I really didn't need a better Photo Gallery. I didn't care much for the "Internet Search" button, the scroll bar that tells me "What's New", or the new arrangement of friends on your list. However, there ARE things I LOVED!! Divx and WMA compatibility, a better web browser, playlists for mp3s, trophies, Video downloads in the store with better design for navigation, Home, Remote Play, increased friend list threshold to 100, Power Save settings, and much more that doesn't just pop into mind.
The writer seemed overly opinionated and somewhat cynical to me. To say you admire Sony's commitment with frequent updates and then disregard their importance is also quite, well, dumb. The point is that the PS3 is growing as a console. Before this generation, no console has done that, and now we're complaining about it?
I also don't agree with the writer of the article AT ALL when he says that previous consoles only released if they deemed themselves to be bug free. I am SO happy that today I don't have to blow into my NES cartridges and tap the reset and power buttons repeatedly to make my games work, that I don't have to keep buying peripherals to make my Sega Genesis better, or more recently, that I don't have to send my system to Microsoft and wait for over 3 weeks cause my 360 gave me a Red Cirle light which happened to so many people we gave it a name "Red Ring of Death".
There was another article that a friend pointed out to me that pointed out Sony's shortcomings for 2008. It said that one of the things Sony should do is get rid of Home. On the same day, Gamespot eported to us that, from users alone, Home generated $1,000,000 by week three and that's not including the fees that companies are paying to advertise in the space. I bring this article up to make this point:
When someone is offered something for free (as an option) and they say "No", you can start disregarding any of their future opinions.
Log in to comment