XXXXXX

The Conduit(wii)has more polygons on screen than Uncharted2. Tech Graphics king?

Dj-Dampleaf · 2012-09-26 04:01:09

Uncharted 2 is considered a graphical powerhouse with all its pre-rendered scripts and fire-effects, yet to be honest, it barely has many polygons on screen. Which means using bright quick events, and paying off review sites and bullshots to show for what Uncharted 2 really is, a poorly visual technical game with pre-rendered effects. Conduit Uncharted 2 First of all let's get into serious detail here: -The polygons in the Uncharted 2 shot are all over the place and some are not finished making bad texture. The gun fire and bullets hitting the wall behind Uncharted are covered in motion blur and bright colors to trick people into thinking it's realistic, when you can clearly see it's poorly done. -The ceiling in the Conduit screenshot had more texture polygons than most of the Uncharted pic. This is undeniable and the fact it stays a consistent quality with the draw distance is very impressive. While they have to use blur where the fire is in Uncharted to pretend its like an action flick but in fact, it's poor draw distance. -The Lighting on Uncharted is VERY POOR, The Window sills behind Uncharted are are super bright, yet the fire in the background where most of the light is coming from, is facing toward uncharted, which has shaded textures. not to mention with fire, there should be red tint in the textures but the PS3 cannot handle that. The Lighting in the Conduit is dynamic and moves and contains the quality with the draw distance. -The Conduit has MUCH MORE objects on the screen it can handle. the Uncharted Pic has to blur the Fire and the wooden pole in the foregorund to the left because it needs more memory to put all its focus on the spark that appears while Uncharted fires his gun.Things like the Floor, the pile of rubble nest to Uncharted, everything on the ceiling, and the fire, are ALL PRE-RENDERED, and nothing is going on except Uncharted shooting and enemy fire. -The Conduit however, can HANDLE GRAPHICS MUCH BETTER at once. While keeping the same quality with out cutting draw distance. The enemy moves, the light is dynamic and can be changed or viewed while moving around the window and is polygonal. And that's for EACH WINDOW. You are also moving and the gun fire from your gun as well. Don't forget the Light Reflections on the ceiling also move. And the Symbols on the pillars flash black and white, and can be zoomed up close to reveal those are also polygons and not Pre-Rendered. -The Conduit also retains the quality while in movement, while in Uncharted tons of blur, frame skips, and texture drops with pixels popping out and even lower draw distance happens. With even worse lighting. SO THE CONCLUSION is: The conduit for Wii has: >Better draw distance >Can handle more objects >Has more polygons on screen >Much more Dynamic Lighting >Much more texture support. >Less blur/pixel coverup. >Won't turn to crap in motion Than Uncharted 2. Thus The Conduit for Wii is the graphics king/one of the graphics kings and is graphically superior to all PS3 exclusives including God of War 3, Killzone 3, and Crysis 2 multiplat. Hopefully this helps some people. It's good to get the correct and informed information instead of distorted misinformation by rabid fans and paid review sites.

deactivated-5c79c3cfce222

Follow

4715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#151 deactivated-5c79c3cfce222

Member since 2009 • 4715 Posts

[QUOTE="Dj-Dampleaf"][QUOTE="McStrongfast"][QUOTE="Dj-Dampleaf"] No you didn't. Show me.

It's in one of my previous posts, on page 2 I think

Then I responded to it.

Nope.

12 years ago

jun_aka_pekto

Follow

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#152 jun_aka_pekto

Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]
[QUOTE="Dj-Dampleaf"]A lot of people in the last page are unintelligent, this is because you were easily manipulated by people such as Verbtex. Who knew this was a technical graphics debate but used the worst shots on low quality video as possible for the conduit and nice shots for Uncharted, which he admitted. However, this has led to many people just go "lol Uncharted looks worse than" "Lol Conduit looks crappy" "Lol troll thread,Conduit does not look" See this is a problem when the thread and top of Op all pretty much state technical graphics and not eye candy, and some even read the whole Op which clearly talks about technical graphics, you read his and others manipulative posts and this somehow wipes out all your brain cells and then you become dumb, including after reading the whole Op and start posting about eye candy out of nowhere. Again: Looks=/=Draw Distance, lighting, polygons effects and textures not pre-rendered, global dominance, object endurance, polygons on screen at once, A.I variety in crowded environment, fast active pallete swapping, no motion blur or texture distortion. NOW it would be nice if someone does not agree to maybe counter some points in the Op. Which nobody has yet except one, nobody else does and Verb cheated, so how can you guys even be complaining? If I am wrong show me.Dj-Dampleaf

What exactly is wrong with the lighting I showed in the UC3 London Underground images or of the draw distance in The Brass city map? In the London map, the lighting effects change as objects cast shadows and as the camera point changes. In the Brass City map, far structures and objects maintain their definition and clarity as the distance increase. I suppose I could've posted images with water reflections as well which both UC2 and UC3 do well. Those and shadows. The shadows I've seen thus far in The Conduit leave a lot to be desired.

The places were the lighting is most impressive in Uncharted they have to remove or cut things in order to do it. just like the first pic, where Nate shooting a gun looks nice, especially the spark of the gun, and the enemies shooting the well lit wall behind him, however,t hey have to blur the background that's like not even 6 feet away, they have inconsistent color depth, and they don't have realistic red tinted lighting with the fire, which makes no sense. The explanation is that it was already doing things it could not handle already. This also is true for water reflections. Also I am using Uncharted 2 since that is said to be the best graphically by many. Both have similar problems however.

I tried to get that angle during a replay of the chapter "Urban Warfare" from the singleplayer campaign. There's no way unless maybe that screenshot you posted is from a co-op game. The only blur I saw was when focusing with the sights. When I fired in the regular view, I didn't notice much blur like that in the image you posted. I also noticed the brightness is maxed. I'm not sure why the discrepancy. But, I'd guess, the blur from your image is from another player's perspective. I kept a close watch during the gun battle in that part of Urban Warfare and i just didn't see the blur at that part of the level.

I'm guessing it may be a coop game because there's no way Drake can shoot in one direction while the camera is pointed in another.