The best KZ2 screensshot, period.

[QUOTE="Chetnik07"][QUOTE="Heith"][QUOTE="no_submission"]

I can honestly say that this made my jaw drop.

(Waits for unjustified bashing)

Heith

u cant compare cutscenes with gameplay.

That picture is in game rendered, there are no CGI in Gears.. when will Cows learn *sigh* oh, I'm sorry, you mean the KZ2 cutscent pic, I gotcha :D

dont try to teach me how things work, cutscenes in GEOW look twice as good than gameplay and its not CGIand i never said it was, i have the game and i know.

And the down playing already started with the first response.Cedmln

Or the truth perhaps. Oh well.

reject

whoisryanmack

Uh huh.

Nice rebuttal to the points I made :roll:

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/21504.html

[QUOTE="whoisryanmack"]

reject

fuzzysquash

Uh huh.

Nice rebuttal to the points I made :roll:

The only point you made was a long list of your opinions. Then when asked to identify them as such, you cop out with a lame response about how I can take or leave whatever I see here.

So I'll leave it.

Here's a logical rebuttal. I disagree

[QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="whoisryanmack"]

reject

whoisryanmack

Uh huh.

Nice rebuttal to the points I made :roll:

The only point you made was a long list of your opinions. Then when asked to identify them as such, you cop out with a lame response about how I can take or leave whatever I see here.

So I'll leave it.

Here's a logical rebuttal. I disagree

Isn't it a given that virtually every post on SW is an opinion?

Is it necessary to identify an opinion every time before I state one? You can't tell?

Why didn't you ask the guy who thinks Gears looks better why he didn't identify his post as an opinion? Because you happen to agree with him?

So unbiased :roll:

also very nice

[QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="whoisryanmack"]

reject

fuzzysquash

Uh huh.

Nice rebuttal to the points I made :roll:

The only point you made was a long list of your opinions. Then when asked to identify them as such, you cop out with a lame response about how I can take or leave whatever I see here.

So I'll leave it.

Here's a logical rebuttal. I disagree

Isn't it a given that virtually every post on SW is an opinion?

Is it necessary to identify an opinion every time before I state one? You can't tell?

Why didn't you ask the guy who thinks Gears looks better why he didn't identify his post as an opinion? Because you happen to agree with him?

So unbiased :roll:

First. No, every post is not an opinion. If I were to say ps2 had the largest game library of all last gen consoles, that would be fact, not opinion. You however, said you thought a certain game looked better than another game. This is what's known as opinion. It's fine to state opinions, but I then asked you to at least admit it was an opinion, and you balked.

Second. Yes, I agree with him.

Third. I am biased.

[QUOTE="Heith"]Gears of War looks better.. and it's pushing on a year old now. The fog looks choppy and the face looks flattened, as well as the objects in the distance.fuzzysquash

No, Gears does not look better than Killzone.

First. No, every post is not an opinion. If I were to say ps2 had the largest game library of all last gen consoles, that would be fact, not opinion. You however, said you thought a certain game looked better than another game. This is what's known as opinion. It's fine to state opinions, but I then asked you to at least admit it was an opinion, and you balked.

Second. Yes, I agree with him.

Third. I am biased.

whoisryanmack

Look closer. Did I say every single post in SW is an opinion? Nope. Read more carefully next time.

Second, it's fine if you agree with him. But if you want to disagree with me, you should offer some good reasons why. So far, you haven't offered any sort of counter argument except to demand that I admit what I stated was an opinion.

Of course it was an opinion.

So were the posts by the guy who said Gears looked better than KZ2. But instead of pestering him about not introducing his posts with "in my opinion," you ask me to do so. You can be biased, but you shouldn't have double standards. If you're nagging me to clarify the obvious, you should nag the person who agrees with you as well.

In all, we're quibbling over semantics. And until you offer me an actual counter-argument, this really ain't worth my time :wink:

[QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="whoisryanmack"]

reject

whoisryanmack

Uh huh.

Nice rebuttal to the points I made :roll:

The only point you made was a long list of your opinions. Then when asked to identify them as such, you cop out with a lame response about how I can take or leave whatever I see here.

So I'll leave it.

Here's a logical rebuttal. I disagree

Isn't it a given that virtually every post on SW is an opinion?

Is it necessary to identify an opinion every time before I state one? You can't tell?

Why didn't you ask the guy who thinks Gears looks better why he didn't identify his post as an opinion? Because you happen to agree with him?

So unbiased :roll:

First. No, every post is not an opinion. If I were to say ps2 had the largest game library of all last gen consoles, that would be fact, not opinion. You however, said you thought a certain game looked better than another game. This is what's known as opinion. It's fine to state opinions, but I then asked you to at least admit it was an opinion, and you balked.

Second. Yes, I agree with him.

Third. I am biased.

What more do you need? Stop whining.

also very nice

BackFlip101

I think these pics look better. The art sty le really comes through.

The pic in the first post has low-res textures. Nice face models and weapon models though.

[QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="whoisryanmack"]

reject

SillyManimal

Uh huh.

Nice rebuttal to the points I made :roll:

The only point you made was a long list of your opinions. Then when asked to identify them as such, you cop out with a lame response about how I can take or leave whatever I see here.

So I'll leave it.

Here's a logical rebuttal. I disagree

Isn't it a given that virtually every post on SW is an opinion?

Is it necessary to identify an opinion every time before I state one? You can't tell?

Why didn't you ask the guy who thinks Gears looks better why he didn't identify his post as an opinion? Because you happen to agree with him?

So unbiased :roll:

First. No, every post is not an opinion. If I were to say ps2 had the largest game library of all last gen consoles, that would be fact, not opinion. You however, said you thought a certain game looked better than another game. This is what's known as opinion. It's fine to state opinions, but I then asked you to at least admit it was an opinion, and you balked.

Second. Yes, I agree with him.

Third. I am biased.

What more do you need? Stop whining.

Ahh..but that is not a quote. I added the "thought" because it is, in fact, an opinion. He said no such thing.

I will continue to whine.

[QUOTE="whoisryanmack"]

First. No, every post is not an opinion. If I were to say ps2 had the largest game library of all last gen consoles, that would be fact, not opinion. You however, said you thought a certain game looked better than another game. This is what's known as opinion. It's fine to state opinions, but I then asked you to at least admit it was an opinion, and you balked.

Second. Yes, I agree with him.

Third. I am biased.

fuzzysquash

Look closer. Did I say every single post in SW is an opinion? Nope. Read more carefully next time.

Second, it's fine if you agree with him. But if you want to disagree with me, you should offer some good reasons why. So far, you haven't offered any sort of counter argument except to demand that I admit what I stated was an opinion.

Of course it was an opinion.

So were the posts by the guy who said Gears looked better than KZ2. But instead of pestering him about not introducing his posts with "in my opinion," you ask me to do so. You can be biased, but you shouldn't have double standards. If you're nagging me to clarify the obvious, you should nag the person who agrees with you as well.

In all, we're quibbling over semantics. And until you offer me an actual counter-argument, this really ain't worth my time :wink:

I think so too. Oh well, my first post was mostly meant as a joke and since then I've continued drinking.

Game on!

This destroys killzone 2

(RE 5 pic)VACASCULIADAS

Yeah, it does actually lol.

Nice textures there.

This destroys killzone 2


VACASCULIADAS

Doesn't use a 16 color pallette? Check.
Has crisp, sharp textures? Check.
Has subtle, non-overpowering motion blur? Check.
A multi-platform game that fanboys across the board can agree with? Check.

If Resident Evil 5 were PS3 exclusive I'd sell my 360 in a heartbeat.

[QUOTE="SillyManimal"][QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="whoisryanmack"]

reject

whoisryanmack

Uh huh.

Nice rebuttal to the points I made :roll:

The only point you made was a long list of your opinions. Then when asked to identify them as such, you cop out with a lame response about how I can take or leave whatever I see here.

So I'll leave it.

Here's a logical rebuttal. I disagree

Isn't it a given that virtually every post on SW is an opinion?

Is it necessary to identify an opinion every time before I state one? You can't tell?

Why didn't you ask the guy who thinks Gears looks better why he didn't identify his post as an opinion? Because you happen to agree with him?

So unbiased :roll:

First. No, every post is not an opinion. If I were to say ps2 had the largest game library of all last gen consoles, that would be fact, not opinion. You however, said you thought a certain game looked better than another game. This is what's known as opinion. It's fine to state opinions, but I then asked you to at least admit it was an opinion, and you balked.

Second. Yes, I agree with him.

Third. I am biased.

What more do you need? Stop whining.

Ahh..but that is not a quote. I added the "thought" because it is, in fact, an opinion. He said no such thing.

I will continue to whine.

No, but it shows that you agree that it was his opinion, thus making all your whiny posts pointless.

Besides, why would he need to state it when it's obviously his opinion? Grow up.

Gears looks better and its a 2 years old game.VACASCULIADAS

No, but it shows that you agree that it was his opinion, thus making all your whiny posts pointless.

Besides, why would he need to state it when it's obviously his opinion? Grow up.

SillyManimal

I can't agree that it was his opinion if he doesn't also admit that it was. To agree necessarily implies 2 people.

As for growing up, I shall do no such thing.

[QUOTE="VACASCULIADAS"]This destroys killzone 2


Apathetic-Irony

Doesn't use a 16 color pallette? Check.
Has crisp, sharp textures? Check.
Has subtle, non-overpowering motion blur? Check.
A multi-platform game that fanboys across the board can agree with? Check.

If Resident Evil 5 were PS3 exclusive I'd sell my 360 in a heartbeat.

[QUOTE="Apathetic-Irony"]

[QUOTE="VACASCULIADAS"]This destroys killzone 2


VACASCULIADAS

Doesn't use a 16 color pallette? Check.
Has crisp, sharp textures? Check.
Has subtle, non-overpowering motion blur? Check.
A multi-platform game that fanboys across the board can agree with? Check.

If Resident Evil 5 were PS3 exclusive I'd sell my 360 in a heartbeat.

He's agreeing with you.

[QUOTE="VACASCULIADAS"][QUOTE="Apathetic-Irony"]

[QUOTE="VACASCULIADAS"]This destroys killzone 2


FrozenLiquid

Doesn't use a 16 color pallette? Check.
Has crisp, sharp textures? Check.
Has subtle, non-overpowering motion blur? Check.
A multi-platform game that fanboys across the board can agree with? Check.

If Resident Evil 5 were PS3 exclusive I'd sell my 360 in a heartbeat.

He's agreeing with you.

This destroys killzone 2


VACASCULIADAS

That game won't be out until 2009, so it doesn't really count.

[QUOTE="VACASCULIADAS"]This destroys killzone 2


Cedmln

That game won't be out until 2009, so it doesn't really count.

I thought the purpose of this thread was to brag about great graphics, no? In that one screenshot alone, Resident Evil 5 shows it can have great graphics that are equal to or better than (in my opinion, better than) Killzone 2, while still having a dozen enemies on the screen, not even including your extra detailed self, at the same time. In game is in game, even if it would be released in 2012.

If nobody minds, I'd also like to bring up that there are different kinds of "good graphics". If a game looked 5x better than Killzone 2, but could only have a 12x12 room with 3 objects in it at a time, it wouldn't be that great. Killzone 2 has yet to prove its capabilities, because I have yet to see more than 6 characters on the screen at the same time, while having a decent draw distance that isn't completely blurred. I'll reserve my judgement until a final build is put out, but I consider a game like Halo with nearly endless draw distance, crisp graphics, and the capabilities to have enemies fill the screen higher up in the graphics department.

[QUOTE="VACASCULIADAS"]This destroys killzone 2


Cedmln

That game won't be out until 2009, so it doesn't really count.

But this is what it looks like now as opposed to looking at final release.

[QUOTE="SillyManimal"]

No, but it shows that you agree that it was his opinion, thus making all your whiny posts pointless.

Besides, why would he need to state it when it's obviously his opinion? Grow up.

whoisryanmack

I can't agree that it was his opinion if he doesn't also admit that it was. To agree necessarily implies 2 people.

As for growing up, I shall do no such thing.

But, you were saying you understood that it was his thought, in other words, his opinion.

Anbody can tell the difference between opinion and fact, I don't get why you are have such a hard time grasping this.

[QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="SillyManimal"]

No, but it shows that you agree that it was his opinion, thus making all your whiny posts pointless.

Besides, why would he need to state it when it's obviously his opinion? Grow up.

SillyManimal

I can't agree that it was his opinion if he doesn't also admit that it was. To agree necessarily implies 2 people.

As for growing up, I shall do no such thing.

But, you were saying you understood that it was his thought, in other words, his opinion.

Anbody can tell the difference between opinion and fact, I don't get why you are have such a hard time grasping this.

The entire point was that he wouldn't admit it was his opinion in the beginning. I knew it was, he just didn't say it. Go back and read (althought it's not very interesting).

...but really, now we're just taking this to levels that even I agree are unnecessary...and I was the troll.

[QUOTE="SillyManimal"][QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="SillyManimal"]

No, but it shows that you agree that it was his opinion, thus making all your whiny posts pointless.

Besides, why would he need to state it when it's obviously his opinion? Grow up.

whoisryanmack

I can't agree that it was his opinion if he doesn't also admit that it was. To agree necessarily implies 2 people.

As for growing up, I shall do no such thing.

But, you were saying you understood that it was his thought, in other words, his opinion.

Anbody can tell the difference between opinion and fact, I don't get why you are have such a hard time grasping this.

The entire point was that he wouldn't admit it was his opinion in the beginning. I knew it was, he just didn't say it. Go back and read (althought it's not very interesting).

...but really, now we're just taking this to levels that even I agree are unnecessary...and I was the troll.

There, so why would he need to state it, if you understood that it was his opinion? Are you just trying to make sure that some other fool doesn't misinterpret it for fact?

[QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="SillyManimal"][QUOTE="whoisryanmack"][QUOTE="SillyManimal"]

No, but it shows that you agree that it was his opinion, thus making all your whiny posts pointless.

Besides, why would he need to state it when it's obviously his opinion? Grow up.

SillyManimal

I can't agree that it was his opinion if he doesn't also admit that it was. To agree necessarily implies 2 people.

As for growing up, I shall do no such thing.

But, you were saying you understood that it was his thought, in other words, his opinion.

Anbody can tell the difference between opinion and fact, I don't get why you are have such a hard time grasping this.

The entire point was that he wouldn't admit it was his opinion in the beginning. I knew it was, he just didn't say it. Go back and read (althought it's not very interesting).

...but really, now we're just taking this to levels that even I agree are unnecessary...and I was the troll.

There, so why would he need to state it, if you understood that it was his opinion? Are you just trying to make sure that some other fool doesn't misinterpret it for fact?

There is no reason.

Best KZ 2 screenshot is from the CGI trailer.Supafly1

[QUOTE="Cedmln"]

[QUOTE="VACASCULIADAS"]

FrozenLiquid

But this is what it looks like now as opposed to looking at final release.

Hey. I'm just doing what people did with with Crysis. We knew about Crysis before Gears was released yet everybody was much more crazy about Gears than Crysis because it was way far from release.

I can honestly say that this made my jaw drop.

(Waits for unjustified bashing)

no_submission

It looks fine, but it's not as impressive as Heavenly Sword, Uncharted, and Mass Effect when up close in cinematics.BioShockOwnz

Mass Effect maybe. But Heavenly Sword and Uncharted don't have near that much detail in the characters. The chick from Heavenly sword hardly has a wrinkle on her, and the guy from uncharted is almost the same way as far as his face goes. He has the wrinkles beside his nose/mouth, but nothing in his forehead area.

[QUOTE="no_submission"] )

bluebrad1974

Please do not tell me you do not see those muddy ass textures.

[QUOTE="bluebrad1974"][QUOTE="no_submission"] )

Cedmln

Please do not tell me you do not see those muddy ass textures.

[QUOTE="Cedmln"][QUOTE="bluebrad1974"][QUOTE="no_submission"] )

VACASCULIADAS

Lost all credibility right there. Just because you have an upgraded version of the game ( oh please :roll: ) doesn't mean the game doesn't have muddy textures. I've played the game a million times in the past. I know it has muddy textures.

I can honestly say that this made my jaw drop.

(Waits for unjustified bashing)

no_submission

Is it just me or does that guy look like HHH?

[QUOTE="VACASCULIADAS"][QUOTE="Cedmln"][QUOTE="bluebrad1974"][QUOTE="no_submission"] )

Cedmln

Lost all credibility right there. Just because you have an upgraded version of the game ( oh please :roll: ) doesn't mean the game doesn't have muddy textures. I've played the game a million times in the past. I know it has muddy textures.