Sony cost themselves this generation because of the initial $600 price tag

  • 66 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for vtbob88
vtbob88

638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#51 vtbob88
Member since 2007 • 638 Posts

The price was the main reason I waited the year and a half to two years I did before getting one. While going through all the expenses at school and only working ~10-12 hours due to classes and hw I really couldn't justify $600 for just the console. Looking back now I wish I had been able to afford spending that kind of money because I wish mine had bc. However, even now I do not think I would pay that much for a console. If it's over $400 I am really going to have to think about it, since once you enter the real world its harder to justify spending that much on 1 console when others are usually much cheaper. I think that is the same mentality a lot of people had seeing as it didn't do well until price drops

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts
RFOM was a great launch title. The 60GB PS3 was a work of friggin art esp with the PS2 guts, mem card slots, and over all look and feel. The price sucked and yes it doomed Sony to spend the rest of the gen playing catch up. But I don't regret paying $600 for mine.
Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#53 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts
Price tage... and no games.... and arrogance assuming everyone would buy it by selling their kids.... and a year late.... and difficult architecture... I'm sure there's more.
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#54 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50187 Posts
Not to mention the horrible initial marketing they tried to do. Those commercials were so stupid.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
Meh the 360 is actually more expensive between the overpriced hard drive you have to buy it and by getting ripped off with $60 every year, not to mention the incredibly high failure rate it had. But most lems are too dumb to realize that.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]RFOM was a great launch title. The 60GB PS3 was a work of friggin art esp with the PS2 guts, mem card slots, and over all look and feel. The price sucked and yes it doomed Sony to spend the rest of the gen playing catch up. But I don't regret paying $600 for mine.

You also have to remember that it has outsold the 360 year after year which means more people thought it was worth it every year more than the 360.
Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#57 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts
Meh the 360 is actually more expensive between the overpriced hard drive you have to buy it and by getting ripped off with $60 every year, not to mention the incredibly high failure rate it had. But most lems are too dumb to realize that.kuraimen
bu bu but it only cheap, so cheap who cares!!!!!111 I agree though 5 years of an Xbox 360 costs you more than a PS3 there's no denying it but i guess some people like to justify XBL with cross-game chat, better multiplats and earlier DLC. Oh joy!
Avatar image for AmazonTreeBoa
AmazonTreeBoa

16745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 AmazonTreeBoa
Member since 2011 • 16745 Posts

I bought the PS3 at $600 and I wouldn't mind a starting price of $600 for the new PS4 since the system was totally worth every penny.

Click_Clock
Then you are a moron and wish to see Sony truly fail because if the PS4 is $600. That's exactly what will happen. And no the PS3 was not worth $600 the messes are proof of that due to the PS3 selling like sh!t when it was $600 because nobody was bying because get this............it wasn't worth it. Shocker, I know.
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45721 Posts

No, there was a multitude of mistakes / assumptions like purposely making the PS3 hard to code for, same old or stupid controllers, unimpressive launch line up etc. plus having the whole Wii/60 thing going on as well. :P

Avatar image for fadersdream
fadersdream

3154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#60 fadersdream
Member since 2006 • 3154 Posts

And they gained it back by launching the slim, really these sony is doomed threads are gettinng really old. Get some new material please! And MS took a huge beating from the RROD fiasco, they have all had some losses and gains this gen. But they have all done well and made a profit, even Sony.

ShadowMoses900
Don't be a hypocrite. You're one of the worst offenders.
Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60833 Posts
[QUOTE="Click_Clock"]

I bought the PS3 at $600 and I wouldn't mind a starting price of $600 for the new PS4 since the system was totally worth every penny.

DrakesHaloGears
I feel exactly the same way

Me too and I'll buy it at that cost no questions ask but remeber this gif?  :lol:
Avatar image for deactivated-5dd711115e664
deactivated-5dd711115e664

8956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 deactivated-5dd711115e664
Member since 2005 • 8956 Posts

It's pathetic, they had 80% of the market and lost almost all of it to a system with a quarter the power because they lacked foresight.

CaveJohnson1

Well, personally, I've been saying since LAST gen that Sony was going to lose market share no matter what. There is just no way to repeat all the "perfect storm" factors that helped Sony make the PS2 the single biggest and best selling console of all time...by a long shot. That just wasn't going to happen again no matter what because that kind of success is more about timing than it is about the product itself. Sony was able to be the right console at the right time when gaming was finally breaking into the mainstream.

So it also shouldn't be that surprising that they lost SOME market share. That was inevitable I think. Where they screwed up was releasing the console at such a ridiculously high price tag alienating that mainstream/core market who want to play games but jumped on the gaming bandwagon when the PS2 was probably closer to $249 or even$199. Dumping a $599 console on this crowd is just a bad, bad, bad idea. So they went with the best two alternatives - the quircky new nintendo console with all the fun little party games and/or the still relatively pricey but still much cheaper than the PS3, 360.

Meanwhile Nintendo was able to sort of copy Sony's successful strategy of appealing to and bringing in a new type of audience who didn't play games before. Attracting that new audience helped Nintendo regain their past success and be the #1 selling console this gen.

Avatar image for deactivated-5dd711115e664
deactivated-5dd711115e664

8956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 deactivated-5dd711115e664
Member since 2005 • 8956 Posts

[QUOTE="DrakesHaloGears"][QUOTE="Click_Clock"]

I bought the PS3 at $600 and I wouldn't mind a starting price of $600 for the new PS4 since the system was totally worth every penny.

Heil68

I feel exactly the same way

Me too and I'll buy it at that cost no questions ask but remeber this gif?  :lol:

That won't happen. The biggest problem with the PS3 was Sony decided to use it to push BR onto the market in a big and fast way. BR players were selling for close to $1000 dollars and they put the same tech into the PS3. EVen at $600 they took a pretty steep loss. Some estimate as much as $200 per console. Although, the tech for most stand alone players also plummets pretty quickly so it help Sony a little bit and they have reported profits at certain points. Interestingly enough, the PS3 is still the best BR player on the market.

Now BR players are dirt cheap and only going to get cheaper (to make) by the time PS4 is launched. So unless Sony tries to do something stupid again, like put a hologram projector into the system, chances are the PS4 will be much more reasonably priced and will likely be the exact same price as whatever MS decides to launch at. Probably $399 is going to be the new norm.

Avatar image for hiryu3
hiryu3

7313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#64 hiryu3
Member since 2003 • 7313 Posts
[QUOTE="Click_Clock"]

I bought the PS3 at $600 and I wouldn't mind a starting price of $600 for the new PS4 since the system was totally worth every penny.

DrakesHaloGears
I feel exactly the same way

ditto. I had 6 games at launch and enjoyed every minute
Avatar image for Amin_and_Azizah
Amin_and_Azizah

143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#65 Amin_and_Azizah
Member since 2011 • 143 Posts
I agree with everything the TC has stated here today. The PS3 had a horrendous launch lineup and the price was way too much for a video game console which most parents still view as a toy for children. Also the user named 'DrakesHaloGears ' is just a blind sony fanboy that cannot see how many faults sony made this gen. Price is the main reason PS3 will go down in history as the loser of this console cycle. Once again sony learned nothing from its past mistakes and are about to release the vita which is also too expensive. Price, price, price, price!!! In a bad economy like the one we are experiencing now, releasing such a high priced system is ridiculous.
Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52566 Posts

And their horrible line up of horrible games.

Seriously,it was disappointment followed by disappointment.