[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="brofists"] "A 3-4% difference is huge WHEN spanning across a sample size of 30, where an addition of an AAAAE would only budge the average a fraction of a percentage." "Exactly, and this further proves the point that every body, but xbots, already knew as common sense, that PS3 exclusives are of a higher quality, and dominate" And if that already wasn't evidence enough. http://www.industrygamers.com/news/ps3-outshining-xbox-360-in-exclusives-category-shows-metacritic-data/brofists
What evidence? Where are your quotes from? :? They seem like they come from a good source of reasonable journalism that uses terminology like 'xbots' and fanboy baiting like 'ps3 exclusives dominate.'3% = domination? Don't be so ridiculous. I don't know what it is that you hate about yourself so much to warrant such pathetic love for a games machine, but it's cringe-worthy just reading sh!t like this. I'm not even saying PS3 exclusives *aren't* better - there's certainly more of them - but the means you're using to try and prove it is just absurd. It's not something that can be demonstrated via 'evidence.'
Some games on metacritic have 10 reviews. Some have 150 reviews. Some are reviewed by fansites. Playstation Lifestyle, despite being utterly amateurish to the core, is considered. Websites run by a *single person*, are considered. Some games get reviewed by a good mix of sites. Other games get reviewed by Playstation/Xbox-only sites and magazines more so than anything else. There are also far more playstation-specific publications than there are xbox or Wii publications. All of these things make a difference.
They make the scores exactly what they are supposed to be - a general idea of a game's quality, not a pin point precise measurement of greatness. Can you tell me the difference between 93.4% and 93.5%? I'd love to hear it.
Its hilarious how you want to point the fanboy finger, Yet here you are, getting all worked up, like a representative of M$. Arguing toorth and nail for your beloved piece of plastic in the 360. You sir are the one acting pathetic. You have your M$ panties up in a bunch, and riding deep into your M$ owned ass. Loosen them up. And the same thing which you said, CAN also be applied to the M$ reviewed exclusives. How many biased pro M$ sites reviewed M$ exclusives? Look at all the big gamimg sites that are supposed to be neutral but show heavy M$ bias too. There's no way ODST earned the scores it got. But the bottom line is that he and you are wrong. And are you stupid or what xbot? READ the F'N quote moron. "A 3-4% difference is huge WHEN spanning across a sample size of 30, where an addition of an AAAAE would only budge the average a fraction of a percentage." Can you comprehend that? You want to damage control some more xbot? I'm not worked up at all my friend, nor did i say anything positive about microsoft. If you read with your fanboy goggles taken off it says playstation/xbox/wii. The same applies to everything. Nowhere did i say that PS3 exclusives are rated by biased authorities and others aren't. Next time actually read the post rather than insta-raging, eh? Merely pointing out the error in the logic. And like i said; where does the quote come from? Do you seem to think that anything in a quote is a fact? Read the quote, moron: "brofists is a big blubbering vagina with very easily hurt ten year old girl feelings." Read the quote, man. Read the quote.
Log in to comment