This topic is locked from further discussion.
I don't even know why people try to say its year of the 360 when none of their games can match that of ps3 games. I mean SC Conviction < MGS4 in terms of points according to GS. and AW doesn't look anywhere near the quality of Uncharted 2 which got a 9.5. How can Lemmings come up with the idea that this is this year? Can't they admit that since MGS4, its been and will always be the year of the 360. The ps3 has been pumping GOTY after GOTY like MGS4, Demons Souls, Uncharted 2 at IGN. I mean its ridiculous how lemmings don't see this and they keep defending their 360s even after they have gone through 4 systems that have RRODed. Do they even have any logic?pstripl3How can any of those PS3 games affect who wins this year?
[QUOTE="themyth01"][QUOTE="Giancar"] playing the SW meta game? nahhhhh (and there are more multi games like BC2 that scored AAA, and you can play Bayonetta still in the ps3) *turns SW meta game on* oh and by your logic AAAe, and a handfull of AAe are nothing? how many exclusives games has gotten the 360 so far? nothing? *turns it off* I can play the game too :oGiancarBy my logic, AAA = AAA, AA = AA and so on. I look forward to you trying to disprove such logic. So based on that logic, 360 has 2 AAA games not on PS3, PS3 has 1 AAA game not on 360, therefore 360 has x+1 AAA games while PS3 has x AAA games. Now let's turn to your logic. An exclusive means simply that it's only on that one platform. So what relevance does that have if I can still play more AAA games on 360 than on PS3. Or if a game is not exclusive, can I NOT play it if it's on 360? and that is nothing?? lol and Ps3 owners can play the Bayonetta game, and you don't NEED a 360 to play ME2 SW meta game :o o and where are the AA games lems get mention a lot of times? Those just disappeared :o ?
Like I said, I can play (X+1) AAA games on 360 and (X) AAA games on PS3, any AAA games, be it exclusive or not, that's what matters. You didn't answer my question, if it's not exclusive, does it mean I can't play an AAA game for the platform? :roll:
If I can, that proves my point→ you can play more AAA games on 360 than PS3 for this year. Can you disprove this? please go ahead and try.
[QUOTE="pstripl3"]How did Demons souls and Uncharted 2 won GOTY at IGN if they were both launched in the same year?I don't even know why people try to say its year of the 360 when none of their games can match that of ps3 games. I mean SC Conviction < MGS4 in terms of points according to GS. and AW doesn't look anywhere near the quality of Uncharted 2 which got a 9.5. How can Lemmings come up with the idea that this is this year? Can't they admit that since MGS4, its been and will always be the year of the 360. The ps3 has been pumping GOTY after GOTY like MGS4, Demons Souls, Uncharted 2 at IGN. I mean its ridiculous how lemmings don't see this and they keep defending their 360s even after they have gone through 4 systems that have RRODed. Do they even have any logic?
ohthemanatee
I think he meant uncharted2 won GOTY at IGN , demons souls won here.
still in your point of view PS3 has more than a simple "nothing" and by the meta games, the Spreadsheet...the PS3 is doing great :D this year, specially in exclusives :oLike I said, I can play (X+1) AAA games on 360 and (X) AAA games on PS3, any AAA games, be it exclusive or not, that's what matters. You didn't answer my question, if it's not exclusive, does it mean I can't play an AAA game for the platform? :roll:
If I can, that proves my point→ you can play more AAA games on 360 than PS3 for this year. Can you disprove this? please go ahead and try.
themyth01
and PS3 owners can play the same game that got AAA in the 360 Bayonetta, just a not so great version
still in your point of view PS3 has more than a simple "nothing" and by the meta games, the Spreadsheet...the PS3 is doing great :D this year, specially in exclusives :o[QUOTE="themyth01"]
Like I said, I can play (X+1) AAA games on 360 and (X) AAA games on PS3, any AAA games, be it exclusive or not, that's what matters. You didn't answer my question, if it's not exclusive, does it mean I can't play an AAA game for the platform? :roll:
If I can, that proves my point→ you can play more AAA games on 360 than PS3 for this year. Can you disprove this? please go ahead and try.
Giancar
and PS3 owners can play the same game that got AAA in the 360 Bayonetta, just a not so great version
I never explicitly or implicitly stated that X = nothing. Neither did I imply that X is insignificant, merely that X+1 > X for X ∈ N. So if AAA is the measuring stick for consoles, then if it's not 360's year, it's certainly not PS3's year either.[QUOTE="lawlessx"]where did the TC go all of a sudden?KarateeeChop
i wanna know too...lol
If you ask me your thread-making privileges should be revoked/suspended temporarily in cases like this. It is unfair that we allow people to make a thread only to abandon it minutes later when its premise is shot down. Give it 24 hours, then come back and post another one. If that doesn't go your way, rinse and repeat. That's not contributing good threads at all.Correct. Except none of the systems have only 1 AAA.[QUOTE="shinrabanshou"]
[QUOTE="themyth01"] 2 AAAs > 1 AAA, am I right?themyth01
For 2010 thus far...
PC (14 total, 7 exclusive)
2 AAA
9 AA (4 AAE) (1 expansion)
3 A (3 AE) (1 expansion)
PS3 (19 total, 5 exclusive)
3 AAA (1 AAAE) (1 expansion)
11 AA (4 AAE)
5 A
XBOX 360 (15 total, -1 exclusive)
3 AAA (-1 E)
7 AA
5 A
Wii (9 total, 6 exclusive)
5 AA (3 AAE)
4 A (3 AE)
By your logic Dragon Age can't be played on the 360 in 2009? Great logic.
[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"][QUOTE="lawlessx"] http://www.neoseeker.com/forums/32186/t1140135-mgs-4-only-running-in-576p-upscaled/so your source is the same as the TC's? he really must've felt that one :lol: im just sitting here waiting for his response for this one. I wonder if he will ever come back!here's my research
lawlessx
[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Xbox 360 gets a great game the PS3 and Wii do not. And Alan Wake was confirmed to be 720p.djsifer01By a forum manager? Like any one will take that seriously. Its was confirmed by a credible source to be sub-hd.Why wouldn't they take it seriously? :?
im just sitting here waiting for his response for this one. I wonder if he will ever come back![QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="ohthemanatee"] so your source is the same as the TC's? he really must've felt that one :lol:Duckyindiana
sure doesn't look like it
Regarding Splinter Cell: Conviction --
We have two hype threads:
If we were to add these together we have a hype of AA with 149 votes over the AAA hype of 143 votes. Therefore Splinter Cell: Conviction is a AA hyped game: hype met. Or maybe we should take the thread that was created first as the true hype thread? Then it is still the thread that hyped Conviction AA.
Regarding Alan Wake --
The game looks absolutely fantastic, and more importantly the gameplay and storytelling appear to be much better than the graphics, no?http://www.gamestar.de/index.cfm?pid=1589&pk=13802
Thank you. Let me put it in general terms. XBOX360 has X+1 AAA games whereas PS3 has X AAA games, for X ∈ Natural numbers.They both have 3 AAA games added this year.[QUOTE="themyth01"]
[QUOTE="shinrabanshou"]Correct. Except none of the systems have only 1 AAA.
For 2010 thus far...
PC (14 total, 7 exclusive)
2 AAA
9 AA (4 AAE) (1 expansion)
3 A (3 AE) (1 expansion)PS3 (19 total, 5 exclusive)
3 AAA (1 AAAE) (1 expansion)
11 AA (4 AAE)
5 AXBOX 360 (15 total, -1 exclusive)
3 AAA (-1 E)
7 AA
5 AWii (9 total, 6 exclusive)
5 AA (3 AAE)
4 A (3 AE)shinrabanshou
By your logic Dragon Age can't be played on the 360 in 2009? Great logic.
Last year several pages of threads were made about whether to consider the expansion, an AAA game, and the conclusion was that it was not (imagine what a great year for the 360 2008 would have been otherwise), you can still check SW post history. The consensus was that the score belonged to the already released game, rather than treating the expansion as new game. As such I'm strictly referring to games. Which is how I arrived at my conclusion. You can start a new thread to change that perception, "Is an expansion a game?" and maybe a new consensus will be reached, until then, my point stands.And the quality of Dragon Age on 360 is not AAA, so an AAA quality game (on non-360 platforms) cannot indeed be played on the 360, since its quality is AA. So Dragon Age makes an AA quality game on the 360 and thus does not belong to the set of AAA games of the 360 for 2009.
[QUOTE="djsifer01"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Xbox 360 gets a great game the PS3 and Wii do not. And Alan Wake was confirmed to be 720p.Stevo_the_gamerBy a forum manager? Like any one will take that seriously. Its was confirmed by a credible source to be sub-hd.Why wouldn't they take it seriously? :? because he works for remedy, meaning in doesn't know anything about the game. as for random forum people? Oh they're experts on the ins and outs of Alan Wake and any other game.
[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"][QUOTE="lawlessx"]where did the TC go all of a sudden?Ninja-Hippo
i wanna know too...lol
If you ask me your thread-making privileges should be revoked/suspended temporarily in cases like this. It is unfair that we allow people to make a thread only to abandon it minutes later when its premise is shot down. Give it 24 hours, then come back and post another one. If that doesn't go your way, rinse and repeat. That's not contributing good threads at all. that is why we need to stay on these fakeboys and keep bringing up past ownage in threads they make. look at what happened to kennysnake. poor guy broke into tiny pieces when he couldn't keep up with his own lies.[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]If you ask me your thread-making privileges should be revoked/suspended temporarily in cases like this. It is unfair that we allow people to make a thread only to abandon it minutes later when its premise is shot down. Give it 24 hours, then come back and post another one. If that doesn't go your way, rinse and repeat. That's not contributing good threads at all. that is why we need to stay on these fakeboys and keep bringing up past ownage in threads they make. look at what happened to kennysnake. poor guy broke into tiny pieces when he couldn't keep up with his own lies.i wanna know too...lol
lawlessx
What did happen to kenny? I remember he kept tripping over if he was a cow or lem. I sometimes swear that there were two seperate people posting on one account. Did he get banned?
Last year several pages of threads were made about whether to consider the expansion, an AAA game, and the conclusion was that it was not (imagine what a great year for the 360 2008 would have been otherwise), you can still check SW post history. The consensus was that the score belonged to the already released game, rather than treating the expansion as new game. As such I'm strictly referring to games. Which is how I arrived at my conclusion. You can start a new thread to change that perception, "Is an expansion a game?" and maybe a new consensus will be reached, until then, my point stands.So EfLC isn't considered a game? And wasn't listed as such (and as an exclusive) on the spreadsheet for the 360? And isn't currently listed as such on the spreadsheet?themyth01
One could look at the year thus far and say the PC is "winning" as it has the most games that are solely on the platform, or the PS3 since it has the most games added total.
I'm not quite seeing how one would determine the 360 is "winning" the year because it has "more AAAs not on the PS3." It's not the most conventional of metrics.
Splinter Cell is fine, Alan Wake is 720 (and resolution doesn't really affect much.) As opposed too Heavy FLOP, MAG (Which most stopped caring and stopped playing) Some slew of JRPG garbage. And a racer cows have been hyping since the dawn of time. lol Back to ME2.
So EfLC isn't considered a game? And wasn't listed as such (and as an exclusive) on the spreadsheet for the 360? And isn't currently listed as such on the spreadsheet?[QUOTE="themyth01"] Last year several pages of threads were made about whether to consider the expansion, an AAA game, and the conclusion was that it was not (imagine what a great year for the 360 2008 would have been otherwise), you can still check SW post history. The consensus was that the score belonged to the already released game, rather than treating the expansion as new game. As such I'm strictly referring to games. Which is how I arrived at my conclusion. You can start a new thread to change that perception, "Is an expansion a game?" and maybe a new consensus will be reached, until then, my point stands.
shinrabanshou
You should know how SW works. It only counts if it's toward your argument.
So EfLC isn't considered a game? And wasn't listed as such (and as an exclusive) on the spreadsheet for the 360? And isn't currently listed as such on the spreadsheet? Like I said, that was SW consensus, check the threads with the poll. It's not considered a game by SW, doesn't matter where it is. It wasn't considered as such on 2009, so why should it change now?[QUOTE="themyth01"] Last year several pages of threads were made about whether to consider the expansion, an AAA game, and the conclusion was that it was not (imagine what a great year for the 360 2008 would have been otherwise), you can still check SW post history. The consensus was that the score belonged to the already released game, rather than treating the expansion as new game. As such I'm strictly referring to games. Which is how I arrived at my conclusion. You can start a new thread to change that perception, "Is an expansion a game?" and maybe a new consensus will be reached, until then, my point stands.
shinrabanshou
So EfLC isn't considered a game? And wasn't listed as such (and as an exclusive) on the spreadsheet for the 360? And isn't currently listed as such on the spreadsheet?[QUOTE="shinrabanshou"]
[QUOTE="themyth01"] Last year several pages of threads were made about whether to consider the expansion, an AAA game, and the conclusion was that it was not (imagine what a great year for the 360 2008 would have been otherwise), you can still check SW post history. The consensus was that the score belonged to the already released game, rather than treating the expansion as new game. As such I'm strictly referring to games. Which is how I arrived at my conclusion. You can start a new thread to change that perception, "Is an expansion a game?" and maybe a new consensus will be reached, until then, my point stands.
OneLazyAsian
You should know how SW works. It only counts if it's toward your argument.
Indeed, this is one where it has backfired since it was Sony fanboys that deemed it NOT a game when it was solely on 360, here were are today, with the same situation but now on PS3. Funny how things work.that is why we need to stay on these fakeboys and keep bringing up past ownage in threads they make. look at what happened to kennysnake. poor guy broke into tiny pieces when he couldn't keep up with his own lies.[QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"] If you ask me your thread-making privileges should be revoked/suspended temporarily in cases like this. It is unfair that we allow people to make a thread only to abandon it minutes later when its premise is shot down. Give it 24 hours, then come back and post another one. If that doesn't go your way, rinse and repeat. That's not contributing good threads at all.OneLazyAsian
What did happen to kenny? I remember he kept tripping over if he was a cow or lem. I sometimes swear that there were two seperate people posting on one account. Did he get banned?
he got banned for dodge banning[QUOTE="shinrabanshou"]So EfLC isn't considered a game? And wasn't listed as such (and as an exclusive) on the spreadsheet for the 360? And isn't currently listed as such on the spreadsheet? Like I said, that was SW consensus, check the threads with the poll. It's not considered a game by SW, doesn't matter where it is. It wasn't considered as such on 2009, so why should it change now? If that was the consensus, why exactly was it recorded as a game and used whenever lists of games were compiled and counted towards the 360's exclusives in 2009 and in fact still used as such until recently when it went multiplatform?[QUOTE="themyth01"] Last year several pages of threads were made about whether to consider the expansion, an AAA game, and the conclusion was that it was not (imagine what a great year for the 360 2008 would have been otherwise), you can still check SW post history. The consensus was that the score belonged to the already released game, rather than treating the expansion as new game. As such I'm strictly referring to games. Which is how I arrived at my conclusion. You can start a new thread to change that perception, "Is an expansion a game?" and maybe a new consensus will be reached, until then, my point stands.
themyth01
So EfLC isn't considered a game? And wasn't listed as such (and as an exclusive) on the spreadsheet for the 360? And isn't currently listed as such on the spreadsheet?[QUOTE="themyth01"] Last year several pages of threads were made about whether to consider the expansion, an AAA game, and the conclusion was that it was not (imagine what a great year for the 360 2008 would have been otherwise), you can still check SW post history. The consensus was that the score belonged to the already released game, rather than treating the expansion as new game. As such I'm strictly referring to games. Which is how I arrived at my conclusion. You can start a new thread to change that perception, "Is an expansion a game?" and maybe a new consensus will be reached, until then, my point stands.
shinrabanshou
One could look at the year thus far and say the PC is "winning" as it has the most games that are solely on the platform, or the PS3 since it has the most games added total.
I'm not quite seeing how one would determine the 360 is "winning" the year because it has "more AAAs not on the PS3." It's not the most conventional of metrics.
Allow me to quote myself: "Neither did I imply that X is insignificant, merely that X+1 > X for X ∈ N. So if AAA is the measuring stick for consoles, then if it's not 360's year, it's certainly not PS3's year either." It does depend on your measuring stick, if you want to declare year of Y platform based on sales, then it might be different. The measuring stick was AAA games. If you want to suggest a new one, by all means go right ahead.Like I said, that was SW consensus, check the threads with the poll. It's not considered a game by SW, doesn't matter where it is. It wasn't considered as such on 2009, so why should it change now? If that was the consensus, why exactly was it recorded as a game and used whenever lists of games were compiled and counted towards the 360's exclusives in 2009? I don't know, you'll have to ask that to the person in charge of keeping the list. The threads are still there, you can check them to see the SW consensus.[QUOTE="themyth01"][QUOTE="shinrabanshou"]So EfLC isn't considered a game? And wasn't listed as such (and as an exclusive) on the spreadsheet for the 360? And isn't currently listed as such on the spreadsheet?
shinrabanshou
[QUOTE="OneLazyAsian"][QUOTE="shinrabanshou"]So EfLC isn't considered a game? And wasn't listed as such (and as an exclusive) on the spreadsheet for the 360? And isn't currently listed as such on the spreadsheet?
themyth01
You should know how SW works. It only counts if it's toward your argument.
Indeed, this is one where it has backfired since it was Sony fanboys that deemed it NOT a game when it was solely on 360, here were are today, with the same situation but now on PS3. Funny how things work.Exactly my point. I think some mod should someday get around to making an official set of rules so all this side stepping and hypocrisy would stop.
Indeed, this is one where it has backfired since it was Sony fanboys that deemed it NOT a game when it was solely on 360, here were are today, with the same situation but now on PS3. Funny how things work.[QUOTE="themyth01"][QUOTE="OneLazyAsian"]
You should know how SW works. It only counts if it's toward your argument.
OneLazyAsian
Exactly my point. I think some mod should someday get around to making an official set of rules so all this side stepping and hypocrisy would stop.
That would be most welcomed.Regarding Splinter Cell: Conviction --
We have two hype threads:
- http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27253602Created by kozzy1234
- This thread had a hype of AAA with 59 votes, and AA with 36 votes
- http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27247836Created by Ninja-Bear
- This thread had a hype of AA with 113 votes, and a AAA with 84 votes
If we were to add these together we have a hype of AA with 149 votes over the AAA hype of 143 votes. Therefore Splinter Cell: Conviction is a AA hyped game: hype met. Or maybe we should take the thread that was created first as the true hype thread? Then it is still the thread that hyped Conviction AA.
Regarding Alan Wake --
The game looks absolutely fantastic, and more importantly the gameplay and storytelling appear to be much better than the graphics, no?http://www.gamestar.de/index.cfm?pid=1589&pk=13802
R3FURBISHED
Somebody better find a broom, we have a thread that needs to be swept under the rug ;).
Even if it were a flop, it's a multiplat, or is it only a multiplat when it flops I'm confused.
[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-12218-Video-Game-Examiner~y2010m4d17-Alan-Wake-runs-at-720p--Confirmed-via-Remedy[QUOTE="thetruespin"]
The 360 is really messing up it's "best year EVAAARRR!!"
thetruespin
Sorry dude, that was from a marketing man. Beyond3d has proved this to be incorrect, see thread on this very board. Video compression makes no difference to the tests run by Beyond 3d...to counter these claims, Remedy has clarified the situation with an official statement on the Alan Wake forums.
Community Manager stated: "The game is 720p. Those screenshots are based off footage captured at 960x540 like cocorenut pointed out, of course there will be some downsampling involved
From MarkusRMD (Remedy Managing Director) i.e.http://forum.alanwake.com/showpost.php?p=67334&postcount=595
BxB402 This is really not Alan Wake support thread.. But we really don't and can't control the resolutions in Alan Wake. We're just pushing 16:9 720p out and the Xbox360 OS handles the rest. The game doesn't even know whether you're connected with HDMI, VGA, Component, Composite and whatever rez you set your 360 to. The setup you describe is not one I've tested but if 360 games typically work on it, I'd expect Wake to work too.
wow, that reminds me ..even MAG with 256 players is 720p!Splinter Cell is fine, Alan Wake is 720 (and resolution doesn't really affect much.) As opposed too Heavy FLOP, MAG (Which most stopped caring and stopped playing) Some slew of JRPG garbage. And a racer cows have been hyping since the dawn of time. lol Back to ME2.
Hathesulacon
[QUOTE="Hathesulacon"]wow, that reminds me ..even MAG with 256 players is 720p!Splinter Cell is fine, Alan Wake is 720 (and resolution doesn't really affect much.) As opposed too Heavy FLOP, MAG (Which most stopped caring and stopped playing) Some slew of JRPG garbage. And a racer cows have been hyping since the dawn of time. lol Back to ME2.
killzowned24
too bad it's gameplay sucks and isn't even AA on Metacritic.
[QUOTE="Hathesulacon"]wow, that reminds me ..even MAG with 256 players is 720p! point?Splinter Cell is fine, Alan Wake is 720 (and resolution doesn't really affect much.) As opposed too Heavy FLOP, MAG (Which most stopped caring and stopped playing) Some slew of JRPG garbage. And a racer cows have been hyping since the dawn of time. lol Back to ME2.
killzowned24
[QUOTE="Hathesulacon"]wow, that reminds me ..even MAG with 256 players is 720p! Yet it looks incredibly drab and is about as dull a shooter as you can possibly conceive.Splinter Cell is fine, Alan Wake is 720 (and resolution doesn't really affect much.) As opposed too Heavy FLOP, MAG (Which most stopped caring and stopped playing) Some slew of JRPG garbage. And a racer cows have been hyping since the dawn of time. lol Back to ME2.
killzowned24
[QUOTE="Hathesulacon"]wow, that reminds me ..even MAG with 256 players is 720p!Splinter Cell is fine, Alan Wake is 720 (and resolution doesn't really affect much.) As opposed too Heavy FLOP, MAG (Which most stopped caring and stopped playing) Some slew of JRPG garbage. And a racer cows have been hyping since the dawn of time. lol Back to ME2.
killzowned24
when the graphics are that bad it's pretty easier to run at a high resolution :lol:
wow, that reminds me ..even MAG with 256 players is 720p![QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="Hathesulacon"]
Splinter Cell is fine, Alan Wake is 720 (and resolution doesn't really affect much.) As opposed too Heavy FLOP, MAG (Which most stopped caring and stopped playing) Some slew of JRPG garbage. And a racer cows have been hyping since the dawn of time. lol Back to ME2.
KarateeeChop
when the graphics are that bad it's pretty easier to run at a high resolution :lol:
lol, Mag looks fine and doesnt resort to sub hd.[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"][QUOTE="killzowned24"] wow, that reminds me ..even MAG with 256 players is 720p!killzowned24
when the graphics are that bad it's pretty easier to run at a high resolution :lol:
lol, Mag looks fine and doesnt resort to sub hd.
Just look at the jaggies on the railing top left corner.
lol, Mag looks fine and doesnt resort to sub hd.
killzowned24
the textures remind me of Perfect Dark Zero
[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="Hathesulacon"]wow, that reminds me ..even MAG with 256 players is 720p! Yet it looks incredibly drab and is about as dull a shooter as you can possibly conceive.Splinter Cell is fine, Alan Wake is 720 (and resolution doesn't really affect much.) As opposed too Heavy FLOP, MAG (Which most stopped caring and stopped playing) Some slew of JRPG garbage. And a racer cows have been hyping since the dawn of time. lol Back to ME2.
Ninja-Hippo
i try not to bash the ps3, but youre speaking the truth. MAG was terrible, and every ps3 owner including myself, has to admit that. On topic, Alan Wake will look fine and i dont even really like Splinter Cell anyway, so i really dont care if people call it a flop. 360 have a ton more games this year coming out than the ps3. arguing about splinter cell will look stupid at the end of the year.
[QUOTE="killzowned24"]
lol, Mag looks fine and doesnt resort to sub hd.
ohthemanatee
the textures remind me of Perfect Dark Zero
PD is sub hd game btw lol[QUOTE="killzowned24"]PD is sub hd game btw lol so is MGS4 yet cows seem to forget that little fact. :wink: those games are years old so we can give them some slack. alan wake on the other hand is a 2010 game!!![QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]
the textures remind me of Perfect Dark Zero
lawlessx
so is MGS4 yet cows seem to forget that little fact. :wink: those games are years old so we can give them some slack. alan wake on the other hand is a 2010 game!!![QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="killzowned24"] PD is sub hd game btw lol
killzowned24
Um with like 4-5 years of development
those games are years old so we can give them some slack. alan wake on the other hand is a 2010 game!!!
killzowned24
Alan Wake in sub-hd? you got any links that confirm that? because beyond3d still hasn't, if they had then they would have already added Alan Wake's resolution on the list, the reason they didn't is because you can not trust blurry pics
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment