Star Wars Battlefront PC minimum specs > PS4

@faizanhd: wow. It's not real. I might as well stop right here then.

Yeah, same as battlefield 4 and hardline on Ps4. And the Xbox one version is 720p lol

wow! Yeah they're damn expensive, you're gonna need atleast a 980TI

It's been 1.5+ years since the start of this gen and BF4 was already running on medium settings on Consoles. It makes sense if this one is running on low-medium or even low settings. The game will still look great though.

Eager to see what minimum specs of DX12 games look like.

Here is some benchmarks from the Beta from Guru3D. Max settings of course.

They are still adding more cards to list but due to Origin's GPU 24 hour hardware restrictions, they can only add 8 GPUs per 24 hour period.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vizj0lUcizM

Well, looks awesome on PS4. I'm still on the fence, though. I don't support 900p on current generation.

My 7950 will be just fine but I think I'll upgrade to a 980ti because I can.

And not to mention it's 900p on 900pStation.

@ShadowDeathX: So the Fury X outperforms the 980ti at 4K....interesting

Wow, think I'm gonna have to run this one on Medium.

PC. And yeah, as great as it looks (the snow surfaces are shader porn), it's just not something I'm interested in.

Hopefully I can get decent performance on my AMD 6300, 8 gigs of ram, and my R9 280. Going to try the Beta on Xbox One too to see which I like better. Currently do BF4 on PC but not really a fan of the PC servers.

Actually the GTX 970 is 3x PS4 and more if it is overclocked.

lol so I guess that i5-6600 is better than my i7 3770k. time to upgrade, its been about 3 years.

will go nicely with my 980 ti

@Liquid_: Nah, you'll get no significant gain upgrading from your i7 3770k to pretty much anything else at the moment. You're still good.

I'll still get PS4 version or maybe even X1 because that's where the people I know and play with are.

Looks like Ps4 is comparable to PC's high settings, though it's 900p just like battlefield of course. Link

And it performs pretty good too, gotta say this is a big step up from the battlefield games, the textures look great.

btw the i3 6300T have similar power to the 9 years old Q6600@ 3.5GHz

... There is no such thing any more.. The current Xbox and PlayStation are glorified entry level pc's.. And have benchmarked that way with basically every multiplat game out there for some time.. A I3/750ti combo outperforms the PS4 for instance..

i7 3770k vs i7 6700k = 3 fps gain(71/74) with GTA 5 with GTX 980. going from a i7 3770k to an i5 6600 is a downgrade since your losing 4 threads.

PS4 version @ 900p looks really good.

It wasn't sabotaged. Xbox One is just weaker! But not THIS weak. I've played several games on Xbox One that have impressed me visually... and I'm a PC/Console gamer first and foremost.

PS4 version look like its running on low.

Impossible. Cows hate anything 900p. Cows claim 900p looks blurry and ugly. I expect every cow to come in saying the same thing, especially El Tormented.

The tech behind this game is incredible. No other game on consoles has graphics on this level while being 60 fps at the same time, coupled with 40 players at once. They're kicking Halo's ass on a technical front.

Shame that the actual game is barebones as ****, they really want to make that 2015 release for the movie.

None of this matters... the A-wing gameplay proves how rushed and arcadey this mess is.

Dat aim assist, dat impossible on-demand manuever .

I was given a PS4 beta code before the open beta begin. I'm thankful for it, but wouldn't even consider buying it on that platform after what I experienced. This console generation is aging quickly.

Hahaha what??? Now I must know where you got that info from?

It all comes down to money and time. Optimization takes time, and time is money. In this particular game's case, there is no room for delays, it has to debut this holiday season to capitalize on the Star Wars craze cause the most, most, anticipate Episode 7 is nearing and the Star Wars hype is there to meet that depending Star Wars game.

Uhhh experience?

Playing Battlefield 4 or Dragon Age: Inquisition on an HDD is almost unbearable.

How much they charging for this pretty mod? £45 on PC?

So are you saying that a HDD just loads slower than an SSD or are you saying that the same drive on a console when used in a pc would load slower?

You don't have an SSD? Wow... sucks to be you bro.

Having a dedicated harddrive for games helps too.

Gallery

how daft are you?

So terribly optimized alpha game confirmed pretty much.

So confirmed by DF ps4 version is running mostly at High settings sometimes close to Ultra at 900p 60fps. So much for running at Low you pathetic hermits.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-star-wars-battlefront-ps4-beta-performance-analysis

No mention of "close to ultra"

Alas, the draw distance for rubble does fall short of the ultra preset's far reach, but this area is a direct match for the high setting.

Also,not really 60fps

The good news is that where we once saw regular drops to 40fps and below, the worst we see in this latest beta build is a more solid 50fps. Even in controlling giant AT-AT vehicles with the full chaos of the map in view, gameplay sticks between 50-60fps in this latest beta build.

But in general,lol 900p

Close to ultra is similar to fall short of ultra depends how you interpret it. Also for the most part it's 60fps, sure it has dips but so does every game. The game isn't a graphics king contender anyway, no massive set pieces, no single player, no destruction, no physics, shitty animation, sterile environment, so yeah it's just a slightly fancier looking MP game at best.

all the hermits claiming this was a graphics king lol. now that we know pc version is basically identical to ps4 version other than resolution, guess by default its a graphics king on ps4 too right?

according to anandtech cpu bench, that particular i5 beats my i7 3770k 9 times out of 10

i5 6600 have around 15% better IPC than your i7 3770k

but the i7 3770k have HT, so when all 8 thread are use the i7 3770k is slightly faster than the i5 6600

so by moving to i5 6600 will be consider sidegrade and not upgrade, basically a waste of money

also the i7 3770k have more OC headroom.

@m3dude1 said:

@Cloud_imperium said:

It's been 1.5+ years since the start of this gen and BF4 was already running on medium settings on Consoles. It makes sense if this one is running on low-medium or even low settings. The game will still look great though.

Gallery

Yup as expected, despite nitpicking, the game still looks noticeably better on PC. Glad we can agree on that.

PS4 being 900p! Ouch, and here I am getting ready to play it at 144fps on PC :P

It might surprise you, but I don't even care about resolution. [Depending on the game that is] I regularly buy Xbox One multiplatform games over PS4 for the XBL, and playing games with my friends.

But people love reading about resolution, so I can't help but talk about it one way or another lol.

@davillain-: You know what? I've re-read the thread. He was the only one saying/posting this game is a graphics king. His insecurity of console of choice is really showing in his posts.

So does this mean we can also say the Xbox One version is basically identical to the PS4 and PC versions other than resolution? You can't downplay the difference between PC and PS4 but exaggerate the difference between PS4 and Xbox One. Not if you are anything other than a trolling Cow.

@anthonyautumns: Indeed. Though it's funny how he said it and yet, PS4 isn't all that lol.

Ps4 version looks great, but will be a dumbed down inferior experience thanks to weak controls.