XXXXXX

94 results
1
2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

2015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#51 FearlessSpirit

Member since 2007 • 2015 Posts

[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"]Porting down is easier than Porting up for the noobminded.massAttack2k

Porting down is harder how can you not realize this? If you port from a weaker system to a more powerful the game suffers no ill effects but if you port down from a more powerful to a weaker system the game has to be cut down and watered down. You are just self owning yourself.

It doesnt matter whether its hard or easy. Publishers want the best looking game they can get that is playable and to compete with other games. 360 wont have enough sales to support being the target platform and being the weaker hardware. In the HD era graphics are more important than ever for developers and publishers. 360 is limiting that.

Developers themselves disagree with you.

17 years ago

1971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2002 • 1971 Posts

Porting down is easier than Porting up for the noobminded.massAttack2k

So you lay the bricks before the steel beams.. gotcha.

17 years ago

5352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#53 ff7isnumbaone

Member since 2005 • 5352 Posts

[QUOTE="_AsasN_"][QUOTE="osusfaith"]Then why were 99% of multiplat games last gen made with the less powerful PS2 as it's base console? There goes your entire argument. You fail at life, so seriously considering ending your ownonewiththegame

Wow! Thanks for coming out. lol You seriously call that crap a post? Try to think a little before you let your fanboy rage get the best of you. Playstation had a much, much bigger following than Xbox, so it's pretty obvious why all the multi-plats were made with less powerful hardware. So, where's your argument? You said he doesn't have one, so where in that piece of garbage post do you have an argument? Oh yeah, and considering this a video game forum, that last comment you made was pretty sad.

so kinda like 2mil compared to 10mil right

so again by cow logic the 360 will be getting the lead

add 30 million to that 10 million and that all 360 is selling.

17 years ago

690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 massAttack2k

Member since 2007 • 690 Posts

[QUOTE="massAttack2k"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"]Porting down is easier than Porting up for the noobminded.FearlessSpirit

Porting down is harder how can you not realize this? If you port from a weaker system to a more powerful the game suffers no ill effects but if you port down from a more powerful to a weaker system the game has to be cut down and watered down. You are just self owning yourself.

It doesnt matter whether its hard or easy. Publishers want the best looking game they can get that is playable and to compete with other games. 360 wont have enough sales to support being the target platform and being the weaker hardware. In the HD era graphics are more important than ever for developers and publishers. 360 is limiting that.

Developers themselves disagree with you.

Competition against those developers who disagree will crush them. If Sony continues to push out the amazing graphics it is getting out of its First Party, 3rd party developers will have to make a move or be left with the ugliest Next Gen games that are limited by 360.

17 years ago

2015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#55 FearlessSpirit

Member since 2007 • 2015 Posts

Competition against those developers who disagree will crush them. If Sony continues to push out the amazing graphics it is getting out of its First Party, 3rd party developers will have to make a move or be left with the ugliest Next Gen games that are limited by 360. massAttack2k

If you say so. :|

And when exactly are we going to see games on PS3 that outperform the X360's games?

17 years ago

-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 -GeordiLaForge-

Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts

[QUOTE="Blackbond"]Is this guy serious? :lol:

The console with the largest user base is the one that developers make the game on and then port to other systems.

360 graphics are currently > PS3 graphics so I don't get why you say the 360 would hold devs back. The PS3 is what's holding devs back and that's why PS3 has lost so many exclusives.

Why port down when you can port up? If you port from weaker to a stronger system there shouldn't be any problems or sacrifices whether as if you port from a stronger to weaker system you have to cut corners and water the game down.

You obviously didn't learn anything from last gen with PS2 did you?
rocktimusprime

Build the foundation, then the house, unfourtunately this guy can't figure out why his roof keeps falling down.

:lol:

17 years ago

690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 massAttack2k

Member since 2007 • 690 Posts

[QUOTE="massAttack2k"]Competition against those developers who disagree will crush them. If Sony continues to push out the amazing graphics it is getting out of its First Party, 3rd party developers will have to make a move or be left with the ugliest Next Gen games that are limited by 360. FearlessSpirit

If you say so. :|

And when exactly are we going to see games on PS3 that outperform the X360's games?

You already do with first generation games R:FOM and Motorstorm. 360 didnt get a good looking game till Geow at the very end of 1st Gen.

17 years ago

6507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 6507 Posts

MassAttack2k is right! Publishers will make the game for the most powerful system that looks the best! Don't you get it?!? PS3 will have the best graphics hands down once developers figure out how to program for it properly! Companies dont care how many units they can sell! They would rather lose their jobs and go on welfare as long as they can make the best looking game for the most failed system! Would you rather make a game that has the potential to sell 10 million units but not look the best or sell 1.5 million units and look great?!?! You would have to be an idiot not to see which is the correct answer!

17 years ago

2015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#59 FearlessSpirit

Member since 2007 • 2015 Posts

[QUOTE="FearlessSpirit"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"]Competition against those developers who disagree will crush them. If Sony continues to push out the amazing graphics it is getting out of its First Party, 3rd party developers will have to make a move or be left with the ugliest Next Gen games that are limited by 360. massAttack2k

If you say so. :|

And when exactly are we going to see games on PS3 that outperform the X360's games?

You already do with first generation games R:FOM and Motorstorm. 360 didnt get a good looking game till Geow at the very end of 1st Gen.

Gears has better graphics then both of those. Nice try.

If you are going to say: 'Yeah, well... When X360 gets a great looking game then PS3 will have a less great looking game in comparision but since the PS3 launched later it looks better! ... right?' then I totally agree with you.

17 years ago

690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 massAttack2k

Member since 2007 • 690 Posts

[QUOTE="flazzle"]MassAttack2k is right! Publishers will make the game for the most powerful system that looks the best! Don't you get it?!? PS3 will have the best graphics hands down once developers figure out how to program for it properly! Companies dont care how many units they can sell! They would rather lose their jobs and go on welfare as long as they can make the best looking game for the most failed system! Would you rather make a game that has the potential to sell 10 million units but not look the best or sell 1.5 million units and look great?!?! You would have to be an idiot not to see which is the correct answer!

Sarcasm is weak because your info is wrong. 360 has 9.25 mln in sales not 10mln and probably 2 Million of those 360 sales are Broken down 360s. By end of March PS3 will have over 3 Million in sales and 360 will still be under 10 Million.

17 years ago

690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 massAttack2k

Member since 2007 • 690 Posts

[QUOTE="massAttack2k"][QUOTE="FearlessSpirit"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"]Competition against those developers who disagree will crush them. If Sony continues to push out the amazing graphics it is getting out of its First Party, 3rd party developers will have to make a move or be left with the ugliest Next Gen games that are limited by 360. FearlessSpirit

If you say so. :|

And when exactly are we going to see games on PS3 that outperform the X360's games?

You already do with first generation games R:FOM and Motorstorm. 360 didnt get a good looking game till Geow at the very end of 1st Gen.

Gears has better graphics then both of those. Nice try.

If you are going to say: 'Yeah, well... When X360 gets a great looking game then PS3 will have a less great looking game in comparision but since the PS3 launched later it looks better! ... right?' then I totally agree with you.

Not really. Gears is also only a 6-7 hour game, when you make a game so short yoiu can focus on graphics, if RFOM was a 7 hour game it would look better than Gears easily. UE3.0 isnt even that graphically great as it is made to be a multiplat engine that any dev can use. It hit its peak with Geow already.

17 years ago

2015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#62 FearlessSpirit

Member since 2007 • 2015 Posts

[QUOTE="massAttack2k"][QUOTE="flazzle"]MassAttack2k is right! Publishers will make the game for the most powerful system that looks the best! Don't you get it?!? PS3 will have the best graphics hands down once developers figure out how to program for it properly! Companies dont care how many units they can sell! They would rather lose their jobs and go on welfare as long as they can make the best looking game for the most failed system! Would you rather make a game that has the potential to sell 10 million units but not look the best or sell 1.5 million units and look great?!?! You would have to be an idiot not to see which is the correct answer!

Sarcasm is weak because your info is wrong. 360 has 9.25 mln in sales not 10mln and probably 2 Million of those 360 sales are Broken down 360s. By end of March PS3 will have over 3 Million in sales and 360 will still be under 10 Million.

So according to you, over 20% of X360's are faulty?

Link? Offcourse not, you are lying right there.

17 years ago

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"]Porting down is easier than Porting up for the noobminded.massAttack2k

Porting down is harder how can you not realize this? If you port from a weaker system to a more powerful the game suffers no ill effects but if you port down from a more powerful to a weaker system the game has to be cut down and watered down. You are just self owning yourself.

It doesnt matter whether its hard or easy. Publishers want the best looking game they can get that is playable and to compete with other games. 360 wont have enough sales to support being the target platform and being the weaker hardware. In the HD era graphics are more important than ever for developers and publishers. 360 is limiting that.

Get ready to get destroyed verbally of course.

Self Ownage # 1
First you say porting down is easier then porrting up for the noobminded. Then you say It doesn't matter whether its hard or is. Are you going to stick to your point or damage control and run away from it?

Self Ownage #2

Next you say 360 won't have enough sales to support being the target platform and weaker hardware. Yet you failed to realize PS3 has as of today the worst hardware and software sales out of the three companies. So you have no room to talk about 360 won't have enough sales to support being the target platform. Maybe you should direct that question to the PS3.

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/21/npd-lost-planet-leads-strong-january-game-sales/

TOP 10 GAMES: December 31, 2006-February 3, 2007: (sales numbers are approximate)
1) Lost Planet: Extreme Condition (Xbox 360, Capcom, Jan. 2007) -- 329,000 copies
2) Guitar Hero II (with Guitar Controller) (PS2, Activision, Nov. 2006) -- 224,000 copies
3) Gears of War (Xbox 360, Microsoft, Nov. 2006) -- 212,000 copies
4) WarioWare: Smooth Moves (Wii, Nintendo, Jan. 2007) -- 201,000 copies
5) Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (Wii, Nintendo, Nov. 2006) -- 189,000 copies
6) Madden NFL 07 (PS2, Electronic Arts, Aug. 2006)
7) Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (GameCube, Nintendo, Nov. 2006) -- 144,000 copies
8) Resistance: Fall of Man (PS3, SCEA, Nov. 2006) -- 144,000 copies
9) Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas (Xbox 360, Ubisoft, Nov. 2006)
10) New Super Mario Bros. (DS, Nintendo, May 2006)

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/21/wii-outsells-both-360-and-ps3-in-january-despite-shortages/

January Sales

Wii - 436,000 units
360 - 294,000 units
PS3 - 244,000 units

Self Ownage #3

You claim that in the HD era graphics are more important than ever for developers and publishers. 360 is limiting that.

If the HD era is so important then why didn't Sony pack in HDMI or even at least component cables in the box with the PS3? You are HD ready with 360 from the get go. The adoption rate of HDTV's is far to low to claim that we are in the HD era. Tell me how we are in the HD era when there isn't even a winner of the HiDef format war?

17 years ago

6507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 6507 Posts

[QUOTE="massAttack2k"][QUOTE="flazzle"]MassAttack2k is right! Publishers will make the game for the most powerful system that looks the best! Don't you get it?!? PS3 will have the best graphics hands down once developers figure out how to program for it properly! Companies dont care how many units they can sell! They would rather lose their jobs and go on welfare as long as they can make the best looking game for the most failed system! Would you rather make a game that has the potential to sell 10 million units but not look the best or sell 1.5 million units and look great?!?! You would have to be an idiot not to see which is the correct answer!

Sarcasm is weak because your info is wrong. 360 has 9.25 mln in sales not 10mln and probably 2 Million of those 360 sales are Broken down 360s. By end of March PS3 will have over 3 Million in sales and 360 will still be under 10 Million.

Since when does bad information equal bad sarcasm. And just where am I being sarcastic?! I'm agreeing with you!

17 years ago

2015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#65 FearlessSpirit

Member since 2007 • 2015 Posts

[QUOTE="FearlessSpirit"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"][QUOTE="FearlessSpirit"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"]Competition against those developers who disagree will crush them. If Sony continues to push out the amazing graphics it is getting out of its First Party, 3rd party developers will have to make a move or be left with the ugliest Next Gen games that are limited by 360. massAttack2k

If you say so. :|

And when exactly are we going to see games on PS3 that outperform the X360's games?

You already do with first generation games R:FOM and Motorstorm. 360 didnt get a good looking game till Geow at the very end of 1st Gen.

Gears has better graphics then both of those. Nice try.

If you are going to say: 'Yeah, well... When X360 gets a great looking game then PS3 will have a less great looking game in comparision but since the PS3 launched later it looks better! ... right?' then I totally agree with you.

Not really. Gears is also only a 6-7 hour game, when you make a game so short yoiu can focus on graphics, if RFOM was a 7 hour game it would look better than Gears easily. UE3.0 isnt even that graphically great as it is made to be a multiplat engine that any dev can use. It hit its peak with Geow already.

Glad to see you agree Gears looks better then the ones you mentioned earlier.

Oh, and it's a 10 hour game by the way. Just because people say they've cleared it in 6 hours (which they have done by the way on casual and a second time through the game) doesn't make the game 6 hours long. Read good reviews. They all state it to last at least 10 hours.

And Unreal Engine 3 isn't great graphically huh? Do you see anything better on consoles? No.

17 years ago

690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 massAttack2k

Member since 2007 • 690 Posts

[QUOTE="massAttack2k"][QUOTE="FearlessSpirit"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"][QUOTE="FearlessSpirit"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"]Competition against those developers who disagree will crush them. If Sony continues to push out the amazing graphics it is getting out of its First Party, 3rd party developers will have to make a move or be left with the ugliest Next Gen games that are limited by 360. FearlessSpirit

If you say so. :|

And when exactly are we going to see games on PS3 that outperform the X360's games?

You already do with first generation games R:FOM and Motorstorm. 360 didnt get a good looking game till Geow at the very end of 1st Gen.

Gears has better graphics then both of those. Nice try.

If you are going to say: 'Yeah, well... When X360 gets a great looking game then PS3 will have a less great looking game in comparision but since the PS3 launched later it looks better! ... right?' then I totally agree with you.

Not really. Gears is also only a 6-7 hour game, when you make a game so short yoiu can focus on graphics, if RFOM was a 7 hour game it would look better than Gears easily. UE3.0 isnt even that graphically great as it is made to be a multiplat engine that any dev can use. It hit its peak with Geow already.

Glad to see you agree Gears looks better then the ones you mentioned earlier.

Oh, and it's a 10 hour game by the way. Just because people say they've cleared it in 6 hours (which they have done by the way on casual and a second time through the game) doesn't make the game 6 hours long. Read good reviews. They all state it to last at least 10 hours.

And Unreal Engine 3 isn't great graphically huh? Do you see anything better on consoles? No.

UE3.0 gets away with using a lot of Bloom. It has very short Draw Distances, its not the greatest at Physics either. When you see Ratchet and Clank unveiled this month you will say Gears of War is ugly.

17 years ago

2717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 miss_kitt3n

Member since 2006 • 2717 Posts

Shut up fakeboy:|

17 years ago

7661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 TheCrazed420

Member since 2003 • 7661 Posts

[QUOTE="massAttack2k"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"]Porting down is easier than Porting up for the noobminded.Blackbond

Porting down is harder how can you not realize this? If you port from a weaker system to a more powerful the game suffers no ill effects but if you port down from a more powerful to a weaker system the game has to be cut down and watered down. You are just self owning yourself.

It doesnt matter whether its hard or easy. Publishers want the best looking game they can get that is playable and to compete with other games. 360 wont have enough sales to support being the target platform and being the weaker hardware. In the HD era graphics are more important than ever for developers and publishers. 360 is limiting that.

Get ready to get destroyed verbally of course.

Self Ownage # 1
First you say porting down is easier then porrting up for the noobminded. Then you say It doesn't matter whether its hard or is. Are you going to stick to your point or damage control and run away from it?

Self Ownage #2

Next you say 360 won't have enough sales to support being the target platform and weaker hardware. Yet you failed to realize PS3 has as of today the worst hardware and software sales out of the three companies. So you have no room to talk about 360 won't have enough sales to support being the target platform. Maybe you should direct that question to the PS3.

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/21/npd-lost-planet-leads-strong-january-game-sales/

TOP 10 GAMES: December 31, 2006-February 3, 2007: (sales numbers are approximate)
1) Lost Planet: Extreme Condition (Xbox 360, Capcom, Jan. 2007) -- 329,000 copies
2) Guitar Hero II (with Guitar Controller) (PS2, Activision, Nov. 2006) -- 224,000 copies
3) Gears of War (Xbox 360, Microsoft, Nov. 2006) -- 212,000 copies
4) WarioWare: Smooth Moves (Wii, Nintendo, Jan. 2007) -- 201,000 copies
5) Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (Wii, Nintendo, Nov. 2006) -- 189,000 copies
6) Madden NFL 07 (PS2, Electronic Arts, Aug. 2006)
7) Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (GameCube, Nintendo, Nov. 2006) -- 144,000 copies
8) Resistance: Fall of Man (PS3, SCEA, Nov. 2006) -- 144,000 copies
9) Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas (Xbox 360, Ubisoft, Nov. 2006)
10) New Super Mario Bros. (DS, Nintendo, May 2006)

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/21/wii-outsells-both-360-and-ps3-in-january-despite-shortages/

January Sales

Wii - 436,000 units
360 - 294,000 units
PS3 - 244,000 units

Self Ownage #3

You claim that in the HD era graphics are more important than ever for developers and publishers. 360 is limiting that.

If the HD era is so important then why didn't Sony pack in HDMI or even at least component cables in the box with the PS3? You are HD ready with 360 from the get go. The adoption rate of HDTV's is far to low to claim that we are in the HD era. Tell me how we are in the HD era when there isn't even a winner of the HiDef format war?

Very nice. I"m quoting this for truth and waiting in anticipation for the poor child to reply to this.

17 years ago

579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Twisted_Hawk

Member since 2005 • 579 Posts

One flaw in your argument, PS3 is NOT superior.Arsuz

So I guess you haven't seen the specs, huh?

17 years ago

690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 massAttack2k

Member since 2007 • 690 Posts

[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"]Porting down is easier than Porting up for the noobminded.TheCrazed420

Porting down is harder how can you not realize this? If you port from a weaker system to a more powerful the game suffers no ill effects but if you port down from a more powerful to a weaker system the game has to be cut down and watered down. You are just self owning yourself.

It doesnt matter whether its hard or easy. Publishers want the best looking game they can get that is playable and to compete with other games. 360 wont have enough sales to support being the target platform and being the weaker hardware. In the HD era graphics are more important than ever for developers and publishers. 360 is limiting that.

Get ready to get destroyed verbally of course.

Self Ownage # 1
First you say porting down is easier then porrting up for the noobminded. Then you say It doesn't matter whether its hard or is. Are you going to stick to your point or damage control and run away from it?

Self Ownage #2

Next you say 360 won't have enough sales to support being the target platform and weaker hardware. Yet you failed to realize PS3 has as of today the worst hardware and software sales out of the three companies. So you have no room to talk about 360 won't have enough sales to support being the target platform. Maybe you should direct that question to the PS3.

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/21/npd-lost-planet-leads-strong-january-game-sales/

TOP 10 GAMES: December 31, 2006-February 3, 2007: (sales numbers are approximate)
1) Lost Planet: Extreme Condition (Xbox 360, Capcom, Jan. 2007) -- 329,000 copies
2) Guitar Hero II (with Guitar Controller) (PS2, Activision, Nov. 2006) -- 224,000 copies
3) Gears of War (Xbox 360, Microsoft, Nov. 2006) -- 212,000 copies
4) WarioWare: Smooth Moves (Wii, Nintendo, Jan. 2007) -- 201,000 copies
5) Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (Wii, Nintendo, Nov. 2006) -- 189,000 copies
6) Madden NFL 07 (PS2, Electronic Arts, Aug. 2006)
7) Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (GameCube, Nintendo, Nov. 2006) -- 144,000 copies
8) Resistance: Fall of Man (PS3, SCEA, Nov. 2006) -- 144,000 copies
9) Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas (Xbox 360, Ubisoft, Nov. 2006)
10) New Super Mario Bros. (DS, Nintendo, May 2006)

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/21/wii-outsells-both-360-and-ps3-in-january-despite-shortages/

January Sales

Wii - 436,000 units
360 - 294,000 unitsPS3 - 244,000 unitsSelf Ownage #3

You claim that in the HD era graphics are more important than ever for developers and publishers. 360 is limiting that.

If the HD era is so important then why didn't Sony pack in HDMI or even at least component cables in the box with the PS3? You are HD ready with 360 from the get go. The adoption rate of HDTV's is far to low to claim that we are in the HD era. Tell me how we are in the HD era when there isn't even a winner of the HiDef format war?

Very nice. I"m quoting this for truth and waiting in anticipation for the poor child to reply to this.

I already laughed and moved on. :lol:

17 years ago

6507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 6507 Posts

[QUOTE="Arsuz"]One flaw in your argument, PS3 is NOT superior.Twisted_Hawk

So I guess you haven't seen the specs, huh?

We'd rather see some proof before the specs. Great specs /= great product.

17 years ago

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

[QUOTE="TheCrazed420"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"]Porting down is easier than Porting up for the noobminded.massAttack2k

Porting down is harder how can you not realize this? If you port from a weaker system to a more powerful the game suffers no ill effects but if you port down from a more powerful to a weaker system the game has to be cut down and watered down. You are just self owning yourself.

It doesnt matter whether its hard or easy. Publishers want the best looking game they can get that is playable and to compete with other games. 360 wont have enough sales to support being the target platform and being the weaker hardware. In the HD era graphics are more important than ever for developers and publishers. 360 is limiting that.

Get ready to get destroyed verbally of course.

Self Ownage # 1
First you say porting down is easier then porrting up for the noobminded. Then you say It doesn't matter whether its hard or is. Are you going to stick to your point or damage control and run away from it?

Self Ownage #2

Next you say 360 won't have enough sales to support being the target platform and weaker hardware. Yet you failed to realize PS3 has as of today the worst hardware and software sales out of the three companies. So you have no room to talk about 360 won't have enough sales to support being the target platform. Maybe you should direct that question to the PS3.

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/21/npd-lost-planet-leads-strong-january-game-sales/

TOP 10 GAMES: December 31, 2006-February 3, 2007: (sales numbers are approximate)
1) Lost Planet: Extreme Condition (Xbox 360, Capcom, Jan. 2007) -- 329,000 copies
2) Guitar Hero II (with Guitar Controller) (PS2, Activision, Nov. 2006) -- 224,000 copies
3) Gears of War (Xbox 360, Microsoft, Nov. 2006) -- 212,000 copies
4) WarioWare: Smooth Moves (Wii, Nintendo, Jan. 2007) -- 201,000 copies
5) Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (Wii, Nintendo, Nov. 2006) -- 189,000 copies
6) Madden NFL 07 (PS2, Electronic Arts, Aug. 2006)
7) Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (GameCube, Nintendo, Nov. 2006) -- 144,000 copies
8) Resistance: Fall of Man (PS3, SCEA, Nov. 2006) -- 144,000 copies
9) Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas (Xbox 360, Ubisoft, Nov. 2006)
10) New Super Mario Bros. (DS, Nintendo, May 2006)

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/21/wii-outsells-both-360-and-ps3-in-january-despite-shortages/

January Sales

Wii - 436,000 units
360 - 294,000 unitsPS3 - 244,000 unitsSelf Ownage #3

You claim that in the HD era graphics are more important than ever for developers and publishers. 360 is limiting that.

If the HD era is so important then why didn't Sony pack in HDMI or even at least component cables in the box with the PS3? You are HD ready with 360 from the get go. The adoption rate of HDTV's is far to low to claim that we are in the HD era. Tell me how we are in the HD era when there isn't even a winner of the HiDef format war?

Very nice. I"m quoting this for truth and waiting in anticipation for the poor child to reply to this.

I already laughed and moved on. :lol:

So you have no defense, no counter arguement, or nothing to say in defense of every point of yours that I proved wrong?

17 years ago

6507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 6507 Posts

Yeah! Give a good counter argument!

17 years ago

418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 418 Posts

damn this cow talks alot of crap in one day 0_0 how many posts you made today now? whats up with your ps3 cant be that great if your sat on your lard ass posting crap all day

17 years ago

690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 massAttack2k

Member since 2007 • 690 Posts

[QUOTE="massAttack2k"][QUOTE="TheCrazed420"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"]Porting down is easier than Porting up for the noobminded.Blackbond

Porting down is harder how can you not realize this? If you port from a weaker system to a more powerful the game suffers no ill effects but if you port down from a more powerful to a weaker system the game has to be cut down and watered down. You are just self owning yourself.

It doesnt matter whether its hard or easy. Publishers want the best looking game they can get that is playable and to compete with other games. 360 wont have enough sales to support being the target platform and being the weaker hardware. In the HD era graphics are more important than ever for developers and publishers. 360 is limiting that.

Get ready to get destroyed verbally of course.

Self Ownage # 1
First you say porting down is easier then porrting up for the noobminded. Then you say It doesn't matter whether its hard or is. Are you going to stick to your point or damage control and run away from it?

Self Ownage #2

Next you say 360 won't have enough sales to support being the target platform and weaker hardware. Yet you failed to realize PS3 has as of today the worst hardware and software sales out of the three companies. So you have no room to talk about 360 won't have enough sales to support being the target platform. Maybe you should direct that question to the PS3.

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/21/npd-lost-planet-leads-strong-january-game-sales/

TOP 10 GAMES: December 31, 2006-February 3, 2007: (sales numbers are approximate)
1) Lost Planet: Extreme Condition (Xbox 360, Capcom, Jan. 2007) -- 329,000 copies
2) Guitar Hero II (with Guitar Controller) (PS2, Activision, Nov. 2006) -- 224,000 copies
3) Gears of War (Xbox 360, Microsoft, Nov. 2006) -- 212,000 copies
4) WarioWare: Smooth Moves (Wii, Nintendo, Jan. 2007) -- 201,000 copies
5) Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (Wii, Nintendo, Nov. 2006) -- 189,000 copies
6) Madden NFL 07 (PS2, Electronic Arts, Aug. 2006)
7) Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (GameCube, Nintendo, Nov. 2006) -- 144,000 copies
8) Resistance: Fall of Man (PS3, SCEA, Nov. 2006) -- 144,000 copies
9) Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas (Xbox 360, Ubisoft, Nov. 2006)
10) New Super Mario Bros. (DS, Nintendo, May 2006)

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/21/wii-outsells-both-360-and-ps3-in-january-despite-shortages/

January Sales

Wii - 436,000 units
360 - 294,000 unitsPS3 - 244,000 unitsSelf Ownage #3

You claim that in the HD era graphics are more important than ever for developers and publishers. 360 is limiting that.

If the HD era is so important then why didn't Sony pack in HDMI or even at least component cables in the box with the PS3? You are HD ready with 360 from the get go. The adoption rate of HDTV's is far to low to claim that we are in the HD era. Tell me how we are in the HD era when there isn't even a winner of the HiDef format war?

Very nice. I"m quoting this for truth and waiting in anticipation for the poor child to reply to this.

I already laughed and moved on. :lol:

So you have no defense, no counter arguement, or nothing to say in defense of every point of yours that I proved wrong?

All i saw was self ownage. 360 only sold 290,000 50k more than PS3 which had only 1 killer ap thru January and $600 price tag. YOU self owned yourself. Your 3rd point about HDMI was complete joke. And your first point was bigger joke. Start over with a new argument worth talking about, or go to the OP and find something else to talk about.

17 years ago

7661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 TheCrazed420

Member since 2003 • 7661 Posts

[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"][QUOTE="TheCrazed420"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"]Porting down is easier than Porting up for the noobminded.massAttack2k

Porting down is harder how can you not realize this? If you port from a weaker system to a more powerful the game suffers no ill effects but if you port down from a more powerful to a weaker system the game has to be cut down and watered down. You are just self owning yourself.

It doesnt matter whether its hard or easy. Publishers want the best looking game they can get that is playable and to compete with other games. 360 wont have enough sales to support being the target platform and being the weaker hardware. In the HD era graphics are more important than ever for developers and publishers. 360 is limiting that.

Get ready to get destroyed verbally of course.

Self Ownage # 1
First you say porting down is easier then porrting up for the noobminded. Then you say It doesn't matter whether its hard or is. Are you going to stick to your point or damage control and run away from it?

Self Ownage #2

Next you say 360 won't have enough sales to support being the target platform and weaker hardware. Yet you failed to realize PS3 has as of today the worst hardware and software sales out of the three companies. So you have no room to talk about 360 won't have enough sales to support being the target platform. Maybe you should direct that question to the PS3.

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/21/npd-lost-planet-leads-strong-january-game-sales/

TOP 10 GAMES: December 31, 2006-February 3, 2007: (sales numbers are approximate)
1) Lost Planet: Extreme Condition (Xbox 360, Capcom, Jan. 2007) -- 329,000 copies
2) Guitar Hero II (with Guitar Controller) (PS2, Activision, Nov. 2006) -- 224,000 copies
3) Gears of War (Xbox 360, Microsoft, Nov. 2006) -- 212,000 copies
4) WarioWare: Smooth Moves (Wii, Nintendo, Jan. 2007) -- 201,000 copies
5) Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (Wii, Nintendo, Nov. 2006) -- 189,000 copies
6) Madden NFL 07 (PS2, Electronic Arts, Aug. 2006)
7) Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (GameCube, Nintendo, Nov. 2006) -- 144,000 copies
8) Resistance: Fall of Man (PS3, SCEA, Nov. 2006) -- 144,000 copies
9) Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas (Xbox 360, Ubisoft, Nov. 2006)
10) New Super Mario Bros. (DS, Nintendo, May 2006)

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/21/wii-outsells-both-360-and-ps3-in-january-despite-shortages/

January Sales

Wii - 436,000 units
360 - 294,000 unitsPS3 - 244,000 unitsSelf Ownage #3

You claim that in the HD era graphics are more important than ever for developers and publishers. 360 is limiting that.

If the HD era is so important then why didn't Sony pack in HDMI or even at least component cables in the box with the PS3? You are HD ready with 360 from the get go. The adoption rate of HDTV's is far to low to claim that we are in the HD era. Tell me how we are in the HD era when there isn't even a winner of the HiDef format war?

Very nice. I"m quoting this for truth and waiting in anticipation for the poor child to reply to this.

I already laughed and moved on. :lol:

So you have no defense, no counter arguement, or nothing to say in defense of every point of yours that I proved wrong?

All i saw was self ownage. 360 only sold 290,000 50k more than PS3 which had only 1 killer ap thru January and $600 price tag. YOU self owned yourself. Your 3rd point about HDMI was complete joke. And your first point was bigger joke. Start over with a new argument worth talking about, or go to the OP and find something else to talk about.

Lamest damage control EVA. I got the popcorn ready for this? Any one else shaking their head in disaapontment say aye.

17 years ago

6507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 6507 Posts

All i saw was self ownage. 360 only sold 290,000 50k more than PS3 which had only 1 killer ap thru January and $600 price tag. YOU self owned yourself. Your 3rd point about HDMI was complete joke. And your first point was bigger joke. Start over with a new argument worth talking about, or go to the OP and find something else to talk about.massAttack2k

Nah, I think you got owned. Try a better counter argument. You were almost there with the HDMI, but not quite. You should state each point you can counter, and give an explanation below instead of a general response IMO.

17 years ago

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

MassAttack2k you want to explain to me with some facts on why my post is wrong or are you just going to spout off with your blind deluded opinions again.

17 years ago

1878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 kingsfan_0333

Member since 2006 • 1878 Posts

This is very important, so pay attention! :idea:

Publishers in the future will NEED not want...NEED to keep the games they fund and market up to par with competing games graphically. Comprende? They will naturally gravitate towards the Playstation 3 as it is the superior hardware and port down to the 360, because the 360 will be limiting the games too much graphically to continue supporting the 360 as the lead platform any further.

The only reason some 360 Multiplatform games theoretically have looked better on the 360 is because the PS3 1 year delay, publishers and devs decided to go with the 360 as target and port down to the PS3. The future this wont be the case and heads will roll when Playstation 3's superiority starts to shine through on Multiplat titles like it already does with First Party titles. When all the important games start as PS3 target platform like Burnout 5, Resident Evil 5, GTA IV, Army of Two....etc, Sony fans will Rejoice and Microsoft fans am Cry to sleep.massAttack2k

I wish that my console didn't have 5 AAA titles so that I could sit around all day and make up stuff like this...anyways...back to the games.

17 years ago

6507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 6507 Posts

MassAttack2k you want to explain to me with some facts on why my post is wrong or are you just going to spout off with your blind deluded opinions again.Blackbond

Give MassAttck2k a chance! Im sure he can do it!

17 years ago

7661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 TheCrazed420

Member since 2003 • 7661 Posts

[QUOTE="Blackbond"]MassAttack2k you want to explain to me with some facts on why my post is wrong or are you just going to spout off with your blind deluded opinions again.flazzle

Give MassAttck2k a chance! Im sure he can do it!

I did give him a chance. His fanboy BS finally shone through and he got owned. HARD. I think Blackbond can add another notch to that belt of his....

17 years ago

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

[QUOTE="flazzle"][QUOTE="Blackbond"]MassAttack2k you want to explain to me with some facts on why my post is wrong or are you just going to spout off with your blind deluded opinions again.TheCrazed420

Give MassAttck2k a chance! Im sure he can do it!

I did give him a chance. His fanboy BS finally shone through and he got owned. HARD. I think Blackbond can add another notch to that belt of his....

Consider it done.

17 years ago

2862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 seabiscuit8686

Member since 2005 • 2862 Posts

This is very important, so pay attention! :idea:

Publishers in the future will NEED not want...NEED to keep the games they fund and market up to par with competing games graphically. Comprende? They will naturally gravitate towards the Playstation 3 as it is the superior hardware and port down to the 360, because the 360 will be limiting the games too much graphically to continue supporting the 360 as the lead platform any further.

The only reason some 360 Multiplatform games theoretically have looked better on the 360 is because the PS3 1 year delay, publishers and devs decided to go with the 360 as target and port down to the PS3. The future this wont be the case and heads will roll when Playstation 3's superiority starts to shine through on Multiplat titles like it already does with First Party titles. When all the important games start as PS3 target platform like Burnout 5, Resident Evil 5, GTA IV, Army of Two....etc, Sony fans will Rejoice and Microsoft fans am Cry to sleep.massAttack2k

Thank you for your expert opinion. It is noted next to all the others in the "thinks they might know something" category

17 years ago

Buff-McBlumpkin

566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Buff-McBlumpkin

Member since 2007 • 566 Posts

The only reason some 360 Multiplatform games theoretically have looked better on the 360 is because the PS3 1 year delay,massAttack2k

1: How do you explain Halo CE looking better than all PS2 games when it launched despite the fact that the PS2 had a 1 year head start?

2: How do you explain the fact that even though the PS2 was the graphically inferior console it got by far the most developer support and fan attention?

3: Given number 2, what would lead you to believe that the graphical differences between the PS3 and the 360 this generation will have an affect on sales when the difference between the PS2 and the XBox was far greater and despite this the PS2 "won?"

4: How do you explain the Japanese powerhouse that is DQ being shifted to the the weak (graphically speaking) DS from the powerful PS3? if graphical capability were the main concern why in the world would something like this happen?

It's clear that developers don't care about graphical capabilities any near as much as they care about total user base.

You post way, way too much and don't think nearly enough. Think before you post, please.

17 years ago

1483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 1483 Posts

One flaw in your argument, PS3 is NOT superior.Arsuz

you don't have one write ..... go to tacobell get a job ang $$$$$$ see the difference for your self

17 years ago

1341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 1341 Posts

Porting down? Nonsense. Both system has graphics power as "next-gen". The only console that requires porting down is the Wii. Yes, the XBOX 360 and the PS3's graphics are almost identical (with the XBOX 360 better due to Anti-Aliasing capabilities). Both boxes support 1080p, both boxes support an almost identical graphics requirement. With one using DirectX 9-based and the other one OpenGL 2.1-based. Right now, if you look at any and all screenshots, it shows that the XBOX 360 still has better graphics due to better use of HDR and Blooming. Just look at EA FN3. (On the multi-platform ones) I was just playing the PS3 at my local EBGames, and I do say that the PS3 still has lag issues, the game freezes once in a while, it has really crappy anti-aliasing issues and I can see the damn character model outlines. I was thinking ... "next-gen"? Guess not. Btw, the sixaxis needs some adjustment, it's way too sensitive and it has directional problems, turning the controller left makes a MotorStorm car turn right. gnutux

17 years ago

Buff-McBlumpkin

566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Buff-McBlumpkin

Member since 2007 • 566 Posts

you don't have one write ..... go to tacobell get a job ang $$$$$$ see the difference for your self
darcom1

This post should be separated from this thread and permanently floated to the top of the forum. It perfectly summarizes System Wars.

1: It has horrible grammar and spelling.

2: It makes absolutely no sense. There is no possible way it can be changed to make less sense.

3: It makes you feel bad about yourself just for having participated in such a pathetic forum.

17 years ago

690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 massAttack2k

Member since 2007 • 690 Posts

[QUOTE="gnutux"]Porting down? Nonsense. Both system has graphics power as "next-gen". The only console that requires porting down is the Wii. Yes, the XBOX 360 and the PS3's graphics are almost identical (with the XBOX 360 better due to Anti-Aliasing capabilities). Both boxes support 1080p, both boxes support an almost identical graphics requirement. With one using DirectX 9-based and the other one OpenGL 2.1-based. Right now, if you look at any and all screenshots, it shows that the XBOX 360 still has better graphics due to better use of HDR and Blooming. Just look at EA FN3. (On the multi-platform ones) I was just playing the PS3 at my local EBGames, and I do say that the PS3 still has lag issues, the game freezes once in a while, it has really crappy anti-aliasing issues and I can see the damn character model outlines. I was thinking ... "next-gen"? Guess not. Btw, the sixaxis needs some adjustment, it's way too sensitive and it has directional problems, turning the controller left makes a MotorStorm car turn right. gnutux

Stop Dreaming please

17 years ago

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

MassAttack2k are you going to keep running or are you actual going to put some FACTS together to try and redeem yourself?

17 years ago

5232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 5232 Posts

This is very important, so pay attention! :idea:

Publishers in the future will NEED not want...NEED to keep the games they fund and market up to par with competing games graphically. Comprende? They will naturally gravitate towards the Playstation 3 as it is the superior hardware and port down to the 360, because the 360 will be limiting the games too much graphically to continue supporting the 360 as the lead platform any further.

The only reason some 360 Multiplatform games theoretically have looked better on the 360 is because the PS3 1 year delay, publishers and devs decided to go with the 360 as target and port down to the PS3. The future this wont be the case and heads will roll when Playstation 3's superiority starts to shine through on Multiplat titles like it already does with First Party titles. When all the important games start as PS3 target platform like Burnout 5, Resident Evil 5, GTA IV, Army of Two....etc, Sony fans will Rejoice and Microsoft fans am Cry to sleep.massAttack2k

Let me tell you something, PS3 hardware SUCKS, yeah I said it, NVIDIA gpu that can't even put AA+HDR in the same screen, poorly designed architecture... I mean c'mon the only thing it has against the 360 is blu ray..., you just reached a WHOLE new level in fanboy terms.

17 years ago

1879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Zero-G_basic

Member since 2002 • 1879 Posts

[QUOTE="TheCrazed420"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="massAttack2k"]Porting down is easier than Porting up for the noobminded.massAttack2k

Porting down is harder how can you not realize this? If you port from a weaker system to a more powerful the game suffers no ill effects but if you port down from a more powerful to a weaker system the game has to be cut down and watered down. You are just self owning yourself.

It doesnt matter whether its hard or easy. Publishers want the best looking game they can get that is playable and to compete with other games. 360 wont have enough sales to support being the target platform and being the weaker hardware. In the HD era graphics are more important than ever for developers and publishers. 360 is limiting that.

Get ready to get destroyed verbally of course.

Self Ownage # 1
First you say porting down is easier then porrting up for the noobminded. Then you say It doesn't matter whether its hard or is. Are you going to stick to your point or damage control and run away from it?

Self Ownage #2

Next you say 360 won't have enough sales to support being the target platform and weaker hardware. Yet you failed to realize PS3 has as of today the worst hardware and software sales out of the three companies. So you have no room to talk about 360 won't have enough sales to support being the target platform. Maybe you should direct that question to the PS3.

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/21/npd-lost-planet-leads-strong-january-game-sales/

TOP 10 GAMES: December 31, 2006-February 3, 2007: (sales numbers are approximate)
1) Lost Planet: Extreme Condition (Xbox 360, Capcom, Jan. 2007) -- 329,000 copies
2) Guitar Hero II (with Guitar Controller) (PS2, Activision, Nov. 2006) -- 224,000 copies
3) Gears of War (Xbox 360, Microsoft, Nov. 2006) -- 212,000 copies
4) WarioWare: Smooth Moves (Wii, Nintendo, Jan. 2007) -- 201,000 copies
5) Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (Wii, Nintendo, Nov. 2006) -- 189,000 copies
6) Madden NFL 07 (PS2, Electronic Arts, Aug. 2006)
7) Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (GameCube, Nintendo, Nov. 2006) -- 144,000 copies
8) Resistance: Fall of Man (PS3, SCEA, Nov. 2006) -- 144,000 copies
9) Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas (Xbox 360, Ubisoft, Nov. 2006)
10) New Super Mario Bros. (DS, Nintendo, May 2006)

http://www.joystiq.com/2007/02/21/wii-outsells-both-360-and-ps3-in-january-despite-shortages/

January Sales

Wii - 436,000 units
360 - 294,000 unitsPS3 - 244,000 unitsSelf Ownage #3

You claim that in the HD era graphics are more important than ever for developers and publishers. 360 is limiting that.

If the HD era is so important then why didn't Sony pack in HDMI or even at least component cables in the box with the PS3? You are HD ready with 360 from the get go. The adoption rate of HDTV's is far to low to claim that we are in the HD era. Tell me how we are in the HD era when there isn't even a winner of the HiDef format war?

Very nice. I"m quoting this for truth and waiting in anticipation for the poor child to reply to this.

I already laughed and moved on. :lol:

Translation: I got owned so hard i just was too scared to post a rebuttal.

17 years ago

2605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 2605 Posts

One flaw in your argument, PS3 is NOT superior.Arsuz

That is true if you were a true gamer or a true fanboy you would have seen the thousands of posts and hundreds of sites saying 360 >>PS3

17 years ago

1801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 1801 Posts

This is very important, so pay attention! :idea:

Publishers in the future will NEED not want...NEED to keep the games they fund and market up to par with competing games graphically. Comprende? They will naturally gravitate towards the Playstation 3 as it is the superior hardware and port down to the 360, because the 360 will be limiting the games too much graphically to continue supporting the 360 as the lead platform any further.

The only reason some 360 Multiplatform games theoretically have looked better on the 360 is because the PS3 1 year delay, publishers and devs decided to go with the 360 as target and port down to the PS3. The future this wont be the case and heads will roll when Playstation 3's superiority starts to shine through on Multiplat titles like it already does with First Party titles. When all the important games start as PS3 target platform like Burnout 5, Resident Evil 5, GTA IV, Army of Two....etc, Sony fans will Rejoice and Microsoft fans am Cry to sleep.massAttack2k

Keep telling yourself that.

17 years ago

1877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 1877 Posts

This is very important, so pay attention! :idea:

Publishers in the future will NEED not want...NEED to keep the games they fund and market up to par with competing games graphically. Comprende? They will naturally gravitate towards the Playstation 3 as it is the superior hardware and port down to the 360, because the 360 will be limiting the games too much graphically to continue supporting the 360 as the lead platform any further.

The only reason some 360 Multiplatform games theoretically have looked better on the 360 is because the PS3 1 year delay, publishers and devs decided to go with the 360 as target and port down to the PS3. The future this wont be the case and heads will roll when Playstation 3's superiority starts to shine through on Multiplat titles like it already does with First Party titles. When all the important games start as PS3 target platform like Burnout 5, Resident Evil 5, GTA IV, Army of Two....etc, Sony fans will Rejoice and Microsoft fans am Cry to sleep.massAttack2k

Speculation FTW

17 years ago

1877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 1877 Posts

[QUOTE="darcom1"]you don't have one write ..... go to tacobell get a job ang $$$$$$ see the difference for your self
Buff-McBlumpkin

This post should be separated from this thread and permanently floated to the top of the forum. It perfectly summarizes System Wars.

1: It has horrible grammar and spelling.

2: It makes absolutely no sense. There is no possible way it can be changed to make less sense.

3: It makes you feel bad about yourself just for having participated in such a pathetic forum.

Preach on brotha preach on.

17 years ago

1180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 1180 Posts

wow SW has been overrun with cows, i wonder why

17 years ago

94 results
1
2

Jump to Top

Please Log In to post.

Use your keyboard!

ESC

Log in to comment