As some of you may know Sony and Microsoft had a little friendly Street Fighter IV match at CES today and well Sony won. LOL
Source
This topic is locked from further discussion.
lmao, Sony's pretty good at these kinds of competitions....didn't Sony also beat valve in their own game 9 to nothing?
Over the years, I've noticed that Sony wins an awful lot of these competitions. agentfredThey won against Valve in TF2 aswell O_o
[QUOTE="agentfred"]Over the years, I've noticed that Sony wins an awful lot of these competitions. ahmedkandilThey won against Valve in TF2 aswell O_o
maybe that's the problem, they should let them win so they don't get pissed off :P
Now if only they were that good when it came to marketing and selling the PS3...:oBioShockOwnzthey are: best graphical game... Beating the 360 in the same time frame...here and there. Bluray is a success. HDDVD flopped. and considering the 360 had a year start, the PS3 did much better.......THINK!
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Now if only they were that good when it came to marketing and selling the PS3...:oEyezonmiithey are: best graphical game... Beating the 360 in the same time frame...here and there. Bluray is a success. HDDVD flopped. and considering the 360 had a year start, the PS3 did much better.......THINK! Um but the 1 year head start is in effect you just don't negate it. That one year head start is the huge difference like it or not.
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Now if only they were that good when it came to marketing and selling the PS3...:oEyezonmiithey are: best graphical game... Beating the 360 in the same time frame...here and there. Bluray is a success. HDDVD flopped. and considering the 360 had a year start, the PS3 did much better.......THINK! :? Blame the one year headstart on Sony and their Blu-Ray...or was it the Cell that delayed the PS3?
EDIT: On topic,I was expecting Sony to win. Haven't seen the Sony team,but MS looks...dull. They look more like they design OS's and not play games.
[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Now if only they were that good when it came to marketing and selling the PS3...:oBlackbondthey are: best graphical game... Beating the 360 in the same time frame...here and there. Bluray is a success. HDDVD flopped. and considering the 360 had a year start, the PS3 did much better.......THINK! Um but the 1 year head start is in effect you just don't negate it. That one year head start is the huge difference like it or not. DER, but if MS didn't have that start, it would have been in 2nd place, considering that head start, they arn't doing that great. Sony is doing dam good for what its been through and how late it came in.....like it or not.
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Now if only they were that good when it came to marketing and selling the PS3...:oEyezonmiithey are: best graphical game... Beating the 360 in the same time frame...here and there. Bluray is a success. HDDVD flopped. and considering the 360 had a year start, the PS3 did much better.......THINK!
Ugh, there's always one. Did you really have to bring the fanboy **** into this thread?
That is very true.[QUOTE="SOedipus"][QUOTE="lantus"]Unless they were using fighting sticks, I don't see how anyone could win with a 360 controller.BZSIN
Well it's doubtful they were playing cross-platform.
Too true, I don't even know why I thought that. Well that's ownage then.[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="Eyezonmii"] they are: best graphical game... Beating the 360 in the same time frame...here and there. Bluray is a success. HDDVD flopped. and considering the 360 had a year start, the PS3 did much better.......THINK! EyezonmiiUm but the 1 year head start is in effect you just don't negate it. That one year head start is the huge difference like it or not. DER, but if MS didn't have that start, it would have been in 2nd place, considering that head start, they arn't doing that great. Sony is doing dam good for what its been through and how late it came in.....like it or not.
Accept reality. The world isn't run on "What If's"
[QUOTE="BZSIN"][QUOTE="SOedipus"] That is very true.SOedipus
Well it's doubtful they were playing cross-platform.
Too true, I don't even know why I thought that. Well that's ownage then.Possibly an adapter to use the 360 controller on PS3 or vice versa?[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="Eyezonmii"] they are: best graphical game... Beating the 360 in the same time frame...here and there. Bluray is a success. HDDVD flopped. and considering the 360 had a year start, the PS3 did much better.......THINK! EyezonmiiUm but the 1 year head start is in effect you just don't negate it. That one year head start is the huge difference like it or not. DER, but if MS didn't have that start, it would have been in 2nd place, considering that head start, they arn't doing that great. Sony is doing dam good for what its been through and how late it came in.....like it or not. That is where you are wrong. MS still would have sold alot of consoles because of Halo 3. I remember all of the buzz behind it to where everyone knew about it.
DER, but if MS didn't have that start, it would have been in 2nd place, considering that head start, they arn't doing that great. Sony is doing dam good for what its been through and how late it came in.....like it or not.[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"][QUOTE="Blackbond"]Um but the 1 year head start is in effect you just don't negate it. That one year head start is the huge difference like it or not.Blackbond
Accept reality. The world isn't run on "What If's"
so you're admitting MS would have fell hard if it wasn't for the head start? comes to show you MS require these ADVANTAGES to be better, kinda sad...huh?[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="Eyezonmii"] DER, but if MS didn't have that start, it would have been in 2nd place, considering that head start, they arn't doing that great. Sony is doing dam good for what its been through and how late it came in.....like it or not. Eyezonmii
Accept reality. The world isn't run on "What If's"
so you're admitting MS would have fell hard if it wasn't for the head start? comes to show you MS require these ADVANTAGES to be better, kinda sad...huh?Would Have?
If?
Enough with speculatory wishful thinking. There is no way to know anything on a but if, what if, this would have happened. Bottom line is that these things didn't happen and unless you have a time machien to go back and change things we won't know how they played out.
Any arguement that has the word "IF" in it already fails because its not based on fact or opinoin. Merely just speculation.
[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"][QUOTE="Blackbond"]so you're admitting MS would have fell hard if it wasn't for the head start? comes to show you MS require these ADVANTAGES to be better, kinda sad...huh?Accept reality. The world isn't run on "What If's"
Blackbond
Would Have?
If?
Enough with speculatory wishful thinking. There is no way to know anything on a but if, what if, this would have happened. Bottom line is that these things didn't happen and unless you have a time machien to go back and change things we won't know how they played out.
Any arguement that has the word "IF" in it already fails because its not based on fact or opinoin. Merely just speculation.
thats what i thought......keep dodging the question. All i'm saying is, with the head start MS has had, it hasn't done as great as it could have. Just imagine how bad things would have been if the PS3 launched the same time.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment