Star Citizen has the best looking city graphically (No Bad LoD or Blur)

@gpuking said:

Not sure if serious, those shots look ugly as sin tbh. I can find so many games with better looking building structures.

Actually those SC shots look like a bad joke next to them.

lol Famous for no Shadows.

All of which begs the question: could these new consoles run Crysis 3? Ryse delivers the full suite of CryEngine features with excellent image quality and it's still just a launch title. Given the experience of working on such a product, we have little doubt that Crytek could produce a Crysis Trilogyof sorts for next-generation consoles with few compromises.

Yeah, because removing HUD in PC games stops gameplay just like the bullshots in photomode, oh wait.

@deathlordcrime: You can turn the Hud off in console games as well that's nothing special. Can you do something about the massive amounts of fog and average draw distance in SC? I didn't think there would be so much fog in space.

@zeeshanhaider: You can remove the Hud in the PS4 games posted in this thread as well not to mention neither the Order or Infamous add assets in photo mode. He can't even post a pic with a character model.

You might as well have just called this gpuking bait

Smoke from the background is considered fog? lol and besides its not in space its on a actual planet

@AM-Gamer: Because it has first person so what's your point and SC doesn't have anything to add assets

lol the 900pStation photomode only removing HUD. Yeah okay!

@zeeshanhaider: Or you can go into the options and play the entire game that way. I did it in Infamous SS so again continue to lie.

So, photomode bullshots only have HUD removed?

@zeeshanhaider: Nope, many screenshots are with the share button and hud removed. All photomode does in most games is adjust the camera. So exactly how would that make it a bullshot exactly?

Photomode can remove the HuD but it's not required in many games. You can even play TW3 on consoles without a HuD.

You didn't answer the question. Does photomode only removes the HUD? And how PC games without HUD the same as 900pStation photomode bullshots?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTVRmT604Us

that's how it looks like :)

@gpuking said:

Not sure if serious, those shots look ugly as sin tbh. I can find so many games with better looking building structures.

Actually those SC shots look like a bad joke next to them.

Apart from the first photo which looks OK and the penultimate photo which looks good...

Bullshots

Photomode

Cutscenes

PC has and always will have the best graphics.

@zeeshanhaider: In most cases it removes hud and adjust camera angle. So my point is if those are considered bullshots how are these not considered bullshots?

Photomode also pauses the gameplay, allows to make changes to the scenes and in many games also add AA thus signigficantly improving AA. Yup, photomdo is bullshit and is in no way can it be compared to PC gameplay shots without HUD. Deal with it. No wonder cows never post any direct feed gameplay shots.

@zeeshanhaider: Photomode in every game posted in here adds nothing. Neither Infamous SS or The Order add AA. You can change Color filters if you like but if the screenshots don't use them how is that a bullshot? Some of these screenshots are direct feed shots and you still can't tell. And why does pausing gameplay matter when it's used to adjust the camera? Both infamous and the Order resume gameplay seamlessly so your argument holds no water.

@finalstar2007: yes it's more fun than it is impressive. The flight mechanics are the best in any space sim I've ever played. 4 different flight speeds, coupled and decoupled flight, completely flyable astronaut suits, complete 3 dimensional functionality in all scenarios, get in and out of ships even during motion (do not recommend, bye bye ship), amazing animations and great art design all around.

They took everything cool out of other space sims like Elite and tweaked it to be better. The landing is better, the flight is better, the gameplay is better.

I was in a freighter in a turret and we were flying through a giant asteroid belt around a planet. The pilot was weaving in and out of the asteroids (hundreds of thousands if not millions) as we were being pursued. It was probably the most fun thing I've ever done in a game, breathtaking views and visceral intense combat. I had to take a second to say woah, before focusing on defending our freighter. Eventually he deked out the smaller fighter causing him to smash into an asteroid into a million little pieces.

They kind of just are finishing basic mechanics testing before integrating more content. For an alpha it's a ton of fun considering there's not much to accomplish yet.

My hangar is larger than The Order 1886 ;)

No need to get the Order involved when Infamous already takes a dump on it.

Meanwhile Star Citizen fanboys still walking around their hangar like:

Womp womp....

LOL!

I think some cinematic film grain, with a touch of blur is needed. We are lucky this is in alpha stage as they have time to work on it before final release.

@Pray_to_me said:

No need to get the Order involved when Infamous already takes a dump on it.

Meanwhile Star Citizen fanboys still walking around their hangar like:

Womp womp....

LOL!

You muppet, that picture is from the very first hangar module release 2.5 years ago.

This doesn't even have any AA in it yet.

As always try opening the image in a new tab, expand to full size, zoom in to get it to actual size and resolution, then start crying when you realise that it doesn't fit on your monitor screen :p

@gpuking said:

SC, Unreal, Witcher3, BFRONT, and even Syndincate on Ultra looks better than those games with a HUD up. Please stop acting like PC isn't gfx king already.

@GarGx1 said:

@Pray_to_me said:

No need to get the Order involved when Infamous already takes a dump on it.

Meanwhile Star Citizen fanboys still walking around their hangar like:

Womp womp....

LOL!

You muppet, that picture is from the very first hangar module release 2.5 years ago.

This doesn't even have any AA in it yet.

As always try opening the image in a new tab, expand to full size, zoom in to get it to actual size and resolution, then start crying when you realise that it doesn't fit on your monitor screen :p

Looks turdtastic.

@Pray_to_me: dat desperation when your posting 720p old screenshot of SC sorry Infamous got nothing

Yeah anyone trying to get discredit Star Citizens graphics is an idiot, it's the best looking game ever by a fair margin.

In motion it's like a work of art, they really put the effort into quality and immersion.

the order is 1920x800 lol...

In all honesty, The Order looks better. More depth. Those Star Citizen shots look like a pc game from last gen.

Looks like shades of grey to me. It's an old game trick to create the illusion of better graphics, just make it dark with lots of greys.

So it does allow pausing the game, let you to modify the image and adds AA in Famous for no Shadows since Famous for no Shadows use AA solution that cause ghosting/shimmering when you move. Cool we agree that comparing the photomode bullshots to PC gameplay shots is ridiculous. No wonder cows never post direct feed gameplay shots since they look like shit.

Yeah, okay!

Sure... *rolleyes*

yes yes we know you're jealous, enough already, we heard you and we assure you that you have our sympathies.

I had to smear vaseline all over my monitor to make it look more cinematic. No black bars either? Jesus PC what is this eyesore?

the jealous tears are real

Why are you people even bothering? Anyone with a brain cell can see Star Citizen looks phenomenal. If you don't realize these guys are posting out of desperation, trolling, and extreme hatred that includes no sense of objectivity, you're almost as much to blame for feeding these trolls.

Dynamically built by the player on a 1/1 city scale.

@uninspiredcup: Shhh, Cities: Skylines is a secret for people with taste and refinement

@zeeshanhaider: Wrong again, because a screenshot using the screen share button looks exactly the same.

Why does a $350 dollar console have you so Salty?

Herms still butthurt over Infamous.

Whats funny is that its the consolites that are salty about the game that os still being developed that looks better and has massive scale that their consoles will never see.

If you like space sims. That's the 99.9% importance right there. Simulations have always been a niche category, it is not Mass Effect, it's not Starfox, Halo or any of that, you either really love them or really hate them. If you are not playing EVE: online, X series, Elite....etc then there is probably a reason for that outside of monthly payments. I suspect many new to the space sim genre will check out this game, explore a bit and quit playing it shortly thereafter, much like many who tried out Project Cars after a life of NFS then quit. The visuals, trailers and concept always seems appealing until you actually play it.

Now Valkyrie on VR will probably be more fun for the average gamer if your wanting space combat with nice graphics.

@04dcarraher: Except it doesn't look better and that assumption is laughable. It may be the most impressive game when you take into account it's scale but to say it looks better then more linear games in every aspect is absolutely laughable.