looked "slightly above average" compared to Doom 3 and Half-Life 2. On the console front it was a contender alongside Ninja Gaiden and Chronicles of Riddick.

Halo 3 looks far from bad, and in fact its awesome lighting was only recently bested by Alan Wake. Both games incidentally have large scale levels.

Just for your info, Halo: Reach also uses the Halo 2 engine. I think they just reuse the framework for all their Halo games. Will probably change following their new action title.

I'd say that Halo 3's looks depend on the location. Pitstop as an MP map looks awful imo, but something like Sandtrap or Orbital looks fantastic - and yeah the lighting in Halo is top notch. I think Reach is using a completely gutted version of the engine, and Bungie have changed pretty much everything :)
Avatar image for spike6566
spike6566

1630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 spike6566
Member since 2008 • 1630 Posts

I really hope the graphics improve. After playing Uncharted 2, I don't think GEOW series can even catch up to it. GEOW 1 set new standards, uncharted 2 stole the show. :(

Avatar image for tempest91
tempest91

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#178 tempest91
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts

[QUOTE="tempest91"]I'm not demanding hundreds of animations, I would just like a few good ones.zero_snake99

It still requires a lot of processing.

You're still making excuses. At this point, it's like all they cared about was getting 256 player matches to work and the quality went out the door. Yes that many players does require a lot of processing, but they decided on that number, and they still should attempt to make it look and feel good and it doesn't.

Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts
[QUOTE="tempest91"]

[QUOTE="zero_snake99"]

I'm not demanding hundreds of animations, I would just like a few good ones.tempest91

It still requires a lot of processing.

You're still making excuses. At this point, it's like all they cared about was getting 256 player matches to work and the quality went out the door. Yes that many players does require a lot of processing, but they decided on that number, and they still should attempt to make it look and feel good and it doesn't.

All this from a 30 second multiplayer clip? Get real.
Avatar image for zero_snake99
zero_snake99

3478

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#180 zero_snake99
Member since 2004 • 3478 Posts

[QUOTE="zero_snake99"]

[QUOTE="tempest91"]I'm not demanding hundreds of animations, I would just like a few good ones.tempest91

It still requires a lot of processing.

You're still making excuses. At this point, it's like all they cared about was getting 256 player matches to work and the quality went out the door. Yes that many players does require a lot of processing, but they decided on that number, and they still should attempt to make it look and feel good and it doesn't.

"Making excuses" implies I'm fabricating a reason, and I'm not, it IS the reason why it had poor animations. When Planet Side came out in 03, that game had absolutely poor animations and graphics, it looked dated by several years, but the developers did the same thing as the MAG devs did. They went with massive battles and armies over quality of visuals. Besides, why are we talking about MAG? Comparing a large multiplayer game to a campaign with MP features.
Avatar image for Foliage-King
Foliage-King

720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 Foliage-King
Member since 2010 • 720 Posts

Lol at anyone complaining about graphics this gen. Even the worse games look good.

Avatar image for moose_knuckler
moose_knuckler

5722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#182 moose_knuckler
Member since 2007 • 5722 Posts
I didn't find them that impressive. I did so OMG the gameplay though which is a great start :D
Avatar image for tempest91
tempest91

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#183 tempest91
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts

[QUOTE="tempest91"]

[QUOTE="zero_snake99"]

zero_snake99

You're still making excuses. At this point, it's like all they cared about was getting 256 player matches to work and the quality went out the door. Yes that many players does require a lot of processing, but they decided on that number, and they still should attempt to make it look and feel good and it doesn't.

"Making excuses" implies I'm fabricating a reason, and I'm not, it IS the reason why it had poor animations. When Planet Side came out in 03, that game had absolutely poor animations and graphics, it looked dated by several years, but the developers did the same thing as the MAG devs did. They went with massive battles and armies over quality of visuals. Besides, why are we talking about MAG? Comparing a large multiplayer game to a campaign with MP features.

Implications are a bi-product of personal bias, because "excuses" in no way imply fabrication. It simply means to remove blame from something, and we are talking about MAG because someone made a comment about it and people were offended by it and started rabidly defending a mediocre game. I'm simply saying that a large scale game can't use it's scale as an excuse for poor animations, simple as that. I'm not asking for anything fancy or numerous, just quality. If you can't do it at that scale, then reduce the quantity for the sake of quality.

Avatar image for tempest91
tempest91

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#184 tempest91
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts

[QUOTE="tempest91"]

[QUOTE="zero_snake99"]

It still requires a lot of processing.

Phazevariance

You're still making excuses. At this point, it's like all they cared about was getting 256 player matches to work and the quality went out the door. Yes that many players does require a lot of processing, but they decided on that number, and they still should attempt to make it look and feel good and it doesn't.

All this from a 30 second multiplayer clip? Get real.

We are in SW, aren't we?

Avatar image for Blixxed
Blixxed

1800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#185 Blixxed
Member since 2009 • 1800 Posts
It's going to be amazing.
Avatar image for Punjabiking101
Punjabiking101

1577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#186 Punjabiking101
Member since 2008 • 1577 Posts

I LOL at everyone complaining at the graphics, I own U2 and GOW3 and I can truly say that Epic has stepped up their game. Well done :D

Avatar image for Esoteric_Proxy
Esoteric_Proxy

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#187 Esoteric_Proxy
Member since 2010 • 40 Posts
Is it just me or does GEOW3 just look like GEOW2 with a few new weapons, girls, and tentacle beasts.
Avatar image for tempest91
tempest91

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#188 tempest91
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts

Is it just me or does GEOW3 just look like GEOW2 with a few new weapons, girls, and tentacle beasts. Esoteric_Proxy

Exactly, and much improved graphics as well.

Avatar image for bad_fur_day
bad_fur_day

1988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#190 bad_fur_day
Member since 2008 • 1988 Posts

:Yawnfest:

Avatar image for NoirLamia
NoirLamia

801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#191 NoirLamia
Member since 2010 • 801 Posts

I like what I'm seeing, can't wait to play this. Gonna replay the first two soon to get me hyped up.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#192 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50214 Posts

Amazing how people come to conclusions on visual details like textures from an offscreen gameplay clip...NVIDIATI

Welcome to SW. They did it with Halo Reach and GT5. They'll continue to do it for as long as SW exists. :P And Beast mode looks like a ton of fun. :shock:

Avatar image for worknow222
worknow222

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#193 worknow222
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts

any gears 3 Gifs?

Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#195 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts
I wasn't aware epic had any other colors besides brown and grey on their palettes, guess I was wrong.
Avatar image for T-razor1
T-razor1

1164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#196 T-razor1
Member since 2002 • 1164 Posts

This looks amazing!! IMO this is almost making KZ2/3 look pretty bad. Also this is definitely on par with UC2 and some things are looking better than UC2 like the foliage. Someone also mentioned that this has too much color. I disagree it looks just fine. I actually think UC2 has more color than this.

....and people say that the 360 is maxed out or not as powerful as the Ps3. Just stop.

Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#197 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

looks nice, not a fan of the mode though... maybe it'll be better than I think it will.

Avatar image for call_of_duty_10
call_of_duty_10

4954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#198 call_of_duty_10
Member since 2009 • 4954 Posts

Seems hard to believe that a n00b like Cliffy B made something as awesome as this.

Avatar image for mike_on_mic
mike_on_mic

886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#199 mike_on_mic
Member since 2004 • 886 Posts
I am sorry, but beast mode just looks lame. Graphics look good though
Avatar image for Malta_1980
Malta_1980

11890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#200 Malta_1980
Member since 2008 • 11890 Posts

Am so hyped for this game :)

Visually it really looks good... the only problem is we have to wait till April 2011 to play the game :(