[QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="EliasAlucard"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="EliasAlucard"][QUOTE="Gamer46"][QUOTE="EliasAlucard"][QUOTE="Kaosed"] [QUOTE="dcm06"]you deserve to get flamed for this one gba is 2002 handheld system ps3 is 2006. EliasAlucard
yet the gba is 30 times inferior and its kickin ps3s ass
The difference in price could have something to do with it.Like $400 isn't more significant? Heck, like $250 isn't much more than a GBA? Stop the excuse making.
How much does the GBA cost? 50 bucks? You think that's even comparable to 600 bucks?You think that $50 is comparable to $400? Just stop.
Point is, any kid can afford a GBA, and there are great games for it since it's established. Most parents can afford a Wii or 360. PS3 is a bit more expensive. Believe me, the price does matter.Of course the price matters, but you still don't have much of a point. If it was that big a deal 360 would be getting outsold by GBA as well, but it's not.
So what you're saying is that the GBA would still outsell the PS3 if they were equal in price? Face it, the price matters. I got a good point here.lol, give it a freaking rest you two. It's not so funny because of some ridiculous price difference. It's funny cause a 5 year + old system, one that could have its software played on another handheld, and one that hasn't released a "killer-ap" in years, is outselling the almighty, be-all-to-end-all $600 mega-powered PS3 with its blu-ray and cell-processor....
Sorry, but that's freaking hilarious!
Log in to comment