Sorny's Folly - Losses in the BILLIONS!!!

  • 93 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for CStheGreat
CStheGreat

705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 CStheGreat
Member since 2008 • 705 Posts
[QUOTE="CStheGreat"]

[QUOTE="Makari"]difference being, MS was cutting in on a new market and had to / expected to spend giant amounts of money.Makari


It doesn't matter, Microsoft still lost a ton of money. Financially, there are no excuses. You lose money you lose money, you gain money you gain money. It makes absolutely no difference how you gain or lose, a company is a company.

iirc now their gaming division is actually making money and they're not doing too badly against sony, which is pretty amazing.Makari

Microsoft is making money as is Sony. However, both companies are still in the red when it comes to their gaming division (overall).

and ms has an utterly gigantic os/software cushion to sit on. sony has.. i think their movie studios are profitable? i don't think the computer/television/music groups were doing all that greatMakari


Their movie studios, their television and home entertainment division, their digital cameras, their high-end electronics for big broadcasting companies. Their television division is doing very well. All your "information" on this is basically what you perceive while reading system wars, sorry.

The Playstation 3 is starting to sell much better than before. The PSP is doing great worldwide, beating the DS in some regions like Japan. The Playstation 2 is still going strong. Their sales for digital cameras are better than expected, ditto to their televisions. Stop posting nonsense with no evidence to back it up.

Some links to show you my actual facts (and not random views I pulled out of nowhere):

http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/sonys-game-division-turns-a-profit/

http://www.rte.ie/business/2008/0514/sony.html

ah.. so according to your links, this year is something of an outlier amongst all of sony's operations? lol. anyway, i saw "The games division narrowed its losses but remained stuck in the red" and stopped there, compared to microsoft's games division having profitable quarters a couple times in a row and expected to come out in the black in 2008. it's pretty clear what i was implying about the games divisions making a profit or not, and being tricky with language doesn't change it.



Microsoft has lost some $6 billion or so on the XBOX franchise. Even if they do come out in the black in 2008, they are still $4 billion in the hole from the original Xbox alone and another couple billion from the XBOX 360. The original Playstation and Playstation 2 have been turning Sony profits for years prior to the release of the Playstation 3. The PSP is doing fine as well.
Avatar image for AgentA-Mi6
AgentA-Mi6

16740

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#52 AgentA-Mi6
Member since 2006 • 16740 Posts

The TC is such a Sony hater and a Nintendo fanboy. He was the general of maintaining damage control against MGS4. Lyphe2k

Just look at this:

[QUOTE="thriteenthmonke"][QUOTE="lvgaming"]

Anyone know how much M$ lost on the first Xbox? Or how they killed all support for it?

Anyone?

It's all part of the gaming industry that's why we pay $60 for a game on a DVD format or buy $40 for a wireless controller and then have to buy the play and charge kit. Almost everyone takes a hit from hardware and we get nickel'd & dimed on everything else. What happen to the days of two controllers, a game and a system? That's right Sega Genesis and Super Nintendo killed it.

jknight5422

I think Microsoft lost around $4 billion on the Xbox.

Get some evidence to prove that. Otherwise, I don't believe that at all.

He thinks that sony is dead even after 2008 Q1 when they started profiting with the Ps3 and completely ignores the fact that "Softy" lost billions on the original xbox :roll:

Avatar image for jknight5422
jknight5422

1992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#54 jknight5422
Member since 2003 • 1992 Posts

Thats Nice, Check the link and there are many more, here at gs also, to prove that sony's gaming division is back on black ink.

http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/sonys-game-division-turns-a-profit/

The Ps3 was the most expensive system last year, and still it outsold the 360 by over 2 millions, It was a huge ownage here on System wars. The 360 needs more than just a few price cuts to beat the Ps3 in worldwide sales :lol:. If Forza, Halo3, Gears of war, Mass Effect etc etc didn't help the 360 to beat the Ps3 in worldwide sales what will? The 360 has been last in monthly sales for quite a while, look forward to June NPD figures and delightfully witness where the xbox360 is standing at.

AgentA-Mi6

Your key word being WORLDWIDE sales. I look at Nexgenwars & I see 21 mil Wii, 19 mil Xbox 360 & 9 mil PS3?? Those are the sales numbers. If America is the only market for the 360 then who cares about the other markets? Total sales show its dominance twice over on the PS3 WORLDWIDE or nation wide. :p

About time to go to sleep with all this swelling optimism inside me. :-)

Avatar image for jknight5422
jknight5422

1992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#55 jknight5422
Member since 2003 • 1992 Posts

He thinks that sony is dead even after 2008 Q1 when they started profiting with the Ps3 and completely ignores the fact that "Softy" lost billions on the original xbox :roll:

AgentA-Mi6

You're doing damage control. I've said 2-3 times already:

Repeating: Mr. Softy started with nothing & worked its way up through a pretty tough Japanese-locked console market, from the Xbox to the 360 (and Beyond)..

Repeating: Sorny was "On top of the world, Ma!" with PS2 & now it's toppling like King Kong off the Empire State Building.

The trend is crystal clear. How do you cows keep ignoring the upward success of Softy & the downward failure of Sorny?? I guess I'll need to sig it.

Avatar image for CStheGreat
CStheGreat

705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 CStheGreat
Member since 2008 • 705 Posts
[QUOTE="AgentA-Mi6"]

Thats Nice, Check the link and there are many more, here at gs also, to prove that sony's gaming division is back on black ink.

http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/sonys-game-division-turns-a-profit/

The Ps3 was the most expensive system last year, and still it outsold the 360 by over 2 millions, It was a huge ownage here on System wars. The 360 needs more than just a few price cuts to beat the Ps3 in worldwide sales :lol:. If Forza, Halo3, Gears of war, Mass Effect etc etc didn't help the 360 to beat the Ps3 in worldwide sales what will? The 360 has been last in monthly sales for quite a while, look forward to June NPD figures and delightfully witness where the xbox360 is standing at.

jknight5422

Your key word being WORLDWIDE sales. I look at Nexgenwars & I see 21 mil Wii, 19 mil Xbox 360 & 9 mil PS3?? Those are the sales numbers. If America is the only market for the 360 then who cares about the other markets? Total sales show its dominance twice over on the PS3 WORLDWIDE or nation wide. :p

About time to go to sleep with all this swelling optimism inside me. :-)



Your source is Nexgenwars? :D
Avatar image for AgentA-Mi6
AgentA-Mi6

16740

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#57 AgentA-Mi6
Member since 2006 • 16740 Posts
[QUOTE="AgentA-Mi6"]

Thats Nice, Check the link and there are many more, here at gs also, to prove that sony's gaming division is back on black ink.

http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/sonys-game-division-turns-a-profit/

The Ps3 was the most expensive system last year, and still it outsold the 360 by over 2 millions, It was a huge ownage here on System wars. The 360 needs more than just a few price cuts to beat the Ps3 in worldwide sales :lol:. If Forza, Halo3, Gears of war, Mass Effect etc etc didn't help the 360 to beat the Ps3 in worldwide sales what will? The 360 has been last in monthly sales for quite a while, look forward to June NPD figures and delightfully witness where the xbox360 is standing at.

jknight5422

Your key word being WORLDWIDE sales. I look at Nexgenwars & I see 21 mil Wii, 19 mil Xbox 360 & 9 mil PS3?? Those are the sales numbers. If America is the only market for the 360 then who cares about the other markets? Total sales show its dominance twice over on the PS3 WORLDWIDE or nation wide. :p

About time to go to sleep with all this swelling optimism inside me. :-)

Go to sleep then, system wars gets boring after a 20 mins or so lately >_>.

Just to clarify things up before I leave as well

1- Nexgenwars = :lol:....:lol: xD (those are meaningless random numbers)

2- Microsoft is struggling to accomplish profitable healthy sales in all regions, selling well in the us and losing everywhere is the one reason why ms is going to end last in sales at this rate.

3- the Ps3 is catching up, there is no denial at this point.

4- lets wait for june NPD figures, :wink:, that'll be a fine example.

Avatar image for CStheGreat
CStheGreat

705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 CStheGreat
Member since 2008 • 705 Posts
[QUOTE="AgentA-Mi6"]

He thinks that sony is dead even after 2008 Q1 when they started profiting with the Ps3 and completely ignores the fact that "Softy" lost billions on the original xbox :roll:

jknight5422

You're doing damage control. I've said 2-3 times already:

Repeating: Mr. Softy started with nothing & worked its way up through a pretty tough Japanese-locked console market, from the Xbox to the 360 (and Beyond)..

Repeating: Sorny was "On top of the world, Ma!" with PS2 & now it's toppling like King Kong off the Empire State Building.

The trend is crystal clear. How do you cows keep ignoring the upward success of Softy & the downward failure of Sorny?? I guess I'll need to sig it.



Microsoft worked it's way up from losing $4 billion dollars on the original Xbox to still losing money on the Xbox 360. One year of being in the black (whenever they reach that) doesn't make up for over $6 billion in acquired losses over 8 years.

Sony made money from the get go on the Playstation and the Playstation 2. The Playstation 3 had a rocky start and it is starting to gain momentum (outselling the Xbox in America, Japan, Europe, and Worldwide as a whole).

The trend is crystal clear? What trend? Both companies are starting to gain more profits from their consoles, both companies have acquired debts from this generation. WTF are you talking about bro?

Avatar image for sireclaborn
sireclaborn

1305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 sireclaborn
Member since 2008 • 1305 Posts
[QUOTE="AgentA-Mi6"]

Thats Nice, Check the link and there are many more, here at gs also, to prove that sony's gaming division is back on black ink.

http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/sonys-game-division-turns-a-profit/

The Ps3 was the most expensive system last year, and still it outsold the 360 by over 2 millions, It was a huge ownage here on System wars. The 360 needs more than just a few price cuts to beat the Ps3 in worldwide sales :lol:. If Forza, Halo3, Gears of war, Mass Effect etc etc didn't help the 360 to beat the Ps3 in worldwide sales what will? The 360 has been last in monthly sales for quite a while, look forward to June NPD figures and delightfully witness where the xbox360 is standing at.

jknight5422

Your key word being WORLDWIDE sales. I look at Nexgenwars & I see 21 mil Wii, 19 mil Xbox 360 & 9 mil PS3?? Those are the sales numbers. If America is the only market for the 360 then who cares about the other markets? Total sales show its dominance twice over on the PS3 WORLDWIDE or nation wide. :p

About time to go to sleep with all this swelling optimism inside me. :-)

NEXGENWARS????? you just prooved your a fanboy. i believe the ps3 is at 13 million. sony said and so does everyone else. do yourself a favor and never use nexgen wars again.

Avatar image for jknight5422
jknight5422

1992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#60 jknight5422
Member since 2003 • 1992 Posts

Microsoft worked it's way up from losing $4 billion dollars on the original Xbox to still losing money on the Xbox 360. One year of being in the black (whenever they reach that) doesn't make up for over $6 billion in acquired losses over 8 years.

Sony made money from the get go on the Playstation and the Playstation 2. The Playstation 3 had a rocky start and it is starting to gain momentum (outselling the Xbox in America, Japan, Europe, and Worldwide as a whole).

The trend is crystal clear? What trend? Both companies are starting to gain more profits from their consoles, both companies have acquired debts from this generation. WTF are you talking about bro?

CStheGreat

You just refuse to see it. Microsoft had to start at a loss to get in the console business! They've worked their way out of it, otherwise why would anyone state they are making this thing called "profit" from selling their consoles today? Whereas we look at the "mighty" PS3 & it's going right into $3 billion in losses...and counting! The 360 lowers it price ever more & this means MORE losses for Sorny for each console. Whatever profit they made on the PS1/2 is fuel for the PS3 fire.

But "Keep the Faith!", guy. After all, tomorrow is another day!

Avatar image for haze_blaze
haze_blaze

3907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 haze_blaze
Member since 2003 • 3907 Posts
[QUOTE="AgentA-Mi6"]

He thinks that sony is dead even after 2008 Q1 when they started profiting with the Ps3 and completely ignores the fact that "Softy" lost billions on the original xbox :roll:

jknight5422

You're doing damage control. I've said 2-3 times already:

Repeating: Mr. Softy started with nothing & worked its way up through a pretty tough Japanese-locked console market, from the Xbox to the 360 (and Beyond)..

Repeating: Sorny was "On top of the world, Ma!" with PS2 & now it's toppling like King Kong off the Empire State Building.

The trend is crystal clear. How do you cows keep ignoring the upward success of Softy & the downward failure of Sorny?? I guess I'll need to sig it.

Looks as if you're the only one not paying attention to the 'trends'. It's actually Microsoft that has been on a downward slope and Sony that has been on an upward swing. In its first two years the PS3 is outselling the 360 both years... The Wii is the market leader. But when it comes to the 360 and the PS3, the PS3 has the obvious momentum... especially since it's even outselling the 360 in North America now. Microsoft will have to fight back with price cuts if it hopes to gain momentum back.

Avatar image for jknight5422
jknight5422

1992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#62 jknight5422
Member since 2003 • 1992 Posts

NEXGENWARS????? you just prooved your a fanboy. i believe the ps3 is at 13 million. sony said and so does everyone else. do yourself a favor and never use nexgen wars again.

sireclaborn

No it doesn't. I didn't know the website was discredited. I've seen people reference it here without being attacked for it previously.

Bottom Line is this: $3 BILLION LOSS on PS3 sales! Does that mean anything to you? Or is that just another phony number?

Cow Damage control: talk about the Xbox in the past..despite the fact that the PS2 was a massive success at the time.

PS3 comes out..oh what happened? D'oh!

Avatar image for jknight5422
jknight5422

1992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#63 jknight5422
Member since 2003 • 1992 Posts

Looks as if you're the only one not paying attention to the 'trends'. It's actually Microsoft that has been on a downward slope and Sony that has been on an upward swing. In its first two years the PS3 is outselling the 360 both years... The Wii is the market leader. But when it comes to the 360 and the PS3, the PS3 has the obvious momentum... especially since it's even outselling the 360 in North America now. Microsoft will have to fight back with price cuts if it hopes to gain momentum back.

haze_blaze

You obviously know more about Sorny's profit loss than the Sorny itself making its report on the losses.:roll:

Avatar image for haze_blaze
haze_blaze

3907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#64 haze_blaze
Member since 2003 • 3907 Posts
[QUOTE="CStheGreat"]

Microsoft worked it's way up from losing $4 billion dollars on the original Xbox to still losing money on the Xbox 360. One year of being in the black (whenever they reach that) doesn't make up for over $6 billion in acquired losses over 8 years.

Sony made money from the get go on the Playstation and the Playstation 2. The Playstation 3 had a rocky start and it is starting to gain momentum (outselling the Xbox in America, Japan, Europe, and Worldwide as a whole).

The trend is crystal clear? What trend? Both companies are starting to gain more profits from their consoles, both companies have acquired debts from this generation. WTF are you talking about bro?

jknight5422

You just refuse to see it. Microsoft had to start at a loss to get in the console business! They've worked their way out of it, otherwise why would anyone state they are making this thing called "profit" from selling their consoles today? Whereas we look at the "mighty" PS3 & it's going right into $3 billion in losses...and counting! The 360 lowers it price ever more & this means MORE losses for Sorny for each console. Whatever profit they made on the PS1/2 is fuel for the PS3 fire.

But "Keep the Faith!", guy. After all, tomorrow is another day!

The 360 has already lost $3 Billion this gen as well. And the PS3 is already on it's way to profitability as well. So unlike the xbox, they are not losing billions of dollars for an entire gen and a half. You can try to spin this news however you want... but the bottom line is that Microsoft has done much worse than Sony when it comes to the lack of profits. Even if you only look at the 360, at this point last year the 360 had lost $1.9 billion... the PS3 has only lost $1.2 billion in its 2nd year & still costs more to make... so Sony's still managing their process better than Microsoft did. And that's simply a fact, sorry.

Avatar image for haze_blaze
haze_blaze

3907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 haze_blaze
Member since 2003 • 3907 Posts
[QUOTE="haze_blaze"]

Looks as if you're the only one not paying attention to the 'trends'. It's actually Microsoft that has been on a downward slope and Sony that has been on an upward swing. In its first two years the PS3 is outselling the 360 both years... The Wii is the market leader. But when it comes to the 360 and the PS3, the PS3 has the obvious momentum... especially since it's even outselling the 360 in North America now. Microsoft will have to fight back with price cuts if it hopes to gain momentum back.

jknight5422

You obviously know more about Sorny's profit loss than the Sorny itself making its report on the losses.:roll:

No, but I obviously no more than you. That comment had nothing to do with the profit/loss statement. You stated that Microsoft's console was on the rise & that Sony's was crumbling while trying to bash some cows for not paying attention to the trends... only problem is, you have your facts backwards. Current trends support Sony and market analysts are worried about 360 sales trends.

Avatar image for jknight5422
jknight5422

1992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#66 jknight5422
Member since 2003 • 1992 Posts

The 360 has already lost $3 Billion this gen as well. And the PS3 is already on it's way to profitability as well. So unlike the xbox, they are not losing billions of dollars for an entire gen and a half. You can try to spin this news however you want... but the bottom line is that Microsoft has done much worse than Sony when it comes to the lack of profits. Even if you only look at the 360, at this point last year the 360 had lost $1.9 billion... the PS3 has only lost $1.2 billion in its 2nd year & still costs more to make... so Sony's still managing their process better than Microsoft did. And that's simply a fact, sorry.

haze_blaze

You have no facts. No links. No data. Start posting those links or be awash in the quagmire of discredibility.

Avatar image for Cowmanik
Cowmanik

506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Cowmanik
Member since 2007 • 506 Posts

MS losses are around 5 Billionrocoswav
That simply isn't true.

You can't just make up a number and say that's what you least favorite console maker loses.

Avatar image for jknight5422
jknight5422

1992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#68 jknight5422
Member since 2003 • 1992 Posts

No, but I obviously no more than you. That comment had nothing to do with the profit/loss statement. You stated that Microsoft's console was on the rise & that Sony's was crumbling while trying to bash some cows for not paying attention to the trends... only problem is, you have your facts backwards. Current trends support Sony and market analysts are worried about 360 sales trends.

haze_blaze

...Except how to spell KNOW.

Avatar image for sakura_Ex
sakura_Ex

3066

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 sakura_Ex
Member since 2007 • 3066 Posts
[QUOTE="AgentA-Mi6"]

Thats Nice, Check the link and there are many more, here at gs also, to prove that sony's gaming division is back on black ink.

http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/31/sonys-game-division-turns-a-profit/

The Ps3 was the most expensive system last year, and still it outsold the 360 by over 2 millions, It was a huge ownage here on System wars. The 360 needs more than just a few price cuts to beat the Ps3 in worldwide sales :lol:. If Forza, Halo3, Gears of war, Mass Effect etc etc didn't help the 360 to beat the Ps3 in worldwide sales what will? The 360 has been last in monthly sales for quite a while, look forward to June NPD figures and delightfully witness where the xbox360 is standing at.

jknight5422

Your key word being WORLDWIDE sales. I look at Nexgenwars & I see 21 mil Wii, 19 mil Xbox 360 & 9 mil PS3?? Those are the sales numbers. If America is the only market for the 360 then who cares about the other markets? Total sales show its dominance twice over on the PS3 WORLDWIDE or nation wide. :p

About time to go to sleep with all this swelling optimism inside me. :-)

I told you this once already,the PS3 is at 13 million sold worldwide,which Sony themselves have already stated.

Avatar image for kenshinhimura16
kenshinhimura16

7009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#70 kenshinhimura16
Member since 2005 • 7009 Posts
Does anyone here knows that the PS2 incurred hardware losses for over 3 years? I guess no one knew that. Companies lose money on some stuff, and they make it up on others. Its simple, new products cost more. Why? New techs, new assembly line, new ad campaigns, etc. But I guess that what 99% of SW community needs s a brain, soory guys, but those are not for sale. Its up to you to get one. Cheers.
Avatar image for haze_blaze
haze_blaze

3907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 haze_blaze
Member since 2003 • 3907 Posts
[QUOTE="haze_blaze"]

The 360 has already lost $3 Billion this gen as well. And the PS3 is already on it's way to profitability as well. So unlike the xbox, they are not losing billions of dollars for an entire gen and a half. You can try to spin this news however you want... but the bottom line is that Microsoft has done much worse than Sony when it comes to the lack of profits. Even if you only look at the 360, at this point last year the 360 had lost $1.9 billion... the PS3 has only lost $1.2 billion in its 2nd year & still costs more to make... so Sony's still managing their process better than Microsoft did. And that's simply a fact, sorry.

jknight5422

You have no facts. No links. No data. Start posting those links or be awash in the quagmire of discredibility.

The links have already been posted in THIS thread... obviously you chose to ignore them :roll:.

Avatar image for verbtex
verbtex

9196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#72 verbtex  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 9196 Posts

[QUOTE="Aquat1cF1sh"]So uh, does this mean that the big N is the only company to come out with a profit this generation? x_x I know Microsoft said they predicted they would start making a profit around 2009 (or was it 2010?) and now with Sony in the dumps... yeah.jknight5422

Mr. Softy, Ninty, & PC are all making the samolians. My theory is that Sorny killed itself by forcing the blu-ray onto everyone. They ate the cost to give you a "cheap" console...probably they were taking off $200-$300 off the price just to make it affordable!

And here is ze CHECK MATE: Mr. Softy is lowering their price. It's like the head shot from some incredible sniperery from the Master Chief.

With Mr. Softy lowering the cost, Sorny will have to lower its cost & lose even MORE money. Sorny will lose more money & will barely be able to break even with profit from the gaming dept. Lastly, even if Phatal Phartasy is a big hit when it's released, it's not going to be like Spore. It would have to be like Spore for Sorny to see it recoup its losses from the hardware.

I wonder if Sorny will go bankrupt? Ninty can buy it out.

Have you not heard of LittleBigPlanet?

Its like Spore, where you can create your own character, but not only that YOU CAN CREATE your own level in REAL TIME.

Look up some of the videos here and at other gaming sites to see the hype over LittleBigPlanet, that is a PS3 EXCLUSIVE.

Avatar image for haze_blaze
haze_blaze

3907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#73 haze_blaze
Member since 2003 • 3907 Posts
[QUOTE="haze_blaze"]

The 360 has already lost $3 Billion this gen as well. And the PS3 is already on it's way to profitability as well. So unlike the xbox, they are not losing billions of dollars for an entire gen and a half. You can try to spin this news however you want... but the bottom line is that Microsoft has done much worse than Sony when it comes to the lack of profits. Even if you only look at the 360, at this point last year the 360 had lost $1.9 billion... the PS3 has only lost $1.2 billion in its 2nd year & still costs more to make... so Sony's still managing their process better than Microsoft did. And that's simply a fact, sorry.

jknight5422

You have no facts. No links. No data. Start posting those links or be awash in the quagmire of discredibility.

Once again, just to enjoy your ownage:

http://www.joystiq.com/2005/09/26/forbes-xbox-lost-microsoft-4-billion-and-counting/

And for the 360, a total of $3.17 Billion in losses already (1.28 in 06 and 1.89 in 07)

http://news.cnet.co.uk/gamesgear/0,39029682,49291771,00.htm

Microsoft has lost much more money on their consoles than the PS3. And Sony cut their losses a lot quicker at this point in their system's life cycle. A remarkable feat considering that their machine cost much more to make.

Avatar image for Abstract_Choas
Abstract_Choas

466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#75 Abstract_Choas
Member since 2008 • 466 Posts
Yay for us getting a good deal on great hardware!
Avatar image for DrCortex
DrCortex

185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 DrCortex
Member since 2008 • 185 Posts
I don't really see why everyone cares.
Avatar image for Jynxzor
Jynxzor

9313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 Jynxzor
Member since 2003 • 9313 Posts
Gotta spend money to make money.
Avatar image for CStheGreat
CStheGreat

705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 CStheGreat
Member since 2008 • 705 Posts
[QUOTE="CStheGreat"]

Microsoft worked it's way up from losing $4 billion dollars on the original Xbox to still losing money on the Xbox 360. One year of being in the black (whenever they reach that) doesn't make up for over $6 billion in acquired losses over 8 years.

Sony made money from the get go on the Playstation and the Playstation 2. The Playstation 3 had a rocky start and it is starting to gain momentum (outselling the Xbox in America, Japan, Europe, and Worldwide as a whole).

The trend is crystal clear? What trend? Both companies are starting to gain more profits from their consoles, both companies have acquired debts from this generation. WTF are you talking about bro?

jknight5422

You just refuse to see it. Microsoft had to start at a loss to get in the console business! They've worked their way out of it, otherwise why would anyone state they are making this thing called "profit" from selling their consoles today? Whereas we look at the "mighty" PS3 & it's going right into $3 billion in losses...and counting! The 360 lowers it price ever more & this means MORE losses for Sorny for each console. Whatever profit they made on the PS1/2 is fuel for the PS3 fire.

But "Keep the Faith!", guy. After all, tomorrow is another day!



Sorry, Sony (or Sorny as you call it) never ended their first generation of consoles (PSX) with $4 billion in operating loss. They ended their production of the PSX almost 10 years after it debuted with PROFITS and continued the trend with the Playstation 2. It wasn't until the Playstation 3 where they really started to lose money. Microsoft did have to "start at a loss" to get the console rolling but they sure screwed up when they pulled the plug on 25 million consumers when they realized they were too deep in the red to turn things around. They "worked" their way out of it by basically telling their customers to "**** off" and decided it would be a good idea to rush their new product to the market and cram it down peoples' throats. Thing is, this backfired and they ended up screwing themselves and their customers over even more (RRoD). The Red Rings of Death not only made consumers lose faith in the system, it also cost them $1 billion in repairs.

Next, Sony's losses on the PS3 are consistently being cut. They are selling more PS3's and PSP's as well as software for both systems than ever before. Sales of the PS2 are still going strong. They are consistently cutting their losses and I think by the end of the console's lifecycle, they will be several billion in the black. And just for your information, Microsoft has lost some $6-7 billion to date on the Xbox franchise....and counting!

Microsoft also really needs this new price drop because they are being outsold by the PS3 and the Wii on all fronts. I'm pretty sure you are just trolling, keep the faith, brother.

Avatar image for snakes3425
snakes3425

1508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 84

User Lists: 0

#79 snakes3425
Member since 2008 • 1508 Posts

The reason is the price cuts are making it harder for Sony to pay the manufacturing costs on the PS3, and making a PS3 isn't cheap.

Avatar image for CStheGreat
CStheGreat

705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 CStheGreat
Member since 2008 • 705 Posts
:roll:

Sort of funny the Xbox 360 is getting outsold by a fad. What would that make the Xbox 360, MarioKart?
Avatar image for blacktorn
blacktorn

8299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#82 blacktorn
Member since 2004 • 8299 Posts

They can afford it after the success of the ps2 lol

Avatar image for jknight5422
jknight5422

1992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#83 jknight5422
Member since 2003 • 1992 Posts

Bump

No, I am not a Sony Fanboy, but this was just hilarious.

The reason they call it an Xbox360 is because, you buy it, you take it home, it breaks, you send it to Microsoft, and then the cycle just keeps on repeating!

Just to let you know, I have an Xbox 360 as well, and I am unbiased.

verbtex

Spoken like a true Sorny fanboy.

Avatar image for jknight5422
jknight5422

1992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#84 jknight5422
Member since 2003 • 1992 Posts

Have you not heard of LittleBigPlanet?

Its like Spore, where you can create your own character, but not only that YOU CAN CREATE your own level in REAL TIME.

Look up some of the videos here and at other gaming sites to see the hype over LittleBigPlanet, that is a PS3 EXCLUSIVE.

verbtex

I've seen it & it looks ridiculous. Spore is going to eat its lunch. Reason: Spore can play on all those non-gaming PCs out there so nobody has to pay $400-$600 for a Sorny console just to play one game. They can pay $50 & get started right away.

Avatar image for NielsNL
NielsNL

4346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 NielsNL
Member since 2005 • 4346 Posts
I think this is more of an economic issue than something that actually says anything about the PS3. With project based economics it's not uncommon to depreciate the investment costs over the first few years of the project. This will result in red numbers. Than at a certain point the project breaks even (in terms of cumulative cash flow) and profits are being made. The 360 showed a similar behaviour. The Wii didn't; it turned a profit from day one. That could mean that the Wii isn't meant to last as long as both the PS3 and the 360, since making lots of money asap is typical to shorter projects, and it wouldn't surprise me if Nintendo would be further along with working on a new console than MS.
Avatar image for jknight5422
jknight5422

1992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#86 jknight5422
Member since 2003 • 1992 Posts

Once again, just to enjoy your ownage:

(link)

haze_blaze

I like how in this article (a 1 paragraph blurb btw) it states this:

"Xbox division isn't yet in the black, but "we've seen evidence to the contrary."

However, when I click on that link that article is missing! Then I read the comments & see nothing but cow rhetoric.

And for the 360, a total of $3.17 Billion in losses already (1.28 in 06 and 1.89 in 07)

(link)

Microsoft has lost much more money on their consoles than the PS3. And Sony cut their losses a lot quicker at this point in their system's life cycle. A remarkable feat considering that their machine cost much more to make.

haze_blaze


Well, guy, maybe we should blow this up into a bigger picture. You've already expanded the argument from Sorny losing $3 billion to Mr. Softy losing billions all the way back to the original Xbox. If what you say is true, that there has been a $5 billion loss for the Xbox/Xbox 360, let's ratio that to the market cap of each company.

As of today, Mr. Softy's Market Cap is 258.44 billion.

Sorny's Market Cap is 45.71 billion.

Now let's do the math.

Mr. Softy -> 5b/258.44b = 0.019. A 1.9% loss.

Sorny -> 3b/45.71b = 0.065. A 6.5% loss.

And also, I put 3 BILLION as Sorny's loss as you have hidden, or failed to provide, actual losses for the PS3 since it's launch in late 2006. An oversight on your part & I am just too lazy to go find it. Also there was no reason to go find it as even if you compare the entire losses of the original Xbox to the Xbox 360, spanning what, a 5-7 year time frame & just comparing that to Sorny's loss for this YEAR alone, you can see that Sorny has sucked up waay more cash compared to its cap than Mr. Softy has. For Mr. Softy, that's a drop in the bucket. Finally, as we move forward Mr. Softy's profits are going up.

Perhaps Mr. Softy will announce soon how much it has lost on the Xbox 360 this year, if it has any losses to report? Will it be $3 billion, if we compare ONLY THIS YEAR on losses between the two? I think not.

Self-ownage.. you wish!

So much for your spin on the Sorny money pit. Failed damage control.

Avatar image for jknight5422
jknight5422

1992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#87 jknight5422
Member since 2003 • 1992 Posts

I think this is more of an economic issue than something that actually says anything about the PS3. With project based economics it's not uncommon to depreciate the investment costs over the first few years of the project. This will result in red numbers. Than at a certain point the project breaks even (in terms of cumulative cash flow) and profits are being made. The 360 showed a similar behaviour. The Wii didn't; it turned a profit from day one. That could mean that the Wii isn't meant to last as long as both the PS3 and the 360, since making lots of money asap is typical to shorter projects, and it wouldn't surprise me if Nintendo would be further along with working on a new console than MS. NielsNL

If Sorny likes losing money so much maybe they should just drop the price of the PS3 to $200? That'll teach Mr. Softy a thing or two!

Avatar image for NielsNL
NielsNL

4346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 NielsNL
Member since 2005 • 4346 Posts

[QUOTE="NielsNL"]I think this is more of an economic issue than something that actually says anything about the PS3. With project based economics it's not uncommon to depreciate the investment costs over the first few years of the project. This will result in red numbers. Than at a certain point the project breaks even (in terms of cumulative cash flow) and profits are being made. The 360 showed a similar behaviour. The Wii didn't; it turned a profit from day one. That could mean that the Wii isn't meant to last as long as both the PS3 and the 360, since making lots of money asap is typical to shorter projects, and it wouldn't surprise me if Nintendo would be further along with working on a new console than MS. jknight5422

If Sorny likes losing money so much maybe they should just drop the price of the PS3 to $200? That'll teach Mr. Softy a thing or two!

How's that a reply to my post?

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

If Sorny likes losing money so much maybe they should just drop the price of the PS3 to $200? That'll teach Mr. Softy a thing or two!

jknight5422

Please stop bumping your own thread... no ones cares..... really...

Avatar image for hiryu3
hiryu3

7313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#90 hiryu3
Member since 2003 • 7313 Posts

The reason is the price cuts are making it harder for Sony to pay the manufacturing costs on the PS3, and making a PS3 isn't cheap.

snakes3425

So wrong. The production price of the PS3 was cut in half a while ago.

Avatar image for ragek1ll589
ragek1ll589

8650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#91 ragek1ll589
Member since 2007 • 8650 Posts
Companies usually are in the red after releasing a new console. It typically takes 2-3 years for them to become profitable.
Avatar image for Kingaerosol
Kingaerosol

107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Kingaerosol
Member since 2006 • 107 Posts

This is why Sony is great; They take the hit and continue to support us, Dosn't affect the consumer...

Microsoft takes a hit, They cut you off completely (Xbox) or they make sure you (the consumer) take a hit as well (RROD)

LMAO

Avatar image for verbtex
verbtex

9196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#93 verbtex  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 9196 Posts
[QUOTE="verbtex"]

Have you not heard of LittleBigPlanet?

Its like Spore, where you can create your own character, but not only that YOU CAN CREATE your own level in REAL TIME.

Look up some of the videos here and at other gaming sites to see the hype over LittleBigPlanet, that is a PS3 EXCLUSIVE.

jknight5422

I've seen it & it looks ridiculous. Spore is going to eat its lunch. Reason: Spore can play on all those non-gaming PCs out there so nobody has to pay $400-$600 for a Sorny console just to play one game. They can pay $50 & get started right away.

How do you know they can play on non-gaming PCs? Show me evidence that the system requirements have been released and what the system requirements are.

Not only that but show me some article that shows that so many people have these PCs on which Spore can be placed on. You know, statistics of which computers have the available RAM space, and the overall harddrive space.

Are you sure of that price? How do you know its gonna be $50? Give me evidence.

What if people need to buy more RAM space to accommodate this game? That could cost them a lot depending on how much RAM they would need. I will agree though, it will still be cheaper than a PS3. But you have to remember, just because its cheaper doesn't necessarily mean its gonna be better, right?