The Orange Box: Why no Counter Strike

  • 82 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for aznfool07
aznfool07

3552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 aznfool07
Member since 2005 • 3552 Posts
1.6 and Source are still doing well. Why bring a new one?
Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts

[QUOTE="Zeliard9"]Probably because TF2 looks and plays better.KrAcKK

really? I dont know i hear all these people going on about counter strike i just want it on console

isn't there an original xbox version you could pick up?

Avatar image for MadExponent
MadExponent

11454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 MadExponent
Member since 2003 • 11454 Posts
I just hope that when the next gen Source engine comes out that they do a brand new CS game with all new game modes and weapons and whatnot. I have been playing CS and CS:Source since literally week 1 of beta 2 way back in 1999. I'd love to see a nice new CS game that lives up to the original's name.
Avatar image for bigrhyno
bigrhyno

1649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 bigrhyno
Member since 2005 • 1649 Posts
First of all, you got 5 games in one, and you are complaining that you didn't get another game? TF2 is an awesome experience and I could see it being fun on consoles, but I honestly don't see CS being that much fun with a controller. I am not a huge fan of CS:S anyway. Something about the transition from old CS to source didn't click with me, but I am glad I have TF2 now.
Avatar image for omgimba
omgimba

2645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 omgimba
Member since 2007 • 2645 Posts
Lol.. Counter strike for consoles? really.. The aiming wouldn't be fast/precise enough for it too work.. Everybody would simply camp with a AWP.. Seriously, its a fast paced game where you die if you react a tenth of a second too late... its not like Halo, UT, and such games where you are close too immortal. (well you might survive for more then 2 seconds after someone spots you.)
Avatar image for zero_snake99
zero_snake99

3478

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 zero_snake99
Member since 2004 • 3478 Posts

[QUOTE="coolviper2003"]Doesn't everyone have counter strike sourceby now? sadikovic

No not the console nubs.

TC CS flopped on the XBOX 1... the game is too fast paced for the sluggish controller.

UT3 will flop on consoles.

Yes

And

Yes...well the Ps3 version will support Mouse / Keyboard...soo Im DEF getting that version (my comp cant handle most new games that well =[ )

And as St_muscat said...64 people in one server on 360? Would that be still cs? or just a mass of polygons randomly appearing on screen?

Avatar image for agentfred
agentfred

5666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 agentfred
Member since 2003 • 5666 Posts

I find the concept of a console CS hilarious.

:lol:

Avatar image for Bromz
Bromz

1639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 Bromz
Member since 2005 • 1639 Posts
Its to ensure nothing takes TF2's thunder. Besides, tf2 is great
Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#59 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts

I find the concept of a console CS hilarious.

:lol:

agentfred

i find it scary, seeing CS or UT3 played with a controller

Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts

Look at what IGN had to say about teamwork on xbox live :

"While PC gamers are often good at playing nicely together, that's not always the case with console owners. So this teamwork requirement could turn games ugly on Xbox Live. That's not Valve's fault in any way; it's just the nature of console gaming."

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/826/826062p5.html
anshul89

I've said something very similar in response to lemmings saying that nobody ever voice chats in pickup games on the PC (which isn't true, anyway). Good to see IGN feels the same way. :P It was pretty amazing how even in the TF2 beta, everyone would work together. I've rarely stumbled into a TF2 game where I felt I had to do everything myself, or that my team was just going solo and doing their own thing. There's always been a strong dosage of teamwork imbued into every match, even random pickup games with random people. Halo 3, on the other hand...

Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#61 FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts

[QUOTE="anshul89"]Look at what IGN had to say about teamwork on xbox live :

"While PC gamers are often good at playing nicely together, that's not always the case with console owners. So this teamwork requirement could turn games ugly on Xbox Live. That's not Valve's fault in any way; it's just the nature of console gaming."

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/826/826062p5.html
Zeliard9

I've said something very similar in response to lemmings saying that nobody ever voice chats in pickup games on the PC (which isn't true, anyway). Good to see IGN feels the same way. :P It was pretty amazing how even in the TF2 beta, everyone would work together. I've rarely stumbled into a TF2 game where I felt I had to do everything myself, or that my team was just going solo and doing their own thing. There's always been a strong dosage of teamwork imbued into every match, even random pickup games with random people. Halo 3, on the other hand...

ugh Halo 3 is like CS.

You can't tell some asses to co operate because you'll cramp their st yle or some crap like that.

Ah well, play with friends and it makes a whole lot of difference.

Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts
[QUOTE="Zeliard9"]

[QUOTE="anshul89"]Look at what IGN had to say about teamwork on xbox live :

"While PC gamers are often good at playing nicely together, that's not always the case with console owners. So this teamwork requirement could turn games ugly on Xbox Live. That's not Valve's fault in any way; it's just the nature of console gaming."

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/826/826062p5.html
FrozenLiquid

I've said something very similar in response to lemmings saying that nobody ever voice chats in pickup games on the PC (which isn't true, anyway). Good to see IGN feels the same way. :P It was pretty amazing how even in the TF2 beta, everyone would work together. I've rarely stumbled into a TF2 game where I felt I had to do everything myself, or that my team was just going solo and doing their own thing. There's always been a strong dosage of teamwork imbued into every match, even random pickup games with random people. Halo 3, on the other hand...

ugh Halo 3 is like CS.

You can't tell some asses to co operate because you'll cramp their st yle or some crap like that.

Ah well, play with friends and it makes a whole lot of difference.

True, Halo 3 can be quite fun playing with friends. But Team Slayer with random people can be a pretty painful experience, voice chat or no. :P

I dunno, though, this wasn't an issue in Rainbow Six: Vegas. Did you ever play that game on XBL? I actually found that most Vegas players on 360 worked together quite well, though they were on average older than Halo players and the like.

Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#63 FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts

True, Halo 3 can be quite fun playing with friends. But Team Slayer with random people can be a pretty painful experience, voice chat or no. :P

I dunno, though, this wasn't an issue in Rainbow Six: Vegas. Did you ever play that game on XBL? I actually found that most Vegas players on 360 worked together quite well, though they were on average older than Halo players and the like.

Zeliard9

Although I argue with people about the casualisation of PC games and how it's really insulting to call it that, I don't like Rainbow Six since it went to consoles lol.

But yeah, games like Halo and CS attract a lot more younger people than most other games do. Don't like it much but what can you do lol.

Avatar image for WuTangG
WuTangG

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 WuTangG
Member since 2007 • 2189 Posts
You get it with the PC version dont you because it has HL2 in it?
Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#65 FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts

You get it with the PC version dont you because it has HL2 in it?WuTangG

No you don't actually.

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
I don't need any more games I already have in it
Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#67 FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts

I don't need any more games I already have in itimprezawrx500

But you already got HL2 and Episode One.

Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts
[QUOTE="Zeliard9"]

True, Halo 3 can be quite fun playing with friends. But Team Slayer with random people can be a pretty painful experience, voice chat or no. :P

I dunno, though, this wasn't an issue in Rainbow Six: Vegas. Did you ever play that game on XBL? I actually found that most Vegas players on 360 worked together quite well, though they were on average older than Halo players and the like.

FrozenLiquid

Although I argue with people about the casualisation of PC games and how it's really insulting to call it that, I don't like Rainbow Six since it went to consoles lol.

But yeah, games like Halo and CS attract a lot more younger people than most other games do. Don't like it much but what can you do lol.

Vegas was surprisingly good on 360. It didn't have nearly the tactics of previous R6's, but it had more action and it was quite fun. I thought it was a good balance of tactics and straight up action. A very fun game both online and off, and probably the best console shooter that I've played. I've certainly played it far more than any other.

Avatar image for FrozenLiquid
FrozenLiquid

13555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#69 FrozenLiquid
Member since 2007 • 13555 Posts
[QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"][QUOTE="Zeliard9"]

True, Halo 3 can be quite fun playing with friends. But Team Slayer with random people can be a pretty painful experience, voice chat or no. :P

I dunno, though, this wasn't an issue in Rainbow Six: Vegas. Did you ever play that game on XBL? I actually found that most Vegas players on 360 worked together quite well, though they were on average older than Halo players and the like.

Zeliard9

Although I argue with people about the casualisation of PC games and how it's really insulting to call it that, I don't like Rainbow Six since it went to consoles lol.

But yeah, games like Halo and CS attract a lot more younger people than most other games do. Don't like it much but what can you do lol.

Vegas was surprisingly good on 360. It didn't have nearly the tactics of previous R6's, but it had more action and it was quite fun. I thought it was a good balance of tactics and straight up action. A very fun game both online and off, and probably the best console shooter that I've played. I've certainly played it far more than any other.

I liked GRAW. I thought that was done really well. So I'm not all against consolization.

But yeah... kinda did like RS3 for Xbox as it had the voice comm stuff, but I had just as much fun, perhaps even more so, with Raven Shield.

Interesting Zeliard, your hermitness could conflict with other hermits. I know there's a particular person on these boards who would think you were making sacriligous comments lol.

Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts
[QUOTE="Zeliard9"]Vegas was surprisingly good on 360. It didn't have nearly the tactics of previous R6's, but it had more action and it was quite fun. I thought it was a good balance of tactics and straight up action. A very fun game both online and off, and probably the best console shooter that I've played. I've certainly played it far more than any other.

FrozenLiquid

I liked GRAW. I thought that was done really well. So I'm not all against consolization.

But yeah... kinda did like RS3 for Xbox as it had the voice comm stuff, but I had just as much fun, perhaps even more so, with Raven Shield.

Interesting Zeliard, your hermitness could conflict with other hermits. I know there's a particular person on these boards who would think you were making sacriligous comments lol.

I know that Vegas ended up poorly on the PC because of a mix of consolization and bad porting, but I'm just saying it was really fun as a console shooter, PC notwithstanding. I never tried any of the previous R6s on console. The GRAWs on 360 were done well, too.

I think what made those games work for me as console shooters is because the control for them was incredibly smooth and streamlined, especially in Vegas. Analog control, amazingly enough, actually felt really good with it. But that's probably because it's a generally slower game than something like Halo.

Besides, I bought a 360, and it's not because I hate the thing. :P

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

GRAW on 360 damn good. Sure it was hardly that tactical, but it was fun. GRAW on PC was a much more tactical fair, but hey it was pretty good too.

Ahhh R6 vegas. Ehhhh. Why didnt they keep it console exclsuive and make a Raven Shield sequal *shakes head*. Now that game had the most hadcore multiplayer (and singleplayer).

As for people being less co-operative in teambased games in Halo 3 - compared to CS - this is understandable.

Look at CS, its game is primarialy team based, and it has been so for 7 years. Halo on the other hand is an array of modes, most of which are variations of slayer. With CS comes a tactical mentality, thus the team is forced into worksing together, however in Halo due to the range of gametypes tactical team play play is never forced.

ACtually it would be interesting to see how console gamers have taken to TF2...

Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts

ACtually it would be interesting to see how console gamers have taken to TF2...skrat_01

I'm curious about that too, actually. Basically all I've heard is that it's laggy over XBL.

Avatar image for jlh47
jlh47

3326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#73 jlh47
Member since 2007 • 3326 Posts

Probably because TF2 looks and plays better.Zeliard9

put cs: source on high settings with a nice computer and then tell me otherwise.

Avatar image for hellsing321
hellsing321

9608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 hellsing321
Member since 2005 • 9608 Posts
Simple. TF2 is the new thing and Valve wants to pimp it as much as possible. It's also more fun than Counterstrike so I don't see whats to complain about.
Avatar image for kevy619
kevy619

5617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#75 kevy619
Member since 2004 • 5617 Posts

[QUOTE="Zeliard9"]Probably because TF2 looks and plays better.KrAcKK

really? I dont know i hear all these people going on about counter strike i just want it on console

It already is on console... xbox version was released long ago.

Avatar image for dlind70
dlind70

2816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 dlind70
Member since 2004 • 2816 Posts
TF2 is so goddamn fun. On PC anyway. I can't imagine playing it with a controller. *cringes*poovine
It plays just fine with a controller because I've played it and beaten (almost) ever nub HW with my scout. Regardless, It's not a game about twitch aiming but about using cooperation and team abilities that have strengths and weakness.
Avatar image for MrDziekuje
MrDziekuje

7730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#77 MrDziekuje
Member since 2004 • 7730 Posts

Doesn't everyone have counter strike sourceby now? coolviper2003

I don't. Granted I'm not the biggest PC gamer out there.

Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts

[QUOTE="Zeliard9"]Probably because TF2 looks and plays better.jlh47

put cs: source on high settings with a nice computer and then tell me otherwise.

I have, and I'm telling you otherwise.

Avatar image for STABW0UND
STABW0UND

2285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 STABW0UND
Member since 2007 • 2285 Posts
Team Foretress > Counter Strike. CS is just a copy of the original TF...
Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60833 Posts
[QUOTE="jlh47"]

[QUOTE="Zeliard9"]Probably because TF2 looks and plays better.Zeliard9

put cs: source on high settings with a nice computer and then tell me otherwise.

I have, and I'm telling you otherwise.

I would second that otherwise too..
Avatar image for Blackfriend8
Blackfriend8

1982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Blackfriend8
Member since 2004 • 1982 Posts

I picked up The Orange Box last weekend and overall im pretty damn pleased with the package i got.

But when i went to the multiplayer section of the game, Team Fortress 2, it really surprised me that i would be playing an animated ****based multiplayer game. I mean why did Valve not put Counter Strick in this pack? It makes no sense. A shooter that compares with the likes of Halo and COD, yet im playing an animated multiplayer. Im sure there are people out there that enjoy this ****of game, but if Counter Strike was on this disk it probably would have been the best gaming package ever released. I feel a little cheated...but more so it is just disappointing.KrAcKK

are you kidding you feel cheated????? how in the hell can you feel cheated???? there is 5 games on that disk for 60 bucks man how much more do you want? i personally think its the best deal out there they could have easily put them out as seprate products and charged way more. i dont understand how you feel cheated just because there is no counter-strike in there. so play the 5 games on the disk and stop complaining man.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

Team Foretress > Counter Strike. CS is just a copy of the original TF...STABW0UND
:|........

Please tell me that is a joke

CS was a totally original game, and it was nothing like Quake 1 Team Fortress.