Soooo... Fallout 3...

  • 95 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for death919
death919

4724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 0

#1 death919
Member since 2004 • 4724 Posts

RPG of the year, or RPG of the century?

Discuss.

Avatar image for JayPee89
JayPee89

3488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 JayPee89
Member since 2005 • 3488 Posts
RPG of the millenium. ;)
Avatar image for ninjaxams
ninjaxams

7500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 ninjaxams
Member since 2004 • 7500 Posts
i was actually dissapointed with the demo. looked kinda meh to me. i'm hoping its alot better than what they were willing to show...
Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
i was actually dissapointed with the demo. looked kinda meh to me. i'm hoping its alot better than what they were willing to show...ninjaxams
i'm guessing it's 'spoilers!!11' so they won't show the good stuff, or maybe focusing on the combat is some attempt to draw otherwise uninterested people in. either way, yeah, that demo was pretty out of place. though he sucked at aiming, so he's probably a PC gamer. yay.
Avatar image for CJL182
CJL182

9233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 CJL182
Member since 2003 • 9233 Posts

i was actually dissapointed with the demo. looked kinda meh to me. i'm hoping its alot better than what they were willing to show...ninjaxams

Yeah, I can't explain it but I wasn't really impressed either. I was interested in it, but I wasn't hyped up for it or anything. I'm still interested though.

Avatar image for JayPee89
JayPee89

3488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 JayPee89
Member since 2005 • 3488 Posts
i was actually dissapointed with the demo. looked kinda meh to me. i'm hoping its alot better than what they were willing to show...ninjaxams
Everything is kinda meh to you. Maybe you should find a new hobby. :|
Avatar image for MagnuzGuerra
MagnuzGuerra

1037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 MagnuzGuerra
Member since 2004 • 1037 Posts
Not impressed at all.
Avatar image for KSU-Wildcat
KSU-Wildcat

859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 KSU-Wildcat
Member since 2008 • 859 Posts
I was not impressed by the demo, and this is coming from an Elder Scrolls fan. The graphics showed potential, and i was excited when he was describing the ways you could play the game, such as stealth based. But when the combat started...eh. When enemies got hit it was just weird, they just stood there. Here's hoping it will entertain me as much as Oblivion did!
Avatar image for blitzkid1
blitzkid1

3952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 blitzkid1
Member since 2008 • 3952 Posts
I was like Whoa.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

[QUOTE="ninjaxams"]i was actually dissapointed with the demo. looked kinda meh to me. i'm hoping its alot better than what they were willing to show...JayPee89
Everything is kinda meh to you. Maybe you should find a new hobby. :|

He hates Half-Life 2 and GTA IV, yet he loves Tenchu Z. His comment bodes pretty well for Fallout 3. AAA!

Avatar image for Not-A-Stalker
Not-A-Stalker

5165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Not-A-Stalker
Member since 2006 • 5165 Posts

RPG of the forever.

Can't wait to see more gameplay. When is it supposed to demo'd again? On either SpikeTV or G4 sometime this week...

Avatar image for vash47
vash47

2171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 vash47
Member since 2007 • 2171 Posts

RPG of the year, or RPG of the century?

Discuss.

death919

Sorry, but that title will never belong to a game other than Fallout 2.

Avatar image for TaCoDuDe
TaCoDuDe

3239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 TaCoDuDe
Member since 2006 • 3239 Posts
If its anything like Oblivion (and it looks like it), then it will be mediocre at best.
Avatar image for ninjaxams
ninjaxams

7500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#14 ninjaxams
Member since 2004 • 7500 Posts

[QUOTE="JayPee89"][QUOTE="ninjaxams"]i was actually dissapointed with the demo. looked kinda meh to me. i'm hoping its alot better than what they were willing to show...BioShockOwnz

Everything is kinda meh to you. Maybe you should find a new hobby. :|

He hates Half-Life 2 and GTA IV, yet he loves Tenchu Z. His comment bodes pretty well for Fallout 3. AAA!

errr sorry for being jaded???
Avatar image for death919
death919

4724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 0

#15 death919
Member since 2004 • 4724 Posts
[QUOTE="death919"]

RPG of the year, or RPG of the century?

Discuss.

vash47

Sorry, but that title will never belong to a game other than Fallout 2.

*still needs to play the original 2 Fallouts*

Avatar image for 6matt6
6matt6

9726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 6matt6
Member since 2005 • 9726 Posts
Are you kidding me? The demo seemed so boring.
Avatar image for RuprechtMonkey
RuprechtMonkey

1509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 RuprechtMonkey
Member since 2008 • 1509 Posts

Any thread about Fallout is basically a license for the hardcore PC fanboys to spew the same cliched talking points they've been spewing out for the past year about the game. The concept of not playing it if they don't like the idea apparently hasn't occured to them.

Because, you know, Oblivion was the worst game EVER and Bethesda totally SUCK!!!111!!! Nothing will ever be as good as the original 2, they were the perfect games and this has nothing to do with nostalgia of course!!!111!!!

Avatar image for Pinkyimp
Pinkyimp

3623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#18 Pinkyimp
Member since 2006 • 3623 Posts

the game IMO looks way to easy..i mean from a long time FPS fan..its looks like i can just blow though this game in a week..but in Fallout 1 and 2 the things you upgraded on you charater effected what happened in combat..but now it just seem like i can grab a pistol and headshot everyone around me with little effort..

dont get me wrong the game looks good..it just looks easy..i mean mini nuke launcher FTL.. not only that but if it was a nuclear war how did he get the mini nuclear bombs..and the mini nuclear missle launcher..alot of this game dosent make sence...but i think some will love it and some will hate it..i for one right now hate it..it seems like a way to easy game geared towards casuals who dont know anything about a basic rpg but just wants to shoot things and make them blow up..

Avatar image for TaCoDuDe
TaCoDuDe

3239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 TaCoDuDe
Member since 2006 • 3239 Posts

Any thread about Fallout is basically a license for the hardcore PC fanboys to spew the same cliched talking points they've been spewing out for the past year about the game. The concept of not playing it if they don't like the idea apparently hasn't occured to them.

Because, you know, Oblivion was the worst game EVER and Bethesda totally SUCK!!!111!!! Nothing will ever be as good as the original 2, they were the perfect games and this has nothing to do with nostalgia of course!!!111!!!

RuprechtMonkey

I'm not playing it because I don't like what I've seen. :|

I wish I could though. They're trashing a great series. Just like they did with Elderr Scrolls.

Avatar image for PC360Wii
PC360Wii

4658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 PC360Wii
Member since 2007 • 4658 Posts

[QUOTE="ninjaxams"]i was actually dissapointed with the demo. looked kinda meh to me. i'm hoping its alot better than what they were willing to show...Makari
i'm guessing it's 'spoilers!!11' so they won't show the good stuff, or maybe focusing on the combat is some attempt to draw otherwise uninterested people in. either way, yeah, that demo was pretty out of place. though he sucked at aiming, so he's probably a PC gamer. yay.

Yea, with a mouse thats actually good for shooters. :D

Avatar image for Tony-Harrison
Tony-Harrison

1884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Tony-Harrison
Member since 2008 • 1884 Posts
So long as that's only the encounter system then I'm fairly satisfied. I still felt physical sick due to certain elements. The musical ambiance has changed to the extreme. The fat boy weapon is hopefully an end game weapon. Please be an end game weapon. :/
Avatar image for Dahaka-UK
Dahaka-UK

6915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Dahaka-UK
Member since 2005 • 6915 Posts
Just like the fallout fans predicted, a oblivion/shooter hybrid. Fallout3 is not an indepth RPG. It's a generic shooter with RPG elements.
Avatar image for nick_manthe
nick_manthe

447

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 nick_manthe
Member since 2005 • 447 Posts
Dude Elders Scrolls 3 was Horrible!This game looks awsome,defenitely buying it.
[QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"]

Any thread about Fallout is basically a license for the hardcore PC fanboys to spew the same cliched talking points they've been spewing out for the past year about the game. The concept of not playing it if they don't like the idea apparently hasn't occured to them.

Because, you know, Oblivion was the worst game EVER and Bethesda totally SUCK!!!111!!! Nothing will ever be as good as the original 2, they were the perfect games and this has nothing to do with nostalgia of course!!!111!!!

TaCoDuDe

I'm not playing it because I don't like what I've seen. :|

I wish I could though. They're trashing a great series. Just like they did with Elderr Scrolls.

Avatar image for CrazyFanboy
CrazyFanboy

639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 CrazyFanboy
Member since 2005 • 639 Posts
Looks boring to me.
Avatar image for GoldenGlove
GoldenGlove

4699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 GoldenGlove
Member since 2002 • 4699 Posts
Reminded me a lot of Bioshock. You can even hack computers.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#28 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

Any thread about Fallout is basically a license for the hardcore PC fanboys to spew the same cliched talking points they've been spewing out for the past year about the game. The concept of not playing it if they don't like the idea apparently hasn't occured to them.

Because, you know, Oblivion was the worst game EVER and Bethesda totally SUCK!!!111!!! Nothing will ever be as good as the original 2, they were the perfect games and this has nothing to do with nostalgia of course!!!111!!!

RuprechtMonkey
Actually, most Hermits don't question that this game is going to be an amazing game. Many of us openly acknowledge that Bethesda can do no wrong. While its going to be a great game, its going to be a horrible "FALLOUT" game. Countless threads have been posted, one with over 1K posts, that detail the arguements against this game. Time and time again we've pointed out that this is going to be a good game, but what Bethesda is doing is being unfaithful to a classic franchise. They've changed so many aspects of the original game. The only arguements I ever hear against this is, "Games change" and "you haven't played it yet". Both of those rebutals are tired and played out. The fact of the matter is that Bethesda is screwing with a classic formula, and stappling the fallout title on there. Its like making a party game and putting the Halo brand on it just to sell copies. It doesn't matter if its a great game, it might be truly unfaithful to Halo.
Avatar image for RuprechtMonkey
RuprechtMonkey

1509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 RuprechtMonkey
Member since 2008 • 1509 Posts
[QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"]

Any thread about Fallout is basically a license for the hardcore PC fanboys to spew the same cliched talking points they've been spewing out for the past year about the game. The concept of not playing it if they don't like the idea apparently hasn't occured to them.

Because, you know, Oblivion was the worst game EVER and Bethesda totally SUCK!!!111!!! Nothing will ever be as good as the original 2, they were the perfect games and this has nothing to do with nostalgia of course!!!111!!!

TaCoDuDe

I'm not playing it because I don't like what I've seen. :|

I wish I could though. They're trashing a great series. Just like they did with Elderr Scrolls.

Opinions are like, well, you know.

I really dug Oblivion, and I've been play the ES since Arena. WAY more ES fans (really though they weren't so much ES fans as they were hardcore Daggerfall fans) complained about Morrowind. The same thing happened with Oblivion and Morrowind fans.

There's nothing stopping Interplay from making a Fallout style game again, they don't need the "Fallout" name. PC fans didn't seem to whine NEARLY as much 9actually it was more like not at all) about the truly bad Fallout Tactics and Brotherhood of Steel spinoffs. Bethesda is just an "easy" target these days for bored PC fanboys upset about losing exclusive titles, or titles that would've been exclusive to the PC had they been made 8 years ago.

Avatar image for RobbieH1234
RobbieH1234

7464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 RobbieH1234
Member since 2005 • 7464 Posts
It's Oblivion with guns in a post-apocalyptic setting, as expected.
Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts

RPG of the year, or RPG of the century?

Discuss.

death919
how about most overrated rpg of the year ?
Avatar image for bballm10
bballm10

1025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#33 bballm10
Member since 2006 • 1025 Posts
I don't see how this game qualifies as an RPG.
Avatar image for NearTheEnd
NearTheEnd

12184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 NearTheEnd
Member since 2002 • 12184 Posts

Maybe the fallout mmo will be 2D, amirite guys? Gotta hold out hope.

Avatar image for PC360Wii
PC360Wii

4658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 PC360Wii
Member since 2007 • 4658 Posts
[QUOTE="TaCoDuDe"][QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"]

Any thread about Fallout is basically a license for the hardcore PC fanboys to spew the same cliched talking points they've been spewing out for the past year about the game. The concept of not playing it if they don't like the idea apparently hasn't occured to them.

Because, you know, Oblivion was the worst game EVER and Bethesda totally SUCK!!!111!!! Nothing will ever be as good as the original 2, they were the perfect games and this has nothing to do with nostalgia of course!!!111!!!

RuprechtMonkey

I'm not playing it because I don't like what I've seen. :|

I wish I could though. They're trashing a great series. Just like they did with Elderr Scrolls.

Opinions are like, well, you know.

I really dug Oblivion, and I've been play the ES since Arena. WAY more ES fans (really though they weren't so much ES fans as they were hardcore Daggerfall fans) complained about Morrowind. The same thing happened with Oblivion and Morrowind fans.

There's nothing stopping Interplay from making a Fallout style game again, they don't need the "Fallout" name. PC fans didn't seem to whine NEARLY as much 9actually it was more like not at all) about the truly bad Fallout Tactics and Brotherhood of Steel spinoffs. Bethesda is just an "easy" target these days for bored PC fanboys upset about losing exclusive titles, or titles that would've been exclusive to the PC had they been made 8 years ago.

Erm, what was wrong with Fallout Tactics? :roll:, targeting "Pc fanboys" ....

Avatar image for RuprechtMonkey
RuprechtMonkey

1509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 RuprechtMonkey
Member since 2008 • 1509 Posts

While its going to be a great game, its going to be a horrible "FALLOUT" game. Vandalvideo

Yes, because Tactics and BoS were AWESOME!

The franchise, as well as the company that created it, were completely dead in the water before Bethesda bought the IP. That money allowed them to continue to breathe.

There is nothing stopping Interplay from making another turn based and isometric RPG while not using the Fallout name. It is just a name, get over it.

Erm, what was wrong with Fallout Tactics? :roll:, targeting "Pc fanboys" .... PC360Wii

Didn't say there was anything "wrong" with it, it just wasn't anywhere close to being as good as the others.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#37 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]While its going to be a great game, its going to be a horrible "FALLOUT" game. RuprechtMonkey

Yes, because Tactics and BoS were AWESOME!

The franchise, as well as the company that created it, were completely dead in the water before Bethesda bought the IP. That money allowed them to continue to breathe.

There is nothing stopping Interplay from making another turn based and isometric RPG while not using the Fallout name. It is just a name, get over it.

No one said that tactics and BOS were awesome, and way to ignore 90% of my post as well. Like I so clearly pointed out, we've pointed out in other threads dozens of times why this game is nothing like the originals. It doesn't matter if this is going to be a great game or not. Bethesda has changed the atmosphere, the gameplay, the dialogue, the storyline, pulp references, and countless other aspects of the game. This isn't fallout, its Oblivion with guns. And again, no one is saying Oblivion is bad or that this game will be bad. We're saying it is not faithful to Fallout. Nothing more, nothing less.
Avatar image for VoodooGamer
VoodooGamer

1864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 VoodooGamer
Member since 2007 • 1864 Posts

Opinions are like, well, you know.RuprechtMonkey

Opinions are opinions. I know that's a hard concept to grasp when you're a 12 year old know-it-all. ;)

I really dug Oblivion, and I've been play the ES since Arena. WAY more ES fans (really though they weren't so much ES fans as they were hardcore Daggerfall fans) complained about Morrowind. The same thing happened with Oblivion and Morrowind fans.Monkey

How come it's always the Oblivion/Beth fanboys who say they've been playing since Arena?

There's nothing stopping Interplay from making a Fallout style game again, they don't need the "Fallout" name.Monkey

They don't have the money nor the means to start on a new franchise. They **** up their company by making half-assed Fallout games for the console kiddies.

PC fans didn't seem to whine NEARLY as much 9actually it was more like not at all) about the truly bad Fallout Tactics and Brotherhood of Steel spinoffs.Monkey

No, they did.

Bethesda is just an "easy" target these days for bored PC fanboys upset about losing exclusive titles, or titles that would've been exclusive to the PC had they been made 8 years ago.

Monkey

Wait, what? What are all these console guys doing saying they don't find Fallout 3 interesting then??

Avatar image for ironcreed
ironcreed

14195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

#39 ironcreed
Member since 2005 • 14195 Posts
I think it is going to be a fantastic game in every regard. It is coming along brilliantly. So, potentially RPG of the year from where I stand. But, we shall see. Fable 2 is looking mighty tasty as well.
Avatar image for death919
death919

4724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 0

#40 death919
Member since 2004 • 4724 Posts
[QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"]

Opinions are like, well, you know.VoodooGamer

Opinions are opinions. I know that's a hard concept to grasp when you're a 12 year old know-it-all. ;)

I really dug Oblivion, and I've been play the ES since Arena. WAY more ES fans (really though they weren't so much ES fans as they were hardcore Daggerfall fans) complained about Morrowind. The same thing happened with Oblivion and Morrowind fans.Monkey

How come it's always the Oblivion/Beth fanboys who say they've been playing since Arena?

There's nothing stopping Interplay from making a Fallout style game again, they don't need the "Fallout" name.Monkey

They don't have the money nor the means to start on a new franchise. They **** up their company by making half-assed Fallout games for the console kiddies.

PC fans didn't seem to whine NEARLY as much 9actually it was more like not at all) about the truly bad Fallout Tactics and Brotherhood of Steel spinoffs.Monkey

No, they did.

Bethesda is just an "easy" target these days for bored PC fanboys upset about losing exclusive titles, or titles that would've been exclusive to the PC had they been made 8 years ago.

Monkey

Wait, what? What are all these console guys doing saying they don't find Fallout 3 interesting then??

lol I love when people run out of ideas and make those random "yeah well you're a 12 years old kiddie" comments on the internets. You know you've truly won a debate when you hear those words come from the opponent's mouth. :)

Avatar image for RuprechtMonkey
RuprechtMonkey

1509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 RuprechtMonkey
Member since 2008 • 1509 Posts
[QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]While its going to be a great game, its going to be a horrible "FALLOUT" game. Vandalvideo

Yes, because Tactics and BoS were AWESOME!

The franchise, as well as the company that created it, were completely dead in the water before Bethesda bought the IP. That money allowed them to continue to breathe.

There is nothing stopping Interplay from making another turn based and isometric RPG while not using the Fallout name. It is just a name, get over it.

No one said that tactics and BOS were awesome, and way to ignore 90% of my post as well. Like I so clearly pointed out, we've pointed out in other threads dozens of times why this game is nothing like the originals. It doesn't matter if this is going to be a great game or not. Bethesda has changed the atmosphere, the gameplay, the dialogue, the storyline, pulp references, and countless other aspects of the game. This isn't fallout, its Oblivion with guns. And again, no one is saying Oblivion is bad or that this game will be bad. We're saying it is not faithful to Fallout. Nothing more, nothing less.

So here's reality.

Eother Bethesda bought the rights to Fallout and made a Fallout game that was a drastic departure from the classic Fallout formula and is more oriented to the Bethesda style of game design OR the made a game similar in atmosphere without the Fallout name, and Interplay and the Fallout IP died off completely.

That's reality. So, what would you choose?

PC fans don't realize that Fallout WAS DEAD.If you don't like the idea of Bethesda developing a Bethesda style action RPG bearing the Fallout name then continue to treat it as it was before they bought the IP and treat the franchise as dead.

Again, there's nothing stopping Interplay from developing a Fallout-like game if there is a demand for one. What's in a name? Are you that concerned about a meaningless name? And the only thing that is allowing them to develop ANYTHING is the money from Bethesda's purchase.

Avatar image for VoodooGamer
VoodooGamer

1864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 VoodooGamer
Member since 2007 • 1864 Posts

Yes, because Tactics and BoS were AWESOME!RuprechtMonkey

You fail hard on this one.:lol:

The franchise, as well as the company that created it, were completely dead in the water before Bethesda bought the IP. That money allowed them to continue to breathe.Monkey

Get over yourself. Beth is **** up this once great franchise, you can't defend them just because they helped Interplay. :roll:

There is nothing stopping Interplay from making another turn based and isometric RPG while not using the Fallout name. It is just a name, get over it.Monkey

Well except this thing called money. Right now, they're building upon existing franchises to increase profit so that one day they can create new franchises. Right now they can't.

Didn't say there was anything "wrong" with it, it just wasn't anywhere close to being as good as the others.

Monkey

You never played the originals, how would you know?

Avatar image for ELJUDEZ
ELJUDEZ

7389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 ELJUDEZ
Member since 2004 • 7389 Posts
i was actually dissapointed with the demo. looked kinda meh to me. i'm hoping its alot better than what they were willing to show...ninjaxams
Agree
Avatar image for VoodooGamer
VoodooGamer

1864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 VoodooGamer
Member since 2007 • 1864 Posts
[QUOTE="VoodooGamer"][QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"]

Opinions are like, well, you know.death919

Opinions are opinions. I know that's a hard concept to grasp when you're a 12 year old know-it-all. ;)

I really dug Oblivion, and I've been play the ES since Arena. WAY more ES fans (really though they weren't so much ES fans as they were hardcore Daggerfall fans) complained about Morrowind. The same thing happened with Oblivion and Morrowind fans.Monkey

How come it's always the Oblivion/Beth fanboys who say they've been playing since Arena?

There's nothing stopping Interplay from making a Fallout style game again, they don't need the "Fallout" name.Monkey

They don't have the money nor the means to start on a new franchise. They **** up their company by making half-assed Fallout games for the console kiddies.

PC fans didn't seem to whine NEARLY as much 9actually it was more like not at all) about the truly bad Fallout Tactics and Brotherhood of Steel spinoffs.Monkey

No, they did.

Bethesda is just an "easy" target these days for bored PC fanboys upset about losing exclusive titles, or titles that would've been exclusive to the PC had they been made 8 years ago.

Monkey

Wait, what? What are all these console guys doing saying they don't find Fallout 3 interesting then??

lol I love when people run out of ideas and make those random "yeah well you're a 12 years old kiddie" comments on the internets. You know you've truly won a debate when you hear those words come from the opponent's mouth. :)

Well they are HILARIOUS. :lol:

Avatar image for dream431ca
dream431ca

10165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 dream431ca
Member since 2003 • 10165 Posts
Fallout 3 looks stellar! Buying it for PC! WOOT!
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#46 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Eother Bethesda bought the rights to Fallout and made a Fallout game that was a drastic departure from the classic Fallout formula and is more oriented to the Bethesda style of game design OR the made a game similar in atmosphere without the Fallout name, and Interplay and the Fallout IP died off completely.That's reality. So, what would you choose?PC fans don't realize that Fallout WAS DEAD.If you don't like the idea of Bethesda developing a Bethesda style action RPG bearing the Fallout name then continue to treat it as it was before they bought the IP and treat the franchise as deadRuprechtMonkey
Reality? Reality doesn't change the concerns people are having with this game. People wouldn't be half as mad as they are now had Bethesda called this game Fallout: (Insert random subname). You have to realize that Bethesda avidly promoted the idea that "we are trying to stay faithful to the game" and they constantly carried themselves as they were actually trying. Time and time again, through countless interviews, they have illustrated that they simply don't understand the atmosphere and humour of the original titles. The "Fallout" name is more than just a name, more than just a brand, it is a SUB CULTURE. The second you realize that Fallout is a subculture you realize why people have such large concerns over this game. Bethesda is doing the sub culture an injustice by labeling this game the third entry in a franchise that has so many things that defines it. They are using the name simply for the sake of using the name. Not only that, but Black Isle had done a working model of what they wanted Fallout 3 to be like. Bethesda has spat in the face of every last fan of the original games. Its not so much that we think this game will be bad. We simply don't like that Bethesda has taken so many liberties with such a great franchise. They have changed practically everything that defines the series as what it is today. Its like the example I used earlier. What if they made a party game with the Halo name that focused on a female master chiefette that danced and partied with the convenant and called it Halo 4? You wouldn't be happy would you? THe second you realize these trappings is the second you will realize our reasoning.
Avatar image for bballm10
bballm10

1025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#47 bballm10
Member since 2006 • 1025 Posts
So here's reality.

Eother Bethesda bought the rights to Fallout and made a Fallout game that was a drastic departure from the classic Fallout formula and is more oriented to the Bethesda style of game design OR the made a game similar in atmosphere without the Fallout name, and Interplay and the Fallout IP died off completely.

That's reality. So, what would you choose?RuprechtMonkey

I'd rather Fallout to remain dead.

Avatar image for RuprechtMonkey
RuprechtMonkey

1509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 RuprechtMonkey
Member since 2008 • 1509 Posts

You never played the originals, how would you know?

VoodooGamer

You really need to stop assuming everyone who disagrees with you despises the PC and has never gamed on one.

I used to be a hardcore PC fan (before these forums even existed.) I still dig the PC, I'm just not an unreasonable fanboy, so that may seem alien to you.

Played those games to death, the original Half Life (and was playing HL against others online before stuff like CS existed) and Deus Ex are my favorite games of all time.

I remember pouring copious amounts of time into the original Arena. The joy of playing now forgotten games like Blood 2, Shogo, and being wowed by Unreal's visuals the first time I played it.

I most certainly played the original 2. Loved them. I consider them classics, just as I do games like BG2 and PT.

I just find these arguments against the games ridiculous.

The franchise and the company behind it WAS DEAD, COMPLETELY DEAD as was the company behind it.

Bethesda are "ruining" nothing. It was dead, you can't kill something that's dead. So, you're saying they revived it, and you're worried they'll re-kill it.

Avatar image for RuprechtMonkey
RuprechtMonkey

1509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 RuprechtMonkey
Member since 2008 • 1509 Posts
[QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"]So here's reality.

Eother Bethesda bought the rights to Fallout and made a Fallout game that was a drastic departure from the classic Fallout formula and is more oriented to the Bethesda style of game design OR the made a game similar in atmosphere without the Fallout name, and Interplay and the Fallout IP died off completely.

That's reality. So, what would you choose?bballm10

I'd rather Fallout to remain dead.

Then ignore it, and in your world it will (and you'll save yourself a headache.)

Avatar image for ithilgore2006
ithilgore2006

10494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#50 ithilgore2006
Member since 2006 • 10494 Posts
Or how about "FPS of the year"? I didn't see any "RPG" elements, at all, even less than Oblivion.