SSF2 vs SSFIV

  • 92 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Synthetic_NinJI
Synthetic_NinJI

2809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Synthetic_NinJI
Member since 2006 • 2809 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"] Its a opinion plain and simple.. Some will enjoy one over the other.. There is no right answer in this..Aljosa23

Tell that to the people who are throwing their opinion as fact and coming up with shallow responses like "buh buh your credibility is laughable!1!!1!! :cry:"

:| Your own words were "Street Fighter 4 is the best figher this decade" Immaturity is strong with this one...
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#52 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

Darn Labtops.

For some odd reason everytime I press backspace it would bring the entire back instead of deleting a simple letter.

But I'm determined to make this post :)

It is obvious that this doesn't require an argument.

Your credibility comes into question when you believe that one fighting game is "better" than the other.

1) You believe that one fighting game is "better" or more superior than the other.

It common knowledge that a fighting can't be better than the other, only different.

You have said that you have "played" KOF, Guilty Gear, and several others but still make a immature statement that Street Fighter 4 is "teh best" and better than all.

My analysis will say that you either haven't played or spent a significant enough time on any of these games to make a valid enough statement.

2) You believe that Super Smash Bros is not a fighting game.

Again, more proof that your knowledge on the matter is limited. Super Smash Bros is a fighting game, a different kind of fighting game, but a fighting game none the less.

This game has national and international tournaments, and such cases as EVO2K is featured with other fighting games.

This common knowledge, but obviously not for you. Thus, I refute. You knowledge on the matter is limited and I find your statement rather laughable.

Synthetic_NinJI

Are you serious....So you think ALL fighting games are equal? I guess Art of Fighting & Mortal Kombat = SF and KoF. :lol:

Please, spare me this "analysis" BS. You are randomly assuming I haven't spent enough time with these games on what criteria? Is it because I have a FFXIII sig and avatar?

And here's the kicker...you say all fighters are equal amirite? Yet earlier in the thread you said SFIV doesn't live up to SFIII. Seriously? Hypocrisy FTW.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#53 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

[QUOTE="everquestlove"]Get SF2 Remix SF4 is garbageHaziqonfire

:|

Are you kidding? SFIV is the best fighter in the last decade.

*shakes head* :(. Some people just never seem to get it.

Who? Me or him? :?

Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#54 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts

[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]:|

Are you kidding? SFIV is the best fighter in the last decade.

Aljosa23

*shakes head* :(. Some people just never seem to get it.

Who? Me or him? :?

lol him.

Avatar image for Synthetic_NinJI
Synthetic_NinJI

2809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Synthetic_NinJI
Member since 2006 • 2809 Posts

Are you serious....So you think ALL fighting games are equal

In a general sense, yes.

You are randomly assuming I haven't spent enough time with these games on what criteria?

On the basis that you believe that you believe one fighting is "better" than the other and Super Smash Bros is not a fighting.

Yet earlier in the thread you said SFIV doesn't live up to SFIII. Seriously? Hypocrisy FTW.

In my opinion I don't think SF4 has done anything new or has done enough to set itself apart from SF2 Turbo. I think the game lacks originality, where as SF3 was one of the most original games every made. Thus, SF4 doesn't live up to SF3, IMO. That is far different from "ZOMG SF4 is teh best thing since 10 Yearz".

amirite

:|

Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#56 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

"I think the game lacks originality, where as SF3 was one of the most original games every made. Thus, SF4 doesn't live up to SF3, IMO"

:|

But they are equal according to you. Stop backpedaling.

So basically you're contradicting yourself and spouting personal opinions to rebuttal my "SFIV is the best fighting game of the last decade". Spare me please, this won't get anywhere.

What other SF game has focus attacks, a revenge meter and ultras? Please tell me, because it's the same game as SFI, like you said they are equal and what not. :roll:

You're using your own opinions yet you won't let me.

Avatar image for JPOBS
JPOBS

9675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 JPOBS
Member since 2007 • 9675 Posts

Remake? :|

Go for SFIV. It's the best fighting game this decade. And get SF2: HD Remix if you can.

Aljosa23
melee
Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

What the hell happened to this thread :lol:

From what I've seen and read, SFIV is the superior game but what the hell is up with your reasoning TC?

Avatar image for Senor_Kami
Senor_Kami

8529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 Senor_Kami
Member since 2008 • 8529 Posts

SF4 is definitely more than a remake of SSF2. Whether it's worth $60 is up to you though. Fighters are either games that lasts forever or games that you can totally beat in 2 hours depending on who you ask. If you're not a hardcore fighter fan, I don't think you'll be happy having spent $60 for SF4. $30-40 is where I think the game is a really good deal.

Personally, I wish I didn't own it. I paid $60 for it. I didn't know about it then, but the spiritual successor to Guilty Gear is coming out in the US in lovely high def 2D animation. Not just that, but in June i'll be able to buy the best fighting game ever made for only $15, Marvel vs Capcom 2. Had I known about those two games, I never would have paid $60 for SF4. I probably never would have bought it.

Avatar image for JPOBS
JPOBS

9675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 JPOBS
Member since 2007 • 9675 Posts
[QUOTE="Senor_Kami"]SF4 is definitely more than a remake of SSF2. Whether it's worth $60 is up to you though. Personally, I wish I didn't own it now that Marvel vs Capcom 2 is coming out and it'll have online play and the successor to Guilty Gear is coming out on consoles in the US. Tag team fighters >>>> Any 1 vs 1 fighter... and this is by default. Every fighting game is made better by tag team combos and attacks. Hell, every game is made better by tag team attacks. Guilty Gear >> Street Fighter

lol MvC isnt held in the same pedestal as SF in the fighting game community lol wtf are you on.
Avatar image for Synthetic_NinJI
Synthetic_NinJI

2809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Synthetic_NinJI
Member since 2006 • 2809 Posts

But they are equal according to you.

Yes. One fighting game would have something that I'm looking for over the other. *Sigh* Would you say that Dead or Alive 4 is better than Virtua Fighter 5 Would you say that Soul Caliber 4 is better than Tekken 6 Would you say that Marvel vs Capcom 2 is better than Guilty Gear X2 Would you say that Street Fighter 4 is better than KOF XII Better yet would you that one sport is better than the other? Or one martial art is better than the other? No, you won't not unless you are an extremely dense or thick minded person. One of these games, sports, or martial arts has something that appeals to you, something that you prefer. Maybe you was playing one of these games and you like the characters, the ease of closing the distance, and overall pacing of the game. THAT DOESN'T MAKE ONE GAME BETTER THAN THE OTHER I honestly don't know any other way to explain that :|

What other SF game has focus attacks, a revenge meter and ultras?

What other game has parrying, simply button combination's, and multiple selection in ultra attacks per character? What if I don't want focus attacks or a revenge meter :| See where this is going?

You're using your own opinions yet you won't let me.

I have yet to see an IMO in any of your statements.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#62 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

I have never heard this argument before on there forums or anywhere in general. If a game is better than one game it's for a few reasons or say the fun factor and whatever, it is MY opinion.

Why are fighting games so special that they can't be better or worse than each other? That doesn't make sense. You can believe what you want and I'll believe what I want. Maybe I think your opinion is laughable because you think all fighting games the same. Heck, I do think that point of view is laughable.

You voice your opinion and I'm fine with that, but I voice mine and suddenly I'm thick headed and dense. You serious? :roll:

Just because you don't want focus attacks or revenge meter doesn't mean you anything as you said what does it do new from other SF's. Focus attacks and Ultras are new to SF's and just because you don't want them doesn't discount them as new additions

My original of "SFIV is the best fighting game of this decade" was implied that it was MY opinion. And I still haven't been proven wrong by anyone, not even you with your deep and philosophical views on fighting games.

Edit: Oh yeah, and I forgot to mention, Mark of The Wolves has just defend and simple button combinations, and SFIII doesn't have ultra's it has Supers. Multiple selections is just dumbing down from alpha which gave you access to more then one super.

Avatar image for Senor_Kami
Senor_Kami

8529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 Senor_Kami
Member since 2008 • 8529 Posts
[QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="Senor_Kami"]SF4 is definitely more than a remake of SSF2. Whether it's worth $60 is up to you though. Personally, I wish I didn't own it now that Marvel vs Capcom 2 is coming out and it'll have online play and the successor to Guilty Gear is coming out on consoles in the US. Tag team fighters >>>> Any 1 vs 1 fighter... and this is by default. Every fighting game is made better by tag team combos and attacks. Hell, every game is made better by tag team attacks. Guilty Gear >> Street Fighter

lol MvC isnt held in the same pedestal as SF in the fighting game community lol wtf are you on.

That would be totally rad if I gave a damn what the fighting game community thinks. When I buy games I only think about the solo community of Senor Kami and what games interest me. LOL @ me buying games because the fighting game community says I should.
Avatar image for JPOBS
JPOBS

9675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 JPOBS
Member since 2007 • 9675 Posts
[QUOTE="Senor_Kami"][QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="Senor_Kami"]SF4 is definitely more than a remake of SSF2. Whether it's worth $60 is up to you though. Personally, I wish I didn't own it now that Marvel vs Capcom 2 is coming out and it'll have online play and the successor to Guilty Gear is coming out on consoles in the US. Tag team fighters >>>> Any 1 vs 1 fighter... and this is by default. Every fighting game is made better by tag team combos and attacks. Hell, every game is made better by tag team attacks. Guilty Gear >> Street Fighter

lol MvC isnt held in the same pedestal as SF in the fighting game community lol wtf are you on.

That would be totally rad if I gave a damn what the fighting game community thinks. When I buy games I only think about the solo community of Senor Kami and what games interest me. LOL @ me buying games because the fighting game community says I should.

i dont recall saying you should buy games based on what the fighting community says is better. however, what i DO recall refuting is your claim "Tag team fighters >>>> Any 1 vs 1 fighter... and this is by default" by pointing out that in circles of gamers whose opinions actually matter on these issues, you are wrong. I dont really care which game you like more or want to buy, im just point out that SF is better than MvC. fact, end of story.
Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

But they are equal according to you. Synthetic_NinJI

Yes. One fighting game would have something that I'm looking for over the other. *Sigh* Would you say that Dead or Alive 4 is better than Virtua Fighter 5 Would you say that Soul Caliber 4 is better than Tekken 6 Would you say that Marvel vs Capcom 2 is better than Guilty Gear X2 Would you say that Street Fighter 4 is better than KOF XII Better yet would you that one sport is better than the other? Or one martial art is better than the other? No, you won't not unless you are an extremely dense or thick minded person. One of these games, sports, or martial arts has something that appeals to you, something that you prefer. Maybe you was playing one of these games and you like the characters, the ease of closing the distance, and overall pacing of the game. THAT DOESN'T MAKE ONE GAME BETTER THAN THE OTHER I honestly don't know any other way to explain that :|

What other SF game has focus attacks, a revenge meter and ultras?

What other game has parrying, simply button combination's, and multiple selection in ultra attacks per character? What if I don't want focus attacks or a revenge meter :| See where this is going?

You're using your own opinions yet you won't let me.

I have yet to see an IMO in any of your statements.

Are you serious :|

He can say SF4 is the best/better if he finds that he enjoys the mechanics/balance better. What you are tellingus is that we should not have favourites or opinions of what we consider the best. Sorry but here is an example: I consider Yoshi's Island better than any other platformer period. This is not a dense opinion, it is my own, you can call it dense but until you start refuting it with some real points instead of throwing around insults you around you are just blowing hot air. If I can suport my notion with solid points there is no reason why I can't use a statement with words like "best" or "better"Your sports and martial artsexamples are flawed by the way.

I'm sorry but there are indeed ways to make a point about what is better and what is not. You look at what they offer objectively and from there make a decision. This whole you can't crap is rather ridiculous, what ifs are useless as it was not Aljosa's point. He is comparing objectively, you are using personal preference as a come back.

Finally, it should be assumed that anything he says is in his opinion. Typing IMO after every statement is stupid and using that as a point against him is just nit picking.

Avatar image for nethernova
nethernova

5721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 nethernova
Member since 2008 • 5721 Posts

10$>60$

hansolo14

Math teachers all around the world cry at your statement.

Avatar image for tmntPunchout
tmntPunchout

3770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 tmntPunchout
Member since 2007 • 3770 Posts

I like SF4 more. It helps since a lot of high level SF players moved on to SF4 here and hold sessions.

Avatar image for Synthetic_NinJI
Synthetic_NinJI

2809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Synthetic_NinJI
Member since 2006 • 2809 Posts
There is unwillingness to be open minded on your part, which is a pity.

You can believe what you want and I'll believe what I want. Maybe I think your opinion is laughable because you think all fighting games the same

I never said all fighting games are the same, just equal. Every fighting game offers something unique to genre, that doesn't make one better than other. This can be used to answer your first question.

And I still haven't been proven wrong by anyone,not even you with your deep and philosophical views on fighting games.

As long as you are unwilling to compromise it is impossible for you to be enlighten, humbled, or learn anything new. :| See this is the kind of wood I was expecting here system wars, it never changes.
Avatar image for Senor_Kami
Senor_Kami

8529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 Senor_Kami
Member since 2008 • 8529 Posts
[QUOTE="Senor_Kami"][QUOTE="JPOBS"]lol MvC isnt held in the same pedestal as SF in the fighting game community lol wtf are you on. JPOBS
That would be totally rad if I gave a damn what the fighting game community thinks. When I buy games I only think about the solo community of Senor Kami and what games interest me. LOL @ me buying games because the fighting game community says I should.

i dont recall saying you should buy games based on what the fighting community says is better. however, what i DO recall refuting is your claim "Tag team fighters >>>> Any 1 vs 1 fighter... and this is by default" by pointing out that in circles of gamers whose opinions actually matter on these issues, you are wrong. I dont really care which game you like more or want to buy, im just point out that SF is better than MvC. fact, end of story.

Your panties are in a bunch over nothing. Tons of people prefer MvC2 to your normal street fighter game. This is not a rare opinion. You are not 100% of the fighting game community. You aren't even 1% of the fighting game community. Where is this evidence that the entire fighting game community dislike MvC2.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#70 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

Whatever you say dude, there is no point in argueing anymore with you. With that said.

Street Fighter IV is the BEST fighting game of the last decade.

Avatar image for Synthetic_NinJI
Synthetic_NinJI

2809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Synthetic_NinJI
Member since 2006 • 2809 Posts

He can say SF4 is the best/better if he finds that he enjoys the mechanics/balance better.

That is exactly what I said. Since I'm not in same room with him it is possible that I read his statement as if he was proclaiming it as fact.

what you are tellingus is that we should not have favourites or opinions of what we consider the best

Clearly, you haven't read anything I wrote.

He is comparing objectively, you are using personal preference as a come back.

If anything it is the other way around. Point out the objective statements that was made there other than SF 4 has Rage meter and Focus Attack.

Typing IMO after every statement is stupid and using that as a point against him is just nit picking.

Will since I asked him, he whole heartily believes SF 4 is better than all fighting games as fact and the concept of One Fighting game being Equal to Another Fighting Game doesn't exist.
Avatar image for tok1879
tok1879

1537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 tok1879
Member since 2005 • 1537 Posts
[QUOTE="Stoner-Pimp"]Think of it like this. SF2 HD Remix if your really into technical fighting with proper hardcore SF2 players. SF4 if your into the more casual "soul calabre/DoA" fighters with dare i say it more noobish players. SF4 is good but SF2 is better.

Wow! I'm sorry, but this is just sooooooo not true.
Avatar image for JPOBS
JPOBS

9675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 JPOBS
Member since 2007 • 9675 Posts
[QUOTE="Senor_Kami"][QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="Senor_Kami"] That would be totally rad if I gave a damn what the fighting game community thinks. When I buy games I only think about the solo community of Senor Kami and what games interest me. LOL @ me buying games because the fighting game community says I should.

i dont recall saying you should buy games based on what the fighting community says is better. however, what i DO recall refuting is your claim "Tag team fighters >>>> Any 1 vs 1 fighter... and this is by default" by pointing out that in circles of gamers whose opinions actually matter on these issues, you are wrong. I dont really care which game you like more or want to buy, im just point out that SF is better than MvC. fact, end of story.

Your panties are in a bunch over nothing. Tons of people prefer MvC2 to your normal street fighter game. This is not a rare opinion. You are not 100% of the fighting game community. You aren't even 1% of the fighting game community. Where is this evidence that the entire fighting game community dislike MvC2.

I never said that the entire fighting game community dislikes MvC i dont know why you keep making assumptions about what I did and didnt say. Nor did i ever imply that I or my opinion is 100% of the fighting game community. Please, do you best to read and understand what im saying, your not even responding to me with accurate statements, your making up stuff that you THINK i said and responding to things i never even implied. anyway, you dont seem very in touch with the competitive fighting game community. Theres no "proof" i can give you to make you accept that Sf is considered the better game. I cant link you to any website that will say in bright colors "SF is better". However, what i can tell you is that within the fighting game community, SF is considered to be a better all around competitve fighter, although MvC obviously is good too. You can take it for what it is or leave it, i dont care which game you like better, im just informing you that "tag team fighters >>> 1v1 fighters.. and this is by default" is an incorrect statement. .
Avatar image for tok1879
tok1879

1537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 tok1879
Member since 2005 • 1537 Posts

Whatever you say dude, there is no point in argueing anymore with you. With that said.

Street Fighter IV is the BEST fighting game of the last decade.

Aljosa23
I concur, and yes SSB is not a fighting game, i guess ragdoll kung fu is one too.
Avatar image for W1NGMAN-
W1NGMAN-

10109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 W1NGMAN-
Member since 2008 • 10109 Posts

Whatever you say dude, there is no point in argueing anymore with you. With that said.

Street Fighter IV is the BEST fighting game of the last decade.

Aljosa23

:lol: the best way you could have possibly ended this argument, good stuff guys.

Avatar image for Uptown
Uptown

10348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Uptown
Member since 2002 • 10348 Posts

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

[QUOTE="everquestlove"]Get SF2 Remix SF4 is garbageyoshi_64

:|

Are you kidding? SFIV is the best fighter in the last decade.

I prefer DOA 4 to be frank. :P Faster, action packed, multi-tiered levels, and awesome combo system... :D Yes... I love me some DOA... :| :P

DOA4 is clunky after playing SF4....and faster? LOL.

Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10970 Posts

[QUOTE="Synthetic_NinJI"]

Darn Labtops.

For some odd reason everytime I press backspace it would bring the entire back instead of deleting a simple letter.

But I'm determined to make this post :)

It is obvious that this doesn't require an argument.

Your credibility comes into question when you believe that one fighting game is "better" than the other.

1) You believe that one fighting game is "better" or more superior than the other.

It common knowledge that a fighting can't be better than the other, only different.

You have said that you have "played" KOF, Guilty Gear, and several others but still make a immature statement that Street Fighter 4 is "teh best" and better than all.

My analysis will say that you either haven't played or spent a significant enough time on any of these games to make a valid enough statement.

2) You believe that Super Smash Bros is not a fighting game.

Again, more proof that your knowledge on the matter is limited. Super Smash Bros is a fighting game, a different kind of fighting game, but a fighting game none the less.

This game has national and international tournaments, and such cases as EVO2K is featured with other fighting games.

This common knowledge, but obviously not for you. Thus, I refute. You knowledge on the matter is limited and I find your statement rather laughable.

Aljosa23

Are you serious....So you think ALL fighting games are equal? I guess Art of Fighting & Mortal Kombat = SF and KoF. :lol:

Please, spare me this "analysis" BS. You are randomly assuming I haven't spent enough time with these games on what criteria? Is it because I have a FFXIII sig and avatar?

And here's the kicker...you say all fighters are equal amirite? Yet earlier in the thread you said SFIV doesn't live up to SFIII. Seriously? Hypocrisy FTW.

that's what i call a "Slap in the Face" ownage right there

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
What I learned from this thread: - game A can not "be better" than game B, "just different", even if you think everything was done better on game A and you liked it more. :| - a statement MUST have an "IMO" on it. If not, it's not an opinion (even if it's obvious it is one) and your credibility goes to zero if you don't post an "IMO" in every sentence. :|
Avatar image for Stoner-Pimp
Stoner-Pimp

979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Stoner-Pimp
Member since 2008 • 979 Posts
[QUOTE="Stoner-Pimp"]Think of it like this. SF2 HD Remix if your really into technical fighting with proper hardcore SF2 players. SF4 if your into the more casual "soul calabre/DoA" fighters with dare i say it more noobish players. SF4 is good but SF2 is better.tok1879
Wow! I'm sorry, but this is just sooooooo not true.

It is true :). SF2HDRM was made as a purely hardcore competitive SF (that's a fact not an opinion) and SF4 was made for mass market casual appeal (that to is a fact not an opinion).
Avatar image for JPOBS
JPOBS

9675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 JPOBS
Member since 2007 • 9675 Posts
[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

Whatever you say dude, there is no point in argueing anymore with you. With that said.

Street Fighter IV is the BEST fighting game of the last decade.

tok1879
I concur, and yes SSB is not a fighting game, i guess ragdoll kung fu is one too.

I wasnt aware that the Evolution Championship Series now admitted games that werent fighters (SSB) into its circuit. funny, how foolish of me :|
Avatar image for Decko5
Decko5

9428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#81 Decko5
Member since 2004 • 9428 Posts
sf4 is amazing
Avatar image for kholdstare61
kholdstare61

944

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#82 kholdstare61
Member since 2006 • 944 Posts

From what I've played, I think SFIV is much much better than HD Remix.

Definitely not best game of the decade though, maybe best this gen. The decade one would have to be MvC2:)

Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts

[QUOTE="hansolo14"]

10$>60$

nethernova

Math teachers all around the world cry at your statement.

I'm sigging this.
Avatar image for iamshivy
iamshivy

3565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 iamshivy
Member since 2007 • 3565 Posts

sf4 is the better game, but if your a hard core pro player, get the hd remix. if your not a hardcore player you will get your *** handed to you with a side of french fries in remix. thats not to say there are no hard core players playing sf4.

Avatar image for AntiType
AntiType

6249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 AntiType
Member since 2003 • 6249 Posts

Hardcore fighter fans are by far the most elitest of gamers... you simply cannot talk to them. They think their word is the law.

I say rent SFIV and see if it's worth it. If not, The virtual console version plays as good as it has back in the day.

And don't have high hopes for online play... it is a concept that simply does not work for fighters... on any game or platform. Even with the best ping, it is not playable. The genre requires precise control/response.

Avatar image for iamshivy
iamshivy

3565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 iamshivy
Member since 2007 • 3565 Posts

From what I've played, I think SFIV is much much better than HD Remix.

Definitely not best game of the decade though, maybe best this gen. The decade one would have to be MvC2:)

kholdstare61

meh i like sf4 over MvC, MvsC is in a way a buttonmasher..

Avatar image for istreakforfood
istreakforfood

7781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#87 istreakforfood
Member since 2004 • 7781 Posts

I lost interest in Street Figher games after SFA3 and SvC2, and wasn't looking forward to SF4. SF4 blew me away after playing it. Haven't had this much fun playing fighters in a long time.

Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#88 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts

Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo Remix is great but Street Fighter 4 has more value and good online play.

Avatar image for magiciandude
magiciandude

9667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#89 magiciandude
Member since 2004 • 9667 Posts

I don't know why some people would chose SFII HD Remix. Then again, I was spoiled by the New Challengers Edition for the SNES I suppose.

Avatar image for DumbDubya
DumbDubya

668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 DumbDubya
Member since 2009 • 668 Posts

[QUOTE="hansolo14"]

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]:|

Are you kidding? SFIV is the best fighter in the last decade.

Aljosa23

Wait wait!

Are you kidding? Smash is the best fighter in the last decade

Smash Bros. is not a fighter. It's a party game with Nintendo characters.

Exactly what this guy said. Smash Bros has an awful fighting system. I'm not sure how any real fighting game fan likes it.

Avatar image for Redmoonxl2
Redmoonxl2

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Redmoonxl2
Member since 2003 • 11059 Posts

Smash Bros. is not a fighter. It's a party game with Nintendo characters.

Aljosa23

Al, must I pull your ear over a statement like that? :P Smash is a fighting game. It may not be all that great after Nintendo's screwup of Brawl, but its a fighting game nonetheless.

Also, between SSF2T and SF4, I cannot make a judgment since I have yet to play SF4. However, after years of SSF2T play, thats a tough act to follow especially since SSF2T is still being played nearly 2 decades later.

Avatar image for Redmoonxl2
Redmoonxl2

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Redmoonxl2
Member since 2003 • 11059 Posts

SFIV is much better to be quite honest. You can trust my knowledge in fighting games.A_zombie

Your ass hasn't been in GGPO for awhile! And don't give me that "I gotz maried lulz" excuse.

I expect you to be my SF4 PC partner as well, dammit.