splinter cell on ps3, looks like it's running on n64, and 360 looks like highend

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothingPerception1

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

They figure out how to use that cell, and 2-3 years down the line, you'll see 360 isn't the more powerful console.

Yeah, a year more dev time and it turned out better than the 360 oblivion, which makes sense. But what about games in the future, I'm pretty sure in a couple years multi-platform games are going to be better on PS3, simply because of the fact that the knowing how to use the cell, can get you far.

cell has no advantage, because ps3 can only produce 250 million polygons/second

xbox 360 can do over 500 million.

ps3 will never match xbox360 graphics developer after developer has said it.

sony released spec's ps3 is only capable of 250 million polygons/second

xbox360 is capable of 500+ million, this info is from e3 2005.

fnr3, vt3, oblivian(as already stated) you had enough? all these games look better on the ps3.111v

FNR3=1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME OBLIVION 1 YEAR  MORE DEV TIME, VT3=2 DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS LOL.

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: It was entirely due to extra development time. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others cant

PS3 OBLIVION DEV INTERVIEW

PROVES PS3 HARDWARE=CRAP

[QUOTE="2largeadults"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="2largeadults"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

PC, Foreal, splinter cell without a doubt, is the biggest graphical differences between 360 and ps3.

everything on ps3 is downgraded lighting, textures,shaders..... sony engineers helped port the game, and still downgraded, because ps3 is less powerful.

Te graphical difference is bigger between the 2 than any multiplatform game to date.

imagine rainbow six vega's on ps3, ubisoft said ps3 version had to be downgraded because of less memory.

splinter cell is only modified unreal engine 2.5

rainbow six uses unreal engine 3.0

rb6 on ps3 is gonna be TRASH LMFAO!

gfhgfhtutyutyut

lol, why do i want to spend 500$ to wait 1 year for downgraded ps3 games?

xbox360 is the real gaming console, more powerful sorry.

no ps3 games appeal to me.

jealously of what? i dont have inferior version of games? LOL

having no good games?

no custom soundtracks?

what?

100$ i dont have?to spend?

[QUOTE="111v"]fnr3, vt3, oblivian(as already stated) you had enough? all these games look better on the ps3.gfhgfhtutyutyut

FNR3=1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME OBLIVION 1 YEAR  MORE DEV TIME, VT3=2 DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS LOL.

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: It was entirely due to extra development time. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others cant

PS3 OBLIVION DEV INTERVIEW

PROVES PS3 HARDWARE=CRAP

If that 10MB of EDRAM was so great, why does Virtua Tennis 3 look better in 1080p on the PS3?

 

Without extra development time...

TekkenMaster606

2 different versions made by 2 different teams.

educate yourself before you throw stones. 

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothingPerception1

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

They figure out how to use that cell, and 2-3 years down the line, you'll see 360 isn't the more powerful console.

Yeah, a year more dev time and it turned out better than the 360 oblivion, which makes sense. But what about games in the future, I'm pretty sure in a couple years multi-platform games are going to be better on PS3, simply because of the fact that the knowing how to use the cell, can get you far.

cell has no advantage, because ps3 can only produce 250 million polygons/second

xbox 360 can do over 500 million.

ps3 will never match xbox360 graphics developer after developer has said it.

you do it - why cant he? 

[QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothinggfhgfhtutyutyut

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

They figure out how to use that cell, and 2-3 years down the line, you'll see 360 isn't the more powerful console.

Yeah, a year more dev time and it turned out better than the 360 oblivion, which makes sense. But what about games in the future, I'm pretty sure in a couple years multi-platform games are going to be better on PS3, simply because of the fact that the knowing how to use the cell, can get you far.

cell has no advantage, because ps3 can only produce 250 million polygons/second

xbox 360 can do over 500 million.

ps3 will never match xbox360 graphics developer after developer has said it.

sony released spec's ps3 is only capable of 250 million polygons/second

xbox360 is capable of 500+ million, this info is from e3 2005.

I hate the Ubisoft excuse....all ports have been better on the 360 so far from all devs....not just Ubichikenfriedrice

all ports huh?

What about oblivion?

Enchanted arms (same expect online)?

What about virtua tennis? (same expect online)?

What about armored core 4?

what about def jam? (same score)

what about NHL 2k7? (same score)

what about NBA 2k7?

All almost exactly the same, at least in terms of graphics and gameplay.... 

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothingPerception1

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

They figure out how to use that cell, and 2-3 years down the line, you'll see 360 isn't the more powerful console.

Yeah, a year more dev time and it turned out better than the 360 oblivion, which makes sense. But what about games in the future, I'm pretty sure in a couple years multi-platform games are going to be better on PS3, simply because of the fact that the knowing how to use the cell, can get you far.

cell has no advantage, because ps3 can only produce 250 million polygons/second

xbox 360 can do over 500 million.

ps3 will never match xbox360 graphics developer after developer has said it.

sony released spec's ps3 is only capable of 250 million polygons/second

xbox360 is capable of 500+ million, this info is from e3 2005.

Perception, just a bit of advice here. You might want to start using facts in your arguments? then.... you know.... you might actually win one some day down the road ;)  

[QUOTE="111v"]fnr3, vt3, oblivian(as already stated) you had enough? all these games look better on the ps3.gfhgfhtutyutyut

FNR3=1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME OBLIVION 1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME, VT3=2 DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS LOL.

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: It was entirely due to extra development time. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others cant

PS3 OBLIVION DEV INTERVIEW

PROVES PS3 HARDWARE=CRAP

How the **** does that make the ps3 hardware crap? It had more development time so it looks better; wouldn't that (and didn't that) apply to the 360 version?

[QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothing3picuri3

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

They figure out how to use that cell, and 2-3 years down the line, you'll see 360 isn't the more powerful console.

Yeah, a year more dev time and it turned out better than the 360 oblivion, which makes sense. But what about games in the future, I'm pretty sure in a couple years multi-platform games are going to be better on PS3, simply because of the fact that the knowing how to use the cell, can get you far.

cell has no advantage, because ps3 can only produce 250 million polygons/second

xbox 360 can do over 500 million.

ps3 will never match xbox360 graphics developer after developer has said it.

sony released spec's ps3 is only capable of 250 million polygons/second

xbox360 is capable of 500+ million, this info is from e3 2005.

Perception, just a bit of advice here. You might want to start using facts in your arguments? then.... you know.... you might actually win one some day down the road ;)

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="111v"]fnr3, vt3, oblivian(as already stated) you had enough? all these games look better on the ps3.munu9

FNR3=1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME OBLIVION 1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME, VT3=2 DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS LOL.

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: It was entirely due to extra development time. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others cant

PS3 OBLIVION DEV INTERVIEW

PROVES PS3 HARDWARE=CRAP

How the **** does that make the ps3 hardware crap? It had more development time so it looks better; wouldn't that (and didn't that) apply to the 360 version?

ps3 is supposed to have 2 teraflops of performance xbox360 1 tflop

the devs couldnt even do stuff on ps3 xbox360 couldnt? talk about SONY HYPE LOL.

my point ps3 cant do anything 360 cant, xbox360 can do stuff ps3 cant though lol.

[QUOTE="3picuri3"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="ronniemoisture"][QUOTE="Perception1"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothingPerception1

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

unified memory architecture, 10mb edram and more powerful gpu makes xbox360 more powerful than ps3, ps3 only has cpu advantage, and oblivion devs said all improvements on ps3 version were made simply because of more dev time, not the playstation 3 hardware, you want shacknews link?

They figure out how to use that cell, and 2-3 years down the line, you'll see 360 isn't the more powerful console.

Yeah, a year more dev time and it turned out better than the 360 oblivion, which makes sense. But what about games in the future, I'm pretty sure in a couple years multi-platform games are going to be better on PS3, simply because of the fact that the knowing how to use the cell, can get you far.

cell has no advantage, because ps3 can only produce 250 million polygons/second

xbox 360 can do over 500 million.

ps3 will never match xbox360 graphics developer after developer has said it.

sony released spec's ps3 is only capable of 250 million polygons/second

xbox360 is capable of 500+ million, this info is from e3 2005.

Perception, just a bit of advice here. You might want to start using facts in your arguments? then.... you know.... you might actually win one some day down the road ;)

virtua tennis on xbox360 had a new sega dev team, virtua tennis on ps3 had the franchise creators sega's best dev team, of course am2 will put more work into their virtua tennis game.

xbox360 version looks better though, it has anti aliasing, ps3 has none has some nasty jaggies.

oblivion looks better on xbox360, overall regardless of what review sites say.

fight night round 3 has better models on ps3, but framerate is worse and the crowds are 2d so overall xbox360 wins.

ps3 doesnt beat xbox360 in any multiplatform game.

[QUOTE="munu9"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="111v"]fnr3, vt3, oblivian(as already stated) you had enough? all these games look better on the ps3.gfhgfhtutyutyut

FNR3=1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME OBLIVION 1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME, VT3=2 DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS LOL.

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: It was entirely due to extra development time. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others cant

PS3 OBLIVION DEV INTERVIEW

PROVES PS3 HARDWARE=CRAP

How the **** does that make the ps3 hardware crap? It had more development time so it looks better; wouldn't that (and didn't that) apply to the 360 version?

ps3 is supposed to have 2 teraflops of performance xbox360 1 tflop

the devs couldnt even do stuff on ps3 xbox360 couldnt? talk about SONY HYPE LOL.

my point ps3 cant do anything 360 cant, xbox360 can do stuff ps3 cant though lol.

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="munu9"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="111v"]fnr3, vt3, oblivian(as already stated) you had enough? all these games look better on the ps3.111v

FNR3=1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME OBLIVION 1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME, VT3=2 DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS LOL.

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: It was entirely due to extra development time. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others cant

PS3 OBLIVION DEV INTERVIEW

PROVES PS3 HARDWARE=CRAP

How the **** does that make the ps3 hardware crap? It had more development time so it looks better; wouldn't that (and didn't that) apply to the 360 version?

ps3 is supposed to have 2 teraflops of performance xbox360 1 tflop

the devs couldnt even do stuff on ps3 xbox360 couldnt? talk about SONY HYPE LOL.

my point ps3 cant do anything 360 cant, xbox360 can do stuff ps3 cant though lol.

kojima is the same person, who couldnt even program for xbox console, mgs2 ran worse on xbox than ps2, proves he's a crap lazy dev and doesnt know any hardware, or sdk except sony's crap, kojima always been a sony fanboy.

id rather listen to other devs like starbreeze, who said xbox360 is more powerful, epicgames, ubisoft, and another dev forgot name etc.

4 devs opinions>>> kojima's

oblivion looks better on xbox360, overall regardless of what review sites say.

gfhgfhtutyutyut

So basically, the opinion of some low level troll on the Gamespot forums. One that can't even create a proper username is worth more than dozens of professional video game journalists and reviewers, that actually have degrees and work for credible sites.

Wow, just wow. 

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

oblivion looks better on xbox360, overall regardless of what review sites say.

TekkenMaster606

So basically, the opinion of some low level troll on the Gamespot forums. One that can't even create a proper username is worth more than dozens of professional video game journalists and reviewers, that actually have degrees and work for credible sites.

Wow, just wow. 

gametrailers, shows xbox360 version is better.

80% of the textures look better on xbox 360 and only about 20% of textures look better on ps3, like character models. 

like i said overall XBOX360 VERSION WINS.

plus ive seen on other forums people with both versions saying xbox360 overall wins.

[QUOTE="111v"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="munu9"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="111v"]fnr3, vt3, oblivian(as already stated) you had enough? all these games look better on the ps3.gfhgfhtutyutyut

FNR3=1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME OBLIVION 1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME, VT3=2 DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS LOL.

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: It was entirely due to extra development time. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others cant

PS3 OBLIVION DEV INTERVIEW

PROVES PS3 HARDWARE=CRAP

How the **** does that make the ps3 hardware crap? It had more development time so it looks better; wouldn't that (and didn't that) apply to the 360 version?

ps3 is supposed to have 2 teraflops of performance xbox360 1 tflop

the devs couldnt even do stuff on ps3 xbox360 couldnt? talk about SONY HYPE LOL.

my point ps3 cant do anything 360 cant, xbox360 can do stuff ps3 cant though lol.

kojima is the same person, who couldnt even program for xbox console, mgs2 ran worse on xbox than ps2, proves he's a crap lazy dev and doesnt know any hardware, or sdk except sony's crap, kojima always been a sony fanboy.

id rather listen to other devs like starbreeze, who said xbox360 is more powerful, epicgames, ubisoft, and another dev forgot name etc.

4 devs opinions>>> kojima's

Sure, it's because of the Playstation 3s hardware. Not Ubisoft's quality abilities to port games for the integrity of creating great games on all platforms. Haven't you seen Far Cry on the Wii?

Freakin' quality.

TekkenMaster606

Who cares about this game, or SC in general?Endfinal

[QUOTE="111v"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="munu9"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="111v"]fnr3, vt3, oblivian(as already stated) you had enough? all these games look better on the ps3.gfhgfhtutyutyut

FNR3=1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME OBLIVION 1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME, VT3=2 DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS LOL.

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: It was entirely due to extra development time. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others cant

PS3 OBLIVION DEV INTERVIEW

PROVES PS3 HARDWARE=CRAP

How the **** does that make the ps3 hardware crap? It had more development time so it looks better; wouldn't that (and didn't that) apply to the 360 version?

ps3 is supposed to have 2 teraflops of performance xbox360 1 tflop

the devs couldnt even do stuff on ps3 xbox360 couldnt? talk about SONY HYPE LOL.

my point ps3 cant do anything 360 cant, xbox360 can do stuff ps3 cant though lol.

kojima is the same person, who couldnt even program for xbox console, mgs2 ran worse on xbox than ps2, proves he's a crap lazy dev and doesnt know any hardware, or sdk except sony's crap, kojima always been a sony fanboy.

id rather listen to other devs like starbreeze, who said xbox360 is more powerful, epicgames, ubisoft, and another dev forgot name etc.

4 devs opinions>>> kojima's

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]

Sure, it's because of the Playstation 3s hardware. Not Ubisoft's quality abilities to port games for the integrity of creating great games on all platforms. Haven't you seen Far Cry on the Wii?

 

Freakin' quality.

KAS3Y_JAM3Z

Who cares about this game, or SC in general?Endfinal

Any reason you quoted me without responding? 

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="111v"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="munu9"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="111v"]fnr3, vt3, oblivian(as already stated) you had enough? all these games look better on the ps3.kage_53

FNR3=1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME OBLIVION 1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME, VT3=2 DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS LOL.

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: It was entirely due to extra development time. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others cant

PS3 OBLIVION DEV INTERVIEW

PROVES PS3 HARDWARE=CRAP

How the **** does that make the ps3 hardware crap? It had more development time so it looks better; wouldn't that (and didn't that) apply to the 360 version?

ps3 is supposed to have 2 teraflops of performance xbox360 1 tflop

the devs couldnt even do stuff on ps3 xbox360 couldnt? talk about SONY HYPE LOL.

my point ps3 cant do anything 360 cant, xbox360 can do stuff ps3 cant though lol.

kojima is the same person, who couldnt even program for xbox console, mgs2 ran worse on xbox than ps2, proves he's a crap lazy dev and doesnt know any hardware, or sdk except sony's crap, kojima always been a sony fanboy.

id rather listen to other devs like starbreeze, who said xbox360 is more powerful, epicgames, ubisoft, and another dev forgot name etc.

4 devs opinions>>> kojima's

john carmack hasnt worked on ps3 hardware, itagaki said that from paper specs never working on ps3, EA said ps3 is less powerful fight night round 3 proves  3d crowds 360  vs 2d on ps3.

mark rein isnt a dev,  cliffy b said 360 is more powerful he actually is a dev lol.

more devs have said xbox360 is more powerful, ps3 has more processing power, but overall power, no,

a systems power isnt all CPU, it's software, how much memory usable, gpu power, etc.

xbox360 is more powerful complete package than ps3.

[QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="111v"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="munu9"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="111v"]fnr3, vt3, oblivian(as already stated) you had enough? all these games look better on the ps3.111v

FNR3=1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME OBLIVION 1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME, VT3=2 DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS LOL.

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: It was entirely due to extra development time. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others cant

PS3 OBLIVION DEV INTERVIEW

PROVES PS3 HARDWARE=CRAP

How the **** does that make the ps3 hardware crap? It had more development time so it looks better; wouldn't that (and didn't that) apply to the 360 version?

ps3 is supposed to have 2 teraflops of performance xbox360 1 tflop

the devs couldnt even do stuff on ps3 xbox360 couldnt? talk about SONY HYPE LOL.

my point ps3 cant do anything 360 cant, xbox360 can do stuff ps3 cant though lol.

kojima is the same person, who couldnt even program for xbox console, mgs2 ran worse on xbox than ps2, proves he's a crap lazy dev and doesnt know any hardware, or sdk except sony's crap, kojima always been a sony fanboy.

id rather listen to other devs like starbreeze, who said xbox360 is more powerful, epicgames, ubisoft, and another dev forgot name etc.

4 devs opinions>>> kojima's

lol, mgs3 doesnt even look as good as xbox launch games like halo man.

not even close.

[QUOTE="111v"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="111v"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="munu9"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="111v"]fnr3, vt3, oblivian(as already stated) you had enough? all these games look better on the ps3.gfhgfhtutyutyut

FNR3=1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME OBLIVION 1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME, VT3=2 DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS LOL.

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: It was entirely due to extra development time. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others cant

PS3 OBLIVION DEV INTERVIEW

PROVES PS3 HARDWARE=CRAP

How the **** does that make the ps3 hardware crap? It had more development time so it looks better; wouldn't that (and didn't that) apply to the 360 version?

ps3 is supposed to have 2 teraflops of performance xbox360 1 tflop

the devs couldnt even do stuff on ps3 xbox360 couldnt? talk about SONY HYPE LOL.

my point ps3 cant do anything 360 cant, xbox360 can do stuff ps3 cant though lol.

kojima is the same person, who couldnt even program for xbox console, mgs2 ran worse on xbox than ps2, proves he's a crap lazy dev and doesnt know any hardware, or sdk except sony's crap, kojima always been a sony fanboy.

id rather listen to other devs like starbreeze, who said xbox360 is more powerful, epicgames, ubisoft, and another dev forgot name etc.

4 devs opinions>>> kojima's

lol, mgs3 doesnt even look as good as xbox launch games like halo man.

not even close.

PS3 Oblivion says hello:)miss_kitt3n

[QUOTE="111v"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"][QUOTE="munu9"][QUOTE="gfhgfhtutyutyut"]

[QUOTE="111v"]fnr3, vt3, oblivian(as already stated) you had enough? all these games look better on the ps3.gfhgfhtutyutyut

FNR3=1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME OBLIVION 1 YEAR MORE DEV TIME, VT3=2 DIFFERENT DEVELOPERS LOL.

http://www.shacknews.com/extras/2007/020807_petehines_1.x

Shack: Can you offer any insight into how much of that was made possible by the PS3 hardware versus simply the additional development time?

Pete Hines: It was entirely due to extra development time. It's not like the PS3 can do this and the others cant

PS3 OBLIVION DEV INTERVIEW

PROVES PS3 HARDWARE=CRAP

How the **** does that make the ps3 hardware crap? It had more development time so it looks better; wouldn't that (and didn't that) apply to the 360 version?

ps3 is supposed to have 2 teraflops of performance xbox360 1 tflop

the devs couldnt even do stuff on ps3 xbox360 couldnt? talk about SONY HYPE LOL.

my point ps3 cant do anything 360 cant, xbox360 can do stuff ps3 cant though lol.

kojima is the same person, who couldnt even program for xbox console, mgs2 ran worse on xbox than ps2, proves he's a crap lazy dev and doesnt know any hardware, or sdk except sony's crap, kojima always been a sony fanboy.

id rather listen to other devs like starbreeze, who said xbox360 is more powerful, epicgames, ubisoft, and another dev forgot name etc.

4 devs opinions>>> kojima's

[QUOTE="blazinpuertoroc"]you clearly know nothinggfhgfhtutyutyut

Sorry xbox360 is more powerful than ps3.

more powerful gpu and more system memory avaliable>>>more powerful cpu.

The reason why ps3 dont dev on ps3 first then port to 360 ,because it holds their games back, on 360 they have much more memory and create what they want and on ps3, they just downgrade stuff lol,

It sure sticks for the consumer who spends top dollar for the most expensive console and multiplat games run and look better on a cheaper console not to mention 360 has the best looking game Gears. I believe there is a standard for the diffculty a console should be to develope for, the PS3 is obvious below that standard.

 Devs should not have to spend extra time on a game because the console is so damn difficult to develope for, they end up losing money and the PS3 userbase is so small it's hader to make money back on.