You aren't getting it, are you?
Vampyr looks like the true successor to Vampire the Masquerade Bloodlines, and if previews are anything to go by, than Vampyr will have far more player agency than Bloodlines to where how you play the game impacts the story and the setting.
What am I not getting? I've seen the previews too and the graphics look dated as **** (again) but that's more forgivable than a game that plays itself and there is no hint at all that Vampyr will be anywhere even vaguely close to Bloodlines which is classic and iconic and ALL about the gameplay i.e. the fucking opposite to Dontnod games.
Bloodlines wasn't all about nudging a controller to move an extremely dodgy teen soap opera 'story' forward I'll grant you that. I guess Vampyr will up the stakes in that respect, ha, see what I did there.
Vampyr is a full blown RPG with Bloodborne like combat, and where you gain XP by not killing enemies, but by sucking blood from the citizens. So the more you level up, the more the areas decline and the darker the story and the ending. Its very much an immersive sim RPG that Bloodlines in the end, failed to be.
Its nothing like Life is Strange outside of the conversation system.
And really, Bloodlines still has a lot of flaws despite its cult status.
Full blown RPG? I haven't even seen evidence of a half assed RPG from trailers and preview material but hey, we'll wait and see. Bloodborne like combat? lmao! Calm yourself man, Bloodborne is the very pinnacle of RPG combat and Bloodlines is masterful in ways you clearly didn't appreciate to dismiss it so but if you are expecting anything close to the level of either game from a team that haven't even produced anything vaguely resembling an ACTUAL videogame you are setting yourself up for one hell of a fall.
Manage those expectations dude, you're on a hiding to nothing. How about a 'wait and see' approach and if they actually produce a game this time you can see it as a huge bonus?
I am a fan of Bloodlines, but it has its flaws. Sorry, but the fact is that the game was rushed out the door and the level design and the quest design suffers from it, especially near the end. its not a masterpiece, it was a game that modders saved because the developers had things dummied in, but they could not fix everything. You could not play how you wanted in the end and that's its biggest failing.
Bloodlines also doesn't have much of a reactive world that Vampyr will have. What part of this do you not get? Vampyr is more of an immersive sim closer to Deus Ex and Dishonored than Bloodlines was. Unlike Bloodlines, you can finish the game without killing anyone.
And even if Vampyr were to fail, it doesn't change that DONTNOD still is on top of the adventure game genre right now.
There is zero evidence that Vampyr has anything at all in common with Deus Ex or Bloodlines. You are talking about what you hope the game will be with no evidence it will happen.
Dontnod are on the same level as Telltale in the adventure game genre, they both make really shit graphic novels with pig-ugly graphics that are an insult to the intelligence of anyone who has played actual adventure games before.
Not everyone is like you Texas, we don't all want games that are graphically horrendous that play themselves from start to finish. Vampyr might be a good game despite the awful trailers, we'll just have to wait and see. You are the only one convinced it has already surpassed past classics because it's made by Dontnod who no doubt pay you some form of commission for all the Dontnod PR drivel you keep posting on here.
Log in to comment