The Conduit vs Killzone

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Brawl578
Brawl578

895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#1 Brawl578
Member since 2008 • 895 Posts

The Conduit vs the first Killzone

Avatar image for smokingsbad
smokingsbad

38455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 smokingsbad
Member since 2004 • 38455 Posts
dammit i thought you meant Killzone 2 lol
Avatar image for Yandere
Yandere

9878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Yandere
Member since 2009 • 9878 Posts
A 2009 game vs a 2004 game? Nice.
Avatar image for urdead18
urdead18

3630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 urdead18
Member since 2008 • 3630 Posts
[QUOTE="Yandere"]A 2009 game vs a 2004 game? Nice.

What's even more sad is that they're comparable graphically.
Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

I thought both were mediocore frankly.

Avatar image for Brawl578
Brawl578

895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#6 Brawl578
Member since 2008 • 895 Posts

A 2009 game vs a 2004 game? Nice. Yandere

I can tell you haven't seen the other ridiculous vs polls.

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#7 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

Killzone2>>The Conduit>>>Killzone1

Avatar image for finesse-gamer
finesse-gamer

946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 finesse-gamer
Member since 2009 • 946 Posts

Why make a poll comparing 2 crappy games?

let's focus on the good games, people.

oh wait, TC is a wii fan, guess he has nothing else.

Avatar image for superapo
superapo

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 superapo
Member since 2009 • 1714 Posts
[QUOTE="urdead18"][QUOTE="Yandere"]A 2009 game vs a 2004 game? Nice.

What's even more sad is that they're comparable graphically.

good one
Avatar image for finesse-gamer
finesse-gamer

946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 finesse-gamer
Member since 2009 • 946 Posts

[QUOTE="urdead18"][QUOTE="Yandere"]A 2009 game vs a 2004 game? Nice. superapo
What's even more sad is that they're comparable graphically.

good one

i don't think that was a joke...

they both look horrible by todays standards.

Avatar image for TheOwnerOner
TheOwnerOner

2921

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 TheOwnerOner
Member since 2007 • 2921 Posts
I dont even think the first Killzone had online.
Avatar image for Brawl578
Brawl578

895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#12 Brawl578
Member since 2008 • 895 Posts

Why make a poll comparing 2 crappy games?

let's focus on the good games, people.

oh wait, TC is a wii fan, guess he has nothing else.

finesse-gamer

Uh-oh. Someone doesn't know that a 7.3 average means good. Oh, and you're Wii bashing is pathetic. Work on it.

Avatar image for urdead18
urdead18

3630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 urdead18
Member since 2008 • 3630 Posts

[QUOTE="superapo"][QUOTE="urdead18"] What's even more sad is that they're comparable graphically.finesse-gamer

good one

i don't think that was a joke...

they both look horrible by todays standards.

You're right, it wasn't.
Avatar image for Pinkyimp
Pinkyimp

3623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#14 Pinkyimp
Member since 2006 • 3623 Posts

Killzone2>>The Conduit>>>Killzone1

kozzy1234
This.
Avatar image for Yandere
Yandere

9878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Yandere
Member since 2009 • 9878 Posts

Killzone:

The Conduit:

For all the people that are going to talk about graphics.

Avatar image for Pinkyimp
Pinkyimp

3623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#17 Pinkyimp
Member since 2006 • 3623 Posts

Killzone looks so fuzzy and washed out, the Conduit looks very clean.

Avatar image for Brawl578
Brawl578

895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#18 Brawl578
Member since 2008 • 895 Posts

[QUOTE="Brawl578"]

[QUOTE="finesse-gamer"]

Why make a poll comparing 2 crappy games?

let's focus on the good games, people.

oh wait, TC is a wii fan, guess he has nothing else.

finesse-gamer

Uh-oh. Someone doesn't know that a 7.3 average means good. Oh, and you're Wii bashing is pathetic. Work on it.

i've played both games, and they are both crappy IMO. don't really care what the average is.

your damage control is is pathetic. Work on it.

Trust me, it would take alot more then what you said for me to get damage control.

Avatar image for finesse-gamer
finesse-gamer

946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 finesse-gamer
Member since 2009 • 946 Posts

[QUOTE="finesse-gamer"]

[QUOTE="Brawl578"]

Uh-oh. Someone doesn't know that a 7.3 average means good. Oh, and you're Wii bashing is pathetic. Work on it.

Brawl578

i've played both games, and they are both crappy IMO. don't really care what the average is.

your damage control is is pathetic. Work on it.

Trust me, it would take alot more then what you said for me to get damage control.

how's this:

you want to know if poeple think the conduit compares to killzone because you are holding onto false hope that high voltage software can make a comeback like guerrilla games did.

Avatar image for Brawl578
Brawl578

895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#20 Brawl578
Member since 2008 • 895 Posts

[QUOTE="Brawl578"]

[QUOTE="finesse-gamer"]

i've played both games, and they are both crappy IMO. don't really care what the average is.

your damage control is is pathetic. Work on it.

finesse-gamer

Trust me, it would take alot more then what you said for me to get damage control.

how's this:

you want to know if poeple think the conduit compares to killzone because you are holding onto false hope that high voltage software can make a comeback like guerrilla games did.

You are WAY off. I did this out of curiosity, to see what SW thought.

Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

6.9> 6.5.

Killzone> Conduit.

Avatar image for Yandere
Yandere

9878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Yandere
Member since 2009 • 9878 Posts

6.9> 6.5.

Killzone> Conduit.

Silverbond

Lol, I think he wanted YOUR opinion.

Avatar image for finesse-gamer
finesse-gamer

946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 finesse-gamer
Member since 2009 • 946 Posts

[QUOTE="finesse-gamer"]

[QUOTE="Brawl578"]

Trust me, it would take alot more then what you said for me to get damage control.

Brawl578

how's this:

you want to know if poeple think the conduit compares to killzone because you are holding onto false hope that high voltage software can make a comeback like guerrilla games did.

You are WAY off. I did this out of curiosity, to see what SW thought.

suure. why'd you pick killzone then? and don't say "because they averaged similarly" because there are plenty of other mediocre shooters to compare it to.

plus, killzone is an old ass game, why go so far back in time?

Avatar image for murat8
murat8

10362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#24 murat8
Member since 2006 • 10362 Posts

oh i thought u ment KZ2 but this

Killzone2>>The Conduit>>>Killzone1

kozzy1234

Avatar image for VendettaRed07
VendettaRed07

14012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25 VendettaRed07
Member since 2007 • 14012 Posts

Ive never played the first killzone so idk, but i rented the conduit, hoping it would be alright, and it wasnt, it sucked.. alot. There are ps2 shooters that do look and play better than the conduit. Sure the controls are accurate but, i dont find them to be fun at all

Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#26 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

[QUOTE="Brawl578"]

[QUOTE="finesse-gamer"]

how's this:

you want to know if poeple think the conduit compares to killzone because you are holding onto false hope that high voltage software can make a comeback like guerrilla games did.

finesse-gamer

You are WAY off. I did this out of curiosity, to see what SW thought.

suure. why'd you pick killzone then? and don't say "because they averaged similarly" because there are plenty of other mediocre shooters to compare it to.

plus, killzone is an old ass game, why go so far back in time?

You don't know what you are talking about. People have compared things on this board that are weirder than this (this isn't even weird). I have seen comparisons on Braid vrs Super Mario World...yada yada... Last time i checked, the gap between SMW and Braid is much bigger than the conduit and Kilzone. Just give him the answer he wants, and stop trying to look cool.

Avatar image for zero_snake99
zero_snake99

3478

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 zero_snake99
Member since 2004 • 3478 Posts
For a game that was developed and made by a group of about 8 people, Killzone 1 is awesome. (yes..look it up, there was about 8 people on Guerrilla Games)
Avatar image for kaangonultas
kaangonultas

1647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 kaangonultas
Member since 2008 • 1647 Posts
Both comparable games. KZ takes the online play