The loss of Rare

  • 96 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for gamer4life85
gamer4life85

1203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 gamer4life85
Member since 2003 • 1203 Posts

some of the developers left before nintendo sold rare noone left rare when Nintendo Sold them.

Kameo was really good game but short

Perfect  Dark zero was a decent game just there aiming was off most likely cause microsoft rushed PDZ

viva Pinata is really good sim game

 If anything RARE games seem to be getting better.

The original Banjo team is making the new banjo game.

everyone on this board makes it seem whem microsoft got rare everyone left truth is most of the good teams are still there. 

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

PDZ is NOT a AAA game, GS screwed up because they were dazzled by the next gen. The game is not even AA.GunSmith1_basic

Perfect Dark Zero is a AAA game on GS. Fact. 

Avatar image for Iyethar
Iyethar

4660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Iyethar
Member since 2006 • 4660 Posts

Not much of a loss - if you look at what Rare's earned for Microsoft, it becomes clear that Microsoft paid way too much money.

Nintendo got more cash for Rare than Rare ever would have earned for them.  It was a good deal for Nintendo, not so much for Microsoft.

Avatar image for Click_Clock
Click_Clock

3632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Click_Clock
Member since 2005 • 3632 Posts
Every Rare game on the Xbox360 scored at last an 8.2+ and one of them even scored an AAA. So system war logic is that an AA-AAA developer is crap? Wow, then every other developer out there sucks too.
Avatar image for Golden_surfer
Golden_surfer

5749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Golden_surfer
Member since 2004 • 5749 Posts

Every Rare game on the Xbox360 scored at last an 8.2+ and one of them even scored an AAA. So system war logic is that an AA-AAA developer is crap? Wow, then every other developer out there sucks too.Click_Clock
What about the investment? do you think MS cares those games scored good when they don't make money?

 

Not to mention everyone knows those games are mediocre when compared with their work at nintendo.  

Avatar image for D_Znuhtz
D_Znuhtz

2276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 D_Znuhtz
Member since 2004 • 2276 Posts

How big of a loss, do you believe that selling rare to Xbox is to Nintendo, especially with games such as Kameo, Perfect Dark, Conker and Banjo Kazooie being released on the Xbox and the 360?

Gismo25

None of those games you listed are really any good. Doesn't sound like a loss. Last time I bought a Rare game was Battletoads for the Gameboy, if I remember correctly. 

Avatar image for D_Znuhtz
D_Znuhtz

2276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 D_Znuhtz
Member since 2004 • 2276 Posts

[QUOTE="GunSmith1_basic"]PDZ is NOT a AAA game, GS screwed up because they were dazzled by the next gen. The game is not even AA.Blackbond

Perfect Dark Zero is a AAA game on GS. Fact.

On GS sure, but it looks strange when they're the only ones. Does anyone still play PDZ? That's what I thought. 

Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#58 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts
[QUOTE="Blackbond"]

[QUOTE="GunSmith1_basic"]PDZ is NOT a AAA game, GS screwed up because they were dazzled by the next gen. The game is not even AA.D_Znuhtz

Perfect Dark Zero is a AAA game on GS. Fact.

On GS sure, but it looks strange when they're the only ones. Does anyone still play PDZ? That's what I thought. 

Panzer_Zwie (spelling) just finished it, and he said it was a huge let down.
Avatar image for wavebrid
wavebrid

8204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 wavebrid
Member since 2006 • 8204 Posts
[QUOTE="wavebrid"][QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

[QUOTE="organic_machine"]Rare totally sucks now. After Conker's bad fur day, the quality of their games plummited. Perfect Dark Zero was the saddest excuse for a game that I have ever played and this is coming from someone who is a Perfect Dark fan. Unfortunately, I have not played Viva Pinata, though I hear it is good, I cannot comment on it until I have played it. SecretPolice

   

                    You are entitled to an opinion but GS and millions of others disagree !!  PDZ= AAA launch title ;)

so wario ware is a aaa :|

 

     You have yet to nap I see - ;)   If you are not sleepy than maybe you are just a bit dense - no offence b/c I've seen this before.

                  Okay look at the post again I was responding too - He said PDZ was the " saddest excuse for a game " - now did I say anything about Wario Ware being sad, poor, suck or even mention it at all ???  No I only stated a fact you should take notes ;)

                  Take those goggles and file them under " G " than come back and maybe we can talk ;)

again you avoding my question and when dose gs Opioion = fact? :roll:

 

 

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45724 Posts
[QUOTE="D_Znuhtz"][QUOTE="Blackbond"]

[QUOTE="GunSmith1_basic"]PDZ is NOT a AAA game, GS screwed up because they were dazzled by the next gen. The game is not even AA.Nintendo_Ownes7

Perfect Dark Zero is a AAA game on GS. Fact.

On GS sure, but it looks strange when they're the only ones. Does anyone still play PDZ? That's what I thought. 

Panzer_Zwie (spelling) just finished it, and he said it was a huge let down.

 

             See this is what I find funny - If PDZ was the same ( not possible on the inferior Wii ) but  what Wii owner would think it's not all that on their little Wii? I mean - graphics, gameplay, FUN, ease of use, ONLINE ect.   Cmon sheeple give me some sort of logic on this one. For a $50.00 bill you coulda been a contender ;)

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45724 Posts
[QUOTE="SecretPolice"][QUOTE="wavebrid"][QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

[QUOTE="organic_machine"]Rare totally sucks now. After Conker's bad fur day, the quality of their games plummited. Perfect Dark Zero was the saddest excuse for a game that I have ever played and this is coming from someone who is a Perfect Dark fan. Unfortunately, I have not played Viva Pinata, though I hear it is good, I cannot comment on it until I have played it. wavebrid

   

                    You are entitled to an opinion but GS and millions of others disagree !!  PDZ= AAA launch title ;)

so wario ware is a aaa :|

 

     You have yet to nap I see - ;)   If you are not sleepy than maybe you are just a bit dense - no offence b/c I've seen this before.

                  Okay look at the post again I was responding too - He said PDZ was the " saddest excuse for a game " - now did I say anything about Wario Ware being sad, poor, suck or even mention it at all ???  No I only stated a fact you should take notes ;)

                  Take those goggles and file them under " G " than come back and maybe we can talk ;)

again you avoding my question and when dose gs Opioion = fact? :roll:

 

 

Huh lmao again you need a nap ;) Fact = AAA on GS and what real question have you asked other than from a fanboy prospective as usual?    Here lemme try... Umm let me prove lol that Wii gamers would like more great games - Just GTFO of here - you give Wii fans a bad rep.
Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#62 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts
[QUOTE="Nintendo_Ownes7"][QUOTE="D_Znuhtz"][QUOTE="Blackbond"]

[QUOTE="GunSmith1_basic"]PDZ is NOT a AAA game, GS screwed up because they were dazzled by the next gen. The game is not even AA.SecretPolice

Perfect Dark Zero is a AAA game on GS. Fact.

On GS sure, but it looks strange when they're the only ones. Does anyone still play PDZ? That's what I thought. 

Panzer_Zwie (spelling) just finished it, and he said it was a huge let down.

 

             See this is what I find funny - If PDZ was the same ( not possible on the inferior Wii ) but  what Wii owner would think it's not all that on their little Wii? I mean - graphics, gameplay, FUN, ease of use, ONLINE ect.   Cmon sheeple give me some sort of logic on this one. For a $50.00 bill you coulda been a contender ;)

I'm not a Sheep and neither is Panzer_Zwei because Panzer_Zwei is a Sega Fan and his only next gen console is the 360, I'm not really a Sheep because sure I like Nintendo but I'm not really a Sheep because I like other consoles I've own more then one console each gen and I also own a 360 my most anticipated games for the 360 are Bioshock, Banjo 3, Halo 3 I also played Kameo and I thought it was fun but it wasn't IMO what Rare is capable of but Banjo 3 is going to be good because it is the same team that made the other ones.
Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts

[QUOTE="GunSmith1_basic"]PDZ is NOT a AAA game, GS screwed up because they were dazzled by the next gen.  The game is not even AA.Bread_or_Decide

PDZ is over rated here at gamespot but that doesn't mean the game is worthless.

PDZ, Kameo, and Viva Pinata are three good games and Rare only seems to be getting better with each release.

Why PDZ is a total failure is because the original Perfect Dark still remains as one of the greatest FPS experiences ever made. It was its own thing. Then Halo came out and set the console FPS standard. Then when PDZ came out, I was hoping to experience the greatness of PD in the next gen format. Not so. It took PD and made it almost a clone copy of the Halo formula. They took the persoanlity that made the original great and fused it with what was popular at the time.

The problem with games like Halo is that, while they are great games, their critical success hurts the industry with copyoffs.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45724 Posts
[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]

[QUOTE="GunSmith1_basic"]PDZ is NOT a AAA game, GS screwed up because they were dazzled by the next gen.  The game is not even AA.organic_machine

PDZ is over rated here at gamespot but that doesn't mean the game is worthless.

PDZ, Kameo, and Viva Pinata are three good games and Rare only seems to be getting better with each release.

Why PDZ is a total failure is because the original Perfect Dark still remains as one of the greatest FPS experiences ever made. It was its own thing. Then Halo came out and set the console FPS standard. Then when PDZ came out, I was hoping to experience the greatness of PD in the next gen format. Not so. It took PD and made it almost a clone copy of the Halo formula. They took the persoanlity that made the original great and fused it with what was popular at the time.

The problem with games like Halo is that, while they are great games, their critical success hurts the industry with copyoffs.

    Again with stuff like PDZ is " a total failure " just promotes such a loss of cred that Wii fans should just stop before evryone starts hating Wii b/c of the nonsense spewed from it's current fan base - IMO ;)
Avatar image for wavebrid
wavebrid

8204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 wavebrid
Member since 2006 • 8204 Posts
[QUOTE="wavebrid"][QUOTE="SecretPolice"][QUOTE="wavebrid"][QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

[QUOTE="organic_machine"]Rare totally sucks now. After Conker's bad fur day, the quality of their games plummited. Perfect Dark Zero was the saddest excuse for a game that I have ever played and this is coming from someone who is a Perfect Dark fan. Unfortunately, I have not played Viva Pinata, though I hear it is good, I cannot comment on it until I have played it. SecretPolice

   

                    You are entitled to an opinion but GS and millions of others disagree !!  PDZ= AAA launch title ;)

so wario ware is a aaa :|

 

     You have yet to nap I see - ;)   If you are not sleepy than maybe you are just a bit dense - no offence b/c I've seen this before.

                  Okay look at the post again I was responding too - He said PDZ was the " saddest excuse for a game " - now did I say anything about Wario Ware being sad, poor, suck or even mention it at all ???  No I only stated a fact you should take notes ;)

                  Take those goggles and file them under " G " than come back and maybe we can talk ;)

again you avoding my question and when dose gs Opioion = fact? :roll:

 

 

Huh lmao again you need a nap ;) Fact = AAA on GS and what real question have you asked other than from a fanboy prospective as usual?    Here lemme try... Umm let me prove lol that Wii gamers would like more great games - Just GTFO of here - you give Wii fans a bad rep.

again you KEEP AVOIND THE POINT.

BTW IM NOT A DAMM SHEEP GET THAT THREW YOUR THINK SJULL LEMMING

 

Avatar image for magrappy
magrappy

1835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#66 magrappy
Member since 2003 • 1835 Posts
Absolutly no loss at all, nintendo sold rare at the perfect time, and rare havnt produced anything good since.
Avatar image for wavebrid
wavebrid

8204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 wavebrid
Member since 2006 • 8204 Posts
[QUOTE="Nintendo_Ownes7"][QUOTE="D_Znuhtz"][QUOTE="Blackbond"]

[QUOTE="GunSmith1_basic"]PDZ is NOT a AAA game, GS screwed up because they were dazzled by the next gen. The game is not even AA.SecretPolice

Perfect Dark Zero is a AAA game on GS. Fact.

On GS sure, but it looks strange when they're the only ones. Does anyone still play PDZ? That's what I thought. 

Panzer_Zwie (spelling) just finished it, and he said it was a huge let down.

 

             See this is what I find funny - If PDZ was the same ( not possible on the inferior Wii ) but  what Wii owner would think it's not all that on their little Wii? I mean - graphics, gameplay, FUN, ease of use, ONLINE ect.   Cmon sheeple give me some sort of logic on this one. For a $50.00 bill you coulda been a contender ;)

can you prove it let me give you lemming alittle hint NO YOU CANT

You havent even used logic yet i wouldnt be talking :| freaking lemmings

 

 

Avatar image for Redgarl
Redgarl

13252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#68 Redgarl
Member since 2002 • 13252 Posts
We are far from the time they have released Perfect Dark on the N64. They lost the touch as simple as that.
Avatar image for peacebringer
peacebringer

3371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#69 peacebringer
Member since 2006 • 3371 Posts
[QUOTE="peacebringer"][QUOTE="Ultimas_Blade"][QUOTE="peacebringer"]

Rare isn't as good as they used to be(reason Nintendo didn't care about them anymore should proov something) Nintendo didn't even make a bid at there most important 2nd party is proove in itself there not the same. the only thing nintendo lost is the rights to some of those games but it's not the same rare , how do i know this? i'm not running to buy there new games and i was a huge rare fan. one of my top 10 favorite games of all time Jet Force Gemini. Nintendo Instills a quality from it's devs and seems MS isn't worried about the gameplay Elements more than the Graphics elemts(just look how much Lemming care about GFX)so they need games with good Graphics so they can maintain that quality.

Ultimas_Blade

Tell that to Halo 3. Gameplay>>>>>>>>>>>>>Graphics, Bungie's said it a billion times.

there only saying that now cause it doesn't look as good. But what were they singing last gen? "Does PS2 have a game that looks this good" so no they just singing a differant song.

No they weren't, they were singing a song to the tune of "Best sales in history" esp. after they made $125 million in one day. Oh and FYI if you know about bungie you'd know they've always been saying Gameplay>Graphics.

Nah i don't keep track of Devs who make 1 game sorry.
Avatar image for wavebrid
wavebrid

8204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 wavebrid
Member since 2006 • 8204 Posts
[QUOTE="Ultimas_Blade"][QUOTE="peacebringer"][QUOTE="Ultimas_Blade"][QUOTE="peacebringer"]

Rare isn't as good as they used to be(reason Nintendo didn't care about them anymore should proov something) Nintendo didn't even make a bid at there most important 2nd party is proove in itself there not the same. the only thing nintendo lost is the rights to some of those games but it's not the same rare , how do i know this? i'm not running to buy there new games and i was a huge rare fan. one of my top 10 favorite games of all time Jet Force Gemini. Nintendo Instills a quality from it's devs and seems MS isn't worried about the gameplay Elements more than the Graphics elemts(just look how much Lemming care about GFX)so they need games with good Graphics so they can maintain that quality.

peacebringer

Tell that to Halo 3. Gameplay>>>>>>>>>>>>>Graphics, Bungie's said it a billion times.

there only saying that now cause it doesn't look as good. But what were they singing last gen? "Does PS2 have a game that looks this good" so no they just singing a differant song.

No they weren't, they were singing a song to the tune of "Best sales in history" esp. after they made $125 million in one day. Oh and FYI if you know about bungie you'd know they've always been saying Gameplay>Graphics.

Nah i don't keep track of Devs who make 1 game sorry.

bugine has made more than 1 game :|

 

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

Absolutly no loss at all, nintendo sold rare at the perfect time, and rare havnt produced anything good since.magrappy

Sounds like sour grapes to me.

Too bad all those good scores prove you wrong.

Nintendo also lost Factor 5. I'm sure no sheep will admit that Lair looks awesome.

Avatar image for peacebringer
peacebringer

3371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#72 peacebringer
Member since 2006 • 3371 Posts
[QUOTE="peacebringer"][QUOTE="Ultimas_Blade"][QUOTE="peacebringer"][QUOTE="Ultimas_Blade"][QUOTE="peacebringer"]

Rare isn't as good as they used to be(reason Nintendo didn't care about them anymore should proov something) Nintendo didn't even make a bid at there most important 2nd party is proove in itself there not the same. the only thing nintendo lost is the rights to some of those games but it's not the same rare , how do i know this? i'm not running to buy there new games and i was a huge rare fan. one of my top 10 favorite games of all time Jet Force Gemini. Nintendo Instills a quality from it's devs and seems MS isn't worried about the gameplay Elements more than the Graphics elemts(just look how much Lemming care about GFX)so they need games with good Graphics so they can maintain that quality.

wavebrid

Tell that to Halo 3. Gameplay>>>>>>>>>>>>>Graphics, Bungie's said it a billion times.

there only saying that now cause it doesn't look as good. But what were they singing last gen? "Does PS2 have a game that looks this good" so no they just singing a differant song.

No they weren't, they were singing a song to the tune of "Best sales in history" esp. after they made $125 million in one day. Oh and FYI if you know about bungie you'd know they've always been saying Gameplay>Graphics.

Nah i don't keep track of Devs who make 1 game sorry.

bugine has made more than 1 game :|

 

but they only making Halo ATM right? thats what i meant they do 1 game at a time wooptey dooohoooo. in terms of Devs there like dead last i feel bad for bungie cause MS is gonna use them and when they lose some team members there gonna get sold like Nintendo Sold Rare when they lost people. Isn't it ironic? don't ya think.
Avatar image for peacebringer
peacebringer

3371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#73 peacebringer
Member since 2006 • 3371 Posts
Must i remind you that the last Nintendo Game rare made was that crappy Starfox Zeldaesqu game? Lemming must have been laughing when they saw that game then Nintendo sold them and now Lemming wanna brag how good rare is when really it's Rare "Used" to be really good. It's common sense why would you sell a Developer that is so good? easy they weren't that good.
Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#74 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts

[QUOTE="magrappy"]Absolutly no loss at all, nintendo sold rare at the perfect time, and rare havnt produced anything good since.Bread_or_Decide

Sounds like sour grapes to me.

Too bad all those good scores prove you wrong.

Nintendo also lost Factor 5. I'm sure no sheep will admit that Lair looks awesome.

I'm a Nintendo fan but I'm not really a Sheep, and I admit Lair looks Awesome, but Nintendo didn't really lose them because Factor 5 said they will work with Nintendo after they make the two games for Sony, and when ever the price drops on the PS3, and it gets more exclusives I will get one for Lair, I also have a 360 to play games on the 360.
Avatar image for xXHackettXx
xXHackettXx

3560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#75 xXHackettXx
Member since 2006 • 3560 Posts

How big of a loss, do you believe that selling rare to Xbox is to Nintendo, especially with games such as Kameo, Perfect Dark, Conker and Banjo Kazooie being released on the Xbox and the 360?

Gismo25
After the N64 Rare sucks.
Avatar image for Iyethar
Iyethar

4660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Iyethar
Member since 2006 • 4660 Posts

[QUOTE="magrappy"]Absolutly no loss at all, nintendo sold rare at the perfect time, and rare havnt produced anything good since.Bread_or_Decide

Sounds like sour grapes to me.

Too bad all those good scores prove you wrong.

Nintendo also lost Factor 5. I'm sure no sheep will admit that Lair looks awesome.

I'm a dedicated sheep and I have no problems congratulating Factor 5 on their incredible technical accomplishments with L.A.I.R.  They're one of the few developers that have done something that expresses the advanced capabilities of Cell in a game.

Factor 5 wasn't owned by Nintendo, however.  They were always an independent third party, and their forte is graphics and engine design.  They're very technically focused, so it's not surprising that they aren't interested in the Wii hardware.

Rare, on the other hand, was 49% owned by Nintendo.  Microsoft paid a very large sum of money for Rare, $280 million or so.

Rare hasn't even come close to earning that for Microsoft.  Nintendo really got the best end of that deal financially, because Microsoft paid far more than Rare was worth.  Game reviews don't really come into it.

Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#77 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts
[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]

[QUOTE="magrappy"]Absolutly no loss at all, nintendo sold rare at the perfect time, and rare havnt produced anything good since.Iyethar

Sounds like sour grapes to me.

Too bad all those good scores prove you wrong.

Nintendo also lost Factor 5. I'm sure no sheep will admit that Lair looks awesome.

I'm a dedicated sheep and I have no problems congratulating Factor 5 on their incredible technical accomplishments with L.A.I.R.  They're one of the few developers that have done something that expresses the advanced capabilities of Cell in a game.

Factor 5 wasn't owned by Nintendo, however.  They were always an independent third party, and their forte is graphics and engine design.  They're very technically focused, so it's not surprising that they aren't interested in the Wii hardware.

Rare, on the other hand, was 49% owned by Nintendo.  Microsoft paid a very large sum of money for Rare, $280 million or so.

Rare hasn't even come close to earning that for Microsoft.  Nintendo really got the best end of that deal financially, because Microsoft paid far more than Rare was worth.  Game reviews don't really come into it.

Nintendo never owned Factor 5 but they did have a contract with Nintendo to make games with them until this Gen when Sony made a Contract with Factor 5 to make a couple of games for the PS3, and the reason Factor 5 was good at making games for the GCN was because they helped Nintendo design the console.
Avatar image for peacebringer
peacebringer

3371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#78 peacebringer
Member since 2006 • 3371 Posts
[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]

[QUOTE="magrappy"]Absolutly no loss at all, nintendo sold rare at the perfect time, and rare havnt produced anything good since.Iyethar

Sounds like sour grapes to me.

Too bad all those good scores prove you wrong.

Nintendo also lost Factor 5. I'm sure no sheep will admit that Lair looks awesome.

I'm a dedicated sheep and I have no problems congratulating Factor 5 on their incredible technical accomplishments with L.A.I.R. They're one of the few developers that have done something that expresses the advanced capabilities of Cell in a game.

Factor 5 wasn't owned by Nintendo, however. They were always an independent third party, and their forte is graphics and engine design. They're very technically focused, so it's not surprising that they aren't interested in the Wii hardware.

Rare, on the other hand, was 49% owned by Nintendo. Microsoft paid a very large sum of money for Rare, $280 million or so.

Rare hasn't even come close to earning that for Microsoft. Nintendo really got the best end of that deal financially, because Microsoft paid far more than Rare was worth. Game reviews don't really come into it.

Good point but also wanted to add that Nintendo Did owning Rare based most of what Rare did as a dev. so you can say even though it was 49% it really was like 100%. So would you sell your game if you still like them? no. so if nintendo was so happy with rare why would they sell there half? it's not like rare left on there own free will cause if they did that then yes you lemming would be right about us having bad feelings but it's not like that. When i first heard Nintendo was selling rare for a quick second i was like WTF then after that second past i remember i havn't played any good Rare games since N64 and that was 6 to 8 years ago so i was like ehh makes sense. If Rare left on it's own free will then you guys would have an argument but Nintendo sold there half cause they didn't like them anymore , the same way you trade in Superman and Spider man 3 they traded Rare and later on Bought monolith soft wich is betetr cause Monolith soft can make games Nintendo never has(RPG's) whil Rare made copy cat games of Nintendo games(banjo being like mario and DK racing being like Mario kart)
Avatar image for frankeyser
frankeyser

5667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#79 frankeyser
Member since 2004 • 5667 Posts
it is more of a loss for rare.  look at their sales when they were with ninty compared to their sales now.  without myimoto giving them a helping hand on every game it seems they are really loosing steam.  the only game i have enjoyed since they were sold is viva pinata.  kameo was ok but way to short, perfect dark zero was ok but not even close to as good as the orginal, conker is fine and dandy on the xbox but it was just a remake of a 64 game.  voodoo vince was just rubbish, rare does not have their magic anymore.  heck even the founders have left them and gone to make their own new studio. that is how far down hill rare has gone.  microsoft bought a good catalog but have none of the developers working on those games anymore.  microsoft simple put got screwed in that deal.
Avatar image for StephenKing_1
StephenKing_1

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 StephenKing_1
Member since 2003 • 701 Posts
Haven't the last 4 Rare games all been solid AA games?  Sheep are really grasping for straws when Rare has put out more quality games in the last year than total quality games available on the Wii.
Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#81 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts
it is more of a loss for rare.  look at their sales when they were with ninty compared to their sales now.  without myimoto giving them a helping hand on every game it seems they are really loosing steam.  the only game i have enjoyed since they were sold is viva pinata.  kameo was ok but way to short, perfect dark zero was ok but not even close to as good as the orginal, conker is fine and dandy on the xbox but it was just a remake of a 64 game.  voodoo vince was just rubbish, rare does not have their magic anymore.  heck even the founders have left them and gone to make their own new studio. that is how far down hill rare has gone.  microsoft bought a good catalog but have none of the developers working on those games anymore.  microsoft simple put got screwed in that deal.frankeyser
I also think When Rare was with Nintendo there games sold for two reasons 1. they had Nintendo helping them and 2. when Microsofts fans are put off by the look of most Rareware games.
Avatar image for peacebringer
peacebringer

3371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#82 peacebringer
Member since 2006 • 3371 Posts
Haven't the last 4 Rare games all been solid AA games? Sheep are really grasping for straws when Rare has put out more quality games in the last year than total quality games available on the Wii.StephenKing_1
those AA games didn't sell so great and rare used to make AAA games, so yeah go figure.
Avatar image for Nintega91
Nintega91

713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Nintega91
Member since 2006 • 713 Posts

it is more of a loss for rare.  look at their sales when they were with ninty compared to their sales now.  without myimoto giving them a helping hand on every game it seems they are really loosing steam.  the only game i have enjoyed since they were sold is viva pinata.  kameo was ok but way to short, perfect dark zero was ok but not even close to as good as the orginal, conker is fine and dandy on the xbox but it was just a remake of a 64 game.  voodoo vince was just rubbish, rare does not have their magic anymore.  heck even the founders have left them and gone to make their own new studio. that is how far down hill rare has gone.  microsoft bought a good catalog but have none of the developers working on those games anymore.  microsoft simple put got screwed in that deal.frankeyser

Thank you, a 360 owner whos saying what the sheep are. But im sure your just a fanboy aswell.

When rare worked with Nintendo their game scores were alot higher than the games they are making now.

Avatar image for StephenKing_1
StephenKing_1

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 StephenKing_1
Member since 2003 • 701 Posts

[QUOTE="frankeyser"]it is more of a loss for rare.  look at their sales when they were with ninty compared to their sales now.  without myimoto giving them a helping hand on every game it seems they are really loosing steam.  the only game i have enjoyed since they were sold is viva pinata.  kameo was ok but way to short, perfect dark zero was ok but not even close to as good as the orginal, conker is fine and dandy on the xbox but it was just a remake of a 64 game.  voodoo vince was just rubbish, rare does not have their magic anymore.  heck even the founders have left them and gone to make their own new studio. that is how far down hill rare has gone.  microsoft bought a good catalog but have none of the developers working on those games anymore.  microsoft simple put got screwed in that deal.Nintega91

Thank you, a 360 owner whos saying what the sheep are. But im sure your just a fanboy aswell.

When rare worked with Nintendo their game scores were alot higher than the games they are making now.

Nintendo's scores were higher too.  Guess they've "lost it" eh?

Avatar image for Nintega91
Nintega91

713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Nintega91
Member since 2006 • 713 Posts
[QUOTE="Nintega91"]

[QUOTE="frankeyser"]it is more of a loss for rare.  look at their sales when they were with ninty compared to their sales now.  without myimoto giving them a helping hand on every game it seems they are really loosing steam.  the only game i have enjoyed since they were sold is viva pinata.  kameo was ok but way to short, perfect dark zero was ok but not even close to as good as the orginal, conker is fine and dandy on the xbox but it was just a remake of a 64 game.  voodoo vince was just rubbish, rare does not have their magic anymore.  heck even the founders have left them and gone to make their own new studio. that is how far down hill rare has gone.  microsoft bought a good catalog but have none of the developers working on those games anymore.  microsoft simple put got screwed in that deal.StephenKing_1

Thank you, a 360 owner whos saying what the sheep are. But im sure your just a fanboy aswell.

When rare worked with Nintendo their game scores were alot higher than the games they are making now.

Nintendo's scores were higher too.  Guess they've "lost it" eh?

to an extent yes they have.

Avatar image for shaggyaz
shaggyaz

2279

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 shaggyaz
Member since 2004 • 2279 Posts
If Rare stayed with Nintendo, people's comments would be very different.  Rare is Rare, Microsoft-owned or Nintendo-owned.Ultimas_Blade
Avatar image for Nintega91
Nintega91

713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Nintega91
Member since 2006 • 713 Posts

[QUOTE="Ultimas_Blade"]If Rare stayed with Nintendo, people's comments would be very different.  Rare is Rare, Microsoft-owned or Nintendo-owned.shaggyaz

Rare is Rare in name only. If you read this thread you'll realise that people have been jumping ship since they made Goldneye.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="shaggyaz"][QUOTE="Ultimas_Blade"]If Rare stayed with Nintendo, people's comments would be very different. Rare is Rare, Microsoft-owned or Nintendo-owned.Nintega91

Rare is Rare in name only. If you read this thread you'll realise that people have been jumping ship since they made Goldneye.

So what about the Banjo team? BTW, what's happened to these supposed defectors?
Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#89 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts
[QUOTE="Nintega91"]

[QUOTE="shaggyaz"][QUOTE="Ultimas_Blade"]If Rare stayed with Nintendo, people's comments would be very different. Rare is Rare, Microsoft-owned or Nintendo-owned.HuusAsking

Rare is Rare in name only. If you read this thread you'll realise that people have been jumping ship since they made Goldneye.

So what about the Banjo team? BTW, what's happened to these supposed defectors?

In 1997 Oliver Davies, Oliver Nortan, Steve Patrick, Jeff Stafford, Christopher Gage, and Adrian Smith left Rare to form Eight Wonder who was picked up by Sony. Mark hollis left Rare in 1998 to work With Nintendo of America on the GCN, then in 2000 he left to form Zoonami, then soon after he did others left to form Free Radical Design, then in 2007 the founders of Rare Chris and Tim Stamper left to form there own company. The only team that was around with Nintendo that is still completely together is the Banjo team.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="Nintega91"]

[QUOTE="shaggyaz"][QUOTE="Ultimas_Blade"]If Rare stayed with Nintendo, people's comments would be very different. Rare is Rare, Microsoft-owned or Nintendo-owned.Nintendo_Ownes7

Rare is Rare in name only. If you read this thread you'll realise that people have been jumping ship since they made Goldneye.

So what about the Banjo team? BTW, what's happened to these supposed defectors?

In 1997 Oliver Davies, Oliver Nortan, Steve Patrick, Jeff Stafford, Christopher Gage, and Adrian Smith left Rare to form Eight Wonder who was picked up by Sony. Mark hollis left Rare in 1998 to work With Nintendo of America on the GCN, then in 2000 he left to form Zoonami, then soon after he did others left to form Free Radical Design, then in 2007 the founders of Rare Chris and Tim Stamper left to form there own company. The only team that was around with Nintendo that is still completely together is the Banjo team.

And what have they done since then?
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts
Did they look in the sofa cushons?
Avatar image for Chris-Hansen
Chris-Hansen

685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Chris-Hansen
Member since 2007 • 685 Posts
[QUOTE="wavebrid"]

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]          Don't fool yourselves sheeple - Nintendo losing Rare at the time it happened is almost as big as MS losing Bungie right now !!! Okay not almost as big but still..;)SecretPolice

if it did it would of shown by now and plus rare is making games for gba/ ds anyways so they havent loss rare

 

   Oh plzzz - It has shown now more than ever ;) Tell me sheeple would not like to be both playing Rare games on Wii and looking forward to up coming Rare games on Wii - you have no cred with you're post... Yet I'm not surprised ;)

rare is a sad shell of what it used to be

 

Avatar image for hazuki87
hazuki87

2031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 89

User Lists: 0

#93 hazuki87
Member since 2004 • 2031 Posts

If Rare stayed with Nintendo, people's comments would be very different. Rare is Rare, Microsoft-owned or Nintendo-owned.Ultimas_Blade

 

Yeah. well. i have played all of Rares games recently and theyre awful. actually Goldeneye Perfect Dark and Jet Force Gemini were their last good games. 

Avatar image for AvIdGaMeR444
AvIdGaMeR444

7031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 AvIdGaMeR444
Member since 2004 • 7031 Posts

How big of a loss, do you believe that selling rare to Xbox is to Nintendo, especially with games such as Kameo, Perfect Dark, Conker and Banjo Kazooie being released on the Xbox and the 360?

Gismo25

No loss whatsoever.  Viva Pinata is selling terribly.  Most people seem to hate PDZ.  Kameo didn't sell all that well.  Conker: Live and Reloaded was far worse than the N64 version.  Same goes for PDZ.  Grabbed by the Ghoulies :lol: i'm glad Nintendo was smart and got rid of them.  Having said that though, I think Kameo still has some of the best textures on 360 to date. 

Avatar image for peacebringer
peacebringer

3371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#95 peacebringer
Member since 2006 • 3371 Posts
[QUOTE="Gismo25"]

How big of a loss, do you believe that selling rare to Xbox is to Nintendo, especially with games such as Kameo, Perfect Dark, Conker and Banjo Kazooie being released on the Xbox and the 360?

AvIdGaMeR444

No loss whatsoever. Viva Pinata is selling terribly. Most people seem to hate PDZ. Kameo didn't sell all that well. Conker: Live and Reloaded was far worse than the N64 version. Same goes for PDZ. Grabbed by the Ghoulies :lol: i'm glad Nintendo was smart and got rid of them. Having said that though, I think Kameo still has some of the best textures on 360 to date.

even Lemming say PDZ is over rated what does that say? Sheesh sheep will say Red Steel is good. Lemming can't even say PDZ is good just for the heck of it. shows how bad Rare is doing.
Avatar image for FrankHurt
FrankHurt

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 FrankHurt
Member since 2006 • 56 Posts

I miss Rare...

Goldeneye... Perfect Dark... Conkers Bad Fur Day...

Those were some great memories...

Now what do we have left...

Just... Memories...