It's pathetic, they had 80% of the market and lost almost all of it to a system with a quarter the power because they lacked foresight.
CaveJohnson1
Well, personally, I've been saying since LAST gen that Sony was going to lose market share no matter what. There is just no way to repeat all the "perfect storm" factors that helped Sony make the PS2 the single biggest and best selling console of all time...by a long shot. That just wasn't going to happen again no matter what because that kind of success is more about timing than it is about the product itself. Sony was able to be the right console at the right time when gaming was finally breaking into the mainstream.
So it also shouldn't be that surprising that they lost SOME market share. That was inevitable I think. Where they screwed up was releasing the console at such a ridiculously high price tag alienating that mainstream/core market who want to play games but jumped on the gaming bandwagon when the PS2 was probably closer to $249 or even$199. Dumping a $599 console on this crowd is just a bad, bad, bad idea. So they went with the best two alternatives - the quircky new nintendo console with all the fun little party games and/or the still relatively pricey but still much cheaper than the PS3, 360.
Meanwhile Nintendo was able to sort of copy Sony's successful strategy of appealing to and bringing in a new type of audience who didn't play games before. Attracting that new audience helped Nintendo regain their past success and be the #1 selling console this gen.
Log in to comment