This topic is locked from further discussion.
For all that thought vader was better:
The Xbox 360 version's advantage rests with its exclusive guest Star Wars character, Yoda. The PS3 version is saddled with Darth Vader, but Yoda is the better character of the two, as he's sprightly and nimble, as opposed to the slow and lumbering Vader.
wolverine4262
Uhm, i might be wrong here, but isnt that a matter of personal taste? For example, Siegfried is slow and lumbering, but i much prefer him to someone like Xianghua.
For all that thought vader was better:
The Xbox 360 version's advantage rests with its exclusive guest Star Wars character, Yoda. The PS3 version is saddled with Darth Vader, but Yoda is the better character of the two, as he's sprightly and nimble, as opposed to the slow and lumbering Vader.
wolverine4262
great for 360 though!!
but I dont know why I get the "unprofessional" feeling reading what you quoted it sounded like one of system wars poster who writes a whole para over a console of his choice why its better and in the end says "I am not a fanboy"
For all that thought vader was better:
The Xbox 360 version's advantage rests with its exclusive guest Star Wars character, Yoda. The PS3 version is saddled with Darth Vader, but Yoda is the better character of the two, as he's sprightly and nimble, as opposed to the slow and lumbering Vader.
wolverine4262
[QUOTE="wolverine4262"]For all that thought vader was better:
The Xbox 360 version's advantage rests with its exclusive guest Star Wars character, Yoda. The PS3 version is saddled with Darth Vader, but Yoda is the better character of the two, as he's sprightly and nimble, as opposed to the slow and lumbering Vader.
Conjuredevil
great for 360 though!!
but I dont know why I get the "unprofessional" feeling reading what you quoted it sounded like one of system wars poster who writes a whole para over a console of his choice why its better and in the end says "I am not a fanboy"
That would be 1Up.
[QUOTE="wolverine4262"]For all that thought vader was better:
The Xbox 360 version's advantage rests with its exclusive guest Star Wars character, Yoda. The PS3 version is saddled with Darth Vader, but Yoda is the better character of the two, as he's sprightly and nimble, as opposed to the slow and lumbering Vader.
EVOLV3
[QUOTE="wolverine4262"]For all that thought vader was better:
The Xbox 360 version's advantage rests with its exclusive guest Star Wars character, Yoda. The PS3 version is saddled with Darth Vader, but Yoda is the better character of the two, as he's sprightly and nimble, as opposed to the slow and lumbering Vader.
nicenator
Uhm, i might be wrong here, but isnt that a matter of personal taste? For example, Siegfried is slow and lumbering, but i much prefer him to someone like Xianghua.
Exacly. They just like fast characters more thats all. Vader is a tall cyborg why the hell did you think he was going to move as fast as yoda.
[QUOTE="EVOLV3"][QUOTE="wolverine4262"]For all that thought vader was better:
The Xbox 360 version's advantage rests with its exclusive guest Star Wars character, Yoda. The PS3 version is saddled with Darth Vader, but Yoda is the better character of the two, as he's sprightly and nimble, as opposed to the slow and lumbering Vader.
wolverine4262
Every game has a slow and lumbering and a sprightly and nimble counterpart.
Typically the slow guy either has more damage more health or both and the spritely and nimble is saddled with less health or damage.
It's the way fighting games are designed and it's pretty atrocious journalism to plug something that utterly bewildering.
why even read reviews then?wolverine4262
All reviews have to have a degree of objectivity. Thats like me saying "Dont buy Mass Effect, it has a levelling system and im not keen on RPG elements". Subjective as it may seem, everything has to be taken in the context of what it is. There is absolutely no reason for me to put yoda in the "pro" column when deciding which version to buy when my preferred fighting styles lie with characters like Cervantes, Nightmare and Siegfried.
[QUOTE="nicenator"][QUOTE="wolverine4262"]For all that thought vader was better:
The Xbox 360 version's advantage rests with its exclusive guest Star Wars character, Yoda. The PS3 version is saddled with Darth Vader, but Yoda is the better character of the two, as he's sprightly and nimble, as opposed to the slow and lumbering Vader.
finalfantasy94
Uhm, i might be wrong here, but isnt that a matter of personal taste? For example, Siegfried is slow and lumbering, but i much prefer him to someone like Xianghua.
Exacly. They just like fast characters more thats all. Vader is a tall cyborg why the hell did you think he was going to move as fast as yoda.
Technically he's supposed to considering that Yoda is a little 900 year old gremlin and he can move extremely quickly too...
they use the force to dance around and stuff and their mastery of teh jedize to be all quick and powerfall.
But then they got crammed into a fighting game and this is what happened to them.
PS3 has the slight edge .... coming from 1Up that is a HUGE compliment. :lol:Delsage
Its funny that they quickly took it back since they said that 360 will have the option later on. Which is unfair to say. You must judge the version how it is right now. This is not a MMO.
[QUOTE="wolverine4262"]For all that thought vader was better:
The Xbox 360 version's advantage rests with its exclusive guest Star Wars character, Yoda. The PS3 version is saddled with Darth Vader, but Yoda is the better character of the two, as he's sprightly and nimble, as opposed to the slow and lumbering Vader.
nicenator
I agree, for me, I'm a power fighter. I find the character with the strongets moves and master HIM. SC is the game where you need to make the fighter flow and once you learn all the moves, then its a breeze. Just let the hate flow.
Uhm, i might be wrong here, but isnt that a matter of personal taste? For example, Siegfried is slow and lumbering, but i much prefer him to someone like Xianghua.
[QUOTE="EVOLV3"][QUOTE="wolverine4262"]For all that thought vader was better:
The Xbox 360 version's advantage rests with its exclusive guest Star Wars character, Yoda. The PS3 version is saddled with Darth Vader, but Yoda is the better character of the two, as he's sprightly and nimble, as opposed to the slow and lumbering Vader.
wolverine4262
[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"][QUOTE="nicenator"][QUOTE="wolverine4262"]For all that thought vader was better:
The Xbox 360 version's advantage rests with its exclusive guest Star Warscharacter, Yoda. The PS3 version is saddled with Darth Vader, but Yoda is the better character of the two, as he's sprightly and nimble, as opposed to the slow and lumbering Vader.
BobHipJames
Uhm, i might be wrong here, but isnt that a matter of personal taste? For example, Siegfried is slow and lumbering, but i much prefer him to someone like Xianghua.
Exacly. They just like fast characters more thats all. Vader is a tall cyborg why the hell did you think he was going to move as fast as yoda.
Technically he's supposed to considering that Yoda is a little 900 year old gremlin and he can move extremely quickly too...
they use the force to dance around and stuff and their mastery of teh jedize to be all quick and powerfall.
But then they got crammed into a fighting game and this is what happened to them.
I just never seen vader speed around like yoda. Hes always been a lumbering guy. Yoda is small and has very light cloths. While Vader is big and is basically more machine then man. So hes more heavy.
have you played it?[QUOTE="beast667"][QUOTE="XenoNinja"]Unquestionably Namco's best fighting game?...um no.XenoNinja
Yup! played the arcade version, and it was kinda like Rise of the Robots.
lol. can't believe that still someone knows this game :)
PS3 has the slight edge .... coming from 1Up that is a HUGE compliment. :lol:Delsage
Because of an install?.
have you played it?[QUOTE="beast667"][QUOTE="XenoNinja"]Unquestionably Namco's best fighting game?...um no.XenoNinja
Yup! played the arcade version, and it was kinda like Rise of the Robots.
Arcade? Lucky, all the arcades near me suck, it's all Time Crisis and DDR, no fighters at all :([QUOTE="XenoNinja"]have you played it?[QUOTE="beast667"][QUOTE="XenoNinja"]Unquestionably Namco's best fighting game?...um no.beast667
Yup! played the arcade version, and it was kinda like Rise of the Robots.
Arcade? Lucky, all the arcades near me suck, it's all Time Crisis and DDR, no fighters at all :(Lol, thats pretty sad.
[QUOTE="LiquidSnakesdad"][QUOTE="Delsage"]PS3 has the slight edge .... coming from 1Up that is a HUGE compliment. :lol:Fayt445
Because of an install?.
An install that the 360 will soon be able to do none the less.
Indeed.
[QUOTE="Fayt445"][QUOTE="LiquidSnakesdad"][QUOTE="Delsage"]PS3 has the slight edge .... coming from 1Up that is a HUGE compliment. :lol:LiquidSnakesdad
Because of an install?.
An install that the 360 will soon be able to do none the less.
Indeed.
right, mandotory install for loading times on par with 360 version = optionally installing entire game onto HD :roll:[QUOTE="Fayt445"][QUOTE="LiquidSnakesdad"][QUOTE="Delsage"]PS3 has the slight edge .... coming from 1Up that is a HUGE compliment. :lol:LiquidSnakesdad
Because of an install?.
An install that the 360 will soon be able to do none the less.
Indeed.
But yet, when acting a 360 fan about installing any games, they said no because of the 20gb hard drive.
[QUOTE="LiquidSnakesdad"][QUOTE="Fayt445"][QUOTE="LiquidSnakesdad"][QUOTE="Delsage"]PS3 has the slight edge .... coming from 1Up that is a HUGE compliment. :lol:beast667
Because of an install?.
An install that the 360 will soon be able to do none the less.
Indeed.
right, mandotory install for loading times on par with 360 version = optionally installing entire game onto HD :roll:Are you gonna install the game?
[QUOTE="XenoNinja"]have you played it?[QUOTE="beast667"][QUOTE="XenoNinja"]Unquestionably Namco's best fighting game?...um no.I_AM_MEGATRON
Yup! played the arcade version, and it was kinda like Rise of the Robots.
lol. can't believe that still someone knows this game :)
Haha, theres probably only 2 other people in the world besides us that know it.
[QUOTE="beast667"] right, mandotory install for loading times on par with 360 version = optionally installing entire game onto HD :roll:CubanBlunt
Are you gonna install the game?
No, I have a 20gb HD. What does that have to do with anything? The install on 360 makes it so you can play the game without the disc, in case you didn't know.[QUOTE="CubanBlunt"][QUOTE="beast667"] right, mandotory install for loading times on par with 360 version = optionally installing entire game onto HD :roll:beast667
Are you gonna install the game?
No, I have a 20gb HD. What does that have to do with anything? The install on 360 makes it so you can play the game without the disc, in case you didn't know.Not quite. The disc does not need to be read from during the game, but unless the disc is in the drive, the game wont load due to the risk of piracy.
[QUOTE="beast667"][QUOTE="CubanBlunt"][QUOTE="beast667"] right, mandotory install for loading times on par with 360 version = optionally installing entire game onto HD :roll:nicenator
Are you gonna install the game?
No, I have a 20gb HD. What does that have to do with anything? The install on 360 makes it so you can play the game without the disc, in case you didn't know.Not quite. The disc does not need to be read from during the game, but unless the disc is in the drive, the game wont load due to the risk of piracy.
Oh. Thanks for correcting me, there. It's still much different than what installs on the PS3 are for.[QUOTE="CubanBlunt"][QUOTE="beast667"] right, mandotory install for loading times on par with 360 version = optionally installing entire game onto HD :roll:beast667
Are you gonna install the game?
No, I have a 20gb HD. What does that have to do with anything? The install on 360 makes it so you can play the game without the disc, in case you didn't know.You need to go back and read up on you system......you do need the disk.
[QUOTE="nicenator"][QUOTE="beast667"][QUOTE="CubanBlunt"][QUOTE="beast667"] right, mandotory install for loading times on par with 360 version = optionally installing entire game onto HD :roll:beast667
Are you gonna install the game?
No, I have a 20gb HD. What does that have to do with anything? The install on 360 makes it so you can play the game without the disc, in case you didn't know.Not quite. The disc does not need to be read from during the game, but unless the disc is in the drive, the game wont load due to the risk of piracy.
Oh. Thanks for correcting me, there. It's still much different than what installs on the PS3 are for.a install is a install.
[QUOTE="beast667"][QUOTE="CubanBlunt"][QUOTE="beast667"] right, mandotory install for loading times on par with 360 version = optionally installing entire game onto HD :roll:CubanBlunt
Are you gonna install the game?
No, I have a 20gb HD. What does that have to do with anything? The install on 360 makes it so you can play the game without the disc, in case you didn't know.You need to go back and read up on you system......you do need the disk.
Great.Why would you ask if I was going to install it in the first place?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment