Sony to Announce the PS4 Last.

  • 83 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for eboyishere
eboyishere

12681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 eboyishere
Member since 2011 • 12681 Posts

[QUOTE="eboyishere"]if they come out after xbox then they are done. Unless they are playing on undercutting the competition in price. Thats really the only thing that can do it right now.garland51

I don't think that they can even afford to do so with PS Vita or PS4. They constantly did that with PS3 only because they had all the profits of both PS1 & PS2 lined up to help back them up on some losses with.

vita no ps4 yea. They will have to use the cell again and basically buff up the online.

Avatar image for shinrabanshou
shinrabanshou

8458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 shinrabanshou
Member since 2009 • 8458 Posts
I see people are ignoring that Sony 'lost marketshare' (a flawed metric for console generation transitions) primarily to the Nintendo Wii, which launched around the same time as the PS3.
Avatar image for ddlcpc
ddlcpc

887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 ddlcpc
Member since 2007 • 887 Posts

depends... after all it'll be competing against microsoft next gen.... console.... so, even if they announce it might'll be jst a provo... towards microsoft..

Avatar image for Frostbite24
Frostbite24

4536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Frostbite24
Member since 2003 • 4536 Posts
That is, of course, assuming they will release a PS4.Stevo_the_gamer
At this point it has been confirmed that they are planning it and have representatives stating that it is going to happen. If they were to nix the PS4 plans I would assume it would be because they are not interested in continuing in the console market in a traditional sense. -2 points for doubting the benevolent Sony empire.
Avatar image for ForzaGearsFace
ForzaGearsFace

3724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 ForzaGearsFace
Member since 2011 • 3724 Posts

kinda scary that they are saying this now when just a little while ago they said they dont want to give a big head start to MS next gen. Im thinking PS4 is in doubt, oh yeah so glad.

Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

Makes sense. 2012 is all about Vita launch and those killer PS3 exclusives. (and more to be announced soon).

Nike_Air
What you're basically saying is Xbox wins again.
Avatar image for LovePotionNo9
LovePotionNo9

4751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 LovePotionNo9
Member since 2010 • 4751 Posts
I'm doubting they're capable of releasing a new console right now. Maybe they'll surprise us. But I think it would be ok for them to wait it out and release one once PS3 sales fizzle down to near nothing.
Avatar image for Frostbite24
Frostbite24

4536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Frostbite24
Member since 2003 • 4536 Posts

I'm doubting they're capable of releasing a new console right now. Maybe they'll surprise us. But I think it would be ok for them to wait it out and release one once PS3 sales fizzle down to near nothing.LovePotionNo9
What do you think would happen to their market share by then. I shudder to think. -2 points for making me shudder :o

Avatar image for GunSmith1_basic
GunSmith1_basic

10548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#59 GunSmith1_basic
Member since 2002 • 10548 Posts
as long as the console is announced before any of the others launch they will be fine. Give people the option to save their money and wait
Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

Quite a few factors that people are overlooking in this debate:

1. What if MS and Nintendo tool their consoles to target the casual audience? The Wii-U's controller is certainly a novel concept and Kinect is keeping the 360 afloat in the face of the growing worldwide fanbase that the PS3 garners this gen.. Not to mention the near complete lack of core-gamer exclusive titles coming from internal MS studios.

2. No BluRay startup costs this time around, nor massive Cell R&D. Think about it. While the process for creating blue laser diodes was at it's most expensive, Sony had to contend with the HD-DVD Association competing for those diodes. This greatly inflated the cost of launching the PS3. The STI partnership with Toshiba and IBM was also a pretty large cost in putting the PS3 on shelves. Now, a BluRay drive is pretty much the same cost in manufacturing that at DVD drive was back in 2004. It is also in-house technology to them which saves a bit of cost from licensing and such.

3. By launching last, whatever technology they do want to run with this time around can also be brought down in price of manufacturing. If you think Sony is launching a $600 console again, you should probably stop eating paint chips. It ain't happening.

Sony is in a position to bake their cake and eat it too by having a powerful system and launch at a competitive price range. They also need this year to establish Vita. It would be against their own interests to not spread their hardware launch cycle. Today, Sony is the heel. Tomorrow, you may be thanking your lucky stars for them.

Avatar image for Shinobi120
Shinobi120

5728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Shinobi120
Member since 2004 • 5728 Posts

Quite a few factors that people are overlooking in this debate:

1. What if MS and Nintendo tool their consoles to target the casual audience? The Wii-U's controller is certainly a novel concept and Kinect is keeping the 360 afloat in the face of the growing worldwide fanbase that the PS3 garners this gen.. Not to mention the near complete lack of core-gamer exclusive titles coming from internal MS studios.

2. No BluRay startup costs this time around, nor massive Cell R&D. Think about it. While the process for creating blue laser diodes was at it's most expensive, Sony had to contend with the HD-DVD Association competing for those diodes. This greatly inflated the cost of launching the PS3. The STI partnership with Toshiba and IBM was also a pretty large cost in putting the PS3 on shelves. Now, a BluRay drive is pretty much the same cost in manufacturing that at DVD drive was back in 2004. It is also in-house technology to them which saves a bit of cost from licensing and such.

3. By launching last, whatever technology they do want to run with this time around can also be brought down in price of manufacturing. If you think Sony is launching a $600 console again, you should probably stop eating paint chips. It ain't happening.

Sony is in a position to bake their cake and eat it too by having a powerful system and launch at a competitive price range. They also need this year to establish Vita. It would be against their own interests to not spread their hardware launch cycle. Today, Sony is the heel. Tomorrow, you may be thanking your lucky stars for them.Shewgenja

While true, look at how that's working out for Vita so far.

Avatar image for shinrabanshou
shinrabanshou

8458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 shinrabanshou
Member since 2009 • 8458 Posts

While true, look at how that's working out for Vita so far.

garland51

From a product design standpoint the Vita is a complete 180 in comparison to the PS3. It uses relatively off-the-shelf components, that leverage other people's R&D, and will rapidly reduce in cost over time due to economies of scale as they see usage in other products. The product was also developed with software developers in mind - with a the hardware and software teams working together to develop the product - and the development environment has been stated as straightforward and relatively inexpensive. It was also designed with a target pricepoint to which they stuck to.

The same approach can produce a powerful-enough PS4, with a profitable ecosystem from the get-go, if not on the hardware itself.

If you're talking about how it's selling though - the issue with the Vita is more universal - people will not pay $250 for a gaming handheld.

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

While true, look at how that's working out for Vita so far.

garland51
Well, the 3DS was also languishing when it launched. Sony is not in a position to back down from the launch price of the Vita before it has a worldwide presence. Didn't Nintendo offer free games to early 3DS buyers, come to think of it? Vita is a bit of a premature arguing point. We can certainly revisit the subject come time for E3 '12, though.
Avatar image for PillyChickle
PillyChickle

745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 PillyChickle
Member since 2011 • 745 Posts

Sony have put themselves in a really difficult position.

Avatar image for tjricardo089
tjricardo089

7429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 tjricardo089
Member since 2010 • 7429 Posts

There will be no PS4 -- they will simply release an update via PSN that will unlock all the untapped power of the Cell in your PS3...67gt500

Keep on dreaming.

Avatar image for Eponique
Eponique

17918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#66 Eponique
Member since 2007 • 17918 Posts
Lol, looks like they're destined for last place again.
Avatar image for FPSDad1161
FPSDad1161

814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 FPSDad1161
Member since 2011 • 814 Posts
Well I don't care about Nintendo, so the Wii U releasing first doesn't matter to me at all. That thing will be a joke. I want the next Xbox and PS4 day one. I'm hoping for a decent gap between the twos release so that I can be able to afford both. But I definetely want the next Xbox system first.
Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts

Sony to announce last... after they see what the competition is doing and how well it sells. That way they can do the same type of hardware.

Avatar image for Frostbite24
Frostbite24

4536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Frostbite24
Member since 2003 • 4536 Posts

Sony to announce last... after they see what the competition is doing and how well it sells. That way they can do the same type of hardware.

Phazevariance
This might be so. Of all the 3 companies, Sony is the least likely to take risks and innovate. They really need to distance themselves from MS's next console by giving the PS4 more unique features than just a blu ray drive. +20 points if they make me want a PS4 for more than just the exclusive games.
Avatar image for fadersdream
fadersdream

3154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#70 fadersdream
Member since 2006 • 3154 Posts

I play my PS3 out of guilt for not playing it often enough more than from a compulsion to want to play it.

Fix that.

Avatar image for TomatoDragonPSN
TomatoDragonPSN

535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 TomatoDragonPSN
Member since 2012 • 535 Posts
Eh, that's fine with me. In all honesty, I'm not quite ready to move onto another console anytime soon.
Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#72 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

if they come out after xbox then they are done. Unless they are playing on undercutting the competition in price. Thats really the only thing that can do it right now.eboyishere

Coming out after actually wouldn't be bad. The PS3 has been pretty successful, and the gap behind Xbox 360 is astonishingly small (around 3 million with both having sold upwards of 60 million units).

If they release late, but can manage to keep a good price and a stable of decent launch games (something the PS3 had issues with), then they'll be fine.

Avatar image for ForzaGearsFace
ForzaGearsFace

3724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 ForzaGearsFace
Member since 2011 • 3724 Posts

I guess Sony is used to being last.

Avatar image for HaloPimp978
HaloPimp978

7329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#74 HaloPimp978
Member since 2005 • 7329 Posts
Old news much.
Avatar image for SilverSterls
SilverSterls

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 SilverSterls
Member since 2012 • 98 Posts

[QUOTE="Shewgenja"]

Quite a few factors that people are overlooking in this debate:

1. What if MS and Nintendo tool their consoles to target the casual audience? The Wii-U's controller is certainly a novel concept and Kinect is keeping the 360 afloat in the face of the growing worldwide fanbase that the PS3 garners this gen.. Not to mention the near complete lack of core-gamer exclusive titles coming from internal MS studios.

2. No BluRay startup costs this time around, nor massive Cell R&D. Think about it. While the process for creating blue laser diodes was at it's most expensive, Sony had to contend with the HD-DVD Association competing for those diodes. This greatly inflated the cost of launching the PS3. The STI partnership with Toshiba and IBM was also a pretty large cost in putting the PS3 on shelves. Now, a BluRay drive is pretty much the same cost in manufacturing that at DVD drive was back in 2004. It is also in-house technology to them which saves a bit of cost from licensing and such.

3. By launching last, whatever technology they do want to run with this time around can also be brought down in price of manufacturing. If you think Sony is launching a $600 console again, you should probably stop eating paint chips. It ain't happening.

Sony is in a position to bake their cake and eat it too by having a powerful system and launch at a competitive price range. They also need this year to establish Vita. It would be against their own interests to not spread their hardware launch cycle. Today, Sony is the heel. Tomorrow, you may be thanking your lucky stars for them.garland51

While true, look at how that's working out for Vita so far.

I honestly think the Vita will be sucessful. It may only sell 3 million units worldwide this year but even then Sony will keep it alive and after a price drop it will take off. The fact is gamers are not that interested in what they have seen so far from the Wii U and if the rumors about MIcrosofts console are true people dont sound to enthusastic about it either. This is Sonys chance to steal the show.
Avatar image for SilverSterls
SilverSterls

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 SilverSterls
Member since 2012 • 98 Posts

I guess Sony is used to being last.

ForzaGearsFace
Yet they dominated the past 2 gens and are right behind the 360 this gen. Hell it wouldnt suprise me if hte PS3 surpasses it in the next 2 years . Regardless after owning both consoles the PS3 is simply the superior product.
Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#77 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts
it will be out last you can bet on it.. plus bank on bc being gone, the only reason why they did it wioth the ps3 is cos the ps2 is still selling loads, is it still out selling the ps3 ? lol. anyway a year or something later than the next xbox.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33798

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33798 Posts

the ps4 has to release last so that sony can get ideas on what to put in it.

people may want wii type controllers or achievements and none of us really expect them to come up with ideas like that in house do we?

Riverwolf007
Yeah because 2 analogues,rumble build in 8 buttons on a controller,a camera,dvd all were ms and nintendos ideas,ideas right without the DS we would still be using the flat pad from 20 years ago.
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#79 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

the ps4 has to release last so that sony can get ideas on what to put in it.

people may want wii type controllers or achievements and none of us really expect them to come up with ideas like that in house do we?

tormentos
Yeah because 2 analogues,rumble build in 8 buttons on a controller,a camera,dvd all were ms and nintendos ideas,ideas right without the DS we would still be using the flat pad from 20 years ago.

i gree with this apart from the camera part, the Gameboy had a camera in 1998, PS eye didn't appear till 2003, and to be fair the jaguar had 17 buttons and the saturn had 8 buttons before the Playstation controller.
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45753 Posts

Ahh, so the took the SP's advice :o well, I wasn't paid so I can't be held accountable for any negative outcome with this move but should it prove to be the overwhelmingly positive, profitable move, I stand prepared to take full credit and who knows, ya might even here me let out an approving moo or two. :twisted: :P

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#81 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

Ahh, so the took the SP's advice :o well, I wasn't paid so I can't be held accountable for any negative outcome with this move but should it prove to be the overwhelmingly positive, profitable move, I stand prepared to take full credit and who knows, ya might even here me let out an approving moo or two. :twisted: :P

SecretPolice
nothing ventured, nothing gained bro, mush on dude!
Avatar image for GamerwillzPS
GamerwillzPS

8531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 GamerwillzPS
Member since 2012 • 8531 Posts
I think it's a good move. Sony likes to play it safely and making sure that their console is the best. I'm expecting the PS4 to come with a Cell processor again but with more power. Multiplatform games on PS4 won't be as bad as PS3 because developers are getting the grip with the Cell over the time, or maybe Sony will release a much more developer-friendly development kit for the PS4. Notice the improvement in quality between 2007 and now, so it makes sense for Sony to continue supporting the Cell. I won't mind if Sony decided to use a normal CPU like PCs and Xbox 360. E3 in this year is gonna be exciting! I'm so gonna stock up with Mountain Dew and stay up late absorbing lots of information!
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45753 Posts

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

Ahh, so the took the SP's advice :o well, I wasn't paid so I can't be held accountable for any negative outcome with this move but should it prove to be the overwhelmingly positive, profitable move, I stand prepared to take full credit and who knows, ya might even here me let out an approving moo or two. :twisted: :P

delta3074

nothing ventured, nothing gained bro, mush on dude!

Indeed but...

:P