Okay, so let me get it straight. First you wanted this thread to remain open, but now that we're having a political debate and it doesn't suit your narrative your point is? We're having a discussion, sorry if it doesn't fit your right-wing agenda. As I stated before, I'm happy that Sony is using their platform to actively combat sexism and pedophilia. We're done with a time were 40 year old could marry 13 year olds (though that still happens in the deep south of the U.S).
Sony has a right, if you don't like it, great, doesn't change the fact that they won this gen. 100+ million units, twice as more as the Xbox ONE. Hence, moan and complain on these forums all you want. Not gonna change a thing.
My narrative? It says so in the freaking article. Sony censored their stuff to cover their backsides, and they admitted it. The end. Nothing else to attribute to their motivations.
Again, I am not automatically against all censorship. We can agree that paedophilia is unacceptable in a civilized society. That's a red line we do not cross, and there is consensus on that. As for sexism, in what context? Portrayed in what way? To what intent? Is a story set in "sexist" context intended purely for the purpose of storytelling okay? I personally don't see anything inherently wrong with it, as long as it serves a creative purpose. Ultimately, I simply support creators' freedom to pursue their craft in any direction they wish, to let their works be judged on their own merits and original intent, and to tell the hordes of ideologues and internet obsessives who misinterpret their works according to their own biases and obsessions to f*** off.
Sure, as I said, PlayStation is Sony's platform, and they can do whatever the Hell they please with it. Doesn't mean we, as gamers and consumers, shouldn't ask questions whether those decisions are justified. Again, considering Nintendo and Microsoft don't seem to be having the same severity of the problem, what, exactly, is Sony justification for this seemingly elevated level of censorship, other than excessive caution? Your argumentum ad populum is meaningless to this question.
And yeah, ultimately, it's Sony's decision. But forums are a place for discussion, often for the sake of itself. If it's such a waste of time as you claim, why are YOU here, energetically defending Sony's actions as "supporting a great cause" despite their explicit statement to the otherwise?
And you calling me a right-winger is probably the funniest thing I've read all day. Thanks for the laugh.
Log in to comment