http://www.joystiq.com/2010/12/24/sonys-hirai-playstation-network-not-yet-profitable/
This is interesting. I'm pretty confident Sony will go the Xbox Live route next gen.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Whats the Difference between Plus and Regular ?? Plus offers a lot more extra stuff, if you use psn stuff regularly, it also pays for itself[QUOTE="Randoggy"]
Doubt it. They will do the exact same thing they are doing now, only offering the Plus service from the start.
SpArKs424
Whats the Difference between Plus and Regular ?? http://blog.eu.playstation.com/2010/06/15/playstation-plus-check-out-what-its-all-about/[QUOTE="Randoggy"]
Doubt it. They will do the exact same thing they are doing now, only offering the Plus service from the start.
SpArKs424
Whats the Difference between Plus and Regular ??[QUOTE="Randoggy"]
Doubt it. They will do the exact same thing they are doing now, only offering the Plus service from the start.
SpArKs424
u want the truth. NOTHING.
the little extra deals they offer do not justify the plus imo. i like the psn free way more. psn+ offers some free games(crappy ones).
but psn regular is amazing u dont pay and u also get deals. also u can play online for FREE
Whats the Difference between Plus and Regular ??[QUOTE="SpArKs424"]
[QUOTE="Randoggy"]
Doubt it. They will do the exact same thing they are doing now, only offering the Plus service from the start.
pc-ps360
u want the truth. NOTHING.
the little extra deals they offer do not justify the plus imo. i like the psn free way more. psn+ offers some free games(crappy ones).
but psn regular is amazing u dont pay and u also get deals. also u can play online for FREE
Oddworld 1 & 2 would like a word with you...
Developers also are unhappy with Microsoft's royalty fees for multiple-disk games. Shoop da whoop.From what I've heard its the developers who take the bandwidth costs for PSN today and they aren't liking it.
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2009/03/20/publishers-unhappy-with-ps3-bandwidth-fees/1
jimmypsn
[QUOTE="jimmypsn"]Developers also are unhappy with Microsoft's royalty fees for multiple-disk games. Shoop da whoop. Which are less common than downloads :PFrom what I've heard its the developers who take the bandwidth costs for PSN today and they aren't liking it.
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2009/03/20/publishers-unhappy-with-ps3-bandwidth-fees/1
Mrmccormo
Well, Sony isn't very good at this. They got luck with the PS2.GeneralShowzerThey aren't good at ripping off the consumer?
If you start charging for something that used to be free, people will reject the idea, it's the way people work. If PSN is ever pay to play (DCUO and other MMOs don't count) then I will switch to PC playing or Xbox Live. I refuse to pay for a service that used to be free.
Some of the people will disagree with me, but I think the "casual" market will jump ship. That's just me though.
I wont be surprised. If they would add party chat, i would pay for it this gen.djsifer01$60 cheap enough?
I will never never never pay to play games online. Something that has been free since the invention of online gaming. If Sony's gaming division wants to be a complete disaster they should charge for online next gen. A lot of people will say if Sony is going to charge, I may as well go with the Future xbl.
Agreed. But with Live generating income for MS, it is hard to believe that something won't change next gen for either. Whether it's MS dropping a fee due to low sales next gen, or Sony instating a fee remains to be seen.PSN plus just started.. wait until it catches on a bit or doesn't. We shall see what happens then.
Espada12
Generally it's not profitable when you make a half dozen games and then host dedicated servers for the thousands of people that play those games. Sony loses money for PSN, and people ***** and cry about it. Microsoft strips money out of your pocket and you love them for it. Sony doesn't have to do a damn thing with PSN, they just have to stop hosting dedicated servers and let gamers do it and then they can have all the bandwidth they want for free.http://www.joystiq.com/2010/12/24/sonys-hirai-playstation-network-not-yet-profitable/
This is interesting. I'm pretty confident Sony will go the Xbox Live route next gen.
jimmypsn
I agree. I think they are just testing the water with PSN+. It's hard for a company to look the other way as Microsoft makes a killing off of Xbox Live. Even Nintendo is considering charging a small fee for online. If not this gen,it may happen on the next wave of consoles.http://www.joystiq.com/2010/12/24/sonys-hirai-playstation-network-not-yet-profitable/
This is interesting. I'm pretty confident Sony will go the Xbox Live route next gen.
jimmypsn
They aren't good at ripping off the consumer? Pretty much. MS is good at making money. Sony, not so much.[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]Well, Sony isn't very good at this. They got luck with the PS2.DroidPhysX
they still start charging now due to piracy
people have been playing pirated games online for the last 3 days
hopefully they will add a good banning system to keep hackers out and of course make it as good as Live
The sign that they will charge next route was them ADOPTING a premium model late into this gen. Unlike MS, they were in a position to test the waters. Worst case scenario, no one bought it, and they scrapped the idea altogether. The fact that people ARE actively participating in the premium model shows Sony that people are willing to pay. I wholly expect them to have a mandatory premium fee next gen, however I don't think the basic level will be as expensive as MS. I think Sony will have two models, both pay: 1 that is online play only and limited social features while a second will be competitive with MS's gold.http://www.joystiq.com/2010/12/24/sonys-hirai-playstation-network-not-yet-profitable/
This is interesting. I'm pretty confident Sony will go the Xbox Live route next gen.
jimmypsn
Investors should care, not gamers. Notice how in the same article it says that PSN sales have been doubling year-over-year.
Mrmccormo
if PSN won't be free in the future, it's definetly consumers problem too.
If they can offer online play for free and make PSN+ alot more attractive to consumers then they could do both next gen, like how MS could offer online play for free but dont because how would they market paying for facebook and cross game chat.
If all 3 go the pay to play route, im going PC only. The money i save from paying to play online will fund a gaming rig more capable than the consoles anyway. So its win win
Sony should start charging to reinvest the revenue to create a better service. I'd pay for it if it means to get it at an Xbox Live level.headninjadogThey're losing money precisely because it is a better service. Xbox Live offers the service of parting you with your hard earned money.
[QUOTE="SpArKs424"]Whats the Difference between Plus and Regular ?? Plus offers a lot more extra stuff, if you use psn stuff regularly, it also pays for itself YEah its one of them things you either can justify it or not. I can not but at least i DONT have t pay.[QUOTE="Randoggy"]
Doubt it. They will do the exact same thing they are doing now, only offering the Plus service from the start.
lx_theo
They shouldn't, they should have a good launch line-up, no pay to play online, price it just lower than microsofts next console, and they'll be fine. Most people this gen will realise their mistake of paying for online and get a ps3
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]They aren't good at ripping off the consumer? Pretty much. MS is good at making money. Sony, not so much.Correction. In gaming:[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]Well, Sony isn't very good at this. They got luck with the PS2.GeneralShowzer
Sony was good at making money, but lost their touch. Alternatively they've never been good at it and got lucky before.
Microsoft wasn't, but is getting better at it. Alternatively they're still not good at it, but got lucky now.
And Nintendo is good at making money. Period.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment