http://kotaku.com/5936740/microsoft-releasing-another-zombie-game-though-this-ones-about-teamwork
What is the verdict SW?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
http://kotaku.com/5936740/microsoft-releasing-another-zombie-game-though-this-ones-about-teamwork
What is the verdict SW?
A co-op zombie game?
Oh joy, these are starting to become as oversaturated as FPS. :roll:
Nega3
it's a single player only game but they might add co-op after launch when the MMO they are also developing is further along.
[QUOTE="Nega3"]
A co-op zombie game?
Oh joy, these are starting to become as oversaturated as FPS. :roll:
JayQproductions
it's a single player only game but they might add co-op after launch when the MMO they are also developing is further along.
Didn't the article say it was about teamwork though?:?
[QUOTE="JayQproductions"]
[QUOTE="Nega3"]
A co-op zombie game?
Oh joy, these are starting to become as oversaturated as FPS. :roll:
Nega3
it's a single player only game but they might add co-op after launch when the MMO they are also developing is further along.
Didn't the article say it was about teamwork though?:?
By teamwork they mean "rescue other survivors so they will occupy and help run your base" each surivor has it's own set of skills like a mechanic or medical experience so you need to rescue various survivors to get the skills to help your base thrive. You can also assign NPC's to do certain things like defend your base or help you scavenge for supplies and each survivor may have an attribute that will help or hurt that task for example someone with a bad knee might not be able to crouch for long periods of time so that person wouldnt be a good choice to help you if you want to be stealthy when scavenging for supplies. also, when you die that character stays dead and you have to continue the game as one of the other survivors you have rescued. So, the other survivors run your base but also act as your "extra lifes"
The last one they released (Deadlight) had bad voice acting and short SP but great visuals. This one looks fantastic though, is it XBL or retail?TheGuardian03
XBLA and PC
Will get on PC then, they still have time to fix some of the animations and other stuff, hope this one is good.TheGuardian03
They have said this is basically a "test game" to find out what does and doesn't work so they know what will be best to add to the MMO version they are also developing. What you see is more than likely wht your gonna get, but the MMO will probably have better graphics and animations as well as more features.
Jelly of another lost exclusive game on the 360?Another game making them poor cows jelly, but hey, you can moo moo moo all over Wonderbook.
sonic1564
Everyone seems to be missing the point
ANOTHER LOST EXLCUSIVE.
Oh, and it looks like ass. That is why you don't hype games based off of concepts (admittedly only a few did), but still.
"bu bu but it's a zombie mmo :'("
lems am cry.
Lost exclusive? Wasnt it always on PC?Everyone seems to be missing the point
ANOTHER LOST EXLCUSIVE.
Oh, and it looks like ass. That is why you don't hype games based off of concepts (admittedly only a few did), but still.
"bu bu but it's a zombie mmo :'("
lems am cry.
senses_fail_06
[QUOTE="senses_fail_06"]Lost exclusive? Wasnt it always on PC? Nah. They just announced that today (along with the official name)Everyone seems to be missing the point
ANOTHER LOST EXLCUSIVE.
Oh, and it looks like ass. That is why you don't hype games based off of concepts (admittedly only a few did), but still.
"bu bu but it's a zombie mmo :'("
lems am cry.
navyguy21
[QUOTE="navyguy21"][QUOTE="senses_fail_06"]Lost exclusive? Wasnt it always on PC? Nah. They just announced that today (along with the official name)Everyone seems to be missing the point
ANOTHER LOST EXLCUSIVE.
Oh, and it looks like ass. That is why you don't hype games based off of concepts (admittedly only a few did), but still.
"bu bu but it's a zombie mmo :'("
lems am cry.
senses_fail_06
actually they announced it was gonna be on PC like a month ago but w/e. Also, IMO Microsoft "losing" an exclusive to PC isn't really "losing" an exclusive when 90% of computers run a Microsoft OS and I bet it will use GFWL.
Nah. They just announced that today (along with the official name)[QUOTE="senses_fail_06"][QUOTE="navyguy21"] Lost exclusive? Wasnt it always on PC?JayQproductions
actually they announced it was gonna be on PC like a month ago but w/e. Also, IMO Microsoft "losing" an exclusive to PC isn't really "losing" an exclusive when 90% of computers run a Microsoft OS and I bet it will use GFWL.
Whatever, I know it was an exclusive at one point. As far as your second point, this is system wars, not company wars. It will certainly use GFWL...it's being published by M$.Sounds like a good new game for the 360/PC.
And :lol: at the fanboys talking about it being a lost exclusive. Still a feather in the cap of the 360/PC regardless. :D
Could be fun. But MS is a classic business, imo. Beat it till it's dead. Nothing new until that genre or type is proven by someone else. That can still be turned into good, fun games, but come on, MS, roll the dice a little. But when your major competition is doing just that and not turning profit, who am I to judge?cainetao11Microsoft determines what makes a developer makes instead of the developer itself?
[QUOTE="cainetao11"]Could be fun. But MS is a classic business, imo. Beat it till it's dead. Nothing new until that genre or type is proven by someone else. That can still be turned into good, fun games, but come on, MS, roll the dice a little. But when your major competition is doing just that and not turning profit, who am I to judge?Stevo_the_gamerMicrosoft determines what makes a developer makes instead of the developer itself?So you believe Rare could have gone ahead and deved KI3?
[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="cainetao11"]Could be fun. But MS is a classic business, imo. Beat it till it's dead. Nothing new until that genre or type is proven by someone else. That can still be turned into good, fun games, but come on, MS, roll the dice a little. But when your major competition is doing just that and not turning profit, who am I to judge?cainetao11Microsoft determines what makes a developer makes instead of the developer itself?So you believe Rare could have gone ahead and deved KI3? MS is the publisher for State of Decay. They don't own the developer like they do with Rare.
Indeed and as long as it doesn't count towards the meta game, every faction should be fine with it and not use it for any type of "ownage". Well said.Sounds like a good new game for the 360/PC.
And :lol: at the fanboys talking about it being a lost exclusive. Still a feather in the cap of the 360/PC regardless. :D
The_Game21x
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]Indeed and as long as it doesn't count towards the meta game, every faction should be fine with it and not use it for any type of "ownage". Well said. It is ownage against the PS3. Like it or not it is another game that can not be played on the PS3 and considering it already has the least amount of games of all 4 systems it needs all the games it can get.Sounds like a good new game for the 360/PC.
And :lol: at the fanboys talking about it being a lost exclusive. Still a feather in the cap of the 360/PC regardless. :D
Heil68
[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]Indeed and as long as it doesn't count towards the meta game, every faction should be fine with it and not use it for any type of "ownage". Well said. It is ownage against the PS3. Like it or not it is another game that can not be played on the PS3 and considering it already has the least amount of games of all 4 systems it needs all the games it can get.Sounds like a good new game for the 360/PC.
And :lol: at the fanboys talking about it being a lost exclusive. Still a feather in the cap of the 360/PC regardless. :D
CanYouDiglt
I swear, it seems like Sony fans are the only ones who want to keep XBLA games out of the metagame.
Probably because they know they'd lose if they were counted. :P
It is ownage against the PS3. Like it or not it is another game that can not be played on the PS3 and considering it already has the least amount of games of all 4 systems it needs all the games it can get.[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"][QUOTE="Heil68"] Indeed and as long as it doesn't count towards the meta game, every faction should be fine with it and not use it for any type of "ownage". Well said. The_Game21x
I swear, it seems like Sony fans are the only ones who want to keep XBLA games out of the metagame.
Probably because they know they'd lose if they were counted. :P
That's not true in its entirety... last year, 2011, both PSN and XBL had the same amount of games that made the spreadsheet. I dont know what the total number of this gen has though. As far as this game goes, I'll try it on PC, where I do most of my multi plat gaming.It is ownage against the PS3. Like it or not it is another game that can not be played on the PS3 and considering it already has the least amount of games of all 4 systems it needs all the games it can get.[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"][QUOTE="Heil68"] Indeed and as long as it doesn't count towards the meta game, every faction should be fine with it and not use it for any type of "ownage". Well said. The_Game21x
I swear, it seems like Sony fans are the only ones who want to keep XBLA games out of the metagame.
Probably because they know they'd lose if they were counted. :P
The Sony fanboys try to do everything to make as many 360 games as they can not count. lets see..-XBLA games do not count because only games you can buy at a store matter unless it is on PSN like Journey.
-360,PC games do not count because they can play them on a different system then the 360 even though they still can not play them on the PS3.
-Any sequel does not count such as Halo or Gears because it is just more of the same so just rehash. Games like the next God of War or MLB is giving the fans what they want though.
-Anything older then 6 months for the 360 does not count because everyone already played them all.
-Kinect does not count because any game that has motion controls does not count unless it is for the Move of course.
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]It is ownage against the PS3. Like it or not it is another game that can not be played on the PS3 and considering it already has the least amount of games of all 4 systems it needs all the games it can get.CanYouDiglt
I swear, it seems like Sony fans are the only ones who want to keep XBLA games out of the metagame.
Probably because they know they'd lose if they were counted. :P
The Sony fanboys try to do everything to make as many 360 games as they can not count. lets see..-XBLA games do not count because only games you can buy at a store matter unless it is on PSN like Journey.
-360,PC games do not count because they can play them on a different system then the 360 even though they still can not play them on the PS3.
-Any sequel does not count such as Halo or Gears because it is just more of the same so just rehash. Games like the next God of War or MLB is giving the fans what they want though.
-Anything older then 6 months for the 360 does not count because everyone already played them all.
-Kinect does not count because any game that has motion controls does not count unless it is for the Move of course.
The hypocrisy around these parts is...simply amazing. :P
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment