The best KZ2 screensshot, period.

I can honestly say that this made my jaw drop.

(Waits for unjustified bashing)

omg the textures on the handrail look like dog poop and the draw distance is monkey crap (jk)

I'll admit though the cows have a good looking game on their hands, the question is does it play good.

It looks fine, but it's not as impressive as Heavenly Sword, Uncharted, and Mass Effect when up close in cinematics.BioShockOwnz

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]It looks fine, but it's not as impressive as Heavenly Sword, Uncharted, and Mass Effect when up close in cinematics.-Sniper99-

Uncharted looks better than KZ2 IMO, more polished.

It looks fine, but it's not as impressive as Heavenly Sword, Uncharted, and Mass Effect when up close in cinematics.BioShockOwnz

Agreed.

Gears of War looks better.. and it's pushing on a year old now. The fog looks choppy and the face looks flattened, as well as the objects in the distance.Heith

wow a year already..

The low-res textures in that picture make the texture whore in me want to spurt out epithets.foxhound_fox

Agreed. I don't see how anyone can be very impressed by this. I must say that it has some of the best gun models I've ever seen though.

Hm... Pretty good, I hope there's a game behind the graphics.

Looks awesome.

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]The low-res textures in that picture make the texture whore in me want to spurt out epithets.BioShockOwnz

Agreed. I don't see how anyone can be very impressed by this. I must say that it has some of the best gun models I've ever seen though.

they could be a 360 fan? i admit it as a ps3 fan that im hoping this game looks and plays really really good. just to prove the ps3 can run with the big boys.

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]The low-res textures in that picture make the texture whore in me want to spurt out epithets.BioShockOwnz

Agreed. I don't see how anyone can be very impressed by this. I must say that it has some of the best gun models I've ever seen though.

Killzone 2 has many polygons in the guns and faces, but everything else in the game is not impressive at all.

But the blur effects hide most of that stuff. Killzone 2 makes the illusion of great graphics by making things blurry (far away objects, any movement, your gun, etc) and it totally covers some of the bad texturing.

So it still looks great. Just not that great technically.

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]The low-res textures in that picture make the texture whore in me want to spurt out epithets.mitchconlin

Agreed. I don't see how anyone can be very impressed by this. I must say that it has some of the best gun models I've ever seen though.

they could be a 360 fan?

They would have to be, no PS3 games even look that good yet, sadly enough. Also, check out the guys finger clipping the trigger cover in that picture, lol.

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]The low-res textures in that picture make the texture whore in me want to spurt out epithets.MADVLAD123

Agreed. I don't see how anyone can be very impressed by this. I must say that it has some of the best gun models I've ever seen though.

Killzone 2 has many polygons in the guns and faces, but everything else in the game is not impressive at all.

But the blur effects hide most of that stuff. Killzone 2 makes the illusion of great graphics by making things blurry (far away objects, any movement, your gun, etc) and it totally covers some of the bad texturing.

So it still looks great. Just not that great technically.

Yeah I noticed that too

Its not very crisp like a game like Halo 3 (not saying halo 3 looks better)

they are good at making faces and gun models.they look great!the textures could be much better though, look at how low the res is on the guy's clothes.Dopemonk736

I think the faces are way over the top, so over the top that it looks bad.

This game is coming out sometime in 2008, there is enough time to make improvments.

Gears of War looks better.. and it's pushing on a year old now. The fog looks choppy and the face looks flattened, as well as the objects in the distance.Heith

No, Gears does not look better than Killzone.

[QUOTE="Heith"]Gears of War looks better.. and it's pushing on a year old now. The fog looks choppy and the face looks flattened, as well as the objects in the distance.fuzzysquash

No, Gears does not look better than Killzone.

Hehe, denial. Look at the characters arm and compare it to the detailed texture of the human skin in Gears of War. Also note the blocky low res textures in the distance. Also note the finger clipping the trigger guard. You are in total denial, and when KZ2 comes out, you will realise this.

It looks fine, but it's not as impressive as Heavenly Sword, Uncharted, and Mass Effect when up close in cinematics.BioShockOwnz

I just can't get over that SNES-looking pole in the background and massive basket weave texture on the building. For a few fleeting moments, I was impressed by the gun.

oh wow, I just looked again and the basket weave is the sky. Awful.

[QUOTE="fuzzysquash"]

[QUOTE="Heith"]Gears of War looks better.. and it's pushing on a year old now. The fog looks choppy and the face looks flattened, as well as the objects in the distance.Heith

No, Gears does not look better than Killzone.

Hehe, denial. Look at the characters arm and compare it to the detailed texture of the human skin in Gears of War. Also note the blocky low res textures in the distance. Also note the finger clipping the trigger guard. You are in total denial, and when KZ2 comes out, you will realise this.

You do realize that KZ2 is coming out some time in 2008, don't you think you should be careful of what you say?

I can honestly say that this made my jaw drop.

(Waits for unjustified bashing)

no_submission

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]It looks fine, but it's not as impressive as Heavenly Sword, Uncharted, and Mass Effect when up close in cinematics.CR00K

Same goes for Heavenly Sword, Uncharted, and Mass Effect. They all use in-game graphics and Mass Effect's is in real-time since they are mainly real-time conversations.

[QUOTE="Heith"][QUOTE="fuzzysquash"]

[QUOTE="Heith"]Gears of War looks better.. and it's pushing on a year old now. The fog looks choppy and the face looks flattened, as well as the objects in the distance.SillyManimal

No, Gears does not look better than Killzone.

Hehe, denial. Look at the characters arm and compare it to the detailed texture of the human skin in Gears of War. Also note the blocky low res textures in the distance. Also note the finger clipping the trigger guard. You are in total denial, and when KZ2 comes out, you will realise this.

You do realize that KZ2 is coming out some time in 2008, don't you think you should be careful of what you say?

C'mon.. do you honestly think that PS3 can support a game as good looking as gears?

[QUOTE="fuzzysquash"]

[QUOTE="Heith"]Gears of War looks better.. and it's pushing on a year old now. The fog looks choppy and the face looks flattened, as well as the objects in the distance.Heith

No, Gears does not look better than Killzone.

Hehe, denial. Look at the characters arm and compare it to the detailed texture of the human skin in Gears of War. Also note the blocky low res textures in the distance. Also note the finger clipping the trigger guard. You are in total denial, and when KZ2 comes out, you will realise this.

lol, I'm in denial. I played Gears and loved it.

But visually, Gears does not exceed Killzone. In textures, perhaps. But overall, Killzone 2's got way more going on, the environment is dynamic, the animations are much better, the motion-blur effects are more subtle and realistic, the lighting is more believable, etc.

Gears set the bar, but it doesn't stay on top forever. Killzone 2 has surpassed it. Maybe Gears 2 will surpass KZ2, but we'll have to wait and see.

[QUOTE="no_submission"]

I can honestly say that this made my jaw drop.

(Waits for unjustified bashing)

Heith

u cant compare cutscenes with gameplay.

[QUOTE="-Sniper99-"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]It looks fine, but it's not as impressive as Heavenly Sword, Uncharted, and Mass Effect when up close in cinematics.no_submission

Uncharted looks better than KZ2 IMO, more polished.

[QUOTE="Heith"][QUOTE="no_submission"]

I can honestly say that this made my jaw drop.

(Waits for unjustified bashing)

Chetnik07

u cant compare cutscenes with gameplay.

That picture is in game rendered, there are no CGI in Gears.. when will Cows learn *sigh* oh, I'm sorry, you mean the KZ2 cutscent pic, I gotcha :D

[QUOTE="Heith"][QUOTE="no_submission"]

I can honestly say that this made my jaw drop.

(Waits for unjustified bashing)

Chetnik07

u cant compare cutscenes with gameplay.

but those are both in game cutscenes:|

lol, I'm in denial. I played Gears and loved it.

But visually, Gears does not exceed Killzone. In textures, perhaps. But overall, Killzone 2's got way more going on, the environment is dynamic, the animations are much better, the motion-blur effects are more subtle and realistic, the lighting is more believable, etc.

Gears set the bar, but it doesn't stay on top forever. Killzone 2 has surpassed it. Maybe Gears 2 will surpass KZ2, but we'll have to wait and see.

fuzzysquash

I didn't see any "imo" in there that would allow me to accept this post.

[QUOTE="SillyManimal"][QUOTE="Heith"][QUOTE="fuzzysquash"]

[QUOTE="Heith"]Gears of War looks better.. and it's pushing on a year old now. The fog looks choppy and the face looks flattened, as well as the objects in the distance.Heith

No, Gears does not look better than Killzone.

Hehe, denial. Look at the characters arm and compare it to the detailed texture of the human skin in Gears of War. Also note the blocky low res textures in the distance. Also note the finger clipping the trigger guard. You are in total denial, and when KZ2 comes out, you will realise this.

You do realize that KZ2 is coming out some time in 2008, don't you think you should be careful of what you say?

C'mon.. do you honestly think that PS3 can support a game as good looking as gears?

Are you telling me the PS3 will never be able to produce GeOW level graphics? Btw, Uncharted looks better and so does UT and they are both on the PS3, yes UT is a multiplat, but that's not the point.

[QUOTE="Heith"]Gears of War looks better.. and it's pushing on a year old now. The fog looks choppy and the face looks flattened, as well as the objects in the distance.fuzzysquash

No, Gears does not look better than Killzone.

You know, I think this too honestly. I know you're a great poster as well. I can't understand why people can't see it though. I really think Killzone 2 is hands down the best overall looking console game so far. I feel so alone when I say that though, that's why it's nice to hear from someone like you that you agree with me.

[QUOTE="Heith"][QUOTE="no_submission"]

I can honestly say that this made my jaw drop.

(Waits for unjustified bashing)

Chetnik07

u cant compare cutscenes with gameplay.

Gears uses the in-game engine for cutscenes, just like Killzone 2.

[QUOTE="MADVLAD123"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]The low-res textures in that picture make the texture whore in me want to spurt out epithets.Slyprince

Agreed. I don't see how anyone can be very impressed by this. I must say that it has some of the best gun models I've ever seen though.

Killzone 2 has many polygons in the guns and faces, but everything else in the game is not impressive at all.

But the blur effects hide most of that stuff. Killzone 2 makes the illusion of great graphics by making things blurry (far away objects, any movement, your gun, etc) and it totally covers some of the bad texturing.

So it still looks great. Just not that great technically.

Yeah I noticed that too

Its not very crisp like a game like Halo 3 (not saying halo 3 looks better)

I agree, and know exactly what you mean. Halo 3's graphics aren't jaw-droppingly good, but as you said it has a very... crisp feel to it. No jaggies, just nice, smooth, vibrant graphics.

[QUOTE="Chetnik07"][QUOTE="Heith"][QUOTE="no_submission"]

I can honestly say that this made my jaw drop.

(Waits for unjustified bashing)

Heith

u cant compare cutscenes with gameplay.

That picture is in game rendered, there are no CGI in Gears.. when will Cows learn *sigh* oh, I'm sorry, you mean the KZ2 cutscent pic, I gotcha :D

There may be no CGI in Gears, but those real-time cutscenes get frame-rate chugs and LOD pop-in. Also, is it your opinion that Unreal Tournament 3 looks worse than Gears?

[QUOTE="fuzzysquash"]

lol, I'm in denial. I played Gears and loved it.

But visually, Gears does not exceed Killzone. In textures, perhaps. But overall, Killzone 2's got way more going on, the environment is dynamic, the animations are much better, the motion-blur effects are more subtle and realistic, the lighting is more believable, etc.

Gears set the bar, but it doesn't stay on top forever. Killzone 2 has surpassed it. Maybe Gears 2 will surpass KZ2, but we'll have to wait and see.

whoisryanmack

I didn't see any "imo" in there that would allow me to accept this post.

...and why would I need you to accept it? :?

You're free to accept and reject whatever you see on these forums.

[QUOTE="SillyManimal"][QUOTE="Heith"][QUOTE="fuzzysquash"]

[QUOTE="Heith"]Gears of War looks better.. and it's pushing on a year old now. The fog looks choppy and the face looks flattened, as well as the objects in the distance.Heith

No, Gears does not look better than Killzone.

Hehe, denial. Look at the characters arm and compare it to the detailed texture of the human skin in Gears of War. Also note the blocky low res textures in the distance. Also note the finger clipping the trigger guard. You are in total denial, and when KZ2 comes out, you will realise this.

You do realize that KZ2 is coming out some time in 2008, don't you think you should be careful of what you say?

C'mon.. do you honestly think that PS3 can support a game as good looking as gears?

UT3:|

[QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="fuzzysquash"]

lol, I'm in denial. I played Gears and loved it.

But visually, Gears does not exceed Killzone. In textures, perhaps. But overall, Killzone 2's got way more going on, the environment is dynamic, the animations are much better, the motion-blur effects are more subtle and realistic, the lighting is more believable, etc.

Gears set the bar, but it doesn't stay on top forever. Killzone 2 has surpassed it. Maybe Gears 2 will surpass KZ2, but we'll have to wait and see.

fuzzysquash

I didn't see any "imo" in there that would allow me to accept this post.

...and why would I need you to accept it? :?

You're free to accept and reject whatever you see on these forums.

reject

You know, I think this too honestly. I know you're a great poster as well. I can't understand why people can't see it though. I really think Killzone 2 is hands down the best overall looking console game so far. I feel so alone when I say that though, that's why it's nice to hear from someone like you that you agree with me.

DA_B0MB

Yeah, the only reason I think that is because I've played Gears and I've watched Killzone 2's gameplay.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/21504.html

it may be hard to tell which is more visually impressive by staring at still screenshots, but based on seeing the two games in motion, there's a clear winner.