Super HD isn't coming until Next-Next-Gen.

[QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"][QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

"Super" HD.

:roll:

aroxx_ab

Super high definition =higher than 1080p?

It was about a year ago when I read it. But who knows, maybe that was the prototype of 4k.

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="Riadon2"]

What the hell are you talking about?

Riadon2

Console go by TV standard... not Monitors.

2K = 2048x1080, which is barely higher than 1080p.

4K is just not going to happen, too high for consoles and almost no one will have a 4k TV.

So you think there will be a 1440p HDTV on the market ?

[QUOTE="Riadon2"]

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

Console go by TV standard... not Monitors.

Bebi_vegeta

2K = 2048x1080, which is barely higher than 1080p.

4K is just not going to happen, too high for consoles and almost no one will have a 4k TV.

So you think there will be a 1440p HDTV on the market ?

I am sure they will be at least somewhat mainstream by the time that PS5/Next-nextbox release.  Remember how long this gen lasted, and next gen might last even longer.

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="Riadon2"]

2K = 2048x1080, which is barely higher than 1080p.

4K is just not going to happen, too high for consoles and almost no one will have a 4k TV.

Riadon2

So you think there will be a 1440p HDTV on the market ?

I am sure they will be at least somewhat mainstream by the time that PS5/Next-nextbox release.  Remember how long this gen lasted, and next gen might last even longer.

[QUOTE="TheEpicGoat"]

[QUOTE="GeForce-"]

Super HD?

GeForce-

4k res, next gen is going to still be 780p-1080p.

Oh.

PC will be capable of 4K by the time PS4 arrives.

Panasonic and NHK want to launch 8k around 2020.

Panasonic and NHK want to launch 8k around 2020.

NVIDIATI

is this a topic about how capcom name there games. dobzilian

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="Riadon2"]

2K = 2048x1080, which is barely higher than 1080p.

4K is just not going to happen, too high for consoles and almost no one will have a 4k TV.

Riadon2

So you think there will be a 1440p HDTV on the market ?

I am sure they will be at least somewhat mainstream by the time that PS5/Next-nextbox release.  Remember how long this gen lasted, and next gen might last even longer.

Not sure what you just said has anything to do with display resolution on HDTV...

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]

Panasonic and NHK want to launch 8k around 2020.

clyde46

Another big step is audio, 22.2 surround sound.

human eye can't detect above 1080P and 60fps so it doesn't matter

human eye can't detect above 1080P and 60fps so it doesn't matter

whiskeystrike

human eye can't detect above 1080P and 60fps so it doesn't matter

whiskeystrike

[QUOTE="whiskeystrike"]

human eye can't detect above 1080P and 60fps so it doesn't matter

kraken2109

[QUOTE="kraken2109"][QUOTE="whiskeystrike"]

human eye can't detect above 1080P and 60fps so it doesn't matter

not_wanted

[QUOTE="not_wanted"]

[QUOTE="kraken2109"] Really hope you're joking, slightly worried that maybe you're not.clyde46

human eye can't detect above 1080P and 60fps so it doesn't matter

whiskeystrike

human eye can't detect above 1080P and 60fps so it doesn't matter

whiskeystrike

I must have alien eyes.

[QUOTE="whiskeystrike"]

human eye can't detect above 1080P and 60fps so it doesn't matter

Riadon2

I must have alien eyes.

No, you have lame-ass sarcasm detectors.

No, you have lame-ass sarcasm detectors.

whiskeystrike

Yes, because we detect sarcasm at the binary level.

Face it, if someone doesn't know you, and you give absolutely no indication that you are sarcastic, you will be perceived as serious.

It's not like there aren't plenty of idiots who spout sh!t like that.

[QUOTE="whiskeystrike"]

No, you have lame-ass sarcasm detectors.

Riadon2

Yes, because we detect sarcasm at the binary level.

Face it, if someone doesn't know you, and you give absolutely no indication that you are sarcastic, you will be perceived as serious.

It's not like there aren't plenty of idiots who spout sh!t like that.

Forgot to put my specs in my sig

Then can I be "in on it"

[QUOTE="Riadon2"]

[QUOTE="whiskeystrike"]

No, you have lame-ass sarcasm detectors.

whiskeystrike

Yes, because we detect sarcasm at the binary level.

Face it, if someone doesn't know you, and you give absolutely no indication that you are sarcastic, you will be perceived as serious.

It's not like there aren't plenty of idiots who spout sh!t like that.

Forgot to put my specs in my sig

Then can I be "in on it"

What does that have to do with anything?

No, you have lame-ass sarcasm detectors.

whiskeystrike

[QUOTE="whiskeystrike"]

[QUOTE="Riadon2"]

Yes, because we detect sarcasm at the binary level.

Face it, if someone doesn't know you, and you give absolutely no indication that you are sarcastic, you will be perceived as serious.

It's not like there aren't plenty of idiots who spout sh!t like that.

Riadon2

Forgot to put my specs in my sig

Then can I be "in on it"

What does that have to do with anything?

human eye can't detect above 1080P and 60fps so it doesn't matter

whiskeystrike

The 1080p part is actually kinda right. Between screen size, viewing distance and the fact most people don't have perfect 20/20 vision, the average 1080p home theatre is already at "retina" quality and wouldn't see any tangible benefit from upgrading to 4K. Never mind whether that miniscule improvement would be worth shelling out for a whole new TV. 

[QUOTE="whiskeystrike"]

human eye can't detect above 1080P and 60fps so it doesn't matter

Slow_Show

The 1080p part is actually kinda right. Between screen size, viewing distance and the fact most people don't have perfect 20/20 vision, the average 1080p home theatre is already at "retina" quality and wouldn't see any tangible benefit from upgrading to 4K. Never mind whether that miniscule improvement would be worth shelling out for a whole new TV. 

Hopefully this is more sarcasm.

[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]

Panasonic and NHK want to launch 8k around 2020.

clyde46

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]

Panasonic and NHK want to launch 8k around 2020.

alien1280rhys

The amount of "frames" that we can see depends on lighting conditions. Our eyes work like a camera shutter not a tv screen that shows a fixed amount of images. Depending on the lighting situation we will be able to smoothly interpret 60+fps and sometimes we can't.

1080 for life just up the features.

The amount of "frames" that we can see depends on lighting conditions. Our eyes work like a camera shutter not a tv screen that shows a fixed amount of images. Depending on the lighting situation we will be able to smoothly interpret 60+fps and sometimes we can't.

painguy1

.

[QUOTE="painguy1"]

The amount of "frames" that we can see depends on lighting conditions. Our eyes work like a camera shutter not a tv screen that shows a fixed amount of images. Depending on the lighting situation we will be able to smoothly interpret 60+fps and sometimes we can't.

Riadon2

.

[QUOTE="Riadon2"]

[QUOTE="painguy1"]

The amount of "frames" that we can see depends on lighting conditions. Our eyes work like a camera shutter not a tv screen that shows a fixed amount of images. Depending on the lighting situation we will be able to smoothly interpret 60+fps and sometimes we can't.

clyde46

lolwut

I own a 120 FPS monitor, and the only time I cannot tell the difference between 60 and 120 FPS is when the screen is pitch black (ie, I can't see anything at all), or the game doesn't support higher than 60 FPS.

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Riadon2"]

lolwut

Riadon2

I own a 120 FPS monitor, and the only time I cannot tell the difference between 60 and 120 FPS is when the screen is pitch black (ie, I can't see anything at all), or the game doesn't support higher than 60 FPS.

[QUOTE="Riadon2"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"] He sounds correct, though I've not heard myself of lighting conditions affect what we perceive as motion.clyde46

I own a 120 FPS monitor, and the only time I cannot tell the difference between 60 and 120 FPS is when the screen is pitch black (ie, I can't see anything at all), or the game doesn't support higher than 60 FPS.

I suggest you buy a 120 Hz monitor.

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Riadon2"]

I own a 120 FPS monitor, and the only time I cannot tell the difference between 60 and 120 FPS is when the screen is pitch black (ie, I can't see anything at all), or the game doesn't support higher than 60 FPS.

Riadon2

I suggest you buy a 120 Hz monitor.

[QUOTE="Riadon2"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"] I suggest you read this. http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htmclyde46

I suggest you buy a 120 Hz monitor.

How can you agree with him if you haven't experienced 120 fps?

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Riadon2"]

I suggest you buy a 120 Hz monitor.

Riadon2

How can you agree with him if you haven't experienced 120 fps?

[QUOTE="Riadon2"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"] I'm fine with my 60Hz thankyou. clyde46

How can you agree with him if you haven't experienced 120 fps?

So I guess I just imagine the fluidity, then?

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Riadon2"]

How can you agree with him if you haven't experienced 120 fps?

Riadon2

So I guess I just imagine the fluidity, then?

[QUOTE="Riadon2"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"] It was taught as part of my degree. Its better to actually understand what you are claiming. clyde46

So I guess I just imagine the fluidity, then?

I know all of this.  The guy claimed that lighting conditions could make 60 fps indistinguishable from 120 fps.

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Riadon2"]

So I guess I just imagine the fluidity, then?

Riadon2

I know all of this.  The guy claimed that lighting conditions could make 60 fps indistinguishable from 120 fps.

[QUOTE="Riadon2"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"] Yes and no. Your brain is perceiving the motion. The higher your FPS, the smoother the motion. To gain any benefit of above 60FPS you will obviously need a 120Hz monitor as you have. If you sit down and watch a 60Hz set vs a 120Hz, the motion of the 120Hz set will be smoother as the screen will refresh 120 times a second as opposed to 60 times a second. clyde46

I know all of this.  The guy claimed that lighting conditions could make 60 fps indistinguishable from 120 fps.

The guy posted an assumption.  There was no link posted to back up the assumption.  I disagree with the assumption, having actually played games at above 60 FPS.

Thats pretty much all I need to get across.