Soul Calibur 4 Comparison HD PS3 VS 360

Video
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/37719.html

Screenshot
http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/8336/comnc7.jpg
http://img329.imageshack.us/img329/4359/co33sd2.jpg

In b4 fanboys.rockguy92

Game Trailers has no credibility when they compare the 360 and PS3 games. They always favor the PS3 without setting it on its true settings.FireEmblem_Man

Game Trailers has no credibility when they compare the 360 and PS3 games. They always favor the PS3 without setting it on its true settings.FireEmblem_Man

Huh.

I am guessing that's sarcasm and it just doesn't translate via text.

[QUOTE="rockguy92"]In b4 fanboys.WhyuStillAlive

No they don't.

Anyways, I don't care.

Game Trailers has no credibility when they compare the 360 and PS3 games. They always favor the PS3 without setting it on its true settings.FireEmblem_Man

Game Trailers has no credibility when they compare the 360 and PS3 games. They always favor the PS3 without setting it on its true settings.FireEmblem_Man

:lol: I see what you did there!

[QUOTE="FireEmblem_Man"]Game Trailers has no credibility when they compare the 360 and PS3 games. They always favor the PS3 without setting it on its true settings.jonnyt61

Oh crap!

Yeah, I claim self-ownage :oops:

Anyway, this article explains it all http://www.psu.com/GRiD-PS3360-comparison-video----or-is-it--a0003608-p1.php

I'm terribly not myself today :oops:

After the GRID fiasco im dubious over gametrailers ps3/360 comparisions.

The screenshots posted showed the 360 having a BIT more jaggies, but in the video, I see no difference what so ever.Exeed_Orbit

I could see some more jagged edges in the video. Specifically when they freeze at the one characters face and go back and forth between the two.

So, a ridiculously small difference in aliasing?

I can't wait to see this blown out of proportion.

this affects us how?

ps3 >>> 360rocoswav

because the 360 version is a little more jaggy if you look at it up close?

do you play your games that close to the screen? from any normal seating distance, these differences are meaningless.

So, a ridiculously small difference in aliasing?

I can't wait to see this blown out of proportion.

agentfred

[QUOTE="agentfred"]

So, a ridiculously small difference in aliasing?

I can't wait to see this blown out of proportion.

Dreams-Visions

I know. I can't believe people like to nitpick about the smallest graphical elements.

[QUOTE="agentfred"]

So, a ridiculously small difference in aliasing?

I can't wait to see this blown out of proportion.

Dreams-Visions

Video
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/37719.html

Screenshot
http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/8336/comnc7.jpg
http://img329.imageshack.us/img329/4359/co33sd2.jpg

WhyuStillAlive

Ps3 version looks better in the stills and despite what "Fanboys" will say. Any difference represents a ability of one machine over the other. Or the programers ability to program better. Either way it shows that the PS3 version is superior. Oh and I dont have a 360 but I am guessing that on my 60" High Def tv those differences would be visible in motion.

Lemmings defend it all you want but the PS3 is picking up. More and more the 360 is comming of age in a race in terms of hardware that is years away from finishing. It is a pre-cursor of things to come.

It looks the exact same if you ask meToriko42

You would see that. You dont seem to have reviewed any PS3 games so there is a little bias there. I traded my 360 in so I can compare.

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"][QUOTE="agentfred"]

So, a ridiculously small difference in aliasing?

I can't wait to see this blown out of proportion.

jonnyt61

here

here

they look the same anyone who says different is a fanboycoolnessmancool

True, unless you zoom in, the jaggies are the same in both consoles. I havent played the 360 version since Sunday, but they looked the same. Though at the moment, the PS3 holds the advantage thanks to the installation. Which, before any stupidboy comes in, is optional.

Only a fanboy can see a difference in this.

They look exactly the same.verbtex

yep....nothin' to see hear

It looks like the 360 one has a tiny bit more jaggies.

TINY. to the point where you cant notice because the game isnt zoomed in like the pictures are.

It looks like the 360 one has a tiny bit more jaggies.

TINY. to the point where you cant notice because the game isnt zoomed in like the pictures are.

shadyd1717

My point exactly. The same happened with MGS 4. MGS 4 textures are horrible, when zoomed.

[QUOTE="Toriko42"]It looks the exact same if you ask mehowell1972

You would see that. You dont seem to have reviewed any PS3 games so there is a little bias there. I traded my 360 in so I can compare.

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"][QUOTE="agentfred"]

So, a ridiculously small difference in aliasing?

I can't wait to see this blown out of proportion.

rockguy92

I know. I can't believe people like to nitpick about the smallest graphical elements.

it's not healthy at all. it's not even natural, IMO. it hurts their gaming enjoyment.

I'm really surprised that people fell for this one. lol ...Look close and you'll see that even the Xbox 360 logo has jaggies. Doctored photo's??? Yep!

Cows can't use GT comparisons anymore..... Wait, never mind. Hypocrisy reigns supreme.Ibacai

I see the the 360 looks dull a LITTLE bit,

but who cares? They both work the same, have fun and play it instead of worrying about the graphics.

They should rename System Wars to "Graphic" Wars? Because I've seen more graphics thread than System threads.

[QUOTE="Ibacai"]Cows can't use GT comparisons anymore..... Wait, never mind. Hypocrisy reigns supreme.Toriko42

Hypocrites in System Wars? No!? :o

They look identical. The poll will just show which side has more fanboys, and the ps3 typically wins those polls. Keep it goin cows :lol:TheRealMC01

This.

And speaking about SCIV, on the recent EGM mag, the SCIV review is: A, B+, B+

The Good: Extreme fun and value

The Bad: Darth Vader is pretty lame