The Last of Us is an unprofitable trash core game *NO SPOILERS*

So innovation is bad now, great. :roll:

zeeshanhaider

and so TC fled.

The thing people seem to be forgetting in debates like this is that you are exchanging a nice long RPG like FF III or even FF VII with games like TLOU. In other words, the money that could have been thrown into a really long story is now being thrown at developing ultra realistic sweat. This is really sad, and the obvious reason why so many rpgs come to handhelds and even mobile devices over consoles. Just so much money to have to put into a 40 hour game when you are trying to render so much stuff on screen at once. Hopefully though, the game will sell a lot of units.psx_warrior

[QUOTE="Dilrod"]

Naughty Dog had the money, Im sure Sony put some in it, but they aren't the sole provider here.  Naughty Dog has made a ton of money this gen.

CallOfDutyRulez

So why is SONY only making $16 million in quarterly profits while Microsoft is making close to $500 million?

Microsoft uses the same IPs over and over again to lower development costs. SONY tries to fund great, innovative games that take up too much money and garner crap sales. How many times must it take for you cows to realize people want to be milked dry?

[QUOTE="LOXO7"]How many games did Sony publish this generation? Even if they didn't have the money, they could get money from a loan. The number of successful games they already published is evidence of their capabilities of paying back the loan and interest.

When games barley make profit, it is of no consequence to us. We get to play great games. Any kind of positive profits are still growth. If these kinds of numbers are not good enough then maybe the creators should look at cutting their production expenses more so then their innovative ideas?psx_warrior

call of duty is the greatest fps ever made

call of duty is the greatest fps ever made

Sweenix

Very true.

CallofDutyRulez? :lol: Yeah, get lost you filthy casual.

At least you're level 10 though.

speedfreak48t5p

So what TC is saying is "games that are different and innovative are bad for the industry."

And his name is "CallOfDutyRulez".

Must be a troll topic.

So what TC is saying is "games that are different and innovative are bad for the industry."

And his name is "CallOfDutyRulez".

Must be a troll topic.

turtlethetaffer

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]

So what TC is saying is "games that are different and innovative are bad for the industry."

And his name is "CallOfDutyRulez".

Must be a troll topic.

maddogmark25

Well I didn't. I just posted here a little bit ago.

But yeah SW is incredibly easy to troll.

Between you and me, LETS just say you don't wanna KNOW why they call themselves NaughtyDog

CoD is like Justin Bieber.

[QUOTE="Dilrod"]

Naughty Dog had the money, Im sure Sony put some in it, but they aren't the sole provider here.  Naughty Dog has made a ton of money this gen.

CallOfDutyRulez

So why is SONY only making $16 million in quarterly profits while Microsoft is making close to $500 million?

Microsoft uses the same IPs over and over again to lower development costs. SONY tries to fund great, innovative games that take up too much money and garner crap sales. How many times must it take for you cows to realize people want to be milked dry?

You're an unprofitable trash core game.