The 360 has nothing but shooters..

the only genre the 360 is lacking in is platformers. but we do have Banjo coming next year...yay

there are plenty of sports games for the system, there are plenty of rpgs out or coming out in the next 6 months. there are action/ adventure games plenty of them. theres even a few rts games out. also the 360 has a few mmo's coming out in the next couple of years. that's a diverse lineup of games. not just shooters. it's not the fault of the owners of the 360 if games like Rainbow6 vegas and gears and ghost recon get good reviews. we still have oblivion, kameo, pgr series, forza, marvel ultimate alliance, sports games, horror games like condemned, ( condemned 2 and Alan wake coming out.) Fall out , infinite discovery, fable 2....ext coming out next year. imo thats a diverse lineup.

[QUOTE="svp0123"]but the wii has nothing but mini games, and pc has nothing but FPS, RTS, MMOs. really where are the sports games for the PC like Madden and NBA 2k8, and where are the action adventure series like Ninja Gaiden and GOW. there just not there for the PC.XaosII

You're only proving my point.

The PC doesnt have every genre. Yet for some odd reason lemmigns claim that the 360 offer every genre and that the 360 being largely shooters is a misconception. And yes, the PC does have those games and genres you mentioned, like Madden (its also on the PC, every year) and the DMC/MGS series is on the PC. Ah... but no... the PC ONLY has FPS, RTS, and MMOs. Apparantly giving you counterexamples, doesnt change that. But when lemmings list a single game of one genre, it means the 360 provides adequate support of said genre.

Dont make me laugh.

MG is more like ashooter or stealth shooter or somethingandall of them didnt come to the PC and if they did they came out way later with lower ratings. PlusMG4 isnt even announced for the PC but you say the PC gets the MG series, FALSE! So I guess your are pretty desprate for some titles. There are 0 DMC games out for the PC even though there are 3 titles but yet you say the PC gets the DMC games. DMC4 will be the first DMC on PC but who knows what it will be like. i mean like none shooters action adventure games. Zelda, GOW, NG where are those games for the PC? Even multiplats you cane name them can you?and they certainly dont have any good exclusives in those genres.

you fail

madden on PC got a 6.5 and a 8.5 on the next gen consoles. And they should always take points off PC becausein sports game people like playing against each other all the time but you cant unless you at your own house with a gaming PC. if youconsider getting a peace of crap version with the same title getting THE game then your wrong. And also no NBA 2k8 I was right.

MG is a shooter is and DMC4 will be the first DMC on PC who knows what it will be like. i mean like none shooters action adventure games. Zelda, GOW, NG where are those games. and they certainly dont have any good exclusives in those genres.

you fail

madden on PC got a 6.5 and a 8.5 on the next gen consoles. And they should always take points off PC becausein sports game people like playing against each other all the time but you cant unless you at your own house with a gaming PC. if youconsider getting a peace of crap version with the same title getting THE game then your wrong. And also no NBA 2k8 I was right.

svp0123

... You've got to joking me. Not only do you not know anything (claiming DMC4 will be the first on the PC), you're proving my point even further. Im not even going to bother how you're purposely stacking the fight lisitng three systems versus the PC (yeah, im sure you'll talk your way out of te 360 having a bigger variety than the PS3, Wii, and PC combined).

The PC has these games and these genres but doesnt adequately providde for them. just because i list the games doesnt mean its thats it got a varied amount of them. Im well aware the PC doesnt have a good enough list of fighters and beat-em-ups - just like the 360 doesnt have much beyond shooters. Just because you list some other titles for the 360 doesnt mean its enough to provide satisfactory variety to most gamers.

Meanwhile you list the only one or two titles for the 360 in a genre and all of a sudden the 360 becomes THE system to own for that genre?

Please... stop embarrasing yourself.

[QUOTE="svp0123"]MG is a shooter is and DMC4 will be the first DMC on PC who knows what it will be like. i mean like none shooters action adventure games. Zelda, GOW, NG where are those games. and they certainly dont have any good exclusives in those genres.

you fail

madden on PC got a 6.5 and a 8.5 on the next gen consoles. And they should always take points off PC becausein sports game people like playing against each other all the time but you cant unless you at your own house with a gaming PC. if youconsider getting a peace of crap version with the same title getting THE game then your wrong. And also no NBA 2k8 I was right.

XaosII

... You've got to joking me. Not only do you not know anything (claiming DMC4 will be the first on the PC), you're proving my point even further. Im not even going to bother how you're purposely stacking the fight lisitng three systems versus the PC (yeah, im sure you'll talk your way out of te 360 having a bigger variety than the PS3, Wii, and PC combined).

dude your owning your self. i say where are these action adventure games andsports gamesand you name timed ports which get way lower ratings for the PC. certainly there are no exclusives you can name because all you name are timed ports with crappy ratings.

i dont get it what do they need/

RTS they have every console beat with World in Conflict coming soon and Command and Conquer, RPGs they have Oblivion, Eternal Sonataand Mass Effect + Lost Odyseycoming soon, they own everybody right now in shooters, sports, racing and they have the action adventure games with Kameo plus Fable, Ninja Gaiden and Two Human coming next year. There good with fighters too with DOA, VF and SF coming out next year. those just scratch the serfice of games 360 has too they are some of the top titles but there are many other AA none shooter games too.

what are they lacking that other systems have really? to say they lack in genres would mean that other systems are doing better in those genres which just isnt the truth.

its like your saying because 360 is owning all the consoles in AAAs that they need to make more AAA none shooter games. does that mean because the PS3 has no AAA games comes out with 1 AA none shooter exclusive and there winning because their ratio is better? please...

Viva Pinata is seriously one of the most underrated games of all time, im 18 and enjoyed it very much.

Yes, its aimed for children, but its so deep and complex that anyone can easily have fun with it

I always find it funny that some of the same people who say Wiionly has minigames, ports, and rehashes (and claim that only casuals buy the system) and PS3 has no good games...get really mad when somebody says that 360 only has shooters.

The reason 360 is often seen as shooter-crazy is because most of the AAA and high AA games are gun-based. It's not that all the games are shooters; it's just that a lot of the top games are. Anyways, it's an unfair statement to make.

I always find it funny that some of the same people who say Wiionly has minigames, ports, and rehashes (and claim that only casuals buy the system) and PS3 has no good games...get really mad when somebody says that 360 only has shooters.

The reason 360 is often seen as shooter-crazy is because most of the AAA and high AA games are gun-based. It's not that all the games are shooters; it's just that a lot of the top games are. Anyways, it's an unfair statement to make.

--ProtoMan--

there are 11 AA games 8.6-8.9 which will qualify for "high AA games" which you said and 7 of those 11 are none shooters. Did you not just say most of their high AA are shooters?

the real reason because all the top of the top games for the 360 are shooters. but those top of the top shooters are just the top of the top for 360 they are the top games out there period. so why hate? when it comes to sales, hype and reviews those games are top.

now lets look at wii. their #1 rankedgame is a rehash with RE4 Wii edition, their only new AA title Wario smooth moves is a bunch of mini games, and their only other AAA is also a rehash paper mario then the next top two games are also rehashes with Zelda OOT, and super paper mario. then you have the same old Zelda and Metroid with the same exact stroy line every time both at 8.8 and after that you have a bunch more emulaters like Super Mario and hella old Zeldas.

http://www.gamespot.com/games.html?type=top_rated&platform=1031&sort=score&page_type=games&dlx_type=all&date_filter=all&sortdir=asc

just look for yourself.

I always find it funny that some of the same people who say Wiionly has minigames, ports, and rehashes (and claim that only casuals buy the system) and PS3 has no good games...get really mad when somebody says that 360 only has shooters.

The reason 360 is often seen as shooter-crazy is because most of the AAA and high AA games are gun-based. It's not that all the games are shooters; it's just that a lot of the top games are. Anyways, it's an unfair statement to make.

--ProtoMan--

really how many AAAs do the Wii have that arent rehahses, a very old gen emulater, or a mini game game? 0!

howmany Wii games are over 8.0 on GS does the Wii have that arent rehahses, very old gen emulaters or a mini game games? outside of Zelda and Metroid which are good AAs even though they have the same exact story every time kill ganon save the princess for zelda, and you use lose your powers you gain them back slowy and kill alians. same old thing everytime nintendo is scared of change. ok how many? monkey ball bannan blitz! 1 AA game out of that genre and if you name multiplatforms it is like 2-3 just really sad. now that is being one note.

[QUOTE="--ProtoMan--"]

I always find it funny that some of the same people who say Wiionly has minigames, ports, and rehashes (and claim that only casuals buy the system) and PS3 has no good games...get really mad when somebody says that 360 only has shooters.

The reason 360 is often seen as shooter-crazy is because most of the AAA and high AA games are gun-based. It's not that all the games are shooters; it's just that a lot of the top games are. Anyways, it's an unfair statement to make.

svp0123

there are 11 AA games 8.6-8.9 which will qualify for "high AA games" which you said and 7 of those 11 are none shooters. Did you not just say most of their high AA are shooters?

the real reason because all the top of the top games for the 360 are shooters. but those top of the top shooters are just the top of the top for 360 they are the top games out there period. so why hate? when it comes to sales, hype and reviews those games are top.

now lets look at wii. their #1 rankedgame is a rehash with RE4 Wii edition, their only new AA title Wario smooth moves is a bunch of mini games, and their only other AAA is also a rehash paper mario then the next top two games are also rehashes with Zelda OOT, and super paper mario. then you have the same old Zelda and Metroid with the same exact stroy line every time both at 8.8 and after that you have a bunch more emulaters like Super Mario and hella old Zeldas.

http://www.gamespot.com/games.html?type=top_rated&platform=1031&sort=score&page_type=games&dlx_type=all&date_filter=all&sortdir=asc

just look for yourself.

You don't have to get all offended about it. I was just saying that 360 has a lot of high-quality shooters. I know I'm not being exact. And besides, even 4 out of 11 is high.

I'm on your side. I don't get the anti-Wii paragraph... I hope you weren't trying to use it against me.

But if you're going to be like that...

"same old Zelda... with the exact same story line" Uhh, every game is set in a different time with a different Link. Did you not just say that Zelda games have the exact same story line?

Besides that, if you've played the Paper Mario series at all, you'll know that SPM is nothing like the first two... very few RPG elements, much more platforming. Did you not just say that SPM was a rehash?

[QUOTE="svp0123"][QUOTE="--ProtoMan--"]

I always find it funny that some of the same people who say Wiionly has minigames, ports, and rehashes (and claim that only casuals buy the system) and PS3 has no good games...get really mad when somebody says that 360 only has shooters.

The reason 360 is often seen as shooter-crazy is because most of the AAA and high AA games are gun-based. It's not that all the games are shooters; it's just that a lot of the top games are. Anyways, it's an unfair statement to make.

--ProtoMan--

there are 11 AA games 8.6-8.9 which will qualify for "high AA games" which you said and 7 of those 11 are none shooters. Did you not just say most of their high AA are shooters?

the real reason because all the top of the top games for the 360 are shooters. but those top of the top shooters are just the top of the top for 360 they are the top games out there period. so why hate? when it comes to sales, hype and reviews those games are top.

now lets look at wii. their #1 rankedgame is a rehash with RE4 Wii edition, their only new AA title Wario smooth moves is a bunch of mini games, and their only other AAA is also a rehash paper mario then the next top two games are also rehashes with Zelda OOT, and super paper mario. then you have the same old Zelda and Metroid with the same exact stroy line every time both at 8.8 and after that you have a bunch more emulaters like Super Mario and hella old Zeldas.

http://www.gamespot.com/games.html?type=top_rated&platform=1031&sort=score&page_type=games&dlx_type=all&date_filter=all&sortdir=asc

just look for yourself.

You don't have to get all offended about it. I was just saying that 360 has a lot of high-quality shooters. I know I'm not being exact. And besides, even 4 out of 11 is high.

I'm on your side. I don't get the anti-Wii paragraph... I hope you weren't trying to use it against me.

But if you're going to be like that...

"same old Zelda... with the exact same story line" Uhh, every game is set in a different time with a different Link. Did you not just say that Zelda games have the exact same story line?

Besides that, if you've played the Paper Mario series at all, you'll know that SPM is nothing like the first two... very few RPG elements, much more platforming. Did you not just say that SPM was a rehash?

okay are all the climax part of the story not the same?

there is link, then there is zelda, you find out gannon is the bad guy, you find the hero sword or whatever its called or legend sword or something then youneed to use the power of the triforce or something your the triforce of courage, zelda is wisedom and ganon stoll power from the king of hyrule or something. you destroy gannon and save zelda. just like mario will kill bowser and save princess toadstull in SMG.

tell me that didnt happen in zelda.. i never played it but i know it happened.