The one thing that could save the Wii U

  • 82 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#51 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45452 Posts
while I believe such a game could be a huge momentum shifting title, I could care less about Pokemon myself, though they make for great characters in any Super Smash Bros game
Avatar image for Kashiwaba
Kashiwaba

8059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Kashiwaba
Member since 2005 • 8059 Posts
Wii u doesn't need saving once nintendo starts dishing their 1st party games it will start selling it wont be as successful as wii and yet it wont do worse than GC so Nintendo will survive
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#53 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts
[QUOTE="Dj-CrunkyTIGER"]Pokemon Stadium sold 5 milliom Stadium 2 sold 2.5 Collosium took most of the GC's life span since release to gain 2 million XD took till the end of print run to gain 1.2 all others not mentioned sold under 100,000 except one. But you believe Pokemon can still save the Wii U?

Did you actually READ THE OP?
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
Well that's an awesome amazing and obvious idea. So OF COURSE Nintendo won't ever do it :P
Avatar image for k2theswiss
k2theswiss

16599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

#55 k2theswiss
Member since 2007 • 16599 Posts
[QUOTE="Dj-CrunkyTIGER"]Pokemon Stadium sold 5 milliom Stadium 2 sold 2.5 Collosium took most of the GC's life span since release to gain 2 million XD took till the end of print run to gain 1.2 all others not mentioned sold under 100,000 except one. But you believe Pokemon can still save the Wii U?

TC wants a real pokemon game like hanhelds not just pokemon battles
Avatar image for Alienware_fan
Alienware_fan

1514

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Alienware_fan
Member since 2010 • 1514 Posts

Nothing can save the wii u except black magic.

Avatar image for murat8
murat8

10362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#57 murat8
Member since 2006 • 10362 Posts

Nothing can save the wii u except black magic.

Alienware_fan
hopefully Nintendo has some lying around after 3ds
Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

25309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 25309 Posts

Seriously... Nintendo, f*cking get your head out of your ass and make a Pokemon HD. A real Pokemon HD, a true blue, full fledged mainline Pokemon game. Make it share the same universe as the upcoming X and Y. Maybe make it a sequel to X and Y, but Wii U only. Release it next year if you have to, to give X and Y breathing space.

  • Fully online compatible, with full Miiverse support I would certainly hope this would be the case, especially with shards (players can swap shards at will so they wont have to choose between friends), add daily and monthly tournaments too.
  • Full 3D, HD graphics, a full fledged open world Keep it sprite based please.
  • All 700+ Pokemon Yeah, as long as all would not be findable on the same region.
  • Wii U pad support, with Off TV Play supported, to keep the 'portable' nature of the games intact Makes sense
  • Random online battling, online tournaments, online trading, and online co-op Sure, for tournaments, add monthly, weekly, daily tournaments and player hosted tournaments (playerhosted having custom rules such as banning certain items, pokemon and maybe even moves), furthermore, a shard system could be used as well with players being able to switch shards at will (so they can still play with friends), players in the same shard can see eachother where they can battle, trade, chat and tag along.
  • Persistent game world, with an aftergame supported by periodic DLC quests. Maybe sell Kanto, Johto, Hoenn, Sinnoh, and Unova as DLC areas. I would rather have them in at day 1, but I suppose that would be physically very difficult.
  • NFC compatible. Buy toys to unlock special Pokemon in game. Ban them from ranked tournaments to make sure the game stays balanced. Another Skylanders? No thanks.
  • Since Game Freak a) takes a lot of time with game development, and b) is completely unfamiliar with console game development, outsource it. Give it to Level 5. As games like Dragon Quest VIII, Rogue Galaxy, Dark Cloud, and Ni No Kuni demonstrate, they are more than up to the task. Level 5 are great devs and I am sure they could do the pokemon series justice, JUST whatever they do, do NOT make it real time. Ni No Kuni's battle system was a complete and utter mess and I would like Pokemon to stay as far away from that as possible.

DO IT NINTENDO. More than any other game, Mario, Mario Kart, Smash Bros., Zelda, anything, this is what will give you sustained sales for your home console. There is still time to save it, if you do it, so... do it already.

charizard1605

Also, player created pokemon trainers, rebalanced pokemon (to make more of them viable, some can be crap though, that is just how nature works). Streamline the EVs and IVs.

A pokemon game in the same vein as the handhelds could work.

Avatar image for murat8
murat8

10362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#59 murat8
Member since 2006 • 10362 Posts
Also, player created pokemon trainers, rebalanced pokemon (to make more of them viable, some can be crap though, that is just how nature works). Streamline the EVs and IVs.Maroxad
I wouldn't say no to them streamlining the ev and iv system.
Avatar image for lezgoyolo
lezgoyolo

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 lezgoyolo
Member since 2013 • 41 Posts
Nintendo is waay to cheap to invest in a multimillion budget game. They dont want to because their cheap top down pokemon games can still sell millions. Nintendo is cheap in everything from console specs, to budget, to etc etc
Avatar image for metroidfood
metroidfood

11175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 metroidfood
Member since 2007 • 11175 Posts

They could get Game Freak on board. Concessions, maybe support for some non Pokemon games, let them have first dibs on the 4DS dev kits, maybe even let some game Freak guys be on the hardware design panel, whatever. Game Freak is tiny. It could be appeased. charizard1605

I still don't see it happening. GameFreak is pretty slow to update to new technology - they released BW2 on DS well after the release of the 3DS - and the Pokemon series is pretty much they're baby. And XD and Colosseum didn't do so hot so I can't see Nintendo persuading them or even wanting to let someone else use the IP on Wii U, as much as people want it to happen.

Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

25309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 25309 Posts

[QUOTE="Maroxad"]Also, player created pokemon trainers, rebalanced pokemon (to make more of them viable, some can be crap though, that is just how nature works). Streamline the EVs and IVs.murat8
I wouldn't say no to them streamlining the ev and iv system.

By streamlining I just mean a system that would make more sense. Namely EVs would be determined by how you raise your pokemon (encouragement and use of moves among other things) as opposed to what pokemon you beat up.

IVs on the other hand, would be difficult to streamline without taking away from the breeding element (not to mention, the IV system could amplify the online economy). But I do realize that the world of pokemon is technologically advanced and some genetic engineering could probably be done, to give a minor IV boost to the offspring for a hefty fee ofc.

Avatar image for -Snooze-
-Snooze-

7304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 -Snooze-
Member since 2009 • 7304 Posts

I dislike the Wii U and Nintendo in general. I feel all their games are shallow nostalgia-fests.

That being said, I'd buy a Wii U for the game you drescribed. I'd buy the hell out of it.

Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#64 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

Why would people buy the 3DS if they know they can just get Pokemon on the Wii U? Pokemon is the whole reason people own a handheld. That's why. Nintendo still needs to support their handheld demographic. Nintendo has Zelda, Mario, etc... which will all sell the Wii U. The Wii U just doesn't have any games at the moment. 

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#65 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts
i don't care much for Pokemon. My step-sons were into pokemon for the gameboy many years ago. They used to play it to death. Now they are in their 20's and could care less about Pokemon or Nintendo.
Avatar image for mariokart64fan
mariokart64fan

20828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 101

User Lists: 1

#66 mariokart64fan
Member since 2003 • 20828 Posts

I don't think any one  understands what doom is ,   

lets look at sony,    how many years was ps3 bleeding money out of sony ? are they gone? 

lets look at nintendos lowest selling platform the nintendo gamecube -which ironically was more powerful then ps2 and more utilized then xbox cause xbox got cut off  to soon,  ---it sold only 24 million and was just as profitable for nintendo as ps2 was for sony and that sold 150 m plus units that already should tell you that your doom is just  a dream that everyone has had since the snes and that dream is nothing more then that,   it will never flourish because nintendos not stupid enough to sell products at such high cost out of their pocket that if it shall fail it would cost them 

lets look at sega for a minute -- 

how many mistakes did they have before being forced into submission  they had 4 (sega cd sega 32x  sega saturn and sega dreamcast also note the rare 32x cd combo ,)         all of these products put so much money out of sega ,   they had to quit ,      nintendo is far from that predicimate because they have 2 t hings working in their favor 

1- 3ds selling great

 2 wiiu makes profit off of one nintendo game sold ,  so it doesnt matter how many wiius sold it matters if it was losing money but its not its actually going to break even with one nintendo game sold and thats a gurantee   who do you know buys a nintendo system for 3rd party titles i want to see a show of hands , ,

 

and a show of hands also for those who actually cared when gamecube had superioer hardware - i bet you wont because i already know the answer - that answer is , your just fanboys , it doesnt matter what nintendo does ,    wrong or right, you dont buy their products so do me a favor stop posting needless threads nintendo wiiu dont need saving that saving is coming in the form of games 

Avatar image for Dj-CrunkyTIGER
Dj-CrunkyTIGER

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Dj-CrunkyTIGER
Member since 2013 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="mariokart64fan"]

I don't think any one  understands what doom is ,   

lets look at sony,    how many years was ps3 bleeding money out of sony ? are they gone? 

lets look at nintendos lowest selling platform the nintendo gamecube -which ironically was more powerful then ps2 and more utilized then xbox cause xbox got cut off  to soon,  ---it sold only 24 million and was just as profitable for nintendo as ps2 was for sony and that sold 150 m plus units that already should tell you that your doom is just  a dream that everyone has had since the snes and that dream is nothing more then that,   it will never flourish because nintendos not stupid enough to sell products at such high cost out of their pocket that if it shall fail it would cost them 

lets look at sega for a minute -- 

how many mistakes did they have before being forced into submission  they had 4 (sega cd sega 32x  sega saturn and sega dreamcast also note the rare 32x cd combo ,)         all of these products put so much money out of sega ,   they had to quit ,      nintendo is far from that predicimate because they have 2 t hings working in their favor 

1- 3ds selling great

 2 wiiu makes profit off of one nintendo game sold ,  so it doesnt matter how many wiius sold it matters if it was losing money but its not its actually going to break even with one nintendo game sold and thats a gurantee   who do you know buys a nintendo system for 3rd party titles i want to see a show of hands , ,

 

and a show of hands also for those who actually cared when gamecube had superioer hardware - i bet you wont because i already know the answer - that answer is , your just fanboys , it doesnt matter what nintendo does ,    wrong or right, you dont buy their products so do me a favor stop posting needless threads nintendo wiiu dont need saving that saving is coming in the form of games 

If the Wii U fails and they bomb that is a large chunck of money they will have, and don't forget trhe buy backs. Then all they will have is 3DS, which is only really very profitable in Japan. They will need the other region money to cover the Wii U. They would not be able to restart and launch another home console, which if they did, would have to have better specs than the Wii U, as that will bum rush what they have left on the side.
Avatar image for senses_fail_06
senses_fail_06

7033

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 senses_fail_06
Member since 2006 • 7033 Posts

That would sell a few units. Kiddies and manchilds love pokemon

El_Garbanzo
Avatar image for Joedgabe
Joedgabe

5134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#69 Joedgabe
Member since 2006 • 5134 Posts

Pokemon

Seriously... Nintendo, f*cking get your head out of your ass and make a Pokemon HD. A real Pokemon HD, a true blue, full fledged mainline Pokemon game. Make it share the same universe as the upcoming X and Y. Maybe make it a sequel to X and Y, but Wii U only. Release it next year if you have to, to give X and Y breathing space.

  • Fully online compatible, with full Miiverse support
  • Full 3D, HD graphics, a full fledged open world
  • All 700+ Pokemon
  • Wii U pad support, with Off TV Play supported, to keep the 'portable' nature of the games intact
  • Random online battling, online tournaments, online trading, and online co-op
  • Persistent game world, with an aftergame supported by periodic DLC quests. Maybe sell Kanto, Johto, Hoenn, Sinnoh, and Unova as DLC areas.
  • NFC compatible. Buy toys to unlock special Pokemon in game. Ban them from ranked tournaments to make sure the game stays balanced.
  • Since Game Freak a) takes a lot of time with game development, and b) is completely unfamiliar with console game development, outsource it. Give it to Level 5. As games like Dragon Quest VIII, Rogue Galaxy, Dark Cloud, and Ni No Kuni demonstrate, they are more than up to the task.

DO IT NINTENDO. More than any other game, Mario, Mario Kart, Smash Bros., Zelda, anything, this is what will give you sustained sales for your home console. There is still time to save it, if you do it, so... do it already.

charizard1605

 

 

Seems to me like you would love to play Ni no kuni on the console ( not the DS one ) 

It is what you would want in a pokemon game for console..... the only problem is that it has to be a spin off... because for example in ni no kuni you enter a dungeon and expect a boss fight.. something big and funky.. and you do get it... however in pokemon.... you might just get a trainer.... not really that dramatic or climatic.... or the end game.... .a trainer ? that's kinda lame..... they would have to come up with a way to mix pokemons and monsters for boss fights..... not some enhanced dark charizard. or some random deformed robot.,.. that's just lame.

Avatar image for -Patrick_92-
-Patrick_92-

2168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 -Patrick_92-
Member since 2008 • 2168 Posts

Makes too much sense, they wont wont do it :P

That would be the game to make me want a Wii U.

I'd say instead of DLC for the other regions, just put every region in the game to begin with. Maybe you'll get to choose which one to start out in, and eventually make your way through all of them (one can dream). 

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#71 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts

 

 

Seems to me like you would love to play Ni no kuni on the console ( not the DS one ) 

It is what you would want in a pokemon game for console..... the only problem is that it has to be a spin off... because for example in ni no kuni you enter a dungeon and expect a boss fight.. something big and funky.. and you do get it... however in pokemon.... you might just get a trainer.... not really that dramatic or climatic.... or the end game.... .a trainer ? that's kinda lame..... they would have to come up with a way to mix pokemons and monsters for boss fights..... not some enhanced dark charizard. or some random deformed robot.,.. that's just lame.

Joedgabe
Already played Ni No Kuni, I like it a lot :) But it's no Pokemon :P
Avatar image for DJ-Lafleur
DJ-Lafleur

35604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#72 DJ-Lafleur
Member since 2007 • 35604 Posts

Not mainline games, though I wonder if a Pekemon Stadium U or Pokemon Snap U could garner some nice attanetion to the Wii U.

Avatar image for Joedgabe
Joedgabe

5134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#73 Joedgabe
Member since 2006 • 5134 Posts

[QUOTE="Joedgabe"]

 

 

Seems to me like you would love to play Ni no kuni on the console ( not the DS one ) 

It is what you would want in a pokemon game for console..... the only problem is that it has to be a spin off... because for example in ni no kuni you enter a dungeon and expect a boss fight.. something big and funky.. and you do get it... however in pokemon.... you might just get a trainer.... not really that dramatic or climatic.... or the end game.... .a trainer ? that's kinda lame..... they would have to come up with a way to mix pokemons and monsters for boss fights..... not some enhanced dark charizard. or some random deformed robot.,.. that's just lame.

charizard1605

Already played Ni No Kuni, I like it a lot :) But it's no Pokemon :P

 

It's not but it's the closest thing... it also shows that a Full 3D pokemon game can be made... but as i said.. only way is that if they leave the old formula about the 8 badgest behind.... I wish they left that as optional.. while focusing on some other story on the side as the main story. This would not only give them an excuse to make the gym battles a lot harder with no items ( they are gym leaders.. it should be a challenge not a cake walk ) but also make the elite four even better and the champion as the ultimate challenge in the game. 

Avatar image for jer_1
jer_1

7451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#74 jer_1
Member since 2003 • 7451 Posts

The only thing that will save the wii u is a smattering of awesome games. Looks like we're not getting that any time soon...

Avatar image for GD1551
GD1551

9645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 GD1551
Member since 2011 • 9645 Posts

Nintendo could do that, but they will probably say it's too expensive and complicated to do.

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
yes charizard, YES! FREAKENN YESSSSS. But you know, nintendo..lol
Avatar image for Drasonak
Drasonak

1515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Drasonak
Member since 2012 • 1515 Posts
But seriously, expect a Pokemon Ruby/Sapphire remake late 2014 or early 2015.
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#78 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
pokemon was never much of a system seller on consoles, so i doubt it.
Avatar image for Madmangamer364
Madmangamer364

3716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#79 Madmangamer364
Member since 2006 • 3716 Posts

But seriously, expect a Pokemon Ruby/Sapphire remake late 2014 or early 2015.Drasonak

I'm typically not crazy about remakes, but I HOPE that becomes the case eventually. Ruby/Sapphire resparked my interest in the series in a huge way, and I'd love to visit an updated Hoenn.

Although, if the games looks like X&Y, I will have my share of reservations...

Avatar image for Link3301
Link3301

2001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 103

User Lists: 0

#80 Link3301
Member since 2008 • 2001 Posts

 

  • Since Game Freak a) takes a lot of time with game development, and b) is completely unfamiliar with console game development, outsource it. Give it to Level 5. As games like Dragon Quest VIII, Rogue Galaxy, Dark Cloud, and Ni No Kuni demonstrate, they are more than up to the task.

 

charizard1605

Better, have Game Freak make all of the main gameplay and systems design, art direction, and story and then have an outsorced developer deal with the technical stuff like animating, modeling, and programming.

Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#81 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts

[QUOTE="charizard1605"]

 

  • Since Game Freak a) takes a lot of time with game development, and b) is completely unfamiliar with console game development, outsource it. Give it to Level 5. As games like Dragon Quest VIII, Rogue Galaxy, Dark Cloud, and Ni No Kuni demonstrate, they are more than up to the task.

 

Link3301

Better, have Game Freak make all of the main gameplay and systems design, art direction, and story and then have an outsorced developer deal with the technical stuff like animating, modeling, and programming.

Monolith Soft would be good for that Nintendo owns them or maybe Retro Studios. Though Intelligent Systems was created by Nintendo as a programming company that just programmed games for Nintendo's internal teams mainly R&D1.

Avatar image for Shottayouth13-
Shottayouth13-

7018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Shottayouth13-
Member since 2009 • 7018 Posts
Nope, not going to happen.