Son, Uncharted 2 has 5 vs. 5 multiplayer...

[QUOTE="lawlessx"]

[QUOTE="rorskarch"] gears is a game with one whole army vs another whole army, so it would make more sense for that to have more people than a game like uncharted that has one antagonist with a partner fighting against some bandits, in which case it would need to be fewer numbers which would inevitably be more tactical most likely.rorskarch

you mean like gears of war? :|

I personally dislike when there are too many people in one game. It needs to be balanced. GeOW is fine the way it is. It allows for good team coordination. How often will you see a team of 10+ random players play well together as a team? Rarely...JunkTrap

[QUOTE="-Melix-"]

People are not bashing that gears has 5 vs 5... People have just been saying that xbox360 multiplayer is very limited, in terms of large game battles...

itzagir

That would also be the opinion of who wrote that article...Couth_

It's pretty clear it's more of a tactical game, or else cover wouldn't be such an integral part to the gameplay. If you use cover or not is your own decision, but you'll be more successful with it, thus using tactics to be better at the game. This is no Halo or Unreal.

[QUOTE="SilverChimera"][QUOTE="NYrockinlegend"] R2 online may be more fun, but there has to be more reasons other than "more players". The more players certainly makes Resistance 2 very fun, but how does this hurt Gears 2, a game that's supposed to be slow-paced?Englandfc1966

[QUOTE="rorskarch"][QUOTE="lawlessx"]

you mean like gears of war? :|

pyromaniac223

i agree for design purposes it would not be efficient, but uncharted also needs to have fewer numbers in order to make sense of its story.

i dont even know why this matters.

People are not bashing that gears has 5 vs 5... People have just been saying that xbox360 multiplayer is very limited, in terms of large game battles...

Who cares if it will be tactical or not. It looks fun as hell and insanely dynamic! Looking forward to the beta.

Multi-tiered Platforming + Cover System + Melee Mechanics + Stealth Mechanics + Exploring for weapons + Shooting Mechanics + Naughty Dog Polish = WIN

Could end up being one of the most fun and dynamic Advernture games ever made.

I'm glad that Sony and Naughty Dog are finally catching on that more players doesn't mean better. I expect people saying that Uncharted 2 multiplayer is more tactical and such, etc., and probably the people saying that are the ones who bashed Gears only have 5 vs 5, lol.

wait only 5 vs. 5? i was hoping it would be more since ive been spoiled by these ps3 shooters having so many players

3 ps3 games with lots of players... the following ps3 games all have atleast 32 player multiplayer (r;fom, r2, kz2, socom:confrontation, mag, warhawk)

It's better than having no multiplayer at all. 5 v 5 is good enough for me

The argument was at least from no blinf fanboys was that, R2 multiplayer gives you the option to have up to 30 v 30. Only someone who doesn't knwo what they are talking about or is just a fanboy or hasn't played the game would say the 360 can't handle 30 v 30. its not the system its the devs! why do people always try to blame or give credit to systems when its the devs that dictate everything that happens?

freediro

Isn't Xbox Live not capable of having more than 16 people play each other online? I am probably wrong though.

It's better than having no multiplayer at all. 5 v 5 is good enough for me

kingman03

[QUOTE="freediro"]

The argument was at least from no blinf fanboys was that, R2 multiplayer gives you the option to have up to 30 v 30. Only someone who doesn't knwo what they are talking about or is just a fanboy or hasn't played the game would say the 360 can't handle 30 v 30. its not the system its the devs! why do people always try to blame or give credit to systems when its the devs that dictate everything that happens?

rusty_armor1

Isn't Xbox Live not capable of having more than 16 people play each other online? I am probably wrong though.

Bad Company 2 will have 40.

Bad Company 2 will have 40.

Ambli

[QUOTE="rusty_armor1"]

[QUOTE="freediro"]

The argument was at least from no blinf fanboys was that, R2 multiplayer gives you the option to have up to 30 v 30. Only someone who doesn't knwo what they are talking about or is just a fanboy or hasn't played the game would say the 360 can't handle 30 v 30. its not the system its the devs! why do people always try to blame or give credit to systems when its the devs that dictate everything that happens?

TREAL_Since

Isn't Xbox Live not capable of having more than 16 people play each other online? I am probably wrong though.

it has been done with frontlines,PDZ,battlefield:BC,etc