The Hermits have been Owned.

Wow, you have a warrior spirit. Stalin would have made you a general to fight against Martians.

But seriously. What's the point? :roll: one reason?

[QUOTE="kidcool189"]

although i will admit, historicalSD...

you've successfully trolled a good handful of people in this thread, i tip my hat too you sir

HistoricalSD

i haven't trolled anyone, so you miserable, but sadly, fail. is it this way you handle ownages? tell me, because i am relatively new to SW

I recommend you guys do what this says...

Turns out hermits did'nt get owned at all...

you did not answer my question. was it perhaps too difficult? why cant hermits face Ownage as real Men... poor

HistoricalSD

Lol, I'll stay out of this one.

[QUOTE="-Traveller-"]

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

Spin this INTO ownage? im sorry, isn't this ownage? 1.5 / 10. lmao. RTS on consoles destroy the PC RTS. or are you saying 1.5 is masterful?

HistoricalSD

It's like doing this:

Hour of Victory 2.0

History Channel: Battle of the Pacific 2.0

Lawlz, 360 can't do "Historic First-Person Shooters".

Ja.

you did not answer my question. was it perhaps too difficult? why cant hermits face Ownage as real Men... poor

1.5 isn't masterful. Is 2.0? I dunno, using your logic, seems you can't admit ownage either.

See how silly your argument is?

You can't even argue well, let alone troll well.

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

you did not answer my question. was it perhaps too difficult? why cant hermits face Ownage as real Men... poor

SpruceCaboose

I asked first, tough guy.

and the ownage?

1.5 / 10. lol. must be hard to be a hermit nowadays

Lol, I'll stay out of this one.

RobbieH1234

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

you did not answer my question. was it perhaps too difficult? why cant hermits face Ownage as real Men... poor

HistoricalSD

I asked first, tough guy.

and the ownage?

1.5 / 10. lol. must be hard to be a hermit nowadays

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

[QUOTE="-Traveller-"]

It's like doing this:

Hour of Victory 2.0

History Channel: Battle of the Pacific 2.0

Lawlz, 360 can't do "Historic First-Person Shooters".

Ja.

-Traveller-

you did not answer my question. was it perhaps too difficult? why cant hermits face Ownage as real Men... poor

1.5 isn't masterful. Is 2.0? I dunno, using your logic, seems you can't admit ownage either.

See how silly your argument is?

You can't even argue well, let alone troll well.

if i even came remotely close to wanting to be a troll, i'd do it best. good you answered my question. was it hard? oooh. hard to face the ownage, thogh, perhaps?

[QUOTE="-Traveller-"]

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

you did not answer my question. was it perhaps too difficult? why cant hermits face Ownage as real Men... poor

HistoricalSD

1.5 isn't masterful. Is 2.0? I dunno, using your logic, seems you can't admit ownage either.

See how silly your argument is?

You can't even argue well, let alone troll well.

if i even came remotely close to wanting to be a troll, i'd do it best. good you answered my question. was it hard? oooh. hard to face the ownage, thogh, perhaps?

Lol, you just ignored my questions. You fail at your own argument.

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"] You did not answer the question: How is this ownage? Its not, so there is that point....SpruceCaboose

I asked first, tough guy.

and the ownage?

1.5 / 10. lol. must be hard to be a hermit nowadays

dont try to be funny or act stupid. this is an RTS. in my school, since blizzard is taking so long time with their games, this game had anticipation and many of guys in my area called it "StarCraft the Second"

yeah, no hype, lol...

Come on, forget this, PC has way better bad games!

LINK

Look at em all, this is a good thing people! These bad games are giving people jobs! :D

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

you did not answer my question. was it perhaps too difficult? why cant hermits face Ownage as real Men... poor

I asked first, tough guy.

and the ownage?

1.5 / 10. lol. must be hard to be a hermit nowadays

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

[QUOTE="-Traveller-"]

1.5 isn't masterful. Is 2.0? I dunno, using your logic, seems you can't admit ownage either.

See how silly your argument is?

You can't even argue well, let alone troll well.

-Traveller-

if i even came remotely close to wanting to be a troll, i'd do it best. good you answered my question. was it hard? oooh. hard to face the ownage, thogh, perhaps?

Lol, you just ignored my questions. You fail at your own argument.

which embarrassing questions? dude, just MOVE on. accept the 1.5 / 10 and pary StarCraft 2 will score well, or that will be another major ownage. lmao kid..

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

I asked first, tough guy.

and the ownage?

1.5 / 10. lol. must be hard to be a hermit nowadays

HistoricalSD

dont try to be funny or act stupid. this is an RTS. in my school, since blizzard is taking so long time with their games, this game had anticipation and many of guys in my area called it "StarCraft the Second"

yeah, no hype, lol...

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

I asked first, tough guy.

and the ownage?

1.5 / 10. lol. must be hard to be a hermit nowadays

HistoricalSD

dont try to be funny or act stupid. this is an RTS. in my school, since blizzard is taking so long time with their games, this game had anticipation and many of guys in my area called it "StarCraft the Second"

yeah, no hype, lol...

That's nothing like the School of Hard Knocks ya know.

Fanboy fights are so fun. This is never gonna get old.

Tip to arguers: Just let him go....

[QUOTE="Unforgiven2870"]

[QUOTE="Phantom_--"]

OMG teh ownage iz SUPA!!!

Dude srlsy, how does ONE incredibly bad rts somehow pwn hermits? That game wasn't even hyped, I didn't expect it to get over a 6.5 at most. There's tons of great rts on PC, you need to stop failing.

> joke thread or TC is incredibly retarded.

HistoricalSD

i am not a trolljoker. RTS on PC, 1.5/10. DEAL WITH IT

Dear god... he actually means it. Stop feeding him people, he's just a troll

facepalm*

With PC's higher standards if that game was released on 360 it would have been AAAA cy@Brainkiller05

PC doesnt have higher standards. dont try to faily spin 1.5. then you may have a good day, k thx bye.

[QUOTE="Unforgiven2870"]

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

do not -- under any circumstances -- try to spin the OWNAGE that has occured. this game was hyped AAA RTS, to show that HW failed and RTS on consoles sucks.

i remember the hermits "lol, RTSs on consoles..." when HW got 6.5

look now..

HistoricalSD

both well-known and hyped? the difference: this game showed that it's embarrassing developing an RTS for the PC.

[QUOTE="-Traveller-"]

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

if i even came remotely close to wanting to be a troll, i'd do it best. good you answered my question. was it hard? oooh. hard to face the ownage, thogh, perhaps?

HistoricalSD

Lol, you just ignored my questions. You fail at your own argument.

which embarrassing questions? dude, just MOVE on. accept the 1.5 / 10 and pary StarCraft 2 will score well, or that will be another major ownage. lmao kid..

"1.5 isn't masterful. Is 2.0?"

"See how silly your argument is?"

Answer my questions. I answered yours. My top question is the same as yours, so were your questions embarassing? Haha you fail at actually thinking in a coherent fashion.

Fanboy fights are so fun. This is never gonna get old.

Tip to arguers: Just let him go....

LGTX

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

[QUOTE="Unforgiven2870"]umm Comparing an Inde game to a Well known game is just not possible.Links to said Hype?

TheGreatOutdoor

both well-known and hyped? the difference: this game showed that it's embarrassing developing an RTS for the PC.

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"] To have ownage, a game must have had hype. Without hype, there is no flop and thus no ownage. ;)Unforgiven2870

dont try to be funny or act stupid. this is an RTS. in my school, since blizzard is taking so long time with their games, this game had anticipation and many of guys in my area called it "StarCraft the Second"

yeah, no hype, lol...

That's nothing like the School of Hard Knocks ya know.

hard about that 1. damn, feeling sorry for all those kids trapped there.

and once again, fail @ countering my arguemnts. to say that this game wasnt hyped or something would like be saying 'youre not my mom' to your own mom

Owned hermits. This game was supposed to be your starcraft III and DOWIII and it wasnt lollolololololololololololQQQQQQQQQ/sarcasm

Why aren't there any screenshots of Crysis in this thread yet? You're slacking, hermits.Zoso-8

No one has said that killzone looks better ;)

[QUOTE="-Traveller-"]

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

if i even came remotely close to wanting to be a troll, i'd do it best. good you answered my question. was it hard? oooh. hard to face the ownage, thogh, perhaps?

Lol, you just ignored my questions. You fail at your own argument.

which embarrassing questions? dude, just MOVE on. accept the 1.5 / 10 and pary StarCraft 2 will score well, or that will be another major ownage. lmao kid..

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

[QUOTE="-Traveller-"]

Lol, you just ignored my questions. You fail at your own argument.

-Traveller-

which embarrassing questions? dude, just MOVE on. accept the 1.5 / 10 and pary StarCraft 2 will score well, or that will be another major ownage. lmao kid..

"1.5 isn't masterful. Is 2.0?"

"See how silly your argument is?"

Answer my questions. I answered yours. My top question is the same as yours, so were your questions embarassing? Haha you fail at actually thinking in a coherent fashion.

it got 1.5, not 2.0. read the review and get a bit owned.

and you're trying to sound so smart, but you unfortunetaly fail.

hard about that 1. damn, feeling sorry for all those kids trapped there.

and once again, fail @ countering my arguemnts. to say that this game wasnt hyped or something would like be saying 'youre not my mom' to your own mom

HistoricalSD

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

[QUOTE="-Traveller-"]

Lol, you just ignored my questions. You fail at your own argument.

irish4eva

which embarrassing questions? dude, just MOVE on. accept the 1.5 / 10 and pary StarCraft 2 will score well, or that will be another major ownage. lmao kid..

all the games on the PC (especially the RTSs, lol) are hyped. believe, this is coming from some1 that does have a gaming PC, unlike many others here posting on the gamespot forums.......

Gamespot needs to rate a PC RTS 0.1. Interesting what will happen here then :D

This is hilarious, keep it up guys

:evil:

[QUOTE="-Traveller-"]

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

which embarrassing questions? dude, just MOVE on. accept the 1.5 / 10 and pary StarCraft 2 will score well, or that will be another major ownage. lmao kid..

HistoricalSD

"1.5 isn't masterful. Is 2.0?"

"See how silly your argument is?"

Answer my questions. I answered yours. My top question is the same as yours, so were your questions embarassing? Haha you fail at actually thinking in a coherent fashion.

it got 1.5, not 2.0. read the review and get a bit owned.

and you're trying to sound so smart, but you unfortunetaly fail.

I don't need to try and sound smart, your argument with me makes me look all the smarter.

The difference between 1.5 and 2.0 isn't huge, so why can't you admit ownage based off your own logic?

Ahhhh, I love arguing with fanboys who just don't have a clue. :D

[QUOTE="Unforgiven2870"]

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

dont try to be funny or act stupid. this is an RTS. in my school, since blizzard is taking so long time with their games, this game had anticipation and many of guys in my area called it "StarCraft the Second"

yeah, no hype, lol...

HistoricalSD

That's nothing like the School of Hard Knocks ya know.

hard about that 1. damn, feeling sorry for all those kids trapped there.

and once again, fail @ countering my arguemnts. to say that this game wasnt hyped or something would like be saying 'youre not my mom' to your own mom

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]To have ownage, a game must have had hype. Without hype, there is no flop and thus no ownage. ;)HistoricalSD

dont try to be funny or act stupid. this is an RTS. in my school, since blizzard is taking so long time with their games, this game had anticipation and many of guys in my area called it "StarCraft the Second"

yeah, no hype, lol...

Uhhh...

This is Gamespot, not your high school. Even if everyone in the whole world, with the exception of users on Gamespot's System Wars, hyped this game as the second coming, it wouldn't be a flop here. In order to qualify for flopping...it has to be hyped here in System Wars. Otherwise, it's not.

From sub's System Wars Welcome and Information sticky thread:

Hype

When a highly anticipated game is announced, media hype tends to be generated, and supporters of that game, or the system it's on, speculate on the quality of the upcoming title. This is seen in System Wars in the form of review score hyping. In the past, games were "hyped" to a certain review score tier (A, AA, AAA) in "official hype threads". This system has fallen out of practice, and new official hype threads are not being created.

.

Flops

Certain games become highly anticipated and followed by System Wars, typically high-profile games believed to be "system sellers" (exclusive games of a high caliber that lead to new users buying into a platform). When these games become hyped, a score prediction is made, however sometimes a game fails to receive the review score that was predicted by the posters hyping the title. When a game's actual review score is lower than its predicted review score, it is said to have "flopped".

There is currently some disagreement on a game being considered a "true flop", and growing debate over what review scores "count" for that flop. The official policies of System Wars currently dictate that only GameSpot scores count, however other sites are often used to attempt to predict GameSpot's review scores.

System Wars is self-contained and only games that are hyped here are considered flops should they fail to live up to that hype. Again, the kids at your high school may have hyped it, but unless you can link us to hype threads here in System Wars, then you have no legs to stand on.

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

[QUOTE="Unforgiven2870"]What school is that? The School of TrollJokers? umnm you do realize that....

That's nothing like the School of Hard Knocks ya know.

Unforgiven2870

hard about that 1. damn, feeling sorry for all those kids trapped there.

and once again, fail @ countering my arguemnts. to say that this game wasnt hyped or something would like be saying 'youre not my mom' to your own mom

He never provides links. Check out "Animal-Mothers" sig when you see them on next. It's a quote of this guy, stating something and not providing a link.

I never saw one person hyping up this game, so why all the noise?

[QUOTE="irish4eva"][QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

which embarrassing questions? dude, just MOVE on. accept the 1.5 / 10 and pary StarCraft 2 will score well, or that will be another major ownage. lmao kid..

HistoricalSD

all the games on the PC (especially the RTSs, lol) are hyped. believe, this is coming from some1 that does have a gaming PC, unlike many others here posting on the gamespot forums.......

U PC game? lmfao then u really know nothing of RTS games then and btw I have a Gaming pc with pictures to boot so please where the PC of this said PC u have now?

Unforgiven2870

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]To have ownage, a game must have had hype. Without hype, there is no flop and thus no ownage. ;)TreyoftheDead

dont try to be funny or act stupid. this is an RTS. in my school, since blizzard is taking so long time with their games, this game had anticipation and many of guys in my area called it "StarCraft the Second"

yeah, no hype, lol...

Uhhh...

This is Gamespot, not your high school. Even if everyone in the whole world, with the exception of users on Gamespot's System Wars, hyped this game as the second coming, it wouldn't be a flop here. In order to qualify for flopping...it has to be hyped here in System Wars. Otherwise, it's not.

From sub's System Wars Welcome and Information sticky thread:

Hype

When a highly anticipated game is announced, media hype tends to be generated, and supporters of that game, or the system it's on, speculate on the quality of the upcoming title. This is seen in System Wars in the form of review score hyping. In the past, games were "hyped" to a certain review score tier (A, AA, AAA) in "official hype threads". This system has fallen out of practice, and new official hype threads are not being created.

.

Flops

Certain games become highly anticipated and followed by System Wars, typically high-profile games believed to be "system sellers" (exclusive games of a high caliber that lead to new users buying into a platform). When these games become hyped, a score prediction is made, however sometimes a game fails to receive the review score that was predicted by the posters hyping the title. When a game's actual review score is lower than its predicted review score, it is said to have "flopped".

There is currently some disagreement on a game being considered a "true flop", and growing debate over what review scores "count" for that flop. The official policies of System Wars currently dictate that only GameSpot scores count, however other sites are often used to attempt to predict GameSpot's review scores.

System Wars is self-contained and only games that are hyped here are considered flops should they fail to live up to that hype. Again, the kids at your high school may have hyped it, but unless you can link us to hype threads here in System Wars, then you have no legs to stand on.

nice 1. you just welcomed the first self-ownage of this thread (not counting all the other Hermits).

the text says it's all about a GameSpot score, and 1.5 / 10 is a flop, since its a very low score for the PC. lol. wonder if any Hermit's buying the game....?

nice 1. you just welcomed the first self-ownage of this thread (not counting all the other Hermits).

the text says it's all about a GameSpot score, and 1.5 / 10 is a flop, since its a very low score for the PC. lol. wonder if any Hermit's buying the game....?

HistoricalSD

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

[QUOTE="irish4eva"] Halo war was hyped AA-AAA.:O SVM wasent even hyped.... And errr Medieval total war(released 2002) and Rome:Total war(Released 2004) Are waaaay better then halo wars. And C&C+Endwar are far better then halo warsUnforgiven2870

all the games on the PC (especially the RTSs, lol) are hyped. believe, this is coming from some1 that does have a gaming PC, unlike many others here posting on the gamespot forums.......

3 GB ram, 1 8800 GTX and Core 2 Intel CPU

the text says it's all about a GameSpot score, and 1.5 / 10 is a flop, since its a very low score for the PC. lol. wonder if any Hermit's buying the game....?HistoricalSD

[QUOTE="HistoricalSD"]

nice 1. you just welcomed the first self-ownage of this thread (not counting all the other Hermits).

the text says it's all about a GameSpot score, and 1.5 / 10 is a flop, since its a very low score for the PC. lol. wonder if any Hermit's buying the game....?

SpruceCaboose

Without you showing us some hype, there is no flop. Real, GameSpot hype, not "at my school" junk. You provide that, I will accept ownage on behalf of all SW users. But only real hype from at least a few posters who hyped this as a "system seller".

a game doesnt need 2 be hyped as a "system seller" to be able to be a flop. this is the most ridiculous thing i have read on gamespot today. thanks for the laughs,.

Remember children: Only he who has a gaming PC knows that all RTSes are hyped, others don't.

This topic is currently N1 on my "Laugh-your-***-off threads" list.